rambetiko
Member
Offline
Activity: 188
Merit: 10
|
|
April 09, 2018, 08:56:15 PM |
|
result share but slow performance with vega64. 2x vega64 = 2900 h/s. must be 3750-3950 h/s This is not CN algo anymore, it's SUMO's CN-Heavy with Haven changes, aprox. 30% less. v7 hashrate same old algo (3750 h/s) thank you. what is best setup for vega64? i use "intensity" : 1000, "worksize" : 8, but tingling on the screen my o.c. GPU_P7=1400;920 Mem_P3=1025;910 Power_Target=-15
|
|
|
|
miticoin
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 87
Merit: 0
|
|
April 09, 2018, 08:56:35 PM |
|
I have 30% less...
|
|
|
|
peterboy1
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 168
Merit: 0
|
|
April 09, 2018, 08:59:13 PM |
|
result share but slow performance with vega64. 2x vega64 = 2900 h/s. must be 3750-3950 h/s This is not CN algo anymore, it's SUMO's CN-Heavy with Haven changes, aprox. 30% less. i wonder why i cant match srb miner's hashrate with yours? srb is 2% higher. but i dont know, his is not opensource.
|
|
|
|
SimpleM
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 11
Merit: 0
|
|
April 09, 2018, 09:24:42 PM |
|
This version works, every other one i tried gets invalid results...
|
|
|
|
big_daddy
|
|
April 10, 2018, 06:18:46 AM |
|
this was only a pump&dump or we are mooning for real :-)
|
If you don't believe it or don't get it, I don't have the time to try to convince you, sorry.
|
|
|
shiggidy
Copper Member
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 14
|
|
April 10, 2018, 10:38:08 AM |
|
one question to DEV, what is the maximum amount planed to be collected during the ICO?
there is no ico. The dev did premine 95k though to be used for future development.
|
|
|
|
Noahb
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 1
Merit: 0
|
|
April 10, 2018, 11:51:34 AM |
|
Hey what's circulating supply1.4 million ?
|
|
|
|
Mattthev
|
|
April 10, 2018, 12:04:42 PM |
|
result share but slow performance with vega64. 2x vega64 = 2900 h/s. must be 3750-3950 h/s This is not CN algo anymore, it's SUMO's CN-Heavy with Haven changes, aprox. 30% less. i wonder why i cant match srb miner's hashrate with yours? srb is 2% higher. but i dont know, his is not opensource. Maybe better optimized... Can't say much, no source codes for SRBMiner. But uses the same kernel originally from Wolf. Try to play with intensity and worksize.
|
|
|
|
ZackCadee
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 5
Merit: 0
|
|
April 10, 2018, 01:39:38 PM Last edit: April 10, 2018, 02:28:09 PM by ZackCadee |
|
Maybe better optimized... Can't say much, no source codes for SRBMiner. But uses the same kernel originally from Wolf. Try to play with intensity and worksize.
Hey Mattthev, I know this is probably a super noobish question but I've just gotten into mining. I'm trying to use the xmr stak miner but I keep receiving the "result rejected by pool" error. I also have the NVIDIA Invalid Result GPU ID 0 error. Do you have any idea of where I'm going wrong? Using a GTX 1080 and i7 7700K.
|
|
|
|
Mattthev
|
|
April 10, 2018, 04:02:16 PM |
|
Maybe better optimized... Can't say much, no source codes for SRBMiner. But uses the same kernel originally from Wolf. Try to play with intensity and worksize.
Hey Mattthev, I know this is probably a super noobish question but I've just gotten into mining. I'm trying to use the xmr stak miner but I keep receiving the "result rejected by pool" error. I also have the NVIDIA Invalid Result GPU ID 0 error. Do you have any idea of where I'm going wrong? Using a GTX 1080 and i7 7700K. Wrong algo or wrong pool.
|
|
|
|
GD199
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 75
Merit: 0
|
|
April 10, 2018, 04:14:46 PM |
|
super solid project looking to buy big amounts
|
|
|
|
thewolfmaster
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 6
Merit: 0
|
|
April 10, 2018, 06:06:53 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
ctlst
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 3
Merit: 0
|
|
April 10, 2018, 06:39:07 PM |
|
xmr-stak 2.4.3 supports it now
|
|
|
|
|
Teress
|
|
April 10, 2018, 08:26:42 PM |
|
Dev fee %1 for u? And how can i set in bat file rawinstenty or instenty For Amd rx 580 ? Use config file. Yes, it's this fork of XMR-STAK https://github.com/IndeedMiners/xmr-aeon-stak/releases same like in the first post here, but with fixed Haven algo, I will publish source codes and proper release in few days. in your releases is version 2.4.3 which should be fixed, but after downloading this 2.4.3 version and compiling, there is version 2.4.2 inside
|
|
|
|
Mattthev
|
|
April 10, 2018, 08:36:00 PM |
|
in your releases is version 2.4.3 which should be fixed, but after downloading this 2.4.3 version and compiling, there is version 2.4.2 inside I just forget to bump up the version... Or is there some problem with Haven? Nobody reports any issue with it.
|
|
|
|
Teress
|
|
April 10, 2018, 08:46:03 PM Last edit: April 10, 2018, 09:33:32 PM by Teress |
|
in your releases is version 2.4.3 which should be fixed, but after downloading this 2.4.3 version and compiling, there is version 2.4.2 inside I just forget to bump up the version... Or is there some problem with Haven? Nobody reports any issue with it. Yes in this 2.4.2 version which should be 2.4.3 all haven shares are rejected, so it is really the old version without support for haven after fork I'm on Linux, thats why maybe nobody reported that, when majority runs win. So can you upload to github source code of the real 2.4.3 version?
|
|
|
|
Mattthev
|
|
April 11, 2018, 06:39:20 AM Last edit: April 11, 2018, 07:21:07 AM by Mattthev |
|
in your releases is version 2.4.3 which should be fixed, but after downloading this 2.4.3 version and compiling, there is version 2.4.2 inside I just forget to bump up the version... Or is there some problem with Haven? Nobody reports any issue with it. Yes in this 2.4.2 version which should be 2.4.3 all haven shares are rejected, so it is really the old version without support for haven after fork I'm on Linux, thats why maybe nobody reported that, when majority runs win. So can you upload to github source code of the real 2.4.3 version? I've checked it, there is already 2.4.4-haven version in sources. Are you sure you are in our respository, the original XMR-STAK has latest 2.4.2. Also you need to download Dev branch not Aeon do not download the sources from downloads, there is the old version. Clone respository dev branch. https://github.com/IndeedMiners/xmr-aeon-stak/blob/dev/xmrstak/version.cpp#L22This is the right branch https://github.com/IndeedMiners/xmr-aeon-stak/tree/devIn the first post there is link directly to 2.4.3 version so it would be confusing for others if they download not working version, instead of the latest one working. Guys from Haven need to replace the link with just latest release not with exact version. Same for the pools some of them link to the 2.4.3 directly also and some of them even to non existing miner or old not working versions of CN miners. Teress aren't you from Czech Republic like me? I think I've sold you some timings like year ago.
|
|
|
|
Teress
|
|
April 11, 2018, 07:44:22 AM |
|
in your releases is version 2.4.3 which should be fixed, but after downloading this 2.4.3 version and compiling, there is version 2.4.2 inside I just forget to bump up the version... Or is there some problem with Haven? Nobody reports any issue with it. Yes in this 2.4.2 version which should be 2.4.3 all haven shares are rejected, so it is really the old version without support for haven after fork I'm on Linux, thats why maybe nobody reported that, when majority runs win. So can you upload to github source code of the real 2.4.3 version? I've checked it, there is already 2.4.4-haven version in sources. Are you sure you are in our respository, the original XMR-STAK has latest 2.4.2. Also you need to download Dev branch not Aeon do not download the sources from downloads, there is the old version. Clone respository dev branch. https://github.com/IndeedMiners/xmr-aeon-stak/blob/dev/xmrstak/version.cpp#L22This is the right branch https://github.com/IndeedMiners/xmr-aeon-stak/tree/devIn the first post there is link directly to 2.4.3 version so it would be confusing for others if they download not working version, instead of the latest one working. Guys from Haven need to replace the link with just latest release not with exact version. Same for the pools some of them link to the 2.4.3 directly also and some of them even to non existing miner or old not working versions of CN miners. Teress aren't you from Czech Republic like me? I think I've sold you some timings like year ago. Thanks Mattthev, I'll try the dev version. BTW yes, thats me, about year ago we had some deal, but I don't remeber what was that
|
|
|
|
al7878
|
|
April 11, 2018, 12:25:53 PM |
|
hey guys, Can someone tell me how to be listed on tradeogre please? Do you have any contact ?
Thanks
|
|
|
|
|