Study: Everyone hates environmentalists and feminists

[Wilikon]

Fractivist barred from oil company’s lands said parents should engage their children sexually




Environmentalists are rallying to the defense of an anti-fracking activist who has advocated pedophilia and incest after a Pennsylvania court barred her from entering any land owned or leased by a local oil company.

Cabot Oil and Gas won a temporary injunction this week prohibiting Vera Scroggins, director of the anti-fracking group Citizens for Clean Water, from setting foot on any portion of the 200,000 acres of land for which Cabot holds leases.

Environmentalists quickly rushed to Scroggins’ defense.

“How can this be legal???” exclaimed Gasland director and anti-fracking activist Josh Fox. Anti-fracking group 350.org called the decision “surreal.”

“My new heroine is called Vera Scroggins,” one environmental activist declared. “Go Vera!” cheered another.

In addition to her work combatting fracking, an innovative oil and gas technique that experts say is an economic game-changer for the United States and could help ensure energy independence, Scroggins is also an advocate of incest and pedophilia.

Scroggins expressed her desire for parents to engage their children sexually at a young age in a series of messages in 2001 posted to an online message board called Peacelist.

“Are there cultures that mothers or fathers pleasure their children and teenagers sexually or genitally and also possibly initiate them into sexual expression at some point?” she asked.

“I have had intuitive thoughts that such would be a healthy way for parents to interact with their children and introduce their children to sensual/sexual pleasure and bonding and loving practices.”

“Who better to do it, than the parents first?” she wrote.

http://freebeacon.com/environmentalists-defend-pedophilia-advocate/

[Wilikon]

Feminist groups at more than a dozen universities are planning to participate in another mass “edit Wikipedia day,” because the free, volunteer encyclopedia website is obviously horribly sexist.

Sarah Stierch, a Wikipedia contributor and researcher for the Wikimedia Foundation, said the problem isn’t just that most Wikipedia user are male. The layout of the website is itself “very masculine,” she said.

“It’s aesthetically very masculine in its design,” said Stierch in a statement to The Daily Dot, also noting that, “The average Wikipedia editor is a well-educated white male. Well-educated white males have been writing history and the story of the world since ancient times.”

To fix this, feminists at colleges around the country are launching another ‘Wikipedia Edit-A-Thon.’ Next week, feminists are encouraged to change rewrite the online encyclopedia to make it less masculine, according to Campus Reform.

The event is a follow-up to last year’s similar edit-a-thon, when feminist sympathizers were called to edit “feminist thought” into Wikipedia articles.

“It’s not like my life passion to make Wikipedia feminist, but it’s been really surprising, there’s this whole underground world that I wasn’t aware of of people who are dedicated to editing Wikipedia,” said Krystal South, an event organizer, in a statement to Bitch Magazine. “The beauty of Wikipedia is it’s a public institution, people have the ability to go change it.”

The University of Texas, University of Iowa, Michigan State University and the University of Wisconsin-Madison are some of the participating institutions.

http://dailycaller.com/2014/02/02/wikipedia-is-very-masculine-so-feminists-pledge-to-fix-it/

[Wilikon]

Feminist groups at more than a dozen universities are planning to participate in another mass “edit Wikipedia day,” because the free, volunteer encyclopedia website is obviously horribly sexist.

Uh huh. A right-wing news site found some stupid undergrads willing to play up to its image of feminism and is trying to make a story out of it?

I don't mind wiki turning pink and reading about Adolf being a cross dresser so to be more in touch with his feminine side. As long as the editing is not secret, open, with people's agenda known.
The true enemy of feminism: menopause.


"It is well known only left-wing news sites tell the truth, the whole truth, nothing but the truth"

                                                                                                 _Soros' Media Matters_

[Wilikon]

A group of Columbia University and Barnard College alumni filmed a feminist pornographic film in the school’s Butler Library to fight what they see as “gender tension” at Columbia.

The NSFW film, titled “Initiatiøn,” was filmed as a feminist statement exploring “the rituals of American Ivy League secret societies, to the point of hysteria, highlighting our culture’s perception of female desire,” according to an article published on Gawker.

It begins with a group of girls sitting around a library table taking their shirts off. As the film progresses, the girls engage in activities including kissing, rubbing eggs on their bodies and twerking around chicken carcass.

One of the film’s creators, Columbia art and history major Coco Young, told the IvyGate blog that the library itself represented sexism at the school because only male author’s names are on the facade of the building.

http://gawker.com/some-nude-college-girls-filmed-a-feminist-porno-in-colu-1515084075

[Spendulus]

A group of Columbia University and Barnard College alumni filmed a feminist pornographic film in the school’s Butler Library...the girls engage in activities including kissing, rubbing eggs on their bodies and twerking around chicken carcass.....

Well, that sounds pretty hateable....

[bryant.coleman]

A group of Columbia University and Barnard College alumni filmed a feminist pornographic film in the school’s Butler Library to fight what they see as “gender tension” at Columbia.

Hmmm.... radical feminism on a massive scale can lead to...... mental disorder?

[darkmule]

So you mean a politically-motivated group is gathering together to edit Wikipedia?  Horrors!  Surely this has never happened before!  And if it had, I certainly would never have been personally involved on one side of warring editing factions.

How is this even news?

[Wilikon]

So you mean a politically-motivated group is gathering together to edit Wikipedia?  Horrors!  Surely this has never happened before!  And if it had, I certainly would never have been personally involved on one side of warring editing factions.

How is this even news?

When an event is not news no one will comment on it, asking and writing about how the event itself is even news. It would just simply be ignored.

It is news because the politically motivated group made a big deal about making sure a lot of people would know about it, thus making their act becoming news. I believe this action would logically be defined as news, even if "small news"...

[Spendulus]

Both these movements are artificially driven by the state. Basically an excuse for socialism; increased state power.

+1
This is a strategy used many times in the past to successfully topple nations. This is not paranoia, it is a fact.

What exactly is it that you are claiming is such a strategy?

But way of explaining, I don't recall any nations toppled by environmentalism or feminism, truly hateable and worthy of pity though such movements may be.

[Spendulus]

Feminist groups at more than a dozen universities are planning to participate in another mass “edit Wikipedia day,” because the free, volunteer encyclopedia website is obviously horribly sexist.

Uh huh. A right-wing news site found some stupid undergrads willing to play up to its image of feminism and is trying to make a story out of it?

Wouldn't it be more like ...

"a left wing organization" found some stupid undergrads willing to play up to its image of feminism and is trying to make a story out of it?

[Rassah]

What's the difference between "masculine" and "assertive?" (Aka dominant, or confident).

[bryant.coleman]

What's the difference between "masculine" and "assertive?" (Aka dominant, or confident).

So a female who is assertive / confident / dominant is masculine? 

[Schleicher]

I don't think that assertive is the same as dominant. Dominant people are more agressive.
They probably have a higher testosterone level, which means they are more masculine.

[Rassah]

I don't think that assertive is the same as dominant. Dominant people are more agressive.
They probably have a higher testosterone level, which means they are more masculine.

So if a woman is assertive in her position and goals, and aggressively works to pursue them, instead of being submissive to others' opinions and wishes, she might also have a higher testosterone level?

I'm all for empowering women, but it seems that feminists who want to "de-masculanize" things are being somewhat counter-productive. Get women to be assertive and aggressive in their pursuit of things too, instead of trying to make everyone passifist and meek.

(though I do like femboys....)

[bryant.coleman]

I'm all for empowering women, but it seems that feminists who want to "de-masculanize" things are being somewhat counter-productive.

Check this. A perfect example.

[Wilikon]

As of January 3rd, the EPA banned about 80% of the wood-burning stoves and fireplace inserts in the United States. Stoves which are used to heat 12% of the homes in America and are especially needed in outlying rural areas. Fireplaces are also being looked at.

The EPA is attempting to reduce particle pollution with new rules. Instead of limiting fine airborne particulate emissions to 15 micrograms per cubic meter (μg/m3) of air, the change will impose a maximum 12 μg/m3 limit. That is equivalent to a person smoking 3 to 4 cigarettes in a small confined space.

The draconian EPA regulations will be spread out, one will take place in March and the next in five to eight years. Stoves currently in use will not be affected but obviously, getting them repaired will become more and more difficult.

They haven’t yet gone after outdoor appliances or home heating appliances, but can they be far behind? Will people be able to heat their homes in a future controlled by extreme environmentalists?

Even fireplaces are being looked at though not included yet. They are part of the future research.

Forced air furnaces will also face drastic cuts and are headed for extinction over the next five years unless they meet near-impossible limits to their emissions.

The ruling will “require efficiency and carbon monoxide testing and reporting, which will provide consumers additional information to help them select the best wood heater for their homes,” which will cost sellers and home owners time and money as they face an unbending bureaucracy overseeing these simple devices.

Some local governments in some states have gone further and banned stoves as fireplaces, placing fines on users. Montréal, Canada has banned them altogether. It gets pretty cold there but they don’t care.

The Attorneys General in Connecticut, Maryland, Massachusetts, New York, Oregon, Rhode Island, and Vermont, strongholds for far-left Democrats, have filed suit against the EPA demanding wood-burning water heaters and outdoor wood boilers also be included. The extreme environmental group EarthJustice also filed suit.

Senators David Vitter (R-LA) and James Inhofe (R-Okla.), along with Rep. James Lankford (R-Okla.), Chairman of the House Oversight Subcommittee on Energy Policy, Health Care, and Entitlements, et al have been investigating and will continue to hold the administration accountable where possible.

http://www.independentsentinel.com/epa-bans-most-wood-burning-stoves-in-a-corrupt-scheme-fireplaces-next/

[Rassah]

Take it one step further and ban BBQs, and you'll have a revolution.

[Spendulus]

I don't think that assertive is the same as dominant. Dominant people are more agressive.
They probably have a higher testosterone level, which means they are more masculine.

So if a woman is assertive in her position and goals, and aggressively works to pursue them, instead of being submissive to others' opinions and wishes, she might also have a higher testosterone level?

I'm all for empowering women, but it seems that feminists who want to "de-masculanize" things are being somewhat counter-productive. Get women to be assertive and aggressive in their pursuit of things too, instead of trying to make everyone passifist and meek.

I don't think this argument is correctly formulated.

For example, take a unique group of obviously 'high testosterone' individuals.  Say Delta Forces. 

Funniest thing, they stand at attention, passivist and meekly, and take orders.

Second, a "Dominant" person is not one who is "dominating".  The first is a matter of successfully rising to a position of dominance, the second implies what may be a rather annoying personality characteristic, which does not lead to success in the former.

I think I said all that right...

[Wilikon]

Take it one step further and ban BBQs, and you'll have a revolution.

Yep! "From my dead cold grill!"

[NewLiberty]

As of January 3rd, the EPA banned about 80% of the wood-burning stoves and fireplace inserts in the United States. Stoves which are used to heat 12% of the homes in America and are especially needed in outlying rural areas. Fireplaces are also being looked at.

The EPA is attempting to reduce particle pollution with new rules. Instead of limiting fine airborne particulate emissions to 15 micrograms per cubic meter (μg/m3) of air, the change will impose a maximum 12 μg/m3 limit. That is equivalent to a person smoking 3 to 4 cigarettes in a small confined space.

The draconian EPA regulations will be spread out, one will take place in March and the next in five to eight years. Stoves currently in use will not be affected but obviously, getting them repaired will become more and more difficult.

They haven’t yet gone after outdoor appliances or home heating appliances, but can they be far behind? Will people be able to heat their homes in a future controlled by extreme environmentalists?

Even fireplaces are being looked at though not included yet. They are part of the future research.

Forced air furnaces will also face drastic cuts and are headed for extinction over the next five years unless they meet near-impossible limits to their emissions.

The ruling will “require efficiency and carbon monoxide testing and reporting, which will provide consumers additional information to help them select the best wood heater for their homes,” which will cost sellers and home owners time and money as they face an unbending bureaucracy overseeing these simple devices.

Some local governments in some states have gone further and banned stoves as fireplaces, placing fines on users. Montréal, Canada has banned them altogether. It gets pretty cold there but they don’t care.

The Attorneys General in Connecticut, Maryland, Massachusetts, New York, Oregon, Rhode Island, and Vermont, strongholds for far-left Democrats, have filed suit against the EPA demanding wood-burning water heaters and outdoor wood boilers also be included. The extreme environmental group EarthJustice also filed suit.

Senators David Vitter (R-LA) and James Inhofe (R-Okla.), along with Rep. James Lankford (R-Okla.), Chairman of the House Oversight Subcommittee on Energy Policy, Health Care, and Entitlements, et al have been investigating and will continue to hold the administration accountable where possible.

http://www.independentsentinel.com/epa-bans-most-wood-burning-stoves-in-a-corrupt-scheme-fireplaces-next/

In order to halt global warming, people have to freeze to death... or ask their government for permission to survive?