zhuge liang
Newbie
 Offline
Activity: 17
Merit: 0
|
 |
October 07, 2013, 08:32:18 PM |
|
Why would a pool get less stales/orphans/rejects than I would solo ?
All users share the risk, you will not be "empty hand".  |
|
|
|
|
|
sheinsha
|
|
October 07, 2013, 08:48:16 PM |
|
Minar.cc Kudos PPLNS Pool
I have setup a VARDIFF+Stratum PPLNS Pool and its working fine, we have already found 3 blocks at the time of writing, so you are welcome to join and spread the network hashrate. Please let me know if you find anything out of normal, comments and suggestions also welcome! I have set pool fees to 1% and only 0.1 KDS payout fee to pay the actual transaction fee. kds.minar.ccStart your miner using the following parameters: | URL: | stratum+tcp://kds.minar.cc | | PORT: | 3340 | | USER: | username.worker | | PASS: | workerPass |
Sample command-line: ./cgminer -o stratum+tcp://kds.minar.cc:3340 --scrypt -u username.worker -p workerPass New Kudos VARDIF+Stratum PPLNS Mining Pool up! kds.minar.cc |
Minar.cc pools are not running anymore, the domain was registered by someone else and I don't have any relationship with the new owner.
|
|
|
lingling88
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 30
Merit: 0
|
|
October 08, 2013, 01:04:25 AM |
|
kudos pool stratum protocol mining pool
http://kds.szbpool.com
stratum+tcp://kds.szbpool.com:16118I have set pool fees to 1% and only 0.1 KDS payout fee to pay the actual transaction fee. Low refused to
|
|
|
|
|
|
exzellenz
|
|
October 08, 2013, 11:52:32 AM |
|
WTS 15000 KDS - 0.6 BTC
|
|
|
|
abrx
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
|
|
October 08, 2013, 11:58:21 AM |
|
Which port is used by default for RPC and P2P?
|
|
|
|
|
|
innovation
|
|
October 08, 2013, 03:55:12 PM |
|
Which port is used by default for RPC and P2P?
RPC RPC Port: 9765 P2P Port: 9766 |
|
|
|
|
with
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 47
Merit: 0
|
|
October 09, 2013, 01:42:19 AM |
|
Too less information.  |
|
|
|
|
tytanick
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2660
Merit: 1096
Simplemining.net Admin
|
|
October 09, 2013, 05:17:55 PM |
|
So many rejects. This is bullcrap.  you didnt set proper scan time , thats why you have so many rejects, but now when we have 1.7 difficulty, it wont mater, keep mining |
|
|
|
|
exzellenz
|
|
October 11, 2013, 05:33:09 PM |
|
What about KUDOS??? |
|
|
|
|
endlessskill
|
|
October 11, 2013, 07:23:16 PM |
|
What about KUDOS??? +1. Any news? exchange? etc? |
|
|
|
|
|
sheinsha
|
|
October 12, 2013, 05:47:19 AM |
|
I have got a few thousands, and my pool is up and running, with really weird users that hop on and off really often. kds.minar.cc |
Minar.cc pools are not running anymore, the domain was registered by someone else and I don't have any relationship with the new owner.
|
|
|
cryptoftw (OP)
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 11
Merit: 0
|
|
October 12, 2013, 05:21:46 PM |
|
I think it's too soon for an exchange.
The network is not stabilized right now, we need to get to the next retarget now.
I will probably need to implement new retarget timing to deal with hashrate fluctuations (we had 100Gh/s+).
There is still a lot more to come for this project, we are just few days in now.
|
|
|
|
|
NastyDog
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 16
Merit: 0
|
|
October 14, 2013, 12:12:51 PM |
|
Chain seems to be frozen at 14655. I really like this coin and don't want it to die. Any suggestions?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
cryptoftw (OP)
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 11
Merit: 0
|
|
October 14, 2013, 03:46:01 PM |
|
OP updated with links to new clients (V2). Everyone needs to update their clients ASAP.
New retarget is 20 blocks - 30 minutes with max 10% change.
|
|
|
|
|
|
endlessskill
|
|
October 14, 2013, 03:53:15 PM |
|
Good news for good coin  |
|
|
|
|
|
sgrunger
|
|
October 14, 2013, 04:30:11 PM
Last edit: October 14, 2013, 04:45:39 PM by sgrunger |
|
Can't seem to sync past block 14655 after updating client.
Edit: kudos-qt says 13 active connections.
|
|
|
|
|
Hazard
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 980
Merit: 1000
|
|
October 14, 2013, 04:42:43 PM |
|
Oh look, another coin that does a fork at the current height, rather than a block 2-3 weeks in the future. Now there's gonna be 2 competing chain because no one had time to upgrade before the fork.
Amateur hour. Please stop wasting hashes on this garbage.
|
|
|
|
cryptoftw (OP)
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 11
Merit: 0
|
|
October 14, 2013, 04:44:16 PM |
|
Can't seem to sync past block 14655 after updating client.
Edit: kudos-qt says 9 active connections.
The chain is now at 14655, the client is just confused because it was generated a long time ago, I'm going to push it further after more people update the client (I can see at least 24 connections from seed node). Oh look, another coin that does a fork at the current height, rather than a block 2-3 weeks in the future. Now there's gonna be 2 competing chain because no one had time to upgrade before the fork.
Amateur hour. Please stop wasting hashes on this garbage.
Since there is no mining going on there is no other choice than to do it in a few blocks otherwise it would stay stuck. |
|
|
|
|
Hazard
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 980
Merit: 1000
|
|
October 14, 2013, 05:31:27 PM |
|
Since there is no mining going on there is no other choice than to do it in a few blocks otherwise it would stay stuck.
There have been dozens of coins that launched with the default bitcoin 400% difficulty swing intact, and each and every one has had their blockchain get stuck in this fashion. So that begs the question, why would you launch a coin with such parameters? Let me guess, you just read the foocoin tutorial and thought launching a coin would be a good idea? |
|
|
|
|
