How to pick best signature campaign

[Gaurav11kb]

I follow the boounties managed by good bounty managers on bitcointalk. You can find the list of all good bounty managers on bitcointalk. The the rating of the project is important, usually I check ICOBench and TrackICO or ICOmarks. If the rating is not good (for me that is below 4/5) then I drop the idea to doing that bounty. If all above checks out, then I check whether the reward being awarded is worth the efforts or not. This is what I do and you can do the same.

[Invigorated]

Though I don't know much about signature campaigns but I believe just like every other campaign or investment opportunity, it will be best to make some research about the project, the team and the product. If you think it is worth it, then why not. Also, on another note, I think to maximise your earnings from a signature campaign, you need to target a campaign that has fewer participants by so doing, you will be allocated a fair share.

[funkenschuster]

I regularly will think about a portion of these terms. First is the abundance director, higher the rank, better the reputation, or formally done by the official engineer or the accomplished abundance administrator. second, see the token designation for all abundance battles and afterward the rate for the mark. Compute the cost of ETH.

[yanixbtc]

What criteria do you guys use to pick your signature campaigns.  With some of them lasting 2-3 months it seems like a critical decision and I'm not quite sure how to go about it.  With all the scams out there I am fearful of picking a junker which not only hurts me but the people looking at my promotions.  I would like to have one picked out for when I switch over to Jr Member. 

Be sure to choose the right ICO do research first to avoid waste of time and effort. Signature bounty campaigns can be very lucrative. Especially if you choose the right ones. Typically, there are very few bounty hunters joining in the first two weeks. I consider any campaign of 6 weeks or shorter a very attractive one. Wherein 6 weeks  to 12 weeks is somewhere in the middle. And 12 plus weeks is a long signature campaign. You decide which campaign you want to participate in wither the shorter one or the longer one.

[zingspeed123]

I think I should choose bounty campaigns that have a lot of participants. In addition, you should evaluate the project to choose a campaign. The projects have good teams, partners, ... Because you can only participate in a signature campaign so choose carefully.

[MargoGolova]

The choice of the signature company should be approached very carefully . Because you can make good money with a promising company, and lose time with fraud. I look at the Manager who leads the bounty, the team , the idea, the product and the white paper . All very carefully analyze and make a decision

[Jibrinman]

As for me, I always love to check the allocation for the signature campaign before picking it. Once the allocation is cool, I consider the nature of the project as well as the total pool. Then, I jump in immediately if all my criteria are met.

[Psalms23]

There is actually no assurance that youll get a legit and not scam bounty because that is the one problem for most of us here. Just try to participate in bounties managed by known managers or those that the tokens are escrowed.

[clololck]

First of all, you need to choose a well-known and reputable bounty manager, at least you can guarantee that it will not be deceived by scam, as to whether the bounty is worthy of your participation, depending on your own judgment, usually the big companies issue Token value will be higher.

[hheight]

choose a project you believe in. I think that 50% is a game of luck because you can not know how successful the project will be

It's partly true. But this does not negate the fact that we need to conduct a thorough research of the project before participating in its bounty.

[ArIMy11]

What criteria do you guys use to pick your signature campaigns.  With some of them lasting 2-3 months it seems like a critical decision and I'm not quite sure how to go about it.  With all the scams out there I am fearful of picking a junker which not only hurts me but the people looking at my promotions.  I would like to have one picked out for when I switch over to Jr Member.  

If I am to pick a camapign I take into consideration the following things :

1) The allocation of the campaign
2) The Campaign manager (most campaigns I joined are the campaign managed by my previous managers who really do paid me)
3) The team behind the project. (Sometimes, same team but new projects)
4) The total number of token and sometimes its price
5) The time span of the campaign
6) The number of post required (because if it is too many posts needed I cannot comply with it)

Take note, I cannot say I always make a best choice because it is hard to determine which is " THE BEST"

[SkillOfToper]

In the easiest way you should to watch, what signature campaigns  hero members or higher goes. They have some experience about this and it is smaller chance to find the scam, than searching by yourself.

[slavsole2017]

In fact, now it is very difficult to find a good company signature. Luck plays a very big role here. And as everyone understands, the fewer participants, the better it will be for those who participate.

[makercn]

I think we must choose a good project and a trustworthy manager. We must understand the products in the project and the team behind them. The most important thing is to have good luck.

[bright4mech]

Many projects end successful, which is a function of good team and united to every one sign task was carried out, therefore many projects lies on the effectiveness and investors towards the factory production.

[godspree]

I chose signature campaigns which have the most allocations of the whole bounty pool. I also try to pick campaigns with a short lasting period and I always pay attention on the manager. It must be a trustworthy manager such as Sylon,  Blockeye, Wapinter.

[bonyaserg]

Personally for myself, I choose a subscription according to the following criteria. I look carefully at the draft, how many fees are collected, and so on all the data that is provided. And after the project is completed, a small salary is obtained.

[Vova050898]

I pick up on standard criteria, can be read in different topics because a lot of them with this topic, so the answer is to look better there)

[Vova050898]

Personally for myself, I choose a subscription according to the following criteria. I look carefully at the draft, how many fees are collected, and so on all the data that is provided. And after the project is completed, a small salary is obtained.

so pretty not a bad system, and I have another such special criterion, the company has like for my intuition

[Omparkash72]

Before choosing any campaign in crypto you first have to see what is your stage now and how much you get after completing the work of this bounty and also see how many people are doing this campaign. calculate your return with all these factors and then choose the worth of that bounty you are thinking to join. because people say that no investment in bounty campaign but my opinion is different , bounty hunter not investing money but he is investing his precious time in doing that, time has more worth then money, so choose carefully before doing this.