[ANN] Ravencoin [RVN] PoW GPU Mining | Asset Transfer Blockchain (Updated ANN)

[ztaz]

I read the entire branch - but for some reason I did not understand which miner is the most relevant at the moment (for green ones) on the coin, they have emptied out a bunch of versions of them, try to figure it out while I stopped on suprminer-1.5 because 1.6 is written beta

[pietro31@gmail.com]

Is it possible to buy this coin somewhere?

Crypto-Bridge
https://crypto-bridge.org/

Good market there.

It would be desirable to see a little at least more exchanges and it is good if there are several exchanges. But I noticed that recently very few exchanges large add a coin. Tell very expensive prices of addition a top of the exchange, the exchanges ask for addition on the exchange a coin much.

CRIPTO BRIDGE GOT  THAT  FANCY  PASSWORD SETTING  THE  IS  VERY IMPOSSIBLE  TO  SET  UP  ,SO  NO WORKABLE, NO  PRACTICAL   BIG  LOST  OF  TIME  I  TRY  TO  SETT  ONE  DAY   .......

[coincalculators.io]

Can calculate this link: https://www.coincalculators.io/coin.aspx?crypto=ravencoin-mining-calculator

[espressodelisi]

I read the entire branch - but for some reason I did not understand which miner is the most relevant at the moment (for green ones) on the coin, they have emptied out a bunch of versions of them, try to figure it out while I stopped on suprminer-1.5 because 1.6 is written beta

Suprminer 1.6 beta works fine on my 3xGPU 1070 windows rig for about 5 days.
I saw no difference from 1.5. they both work fine.
GPU's power limit set with msi afterburner to %80. No overclock and no other settings.

[Seryvolk]

The coin itself cannot be backed up. And maybe a token
created on the basis of the coin. In the air mind. Tokens can be created after the fork in October, November. Now it's just a fork of bitcoin with an increased number of coins 1000 times.

[vsrocks]

Ravencoin all-in-one info added here:

http://chatoncrypto.com/Crypto/C/21-RVN-Ravencoin


Thanks.

[trader1a]

In use mining software on ravenminer pool. Most to the least popular on 4-10-18: Total :7978 miners  

ccminer/enemy-1.03 - 3139
ccminer/2.2.5   -  869
zealot/enemy-1.05
nevermore/0.2.2   
suprminer/1.6   

I think hash is more relevant

ccminer/enemy-1.03 45%
zealot/enemy-1.05 15.47%
suprminer/1.6 7.79%
ccminer/2.2.5 7.49%
nevermore/0.2.2 6.08%

[NChink]

What's with price drop?

There is a huge 36million raven sell order on cryptobridge.

There's nothing wrong with a little movement to spice things up a bit! Wait till (if) RVN gets listed on other exchanges!

[bubbAJoe]

https://ravenforum.org/topic/25/a1-vs-suprminer-vs-nevermore-vs-enemy-1-04-test-results

Absolutely no reason to be running closed source enemy IMO...

[WickedPigeon]

https://ravenforum.org/topic/25/a1-vs-suprminer-vs-nevermore-vs-enemy-1-04-test-results

Absolutely no reason to be running closed source enemy IMO...

That test confirms that the best miner is.....
Depending on your GPU,
Depending on your MB,
Depending on your OS,
Depending on your Drivers,
Depending on your Settings,
Depending on your Pool,
Depending on your Luck,
Depending on your Location,

There isn't a statistical difference. Each operator has to gauge for themselves which is working best for them.

BTW - Enemy was one of the first to give RVN miners a real increase in hash power. Just saying, it's nice to support those who are leading the change...

[melpheos]

My test is completed.
I have done an extract of the result for the past day up to today and this is the result
ccminer225 : 390.6
enemy1.5 : 409.984248
suprminer1.6 : 396.74
enemy1.3 : 398

As you can see the clear winner is enemy1.5


Enemy 1.5
Suprminer 1.6
https://github.com/Ravencoin-Miner/Ravencoin/releases
https://github.com/a1i3nj03/a1min3r/releases

Will probably start from fresh addresses because the first test is running enemy 1.5 on an old address

Again : this test is in a specific setup 24 identical graphic card (inno3d2X 1070ti), 70% power 200 CPU 600 Memory on windows 7 with nvidia drivers 388.71
In a different setup maybe another miner will be more profitable. It does not mean enemy 1.5 is the most profitable miner in any case. It's the most profitable in MY setup. However, the revenue difference is NOT in the statistical error range as the difference between enemy 1.5 and enemy 1.3 is 3%

New test started with clean adresses

https://ravenminer.com/?address=RTh3SHrKaU4u9BceemsXiWfEYF1ajK6Axn
https://ravenminer.com/?address=RVnEDVezFyNr3oqsHzkRjnjYUZvN6jwDhH
https://ravenminer.com/?address=RWB1hXTzvvRp615v2Dner83BRBpwNJE5bx
https://ravenminer.com/?address=RBGfb34186iWFJXhCnfMKrxPzDY9Bv26n8

[WickedPigeon]

Again : this test is in a specific setup 24 identical graphic card (inno3d2X 1070ti), 70% power 200 CPU 600 Memory on windows 7 with nvidia drivers 388.71

Doesn't Enemy recommend using Nvidia drivers 390+ for best results?

Interesting test all the same. I love that bubbAJoe, right above, is quoting from Ravenforum were Superminer 1.6 won.
Your setup clearly shows, for you, Enemy is best.

My own rigs (30 workers) show Enemy 1.04 is slightly better, at least for the period I tested. To be honest, I didn't see big differences between Enemy 1.03, 1.04 and Superminer 1.6.
All were good.

[Kryptonite991]

What's with price drop?

There is a huge 36million raven sell order on cryptobridge.

Hi, Team!

Any ideas about selling 36 million coins???

[mixasik]

What's with price drop?

There is a huge 36million raven sell order on cryptobridge.

There's nothing wrong with a little movement to spice things up a bit! Wait till (if) RVN gets listed on other exchanges!

our bird is on that place https://graviex.net/markets/rvnbtc?markets=all&column=volume&order=desc&unit=volume&pinned=true, and what's the use

Hi, Team!

Any ideas about selling 36 million coins???

approaching us big UUUUUUP!
Im guessing 0.00005
I buy

[WickedPigeon]

What's with price drop?

There is a huge 36million raven sell order on cryptobridge.

Hi, Team!

Any ideas about selling 36 million coins???

Someone wants to nest away a cool $1.5 million.

[blacklig]

Lol,

that is some shady manipulation on cryptobridge.. huge sell order sitting at 590 Sat with volume over 200 BTC.. It cannot get filled on that small market.. Only guessing who can be behind it! That is around 4.4% of total mined supply right now on the market! There can be at maximum 22 people on the whole world who owns this amount of supply and now want to crush the price.. Not good.. Hope it gets eaten during the time, but if not, prepare for decline for next few weeks.. Or he might remove that wall anytime and then place it again :/ whale..

[mixasik]

Lol,

that is some shady manipulation on cryptobridge.. huge sell order sitting at 590 Sat with volume over 200 BTC.. It cannot get filled on that small market.. Only guessing who can be behind it! That is around 4.4% of total mined supply right now on the market! There can be at maximum 22 people on the whole world who owns this amount of supply and now want to crush the price.. Not good.. Hope it gets eaten during the time, but if not, prepare for decline for next few weeks.. Or he might remove that wall anytime and then place it again :/ whale..

But, most likely, we see fake wall. The schedule is unnatural and created explicitly for the purpose of psychological manipulation. The red wave is too much green in size. Such waves appear when a negative event is outlined, in connection with which users begin to massively sell a coin. For example, as in the case of Biteconnect bankrupt tokens, which fell in price by 80%.
In our case, the major players have placed false orders, which are unlikely to be fully executed. Unprofessional traders in a panic will hurry to get rid of the coin, thereby involuntarily knocking the price down to a level that whales find acceptable for purchase. Then the price will grow again and attract new hamsters. And so on ad infinitum.

[blacklig]

Lol,

that is some shady manipulation on cryptobridge.. huge sell order sitting at 590 Sat with volume over 200 BTC.. It cannot get filled on that small market.. Only guessing who can be behind it! That is around 4.4% of total mined supply right now on the market! There can be at maximum 22 people on the whole world who owns this amount of supply and now want to crush the price.. Not good.. Hope it gets eaten during the time, but if not, prepare for decline for next few weeks.. Or he might remove that wall anytime and then place it again :/ whale..

But, most likely, we see fake wall. The schedule is unnatural and created explicitly for the purpose of psychological manipulation. The red wave is too much green in size. Such waves appear when a negative event is outlined, in connection with which users begin to massively sell a coin. For example, as in the case of Biteconnect bankrupt tokens, which fell in price by 80%.
In our case, the major players have placed false orders, which are unlikely to be fully executed. Unprofessional traders in a panic will hurry to get rid of the coin, thereby involuntarily knocking the price down to a level that whales find acceptable for purchase. Then the price will grow again and attract new hamsters. And so on ad infinitum.

How do you define "fake wall"

For sure seller(s) have to own 37 mil RVN, and they are willing to use it for manipulating the price.. I think this message is clear and now it depends how market reacts.
I am hodling mine and not selling it for at least year or two, so I dont really care for this shady tactics, but it is sad to see that some probably early adopters are already trying to kick down price even on such a small exchange and market.

[Texacha]

Obvious market manipulation.
I will just keep mining & hodling. 

[beursstarter]

Lol,

that is some shady manipulation on cryptobridge.. huge sell order sitting at 590 Sat with volume over 200 BTC.. It cannot get filled on that small market.. Only guessing who can be behind it! That is around 4.4% of total mined supply right now on the market! There can be at maximum 22 people on the whole world who owns this amount of supply and now want to crush the price.. Not good.. Hope it gets eaten during the time, but if not, prepare for decline for next few weeks.. Or he might remove that wall anytime and then place it again :/ whale..

But, most likely, we see fake wall. The schedule is unnatural and created explicitly for the purpose of psychological manipulation. The red wave is too much green in size. Such waves appear when a negative event is outlined, in connection with which users begin to massively sell a coin. For example, as in the case of Biteconnect bankrupt tokens, which fell in price by 80%.
In our case, the major players have placed false orders, which are unlikely to be fully executed. Unprofessional traders in a panic will hurry to get rid of the coin, thereby involuntarily knocking the price down to a level that whales find acceptable for purchase. Then the price will grow again and attract new hamsters. And so on ad infinitum.

How do you define "fake wall"

For sure seller(s) have to own 37 mil RVN, and they are willing to use it for manipulating the price.. I think this message is clear and now it depends how market reacts.
I am hodling mine and not selling it for at least year or two, so I dont really care for this shady tactics, but it is sad to see that some probably early adopters are already trying to kick down price even on such a small exchange and market.

I don't believe in fake walls. As you already pointed out you need to have the coins in the first place. But most important, you take the 'risk' that someone press the button and buys  36+million Raven... That's a lot of risk to take if you want to suppress the price! And for that purpose 1 or 2 million would be more then enough.

I think someone is genuinly willing to sell it's Raven. It would be a powerfull sign if someone buys this huge amount of raven somwhere in the next few days.