Should we limit members in one campaign?

[Disclaimert]

Dear all,
Sorry for any inconvenience for this topic,
I’ve ever joined some bounty campaigns and get some tokens. Bellow are my thinking:
There are some projects attract so much participants, although that means the project is very interesting but it has limited bonus. Result, bonus that each participant receivers from the campaign very small. A lot of participants in one campaign has made so many spams on social networking….
So a question here: Should we limit members in one campaign?
(maybe depend on the bonus value of that campaign)
What are your thinking?
Please share…

there are of course some bounty projects that limit the number of bounty participants for their campaigns, for example, the number of signature campaign participants is limited to 300 participants, to 1000 social media participants and so on. it aims to limit the scammers.

[1714607620]

1714607620

[1714607620]

1714607620

[Farahtenan]

Dear all,
Sorry for any inconvenience on this topic,
I’ve ever joined some bounty campaigns and get some tokens. Bellow is my thinking:
There are some projects attract so many participants, although that means the project is very interesting but it has the limited bonus. The result, bonus that each participant receives from the campaign very small. A lot of participants in one campaign has made so many spams on social networking….
So a question here: Should we limit members in one campaign?
(maybe depending on the bonus value of that campaign)
What is your thinking?
Please share…

I think the same thing. Because I think it is very necessary to limit participants to all campaigns. If the campaign limits the participants and the allocation is not too large. Of course, we get not too small and in accordance with what we do. This is also to avoid the number of participants who spam. As more and more participants are also spam. So it should be limited.

[djlenna12345]

Have you seen the table of bounty programs of the TokenSuite team? There are no restrictions and they are packed with a huge number of bots and scams, duplicating data with incorrect purse addresses. This command fills the table very well, but they need to limit the number of participants.

[keyscore44]

Dear all,
Sorry for any inconvenience for this topic,
I’ve ever joined some bounty campaigns and get some tokens. Bellow are my thinking:
There are some projects attract so much participants, although that means the project is very interesting but it has limited bonus. Result, bonus that each participant receivers from the campaign very small. A lot of participants in one campaign has made so many spams on social networking….
So a question here: Should we limit members in one campaign?
(maybe depend on the bonus value of that campaign)
What are your thinking?
Please share…

It depends cause for guys which are joining campaign it is worst when it has a lot of participants but for guys which are making campaign it is better thanks to bigger spam and bigger ad of their project.

[A.SanchezNo7]

Have you seen the table of bounty programs of the TokenSuite team? There are no restrictions and they are packed with a huge number of bots and scams, duplicating data with incorrect purse addresses. This command fills the table very well, but they need to limit the number of participants.

Yes, I have seen. but i hope there are not too many participants in a campaign.

[Luizrosevelt]

I think your concerns are well shared. The marketing/bounty is primarily an effort to get attention and attract prospects that could hopefully pick interest in the project and invest. It is a no brainer that good projects attract more bounty participants, but the outcome can be managed by the campaign managers through various ways. For instance, this is obtainable in bounty0x, a cap is allocated and counts down from the start till the cap is exhausted. This makes it more targeted if each campaign plan out and know exactly to what extent they want the marketing. I have seen bounty campaigns with a very low cap lasting 15 weeks and participants getting average of 20$ to 60$ after 15 weeks (poor).

[Siriska]

I think that the number of participants in 1000 people in social companies will be sufficient. In the subscription companies will be optimal for 200 people. Why recruit 10 000 people with a reward of $ 5? it's funny

[radokan]

I think that the number of participants in 1000 people in social companies will be sufficient. In the subscription companies will be optimal for 200 people. Why recruit 10 000 people with a reward of $ 5? it's funny

Because it is all about advertisement and visibility. Almost no one cares what participants will post, what matters to them is signature visibility and to get as many participants they can.
In my opinion, participants should be smarter and when they see there are already lots people in these bounties they should look for another bounty, but that is just me.

[A.SanchezNo7]

Dear all,
Thank you all of you for sharing idea in this topic.

[Todychopper77]

yes must limit, the result of the sale is not necessarily exhausted, a project must be really compact in taking decisions in limiting members

[choychoy]

Dear all,
Sorry for any inconvenience for this topic,
I’ve ever joined some bounty campaigns and get some tokens. Bellow are my thinking:
There are some projects attract so much participants, although that means the project is very interesting but it has limited bonus. Result, bonus that each participant receivers from the campaign very small. A lot of participants in one campaign has made so many spams on social networking….
So a question here: Should we limit members in one campaign?
(maybe depend on the bonus value of that campaign)
What are your thinking?
Please share…

Most bounty don't limit their participants as they want a bigger community and also if you find many participants on that ico, a sign that it's a good bounty. Yes it should be limited to 2k participants only but we have no choice as those developers wants many participants for advantage to them. As bounty hunters we should not join once we find out that it's already crowded to respect those early participants.

[tolgahanuzun]

Yes, it seems to me that in order to bounty companies live on, it is necessary to limit the number of participants in them. Otherwise, in the future, the quality of such bounties will be simply awful. Money and time will be lost both by participants and organizers of the bounty.

[cryptowonders@20]

Dear all,
Sorry for any inconvenience for this topic,
I’ve ever joined some bounty campaigns and get some tokens. Bellow are my thinking:
There are some projects attract so much participants, although that means the project is very interesting but it has limited bonus. Result, bonus that each participant receivers from the campaign very small. A lot of participants in one campaign has made so many spams on social networking….
So a question here: Should we limit members in one campaign?
(maybe depend on the bonus value of that campaign)
What are your thinking?
Please share…

normally in some project they always have limited numbers of participant, so once that exert number is reached they don't longer accept participant again.
but for that not withstanding they have to limit numbers of participant in a single campaign so we that can gain enough token, i know some managers can not do because they want there project to hit as possible to the market which people are spreading on so many platforms.

[laracrofth]

Limiting participants will be a good thing for the bounty hunters, but not good for ico, as they need to forecast the number of participants who will survive till the end of the bounty campaign which means more work for the team.

[biznes35]

Dear all,
Sorry for any inconvenience for this topic,
I’ve ever joined some bounty campaigns and get some tokens. Bellow are my thinking:
There are some projects attract so much participants, although that means the project is very interesting but it has limited bonus. Result, bonus that each participant receivers from the campaign very small. A lot of participants in one campaign has made so many spams on social networking….
So a question here: Should we limit members in one campaign?
(maybe depend on the bonus value of that campaign)
What are your thinking?
Please share…

I think it's worth limiting the number of participants in bounty companies, since you get really cheap pays. Assume up to 500 people at least.

[seymenyunus16]

This type of conversation has been held many times before also on this forum and some bounty managers have restricted the number of participants in a single campaigns based on the past work as they dont want any scams.This means the less the members greater will be rewards for the selected members.Now most of the people also avoid ICO with greater number of participants as they think it can be scam but its all in the hand of bounty manager.

[Rhosadah]

limiting the number of participants that many gift managers have done, restricting the social media community to the lack of project promotion, can affect the achievement of ico itself,
so again all managers' decisions can determine because the token allocation for the prize remains the same

[Vektrum]

I am categorically against the introduction of any new restrictions. This forum should always give the right of choice. You now have the right to choose to participate in any ICO project or not to participate. If there are restrictions on the number of participants in the generosity campaign, there will be no such choice. On the other hand, the ICO team is not interested in this limitation. On the participants of the generosity campaign, they allocate a certain percentage of their new tokens and they are interested, on the contrary, in a large number of participants who will advertise and promote their project.

The limit on the number of participants in the generosity campaign and even the number of participants of the same rank is introduced by ICO in case of payment of generosity in bitcoin or ethereum, or linked to the dollar or euro.

[Spaffin]

I do not see the need to impose any restrictions on the number of participants in the ICO generosity campaign. If someone worries that he will get little payment, he may not participate in this ICO campaign and choose another. They are now held very much and quite often only a few dozen people are involved, if we consider the campaign signature. Recently, this forum has introduced and so many restrictions, and above all the restrictions associated with the introduction of the system of merit.

[kreket1]

I think that it is necessary to introduce limits for the campaign of social networks. Spam will not give much for the project, but many hunters will simply lose interest in these projects