Bitcoin Forum
May 07, 2024, 02:07:14 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 [43] 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 ... 119 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [JCE]Fast & stable CN/v8/Heavy/Tube/XHV miner, CPU+GPU, Vega56 1800+ RX580 1200+  (Read 90784 times)
Sx5000
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 31
Merit: 5


View Profile
July 18, 2018, 07:52:14 AM
Last edit: July 18, 2018, 08:48:46 AM by Sx5000
 #841

In version 31f the overall performance on my rig with 12 552rx fell to 200+ hashes (from one card 347-> 330) The settings were exactly the same, the trick I used, maybe this version does not work now.)  
I return to the royal 31e version of the miner Smiley
Developer, what drivers do you use for testing? I'm using 18.3.4.
PS: Just in case, I bring the parameters of the video card on which the rig is assembled.
Rx550 2gb Baffin 1150/1800 (1071/1500) 768sp/12cu (unlock 640/10), mem Elpida

On the test card 588 on the new version, on the contrary, growth is seen on the Heavy Algo from 1100 to 1120 hashes!
I HATE TABLES I HATE TABLES I HA(╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻ TABLES I HATE TABLES I HATE TABLES
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
syncro2017
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 81
Merit: 0


View Profile
July 18, 2018, 12:16:41 PM
 #842

Just FYI, Latest 31f version has the same performance for me on RX580/580/550 mixed rig with 18.6.1 driver on windows 10
UnclWish
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1484
Merit: 253


View Profile
July 18, 2018, 01:20:28 PM
 #843

In version 31f the overall performance on my rig with 12 552rx fell to 200+ hashes (from one card 347-> 330) The settings were exactly the same, the trick I used, maybe this version does not work now.)  
I return to the royal 31e version of the miner Smiley
Developer, what drivers do you use for testing? I'm using 18.3.4.
PS: Just in case, I bring the parameters of the video card on which the rig is assembled.
Rx550 2gb Baffin 1150/1800 (1071/1500) 768sp/12cu (unlock 640/10), mem Elpida

On the test card 588 on the new version, on the contrary, growth is seen on the Heavy Algo from 1100 to 1120 hashes!

Wow, great speed! What settings in miner and overclock settings for 580 card you're using?
Sx5000
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 31
Merit: 5


View Profile
July 18, 2018, 05:01:34 PM
 #844

Wow, great speed! What settings in miner and overclock settings for 580 card you're using?

     { "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 8, "alpha" : 64, "beta" : 16, "gamma" : 4, "delta" : 4, "epsilon" : 4, "zeta":4, "index" : 0, "multi_hash":864 },
     { "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 8, "alpha" : 64, "beta" : 16, "gamma" : 4, "delta" : 4, "epsilon" : 4, "zeta":4, "index" : 0, "multi_hash":864 },
 
This is the divine micron 1250/2200  Cheesy
geck
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 145
Merit: 10


View Profile
July 18, 2018, 07:35:58 PM
 #845

0.31f is brilliant! got my 8 vega 56 to 15.06k h/s; slightly besting srbminer.

FWIW the max multi_hash setting that could be used is 1872. Anymore and i would get random thread failures after compilation
vmozara
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 190
Merit: 59


View Profile
July 18, 2018, 10:25:26 PM
 #846

What Vegas you have? My vegas (all references) have nominal hashrate same or betterthan srbminer, but effective hashrate is like 10-15% more, there is no even comparison. 6x vega 64 = 12700H/s, 7x vega 56 14500H/s. You say you have better hashrate with f version? I am still on C. I am 8000km away from home, I don´t know if I dare to try to update Cheesy
UnclWish
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1484
Merit: 253


View Profile
July 18, 2018, 11:31:13 PM
 #847

Wow, great speed! What settings in miner and overclock settings for 580 card you're using?

     { "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 8, "alpha" : 64, "beta" : 16, "gamma" : 4, "delta" : 4, "epsilon" : 4, "zeta":4, "index" : 0, "multi_hash":864 },
     { "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 8, "alpha" : 64, "beta" : 16, "gamma" : 4, "delta" : 4, "epsilon" : 4, "zeta":4, "index" : 0, "multi_hash":864 },
 
This is the divine micron 1250/2200  Cheesy
Did you tried mukti_hash 832? Maybe it'll be better...
JCE-Miner (OP)
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 350
Merit: 22


View Profile
July 19, 2018, 05:28:45 AM
 #848

Thanks for all your replies!

so if I summarize 0.31f is the best on all cards but the rx550?
you didn't report about rx560 but i've those cards and i reach 360 on cn heavy on f, more than previous. versions.

high priority is now:
Better autoconfig
fix no-gpu bug on win7 + betablockchain
fan speed and temperature
watchdog
4ward
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 473
Merit: 18


View Profile
July 19, 2018, 05:43:04 AM
 #849

can you add the ability to select gpus in --auto mode?

heavyarms1912
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 729
Merit: 114



View Profile
July 19, 2018, 06:01:55 AM
Last edit: July 19, 2018, 02:31:53 PM by heavyarms1912
 #850

@JCE-Miner keep up the good work.  I get the below on 6 x RX 580 4gb, 2 x RX 570 4gb and 1 x RX 570 8gb on CN-Saber.

4gb card
Code:
{ "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 8, "alpha" : 64, "beta" : 8, "gamma" : 4, "delta" : 4, "epsilon" : 4, "zeta":4, "index" : 3, "multi_hash":944 },

8gb card
Code:
{ "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 8, "alpha" : 64, "beta" : 8, "gamma" : 4, "delta" : 4, "epsilon" : 4, "zeta":4, "index" : 4, "multi_hash":832 },
{ "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 8, "alpha" : 64, "beta" : 8, "gamma" : 4, "delta" : 4, "epsilon" : 4, "zeta":4, "index" : 4, "multi_hash":832 },

Code:
02:00:19 | Accepted by the pool.
02:00:20 | Hashrate GPU Thread 0: 768.12 h/s - Total GPU 0: 768.12 h/s
02:00:20 | Hashrate GPU Thread 1: 794.53 h/s - Total GPU 1: 794.53 h/s
02:00:20 | Hashrate GPU Thread 2: 797.66 h/s - Total GPU 2: 797.66 h/s
02:00:20 | Hashrate GPU Thread 3: 737.42 h/s - Total GPU 3: 737.42 h/s
02:00:20 | Hashrate GPU Thread 4: 528.76 h/s
02:00:20 | Hashrate GPU Thread 5: 527.76 h/s - Total GPU 4: 1056.51 h/s
02:00:20 | Hashrate GPU Thread 6: 794.66 h/s - Total GPU 5: 794.66 h/s
02:00:20 | Hashrate GPU Thread 7: 798.89 h/s - Total GPU 6: 798.89 h/s
02:00:20 | Hashrate GPU Thread 8: 709.82 h/s - Total GPU 7: 709.82 h/s
02:00:20 | Hashrate GPU Thread 9: 797.32 h/s - Total GPU 8: 797.32 h/s
02:00:20 | Total: 7254.89 h/s - Max: 7263.18 h/s
02:00:21 | Pool mining.bit.tube:13333
02:00:21 | Currency BitTube (TUBE)
02:00:21 | Current pool Difficulty 100001
02:00:21 | Valid Shares found 41
02:00:21 | Total hashes 2900019
JCE-Miner (OP)
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 350
Merit: 22


View Profile
July 19, 2018, 06:27:45 AM
 #851

I Advise to use double thread on all gpu, even the 4gb one. i always get better perf with double thread, even on low-mem cards.

good idea about the gpu select, i'll add param -g similar to Claymore -di
-g 0,2 : autoconfig only gpu 0 and 2.
UnclWish
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1484
Merit: 253


View Profile
July 19, 2018, 12:14:31 PM
 #852

@JCE-Miner keep up the good work.  I get the below on 6 x RX 580 4gb, 2 x RX 570 4gb and 1 x RX 570 8gb on CN-Saber.

8gb card
Code:
{ "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 8, "alpha" : 64, "beta" : 8, "gamma" : 4, "delta" : 4, "epsilon" : 4, "zeta":4, "index" : 3, "multi_hash":944 },

4gb card
Code:
{ "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 8, "alpha" : 64, "beta" : 8, "gamma" : 4, "delta" : 4, "epsilon" : 4, "zeta":4, "index" : 4, "multi_hash":832 },
{ "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 8, "alpha" : 64, "beta" : 8, "gamma" : 4, "delta" : 4, "epsilon" : 4, "zeta":4, "index" : 4, "multi_hash":832 },

Code:
02:00:19 | Accepted by the pool.
02:00:20 | Hashrate GPU Thread 0: 768.12 h/s - Total GPU 0: 768.12 h/s
02:00:20 | Hashrate GPU Thread 1: 794.53 h/s - Total GPU 1: 794.53 h/s
02:00:20 | Hashrate GPU Thread 2: 797.66 h/s - Total GPU 2: 797.66 h/s
02:00:20 | Hashrate GPU Thread 3: 737.42 h/s - Total GPU 3: 737.42 h/s
02:00:20 | Hashrate GPU Thread 4: 528.76 h/s
02:00:20 | Hashrate GPU Thread 5: 527.76 h/s - Total GPU 4: 1056.51 h/s
02:00:20 | Hashrate GPU Thread 6: 794.66 h/s - Total GPU 5: 794.66 h/s
02:00:20 | Hashrate GPU Thread 7: 798.89 h/s - Total GPU 6: 798.89 h/s
02:00:20 | Hashrate GPU Thread 8: 709.82 h/s - Total GPU 7: 709.82 h/s
02:00:20 | Hashrate GPU Thread 9: 797.32 h/s - Total GPU 8: 797.32 h/s
02:00:20 | Total: 7254.89 h/s - Max: 7263.18 h/s
02:00:21 | Pool mining.bit.tube:13333
02:00:21 | Currency BitTube (TUBE)
02:00:21 | Current pool Difficulty 100001
02:00:21 | Valid Shares found 41
02:00:21 | Total hashes 2900019
On 8Gb cards 944 isn't best multi_hash. Try to use 1836.
HaloGenius
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 251
Merit: 4


View Profile WWW
July 19, 2018, 01:26:11 PM
 #853

@JCE-Miner

Any ETA for Linux GPU/CPU version ?

Hive OS - mining platform #1. Register with promo code MINING4ALL and get 10$ to your balance
UnclWish
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1484
Merit: 253


View Profile
July 19, 2018, 01:38:10 PM
 #854

Thanks for all your replies!

so if I summarize 0.31f is the best on all cards but the rx550?
you didn't report about rx560 but i've those cards and i reach 360 on cn heavy on f, more than previous. versions.

high priority is now:
Better autoconfig
fix no-gpu bug on win7 + betablockchain
fan speed and temperature
watchdog
I don't think that autoconfig option is so important... Often every card needs to fine tune...

Still waiting heavy algo optimization to stop use SRB and go to JCE miner. Until use JCE only with normalv7 algo and based on it coins...
mijnerke
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 10
Merit: 0


View Profile
July 19, 2018, 01:58:45 PM
 #855


good idea about the gpu select, i'll add param -g similar to Claymore -di
-g 0,2 : autoconfig only gpu 0 and 2.

Waiting for this possibility!
trippcheck
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 223
Merit: 100


View Profile
July 19, 2018, 02:19:44 PM
 #856

i want mining only on 3 from 5 cards
is this possible?

████→→       ● DeepOnion                                                                       ✯✯✯✯✯✯✯✯✯✯✯✯✯✯✯✯✯✯✯✯✯✯✯✯✯✯
████→→       ● Tor integrated, 100% anonymous!                                ✯      Get Your FREE Coins NOW!      ✯
████→→       ● Free Airdrop! (No ICO, No Crowdfund)                       ✯✯✯✯✯✯✯✯✯✯✯✯✯✯✯✯✯✯✯✯✯✯✯✯✯✯
Bazzaar
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 75
Merit: 1


View Profile
July 19, 2018, 02:25:47 PM
 #857

i want mining only on 3 from 5 cards
is this possible?
Yes

use the "index" command in gpu_threads_conf section
gpu index numbers start at 0

Baz
heavyarms1912
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 729
Merit: 114



View Profile
July 19, 2018, 02:40:25 PM
 #858

On 8Gb cards 944 isn't best multi_hash. Try to use 1836.

I had the settings swapped in my post for 4gb and 8gb cards.  1836 for CN-Heavy/Saber dual threads.  Will that even work?
trippcheck
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 223
Merit: 100


View Profile
July 19, 2018, 02:51:53 PM
 #859

any have a config? for mining only 1 / 2 /3 gpu
i am try -d command not run

████→→       ● DeepOnion                                                                       ✯✯✯✯✯✯✯✯✯✯✯✯✯✯✯✯✯✯✯✯✯✯✯✯✯✯
████→→       ● Tor integrated, 100% anonymous!                                ✯      Get Your FREE Coins NOW!      ✯
████→→       ● Free Airdrop! (No ICO, No Crowdfund)                       ✯✯✯✯✯✯✯✯✯✯✯✯✯✯✯✯✯✯✯✯✯✯✯✯✯✯
UnclWish
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1484
Merit: 253


View Profile
July 19, 2018, 04:01:23 PM
 #860

On 8Gb cards 944 isn't best multi_hash. Try to use 1836.

I had the settings swapped in my post for 4gb and 8gb cards.  1836 for CN-Heavy/Saber dual threads.  Will that even work?
Of course not. I thought you wrote about v7 algo. On heavy algo max is 944 for 8Gb. On higher values speed is drops due to lack of vmemory.
For heavy algo on 8Gb best multihash is 832 (and maybe 864) and dual threads.
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 [43] 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 ... 119 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!