Bitcoin Forum
December 09, 2016, 11:27:20 PM *
News: To be able to use the next phase of the beta forum software, please ensure that your email address is correct/functional.
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: [1] 2 3 »  All
  Print  
Author Topic: GREAT Alternative to the EVIL DeepBit  (Read 3794 times)
slippyrocks
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 69


respecttheslider


View Profile
August 01, 2011, 10:51:09 PM
 #1

Too many people in one pool very bad for Bitcoin.

http://www.bitcoinwatch.com/

Many people mine on DeepBit due to it's crunching power well here is a great alternative.

Put your even video cards on slush's pool @ http://mining.bitcoin.cz

Put your odd video cards on BTC Guild's pool @ http://www.btcguild.com

Maybe put every third card pointed towards @ http://www.bitcoins.lc/

You add the hashing power together and get 2473 + 2084 + 506 = 5063 GH/sec

Better for Bitcoin and better for you in so many ways.  Such as lower fees or more

consistent payouts due to crunching so many blocks at one time.

Sample batch file:
Code:
cd C:\poclbm
start /affinity 1 /D"C:\poclbm" /MIN poclbm.exe assman:password@api2.bitcoin.cz:8332#serv1 assman:password@api.bitcoin.cz:8332#serv2 assman:password@uscentral.btcguild.com:8332#serv3 -t 10 -b 1000 -d 0 -v -w 128
start /affinity 1 /D"C:\poclbm" /MIN poclbm.exe assman:password@uscentral.btcguild.com:8332#serv1 assman:password@uswest.btcguild.com:8332#serv2 assman:password@api.bitcoin.cz:8332#serv3 -t 10 -b 1000 -d 1 -v -w 128

Comments..

Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1481326040
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481326040

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481326040
Reply with quote  #2

1481326040
Report to moderator
1481326040
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481326040

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481326040
Reply with quote  #2

1481326040
Report to moderator
1481326040
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481326040

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481326040
Reply with quote  #2

1481326040
Report to moderator
iopq
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 644


View Profile
August 01, 2011, 11:00:13 PM
 #2

or just point your cards to mineco.in for no fees and hopping-proof method

Beta-coiner1
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 518


View Profile
August 01, 2011, 11:06:39 PM
 #3

BTCGuild has been really good over the last weekend or so.The pool luck has been waaay positive......currently over 50 % for the last 24 hours and no fee.

For some reason I could have never signed up for Deepbit as the website was done and have been satisfied with my current pool.

If you believe this post has helped,please donate-

1JfwAiV8WbT9HtmQVvnkJ6KwUy9gLjzxdK
Artefact2
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 124


View Profile WWW
August 01, 2011, 11:11:33 PM
 #4

Too many people in one pool very bad for Bitcoin.

I think you a word in this sentence.

A pool-biased blockchain representation, by me: pident (WTFPL)
jackjack
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 882


May Bitcoin be touched by his Noodly Appendage


View Profile
August 01, 2011, 11:18:41 PM
 #5

Too many people in one pool very bad for Bitcoin.

I think you a word in this sentence.
Grin

Own address: 19QkqAza7BHFTuoz9N8UQkryP4E9jHo4N3 - Pywallet support: 1AQDfx22pKGgXnUZFL1e4UKos3QqvRzNh5 - Bitcointalk++ script support: 1Pxeccscj1ygseTdSV1qUqQCanp2B2NMM2
Pywallet: instructions. Encrypted wallet support, export/import keys/addresses, backup wallets, export/import CSV data from/into wallet, merge wallets, delete/import addresses and transactions, recover altcoins sent to bitcoin addresses, sign/verify messages and files with Bitcoin addresses, recover deleted wallets, etc.
Chick
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 70


View Profile
August 01, 2011, 11:24:51 PM
 #6

BTCGuild has been really good over the last weekend or so.The pool luck has been waaay positive......currently over 50 % for the last 24 hours and no fee.

For some reason I could have never signed up for Deepbit as the website was done and have been satisfied with my current pool.

The luck is inaccurate if there was a difficulty change within 24 hours.

DiabloD3
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1162


DiabloMiner author


View Profile WWW
August 01, 2011, 11:40:38 PM
 #7

Too many people in one pool very bad for Bitcoin.

http://www.bitcoinwatch.com/

Many people mine on DeepBit due to it's crunching power well here is a great alternative.

Put your even video cards on slush's pool @ http://mining.bitcoin.cz

Put your odd video cards on BTC Guild's pool @ http://www.btcguild.com

Maybe put every third card pointed towards @ http://www.bitcoins.lc/

You add the hashing power together and get 2473 + 2084 + 506 = 5063 GH/sec

Better for Bitcoin and better for you in so many ways.  Such as lower fees or more

consistent payouts due to crunching so many blocks at one time.

Comments..



So basically, use multipool mode on DiabloMiner.

noob_jul11
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 121


View Profile
August 01, 2011, 11:51:58 PM
 #8

Newbies, Be careful though ... bitcoinpool.com seems sketchy. I used them for a while ... and
1) I can't change my address
2) No password retrieval procedure.
3) No options to withdraw full amount ... only in the nomination of 0.01 btc.

all seems "disabled" in the name of SECURITY and advised to "create new accounts". Meanwhile, I lose 0.008xxxxxx btc because the 0.01 btc rule. So be careful which pool you choose.
noob_jul11
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 121


View Profile
August 01, 2011, 11:55:27 PM
 #9

BTCGuild has been really good over the last weekend or so.The pool luck has been waaay positive......currently over 50 % for the last 24 hours and no fee.

For some reason I could have never signed up for Deepbit as the website was done and have been satisfied with my current pool.

Didn't they just had 13 million shares round over the weekend??
slippyrocks
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 69


respecttheslider


View Profile
August 02, 2011, 04:08:40 AM
 #10

So basically, use multipool mode on DiabloMiner.
Or latest poclbm. Sample batch file:
Code:
cd C:\poclbm
start /affinity 1 /D"C:\poclbm" /MIN poclbm.exe assman:password@api2.bitcoin.cz:8332#serv1 assman:password@api.bitcoin.cz:8332#serv2 assman:password@uscentral.btcguild.com:8332#serv3 -t 10 -b 1000 -d 0 -v -w 128
start /affinity 1 /D"C:\poclbm" /MIN poclbm.exe assman:password@uscentral.btcguild.com:8332#serv1 assman:password@uswest.btcguild.com:8332#serv2 assman:password@api.bitcoin.cz:8332#serv3 -t 10 -b 1000 -d 1 -v -w 128
Xephan
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 42


View Profile
August 02, 2011, 04:19:52 AM
 #11

Too many people in one pool very bad for Bitcoin.

http://www.bitcoinwatch.com/

Many people mine on DeepBit due to it's crunching power well here is a great alternative.

Put your even video cards on slush's pool @ http://mining.bitcoin.cz

Put your odd video cards on BTC Guild's pool @ http://www.btcguild.com

Maybe put every third card pointed towards @ http://www.bitcoins.lc/

You add the hashing power together and get 2473 + 2084 + 506 = 5063 GH/sec

Better for Bitcoin and better for you in so many ways.  Such as lower fees or more

consistent payouts due to crunching so many blocks at one time.

Comments..


Pretty much what I do, pointing my cards at different pools and never at deepbit.

186q9YUW3x8TVHC5aYBEqgZZYMxft8Cw9f
Xephan
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 42


View Profile
August 02, 2011, 04:23:33 AM
 #12

Newbies, Be careful though ... bitcoinpool.com seems sketchy. I used them for a while ... and
1) I can't change my address
2) No password retrieval procedure.
3) No options to withdraw full amount ... only in the nomination of 0.01 btc.

all seems "disabled" in the name of SECURITY and advised to "create new accounts". Meanwhile, I lose 0.008xxxxxx btc because the 0.01 btc rule. So be careful which pool you choose.


I tried bitcoinpool thinking what they are proposing, efficiency mining, seems like a good idea. While I can understand their restrictions in the name of security, what stopped me was getting efficiency up. Without a high efficiency, it would had been the same as mining on any other pool, with less restrictions. Unfortunately, they dropped support for their modded version of poclbm and recommend using Phoenix instead. But for some odd reason phoenix is unable to connect to them on my set (but it works on other pools). So I gave up and dropped them.

186q9YUW3x8TVHC5aYBEqgZZYMxft8Cw9f
slippyrocks
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 69


respecttheslider


View Profile
August 02, 2011, 04:33:49 AM
 #13

I started thinking about this more when we snagged an invalid on slush's pool earlier today.

7041   2011-07-31 02:05:27   4:34:01   8018865   0.01602402    -     invalid

ouch!
hawks5999
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 168



View Profile WWW
August 02, 2011, 04:55:29 AM
 #14

There are even better alternatives.

■ ▄▄▄
■ ███
■ ■  ■               
LEDGER  WALLET    ████
■■■ ORDER NOW! ■■■
              LEDGER WALLET
Smartcard security for your BTCitcoins
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
Decentralized. Open. Secure.
Dargo
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1554



View Profile
August 02, 2011, 05:49:53 AM
 #15

According to the logic suggested by the OP, I guess I should mine with 1/3 of my cards at deepbit, and the other 2/3 at deepbit as well, since then I'm somehow tapping into 5363 + 5363 + 5363 = 16,089 Ghps. Wait, no, I should mine with 1/10 of my cards at deepbit, and the other 9/10 at deepbit. Then I'm tapping into 10x5363 = 50,363 Ghps. Someone needs to rethink their maths.
DiabloD3
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1162


DiabloMiner author


View Profile WWW
August 02, 2011, 05:55:01 AM
 #16

So basically, use multipool mode on DiabloMiner.
Or latest poclbm. Sample batch file:
Code:
cd C:\poclbm
start /affinity 1 /D"C:\poclbm" /MIN poclbm.exe assman:password@api2.bitcoin.cz:8332#serv1 assman:password@api.bitcoin.cz:8332#serv2 assman:password@uscentral.btcguild.com:8332#serv3 -t 10 -b 1000 -d 0 -v -w 128
start /affinity 1 /D"C:\poclbm" /MIN poclbm.exe assman:password@uscentral.btcguild.com:8332#serv1 assman:password@uswest.btcguild.com:8332#serv2 assman:password@api.bitcoin.cz:8332#serv3 -t 10 -b 1000 -d 1 -v -w 128

That is just a silly script.

With DiabloMiner, you just use commas with -l or -u -p -o -r, and it automatically handles it.

pennytrader
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 253


View Profile
August 02, 2011, 06:15:29 AM
 #17

deepbit is good, not evil.

please donate to 1P3m2resGCP2o2sFX324DP1mfqHgGPA8BL
slippyrocks
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 69


respecttheslider


View Profile
August 02, 2011, 06:33:39 AM
 #18

According to the logic suggested by the OP, I guess I should mine with 1/3 of my cards at deepbit, and the other 2/3 at deepbit as well, since then I'm somehow tapping into 5363 + 5363 + 5363 = 16,089 Ghps. Wait, no, I should mine with 1/10 of my cards at deepbit, and the other 9/10 at deepbit. Then I'm tapping into 10x5363 = 50,363 Ghps. Someone needs to rethink their maths.
You must be smoking glue? You do see the difference.. right?
Put your even video cards on slush's pool @ http://mining.bitcoin.cz
Put your odd video cards on BTC Guild's pool @ http://www.btcguild.com
Maybe put every third card pointed towards @ http://www.bitcoins.lc/
You add the hashing power together and get 2473 + 2084 + 506 = 5063 GH/sec
pennytrader
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 253


View Profile
August 02, 2011, 06:43:41 AM
 #19

BTW, OP's math is totally wrong

2473 * (1/3) + 2084 * (1/3) + 506 * (1/3)

please donate to 1P3m2resGCP2o2sFX324DP1mfqHgGPA8BL
dub0matic
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 182



View Profile
August 02, 2011, 06:49:36 AM
 #20

deepbit is of the devil haha. i rather mine at smaller pools. slush is descent and btcguild has been having horrible luck lately

make it rain haha
btc 176MrZ3CCXGb1GqFiGaoqQpaynzYqZsW6n
Pages: [1] 2 3 »  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!