Is rank of bounty manager is really matters?

[gapthecap11]

I think it really matters If the ICO team has a really good project and sure it will produce a lot of investors, the project team should rent an expensive and good bounty managers to handle the bounty campaign.

[1714892140]

1714892140

[Minotus]

If a manager with legendary rank can seem to us has experience. I generally don’t mind bounty managers rank but I prefer to work with same manager for trust. There are really good ones. But there are also irresponsible managers too.

[waorana]

The rank of the bounty manager is only relatively important for the success of an ICO. It 's true that lately new bounty manager are emerging from scratch, but this does not mean that they are all incompetent and that those with a higher rank are absolutely the best. Personally I participated in the past to bounty campaigns of junior manager, I do not remember the name, but they have had a good success because the project and the team were very good

[kiemnhieutien]

It's really important because it's not easy to get high rank on bitcointalk, although that in the past we didn't have merit system, but it takes about 2.1 to 2.8 years to reach Legendary. And in the past amount of members wasn't crowed like now so Mod can easily control forum and delete trash posts, spam account. So the higher rank bountymanager had, the higher reputation and responsibility they are.
 

[quanahri]

I see there are bounty by jr. member managed but attracted a lot of participants. However, I still choose bounty managers with high rank and experience. They manage well and regularly update spreadsheets. I love it

[melinda29]

I think that manager's reputation is much more important than his forum rank. Now there are really many bounty programs and good managers try to participate only in those who have some future. Of course, there are no guarantees here, but personal reputation gives at least a little idea about the future of the project and your future bounty payments.

[Ikay]

Ranking is not justified to a bounty manager's because its all about to a legit project even a high rank member of BTT will run a scam ico project and because of that if I participated in bounty I always investigate if it is legit or not.

[ArkiCrypto]

Well in some part it matters because it's like the representative of the bounties project or the project manager however there are some cases where the projects making a new account and let it handle the bounty thread, most of the people of the forum are joining bounties and one of their traits in joining the bounties is based on the manager of the bounty.

But for me i'm not looking in the bounty manager i'm looking for the project itself if it has a future in the crypto world because most of the tokens are worthless in the future. So it's in the person itself whether he/she's looking for a reputable manager or not.

But a reputable manager is an advantage because:
• He/she review first the bounty/project itself (Most of the managers didn't handle a scam project)
• He/she has the experience of handling participants
• Time management on checking participants
• Well presentation and easy to understand rules
• Good on implementing rules

So for me rank doesn't matter as long as the service he/she can give is good, such as:
• Checking on time
• Updated spreadsheet
• Strict to rules
• Approachable (can contact anytime, fast response)

[hotcoin1234]

It's really important because it's not easy to get high rank on bitcointalk, although that in the past we didn't have merit system, but it takes about 2.1 to 2.8 years to reach Legendary. And in the past amount of members wasn't crowed like now so Mod can easily control forum and delete trash posts, spam account. So the higher rank bountymanager had, the higher reputation and responsibility they are.
 

Based on what you say what is the minimum rank you think is needed to be a bounty manager? Higher rank people does not really mean they are experience in being a bounty manager and lower rank also does not mean they are not competent in being one. I will not say all account but some accounts might be bought or being hack so they land in the level they are in.

[entempo]

Bounty manager can always say "they lied to me, and didn't pay, i'm a victim as you" - so what can you take from him? No matter who is bounty manager, you should find info about ICO by yourself, and invest on your own risc.

[tak bisa]

I am more likely to see the previous job done by the manager, succeed or not. Because each high rank does not necessarily succeed in taking care of every project it handles.

[nitrinto]

Yes for me the rank of Manager is of great importance. if I see a Manager with a low rank, I don't work with him.

[Boristhecat]

I saw nice ICOs and wanted to take part in their bounties, but saw rank junior member as manager.
Do you have examples of successful ICOs with low rank of bounty manager on the BTT.

I know such examples but they are quite rare. In general, there is nothing to worry about if the team itself conducts its own bounty campaign.

[Harley Quinn]

To be honest I don't think it matters because even a 'lower level worker' for a project can screw shit up in some way or other. Chains are only as strong as their weakest links.

[paimen]

I think it is a measure to determine a manager based on rank, as much as possible select a manager whose rank is already high.
Because it will be more convincing if the manager has high ranking and more experienced.
I'm afraid if the junior members only manager rank is an ICO scam, but does not deny the possibility if it is really not a scam.
Check carefully before choosing ICO.

[xen14]

Some icos liked to handle their ICO bounty themselves, bounty manager rank doesnt matter aslong as the team & project is legit thats all you need

[barlo357]

I don't think its a reason to call a project as scam even if the manager is a newbie. Sometimes project's are managed by its own team, so I guess newbie ranked bounty manager is not a basis to call a project as scam

How can he or she participate if they rank is only a newbie? I think there is a qualification in every ICO's and you must be at least a jr member to join a campaign. i'm just asking my friend correct me if I'm wrong.

[Sanugarid]

I saw nice ICOs and wanted to take part in their bounties, but saw rank junior member as manager.
Do you have examples of successful ICOs with low rank of bounty manager on the BTT.

Well, it somehow matters such that if the rank of the bounty manager is high, it will appear to be more trustworthy and might give an impression to its campaign that it has a high chance to succeed. But it doesn't measure the capabilities of a good manager because there are bounty managers despite of having a low rank,  but are better than those who has high ranks in this forum.

[baeva2]

I think  - yes. I now participate in 8 bounties and only two managers show the results in the tables and answer questions. What to think about the rest - I do not know.

[Betwrong]

I think  - yes. I now participate in 8 bounties and only two managers show the results in the tables and answer questions. What to think about the rest - I do not know.

But what about their ranks? Do those two who show the results have higher ranks?

I think many posters in this thread misunderstood the OP's question. Now I'm not talking about you, baeva2, but about others debating the acceptance to different bounty projects and allocation of payments in the projects judging from their ranks. We are talking about the rank of bounty manager here, not about ranks of participants.