Is rank of bounty manager is really matters?

[Pline]

I saw nice ICOs and wanted to take part in their bounties, but saw rank junior member as manager.
Do you have examples of successful ICOs with low rank of bounty manager on the BTT.

I cannot give you any certain one, but you can be sure, that there are lots of them.
For me this does not metter.

[1714670970]

1714670970

[1714670970]

1714670970

[1714670970]

1714670970

[Eclipse2021]

yes they do. whenever I decide to join into bounty campaigns I always look at the profile of the manager to see what projects has he helped before and to be at least hero member as this puts me in a comfortbale place to get involved in that bounty program.

[hihitao50]

i think it's matter.
If the ICO team has a really good project and sure it will produce a lot of investors, the project team should rent an expensive and good bounty managers to handle the bounty campaign.

[sterling.lily]

I had experience of participating in such companies. Their 10 companies 8 turned out to be a scam, 2 paid tokens, 1 sold on the exchange, 2 two months of silence.

[zidanaltaer]

I think rank does not significantly influence, I prefer to experience and trust manager, some of the previous project he ever hold can also be for reference

[bibitao23]

I think there are special points for the matter rank because if the account is still in the form of a beginner then I think the existing bounty or the project in my opinion is still less reliable because that's what requires a high account in a bounty menger to avoid scam and other bad things we do not want.

[cryptotenoy]

I saw nice ICOs and wanted to take part in their bounties, but saw rank junior member as manager.
Do you have examples of successful ICOs with low rank of bounty manager on the BTT.

We can't deny the fact that higher ranks is the one we truly trusted because of its strong foundation in this business but the question is,if that account used really by the true owner or just being piloted inorder to qualify to manage the project because most companies today wanted to have experienced in becoming a bounty manager.There are really projects that just wants to scam people and manager has nothing to do with that since they are also just being hired just to manage the ongoing  project.For me it doesn't matter if the bounty manager has low rank because if that certain projects were legit then they will pay,the company will pay but if its scam then managers has nothing to do with that since we are all anonymous here and seems very hard to trace the true identity of a scammer.

[zxl912157]

I saw nice ICOs and wanted to take part in their bounties, but saw rank junior member as manager.
Do you have examples of successful ICOs with low rank of bounty manager on the BTT.

Which I first see is his trust. Because it is the level of success of a manager. The more trusted it is the better the manager.
I'll get out of that bounty if the manager suddenly gets a negative trust because it's so risky, I'll lose the result of my hard work.

[Bagani]

For me rank is not really matter in determining an ICO if it good or not. Because these manager is just hired to run the bounty program, they not even part of the team. Whether it scam ot legit these members had nothing to deal in anycase. So dont bpame any manager if the project is  scam and dont be proud if the project is good.  But bountyanagers has a good impact on the community supporters such as the bounty hunter who followed them

[tulpash]

I think rank does not significantly influence, I prefer to experience and trust manager, some of the previous project he ever hold can also be for reference

For me, the experience and confidence in the bounty manager are also key factors. The account rank is a secondary factor, which almost does not affect anything. The experience of the manager is crucial.

[$$$sparkles$$$]

I saw nice ICOs and wanted to take part in their bounties, but saw rank junior member as manager.
Do you have examples of successful ICOs with low rank of bounty manager on the BTT.

It really does. It's all about impression. High ranking managers entails experience and credibility. Plus a good trust rating with a solid portfolio, you almost can't go wrong. Not being bias or anything, I wouldn't take the risk of joining a bounty with a low ranked manager. It's just not safe and practical.

[Amalker]

I saw nice ICOs and wanted to take part in their bounties, but saw rank junior member as manager.
Do you have examples of successful ICOs with low rank of bounty manager on the BTT.

Often my attention is directed how strong is looking bounty project and I don't look at bounty manager's account, even if it's a junior.

[ambisyon]

I saw nice ICOs and wanted to take part in their bounties, but saw rank junior member as manager.
Do you have examples of successful ICOs with low rank of bounty manager on the BTT.

Often my attention is directed how strong is looking bounty project and I don't look at bounty manager's account, even if it's a junior.

Usually, that is my preference in selecting ICO for my signature bounty campaign since bounty managers plays an important role for such job. I would feel confident that if the bounty manager is good, definitely we are sure to be given token reward at the end of the campaign period. I happen to notice
that most of the bounty managers are having a Hero member and legendary ranks.

[hidingyou]

I saw nice ICOs and wanted to take part in their bounties, but saw rank junior member as manager.
Do you have examples of successful ICOs with low rank of bounty manager on the BTT.

Yes for me It's really mattered right now its because it talks about an experiense and on how they can hanfled their campaign for every participant joined.

[RondoAnyar]

I saw nice ICOs and wanted to take part in their bounties, but saw rank junior member as manager.
Do you have examples of successful ICOs with low rank of bounty manager on the BTT.

I do not think the manager's rank does affect a success. many senior manager rankings but ico fail as well as low but successful rankings, it is not fundamental and can not be used as the main benchmark of project success.

[Pytbo]

yes they do. whenever I decide to join into bounty campaigns I always look at the profile of the manager to see what projects has he helped before and to be at least hero member as this puts me in a comfortbale place to get involved in that bounty program.

Indeed, bounty managers with a high rank usually have a good reputation and cherish it. I always try to participate in campaigns where the bounty campaign is led by an experienced bounty manager with a high rank.

[stefany101]

For my own opinion, it doesn't matters for me if the rank of the bounty manager is even lower than mine, what matters the most is her trusting numbers. If the bounty manager has a negative trust then I will discourage to join his/her bounty campaigns. Rank is not important on a manager, the most important thing is his/her managing skill to run the whole bounty campaigns in it's self.

[malekcap]

the rank of bounty manager doesnt matter but it depend about who is that bounty manager? is he is officialy bounty manager and he manage many bounty then he should be hight ranked and no less then full member but if he is member of the team of that ICO then its ok if his rank is copper member or jr member because they generaly open a new account and name it by the name of that ICO

[Ekenegbu123]

I think there are special points for the matter rank because if the account is still in the form of a beginner then I think the existing bounty or the project in my opinion is still less reliable because that's what requires a high account in a bounty menger to avoid scam and other bad things we do not want.

[Jednopivo]

Yes and No.

Yes, because a bounty manager who has climbed up the ranks, has managed a number of good bounties knows what they are doing. Trust builds. More bounty hunters will join and therefore this is good for the ICO.

No. I have, unfortunately, joined some bounties and those managing it have been highly ranked members of this forum. For whatever their reasons, they have not managed them well at all, some have even just bailed. Living off their former glory and no longer care? I'm not sure.

Best to check them out as much as possible, ask on here about a manager and you should be in good sted.