Bitcoin Forum
May 06, 2024, 06:24:51 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 [45] 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 ... 2557 »
  Print  
Author Topic: NXT :: descendant of Bitcoin - Updated Information  (Read 2761529 times)
Sharky444
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 724
Merit: 500


View Profile
November 30, 2013, 07:32:44 AM
 #881

It still makes sense to sell at these low prices to make the holder base and the network stronger.

Radix - just imagine
1715019891
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715019891

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715019891
Reply with quote  #2

1715019891
Report to moderator
1715019891
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715019891

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715019891
Reply with quote  #2

1715019891
Report to moderator
1715019891
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715019891

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715019891
Reply with quote  #2

1715019891
Report to moderator
BitcoinCleanup.com: Learn why Bitcoin isn't bad for the environment
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
Come-from-Beyond
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2142
Merit: 1009

Newbie


View Profile
November 30, 2013, 07:53:30 AM
 #882

It still makes sense to sell at these low prices to make the holder base and the network stronger.

+1

But leave a few coins for urself, so u won't blame urself after other features released and price skyrockets.
Come-from-Beyond
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2142
Merit: 1009

Newbie


View Profile
November 30, 2013, 07:53:54 AM
 #883

Well, good news my VPS has been running the app with no crashes since the last update and the block number seems accurate.

The only problem, one that I haven't been able to resolve, is the blacklisting of peers. I've got 8 Active peers and 41 Blacklisted. Is there any way you can quickly implement something to periodically clear the blacklist? I've got a clock sync running on a cron-job to periodically sync the clock, this didn't help.

These are the only ports I have open: 7874, 7875, 80 (forwards to 7875) all TCP.

Stop client. Delete peers.nxt. Start client.
Come-from-Beyond
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2142
Merit: 1009

Newbie


View Profile
November 30, 2013, 07:54:36 AM
 #884

What is the difference between the windows Client and the online wallet http://88.198.210.245:7875/? Did I just need a Password to access the wallet? what is of different people use the same password (secret phrase)?

If they use the same password they will share the account. LOL

Local client is better. Online wallet is insecure.
Come-from-Beyond
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2142
Merit: 1009

Newbie


View Profile
November 30, 2013, 07:56:56 AM
 #885

Published mining and blockchain downloading source code.
inkadnb
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 126
Merit: 10


View Profile
November 30, 2013, 08:31:11 AM
 #886

Well, good news my VPS has been running the app with no crashes since the last update and the block number seems accurate.

The only problem, one that I haven't been able to resolve, is the blacklisting of peers. I've got 8 Active peers and 41 Blacklisted. Is there any way you can quickly implement something to periodically clear the blacklist? I've got a clock sync running on a cron-job to periodically sync the clock, this didn't help.

These are the only ports I have open: 7874, 7875, 80 (forwards to 7875) all TCP.

Stop client. Delete peers.nxt. Start client.

Can you not make this part of the client? I'm thinking long-term here..

Come-from-Beyond
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2142
Merit: 1009

Newbie


View Profile
November 30, 2013, 08:35:48 AM
 #887

Can you not make this part of the client? I'm thinking long-term here..

Well, in long-term blacklisting should be used. It's just a list of peers that were offline when u tried to connect to them. In a week u may decide to unblacklist them and try to connect again. I see nothing wrong with this approach.
inkadnb
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 126
Merit: 10


View Profile
November 30, 2013, 08:49:50 AM
 #888

Can you not make this part of the client? I'm thinking long-term here..

Well, in long-term blacklisting should be used. It's just a list of peers that were offline when u tried to connect to them. In a week u may decide to unblacklist them and try to connect again. I see nothing wrong with this approach.

It just seems like unnecessary maintenance that could be automated. Why not traverse through the blacklist every 30 minutes or so and see if you can connect to them?

Most users aren't going to want to maintain the blacklist, and they shouldn't need to.

Come-from-Beyond
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2142
Merit: 1009

Newbie


View Profile
November 30, 2013, 09:06:20 AM
 #889

Can you not make this part of the client? I'm thinking long-term here..

Well, in long-term blacklisting should be used. It's just a list of peers that were offline when u tried to connect to them. In a week u may decide to unblacklist them and try to connect again. I see nothing wrong with this approach.

It just seems like unnecessary maintenance that could be automated. Why not traverse through the blacklist every 30 minutes or so and see if you can connect to them?

Most users aren't going to want to maintain the blacklist, and they shouldn't need to.

Maybe u r right. BCNext has his own ideas and usually they look strange. At the moment this issue is not in the high-priority list.
Come-from-Beyond
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2142
Merit: 1009

Newbie


View Profile
November 30, 2013, 09:27:16 AM
 #890

We need more bootstrapping peers, the old ones went offline. Anyone wants to become a well-known peer with blue balloon next to its address?
klee
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1498
Merit: 1000



View Profile
November 30, 2013, 09:32:04 AM
 #891

We need more bootstrapping peers, the old ones went offline. Anyone wants to become a well-known peer with blue balloon next to its address?
Sure - if you help me out!
What do we need to do?
Come-from-Beyond
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2142
Merit: 1009

Newbie


View Profile
November 30, 2013, 09:34:50 AM
 #892

We need more bootstrapping peers, the old ones went offline. Anyone wants to become a well-known peer with blue balloon next to its address?
Sure - if you help me out!
What do we need to do?

Owners of nodes that r accessible from the Internet should just PM me with their static IPs/domains.
inkadnb
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 126
Merit: 10


View Profile
November 30, 2013, 09:38:36 AM
 #893

We need more bootstrapping peers, the old ones went offline. Anyone wants to become a well-known peer with blue balloon next to its address?

Yes, nxt.c4c.io

Come-from-Beyond
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2142
Merit: 1009

Newbie


View Profile
November 30, 2013, 09:43:02 AM
 #894

We need more bootstrapping peers, the old ones went offline. Anyone wants to become a well-known peer with blue balloon next to its address?

Yes, nxt.c4c.io

Thx.

BTW, post ur IPs here, so I don't need to resend them to BCNext.
inkadnb
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 126
Merit: 10


View Profile
November 30, 2013, 09:48:25 AM
 #895

We need more bootstrapping peers, the old ones went offline. Anyone wants to become a well-known peer with blue balloon next to its address?

Yes, nxt.c4c.io

Thx.

BTW, post ur IPs here, so I don't need to resend them to BCNext.

Do clients automatically do reverse DNS lookup before broadcast? I noticed that on other clients it doesn't show "nxt.c4c.io" on announced address.

Come-from-Beyond
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2142
Merit: 1009

Newbie


View Profile
November 30, 2013, 09:49:46 AM
 #896

Do clients automatically do reverse DNS lookup before broadcast? I noticed that on other clients it doesn't show "nxt.c4c.io" on announced address.

I don't know. Let's wait when source code of peer connection revealed. This will happen soon.
nexern
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 597
Merit: 500



View Profile
November 30, 2013, 10:18:44 AM
 #897

We need more bootstrapping peers, the old ones went offline. Anyone wants to become a well-known peer with blue balloon next to its address?
Sure - if you help me out!
What do we need to do?

Owners of nodes that r accessible from the Internet should just PM me with their static IPs/domains.

-> 87.230.14.1

question to the java pros here.
with the latest version the nulllpointerexeptions are gone which is fine.
but still having many ReadPendingException, ClosedChannelException, IOException
and stuff like this, which leads into many freezes when using the api intense.
already tested different socket libs (libcurl, native socket and even via piped wget commandline)
and different java versions (openjdk/sun) to access the api with no difference.

starting the client with bigger heap size doesn't work either.
instead adding more features to the blockchain explorer i am busy coding
workarounds for this which bothers me a little.
(the last days i wished bcnext would have coded the client in plain ansi c instead java)

the client is running on a lean debian server, so this shouldn't be the reason
but a final check could be to change the os, perhaps the *java-diva* ;-) needs
something different. any further ideas i could look into?

edit: an api-errorcode listing would be nice to.
dr_yan_yan
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 98
Merit: 10


View Profile
November 30, 2013, 10:22:27 AM
 #898

I had problems with the Blocks and such not updating when I went to the new Client version.
Tried it a couple of times etc. without any luck.

Deleted the peers list... now I have only 3 peers.
88.198.210.245      88.198.210.245      0 B      34 B      -   
146.185.168.142      146.185.168.142      0 B      18 B      -   
162.243.145.83      162.243.145.83      0 B      50 B      -   

But seems it does not connect to them.
I opened up port 7874, but still nothing. Looks like i am sending, but not receiving anything.
And no other Peers are showing up  (previously there were 15 accepted, 30 blacklisted)
Come-from-Beyond
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2142
Merit: 1009

Newbie


View Profile
November 30, 2013, 10:23:55 AM
 #899

I had problems with the Blocks and such not updating when I went to the new Client version.
Tried it a couple of times etc. without any luck.

Deleted the peers list... now I have only 3 peers.
88.198.210.245      88.198.210.245      0 B      34 B      -   
146.185.168.142      146.185.168.142      0 B      18 B      -   
162.243.145.83      162.243.145.83      0 B      50 B      -   

But seems it does not connect to them.
I opened up port 7874, but still nothing. Looks like i am sending, but not receiving anything.
And no other Peers are showing up  (previously there were 15 accepted, 30 blacklisted)

Time/timezone issue.
Come-from-Beyond
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2142
Merit: 1009

Newbie


View Profile
November 30, 2013, 10:27:17 AM
 #900

We need more bootstrapping peers, the old ones went offline. Anyone wants to become a well-known peer with blue balloon next to its address?
Sure - if you help me out!
What do we need to do?

Owners of nodes that r accessible from the Internet should just PM me with their static IPs/domains.

-> 87.230.14.1

question to the java pros here.
with the latest version the nulllpointerexeptions are gone which is fine.
but still having many ReadPendingException, ClosedChannelException, IOException
and stuff like this, which leads into many freezes when using the api intense.
already tested different socket libs (libcurl, native socket and even via piped wget commandline)
and different java versions (openjdk/sun) to access the api with no difference.

starting the client with bigger heap size doesn't work either.
instead adding more features to the blockchain explorer i am busy coding
workarounds for this which bothers me a little.
(the last days i wished bcnext would have coded the client in plain ansi c instead java)

the client is running on a lean debian server, so this shouldn't be the reason
but a final check could be to change the os, perhaps the *java-diva* ;-) needs
something different. any further ideas i could look into?

edit: an api-errorcode listing would be nice to.

BCNext gave me a new version that is supposed to fix problem related to direct buffers issue. It's a fix for peer connections only, if it works he will do the same for bots (API). I hope this will solve ur problem and no workaround will be necessary. I'm testing/profiling it now.

I had the list of codes somewhere, give me 5 mins.
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 [45] 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 ... 2557 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!