[ANN][MOON] Mooncoin: You know where it's headed! KGW exploit FIXED 4/3/2014

[coinflow]

Check the low diff at the moment: https://cryptoine.com/currency/info/MOON

Could pay off, to mine Mooncoin right now: http://mooncoin.rocks/official-pool-list
... and keep them. 

[agswinner]

@MarineCoin_MTC: Get Marinecoins on the side by merchant mining them without extra effort http://t.co/V7OBUhgB9O #bitcoin #Mooncoin

[redjedievolution]

I think this is the bottom again.

[agswinner]

https://www.coinbase.com/gifts

I Give the gift of mooncoin 

[agswinner]

http://dc-charts.com/chart_moon.php?ex=2&cu=4&sw=4&tz=6&ar=0&dl=0&sc=0&js=1&re=0

The trend is still bullish ... No reversal signal 

[coinflow]

If anyone wants to mine MOON, then the time is now. Because of the low difficulty of only 13-15 at the moment.

[redjedievolution]

wow, will moon go more down than 30?

[coinflow]

wow, will moon go more down than 30?

Then the next support-level would be 20, again. But could be still in the upward-trend then, or maybe go into sideways.  
Could be that it goes to ~26-30, if the 40-support does not hold. If you connect the lowest levels of the uptrend so far and draw it further in time, then the line would pass that range.
What do you think?

[redjedievolution]

another big sell of 500M. 30 right now

[redjedievolution]

I think it will raise again when this big holder finishes with his periodic 500M sells

wow, will moon go more down than 30?

Then the next support-level would be 20, again. But could be still in the upward-trend then, or maybe go into sideways.  
Could be that it goes to ~26-30, if the 40-support does not hold. If you connect the lowest levels of the uptrend so far and draw it further in time, then the line would pass that range.
What do you think?

[agswinner]

Now on dinamic and static level support
http://dc-charts.com/chart_moon.php?ex=2&cu=4&sw=4&tz=6&ar=0&dl=2&sc=0&js=1&re=0

[agswinner]

I think I will not find these prices Monday, when will buy everything

[obivion6]

I think I will not find these prices Monday, when will buy everything

PAYDAY!!!!!!! lol

[redjedievolution]

You can't Andrea
  Someone is buying  

[agswinner]

  @MooncoinItalia: https://t.co/mQ6ygme5P4 @KitCoinH

[agswinner]

Goldrake 

[Last Call]

I know this is an older post but this seems very odd.  A majority of the larger block rewards are going to this address and orphans of these larger block rewards are showing up in the bitember pool.  The block explorer is showing these orphans going to 2QgWwFic9H45Waeac7Gr4iveRp8UUuPAy8.  When I try to search this address on the moonchain.net the block explorer just hangs.  Long Live Moon     

coinflow if i put this addres 2QgWwFic9H45Waeac7Gr4iveRp8UUuPAy8 into moonchain.net it breaks

try it....

Can we know how much mooncoins has this address?? We could imagine the dump when cryptsy moonwallet gets back

[coinflow]

I know this is an older post but this seems very odd.  A majority of the larger block rewards are going to this address and orphans of these larger block rewards are showing up in the bitember pool.  The block explorer is showing these orphans going to 2QgWwFic9H45Waeac7Gr4iveRp8UUuPAy8.  When I try to search this address on the moonchain.net the block explorer just hangs.  Long Live Moon    

coinflow if i put this addres 2QgWwFic9H45Waeac7Gr4iveRp8UUuPAy8 into moonchain.net it breaks

try it....

Can we know how much mooncoins has this address?? We could imagine the dump when cryptsy moonwallet gets back

This is the problematic address, that belongs to a miner, who is cheating with a script, mining only the big rewarded blocks, by tuning in with big hashing power only for those. This is the reason, why we need to make the change to static/fixed block rewards. At the moment Mooncoin still has a random reward-scheme.

moonchain.net can display ALL transactions of addresses, but it nearly takes forever for addresses with so many single transactions. Probably the power of the server should be upgraded.
You can check here, as an alternative, but it only shows the last 1000 transactions (which is standard for a normal ABE-installation, too): http://www.multifaucet.tk/index.php?blockexplorer=MOON&address=2QgWwFic9H45Waeac7Gr4iveRp8UUuPAy8
Hence it doesn't put such a heavy load on the server, like showing all of the ~198000 tx's of that address, as moonchain.net tries to do.

[obivion6]

I know this is an older post but this seems very odd.  A majority of the larger block rewards are going to this address and orphans of these larger block rewards are showing up in the bitember pool.  The block explorer is showing these orphans going to 2QgWwFic9H45Waeac7Gr4iveRp8UUuPAy8.  When I try to search this address on the moonchain.net the block explorer just hangs.  Long Live Moon    

coinflow if i put this addres 2QgWwFic9H45Waeac7Gr4iveRp8UUuPAy8 into moonchain.net it breaks

try it....

Can we know how much mooncoins has this address?? We could imagine the dump when cryptsy moonwallet gets back

This is the problematic address, that belongs to a miner, who is cheating with a script, mining only the big rewarded blocks, by tuning in with big hashing power only for those. This is the reason, why we need to make the change to static/fixed block rewards. At the moment Mooncoin still has a random reward-scheme.

moonchain.net can display ALL transactions of addresses, but it nearly takes forever for addresses with so many single transactions. Probably the power of the server should be upgraded.
You can check here, as an alternative, but it only shows the last 1000 transactions (which is standard for a normal ABE-installation, too): http://www.multifaucet.tk/index.php?blockexplorer=MOON&address=2QgWwFic9H45Waeac7Gr4iveRp8UUuPAy8
Hence it doesn't put such a heavy load on the server, like showing all of the ~198000 tx's of that address, as moonchain.net tries to do.

where is Peme with the new wallet??? i thought this was fixed??

[peme]

It has come to my attention, that I have posted some possibly dangerous config-settings (link to your posting) previously.
It originally showed the line server=1 without explaining, that if you use this setting, you must secure your system by using rpcuser=username and rpcpassword=verysecurepassward also. Furthermore you should use rpcallowip, in order to only grant wallet-access via the RPC-interface to certain IP-addresses (e.g.: rpcallowip=127.0.0.1 to only allow access from the same computer). If you don't know what this is all about, the best advice is, to simply delete all lines in the mooncoin.conf other than addnode=xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx.

I have now removed the possibly dangerous lines (since they are absolutely not necessary for a standard-installation) and will search for other postings here in this thread, that also show this possible dangerous setting (I have found one already). I'll try to contact the authors to remove that, too.

Please check, if you have the possibly dangerous setting in your mooncoin.conf, too (maybe by simply copying and pasting it) and change that.
You can find mooncoin.conf at C:\Users\YourUsername\AppData\Roaming\Mooncoin

As this is critical, please do check that as soon as possible, because it has also come to my attention, that this possible vulnerability in the settings is already being exploited - with the result of coins being transferred out of your wallet and no chance to get them back.

If you did not change your installation manually and/or don't see the file mooncoin.conf in your Mooncoin-folder, then this does not apply to you. Only installations with added mooncoin.conf, including "server=1" and the missing - but necessary - credentials to secure the wallet from unrestricted external access, are affected.

If you have questions regarding this, please post them. I'll answer as soon as possible.

Please keep in mind, that this is no problem with the wallet as such. It originates from a dangerous setting in a manually added config-file to the standard-installation.