jakiman
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 1638
Merit: 1011
jakiman is back!
|
 |
March 30, 2014, 08:21:37 AM
Last edit: March 30, 2014, 08:36:38 AM by jakiman |
|
PM Sent.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"This isn't the kind of software where we can leave so many unresolved bugs that we need a tracker for them." -- Satoshi
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
chango
|
|
March 30, 2014, 09:35:16 AM |
|
Does the miner now supports 5850 cards  ?? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
reb0rn21
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1898
Merit: 1024
|
|
March 31, 2014, 10:03:30 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
suchmoon
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8922
https://bpip.org
|
|
April 01, 2014, 01:10:51 AM |
|
Every time I consider switching to mining something else you come up with a faster version. Keep it up  |
|
|
|
|
pdaddy
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 50
Merit: 0
|
|
April 01, 2014, 06:29:48 AM |
|
Thx, went from 14.3 to 18.7 Mh/s on my 7950.  |
|
|
|
|
Xperianz
Member
Offline
Activity: 111
Merit: 10
|
|
April 01, 2014, 07:00:02 AM |
|
Does the miner now supports 5850 cards ?? yes but it's very slow on 5850, just above 4 Mh/s |
|
|
|
|
FoscoBurrows
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 3
Merit: 0
|
|
April 01, 2014, 02:29:57 PM |
|
Anybody getting more than 18.36 Mh/s out of a 280X? I've got two Asus Direct CUII TOPs, currently running these settings:
-g 1
--xintensity 105
-w 256
--gpu-powertune -20
--gpu-engine 1150
--gpu-memclock 1600
|
|
|
|
|
|
reorder
|
|
April 01, 2014, 02:31:58 PM |
|
Anybody getting more than 18.36 Mh/s out of a 280X? I've got two Asus Direct CUII TOPs, currently running these settings:
-g 1
--xintensity 105
-w 256
--gpu-powertune -20
--gpu-engine 1150
--gpu-memclock 1600
I'd suggest '-w 64' (register pressure is high with this kernel) |
|
|
|
|
FoscoBurrows
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 3
Merit: 0
|
|
April 01, 2014, 02:41:02 PM |
|
Sweet baby Jesus... -w 64 took them up to 21.1 Mh/s!
reorder, you're the man! Thanks for the tip and keep up the awesome work!
|
|
|
|
|
Starlightbreaker
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1006
|
|
April 01, 2014, 03:02:59 PM
Last edit: September 17, 2016, 06:41:43 PM by Starlightbreaker |
|
Anybody getting more than 18.36 Mh/s out of a 280X? I've got two Asus Direct CUII TOPs, currently running these settings:
-g 1
--xintensity 105
-w 256
--gpu-powertune -20
--gpu-engine 1150
--gpu-memclock 1600
19.5 mh/s -g 6 -i 6 @ 1100/1200 |
|
|
|
|
Junkey
|
|
April 01, 2014, 03:37:50 PM |
|
Should I be using the -p VIP feature? I have a 7970 and 7770. Mining HeavyCoin.
|
|
|
|
|
|
reorder
|
|
April 01, 2014, 03:39:18 PM |
|
Should I be using the -p VIP feature? I have a 7970 and 7770. Mining HeavyCoin.
Probably yes, especially if you run them together. |
|
|
|
|
|
Junkey
|
|
April 01, 2014, 03:47:09 PM |
|
Should I be using the -p VIP feature? I have a 7970 and 7770. Mining HeavyCoin.
Probably yes, especially if you run them together. Yes I do, in the same rig. Will change it once I get home. Thanks for the fast response. |
|
|
|
|
|
chango
|
|
April 01, 2014, 05:04:21 PM |
|
Anybody getting more than 18.36 Mh/s out of a 280X? I've got two Asus Direct CUII TOPs, currently running these settings:
-g 1
--xintensity 105
-w 256
--gpu-powertune -20
--gpu-engine 1150
--gpu-memclock 1600
I'd suggest '-w 64' (register pressure is high with this kernel) Hi, until now I follow other peoples advice and put random numbers and testing the best results, what is the reason to set -w 64, what does it mean "register pressure is high with this kernel"? |
|
|
|
|
|
reorder
|
|
April 01, 2014, 05:16:10 PM |
|
Anybody getting more than 18.36 Mh/s out of a 280X? I've got two Asus Direct CUII TOPs, currently running these settings:
-g 1
--xintensity 105
-w 256
--gpu-powertune -20
--gpu-engine 1150
--gpu-memclock 1600
I'd suggest '-w 64' (register pressure is high with this kernel) Hi, until now I follow other peoples advice and put random numbers and testing the best results, what is the reason to set -w 64, what does it mean "register pressure is high with this kernel"? A thorough explanation would require quite a lot of introduction, let me just say that the opencl kernel uses too many registers and that makes -w 64 setting optimal for AMD (at least on GCN and with modern enough Catalyst, 13.11 and newer). |
|
|
|
|
|
chango
|
|
April 01, 2014, 06:36:24 PM |
|
Anybody getting more than 18.36 Mh/s out of a 280X? I've got two Asus Direct CUII TOPs, currently running these settings:
-g 1
--xintensity 105
-w 256
--gpu-powertune -20
--gpu-engine 1150
--gpu-memclock 1600
I'd suggest '-w 64' (register pressure is high with this kernel) Hi, until now I follow other peoples advice and put random numbers and testing the best results, what is the reason to set -w 64, what does it mean "register pressure is high with this kernel"? A thorough explanation would require quite a lot of introduction, let me just say that the opencl kernel uses too many registers and that makes -w 64 setting optimal for AMD (at least on GCN and with modern enough Catalyst, 13.11 and newer). Ok, this doesn't explain much :p. Anyway I don't wan't to make you to waste much time, but I am quite interested in learn how this thing works, seems to be quite profitable  . Do you have any good opencl book to recommend or should I just try to follow the docs ? Thanks! |
|
|
|
|
|
reorder
|
|
April 01, 2014, 06:43:27 PM |
|
Anybody getting more than 18.36 Mh/s out of a 280X? I've got two Asus Direct CUII TOPs, currently running these settings:
-g 1
--xintensity 105
-w 256
--gpu-powertune -20
--gpu-engine 1150
--gpu-memclock 1600
I'd suggest '-w 64' (register pressure is high with this kernel) Hi, until now I follow other peoples advice and put random numbers and testing the best results, what is the reason to set -w 64, what does it mean "register pressure is high with this kernel"? A thorough explanation would require quite a lot of introduction, let me just say that the opencl kernel uses too many registers and that makes -w 64 setting optimal for AMD (at least on GCN and with modern enough Catalyst, 13.11 and newer). Ok, this doesn't explain much :p. Anyway I don't wan't to make you to waste much time, but I am quite interested in learn how this thing works, seems to be quite profitable . Do you have any good opencl book to recommend or should I just try to follow the docs ? Thanks! AMD OpenCL reference, especially its chapters about optimization and hardware reference appendix is surprisingly good (given the quality of compiler itself and its support). Other than that, maybe just google and AMD support forums may be of value. |
|
|
|
|
Chello
Member
Offline
Activity: 64
Merit: 10
|
|
April 01, 2014, 10:16:43 PM |
|
GPU 0 57,0C 2420RPM | 20,13M/20,1Mh/s | A:126 R:0 HW:0 U: 1,02/m I:0
GPU 1 52,0C 1995RPM | 20,13M/20,1Mh/s | A:122 R:0 HW:0 U: 0,99/m I:0 with: "api-allow" : "W:127.0.0.1,W:192.168.0.247",
"api-listen" : true,
"api-mcast-port" : "4028",
"api-port" : "4028",
"gpu-engine" : "1100",
"gpu-memclock" : "900",
"gpu-memdiff" : "0",
"gpu-powertune" : "20",
"gpu-threads" : "1",
"gpu-vddc" : "0.000",
"no-submit-stale" : true,
"temp-target" : "72",
"temp-overheat" : "85",
"temp-cutoff" : "90",
"temp-hysteresis" : "3",
"xintensity" : "7",
"worksize" : "64"
here |
|
|
|
|
|
SpeedDemon13
|
|
April 02, 2014, 07:01:52 AM |
|
Will there be a HVC miner optimization for non-GCN cards, ie. HD 5850, 5870, 6950, 6970, etc? They run slow, barely 4 to 4.5 mhs.
Any plan to optimize the PTS miner?
|
CRYPTSY exchange: https://www.cryptsy.com/users/register?refid=9017 BURST= BURST-TE3W-CFGH-7343-6VM6R BTC=1CNsqGUR9YJNrhydQZnUPbaDv6h4uaYCHv ETH=0x144bc9fe471d3c71d8e09d58060d78661b1d4f32 SHF=0x13a0a2cb0d55eca975cf2d97015f7d580ce52d85 EXP=0xd71921dca837e415a58ca0d6dd2223cc84e0ea2f SC=6bdf9d12a983fed6723abad91a39be4f95d227f9bdb0490de3b8e5d45357f63d564638b1bd71 CLAMS=xGVTdM9EJpNBCYAjHFVxuZGcqvoL22nP6f SOIL=0x8b5c989bc931c0769a50ecaf9ffe490c67cb5911 |
|
|
|
