[ANN] 1GH.COM - HVC / MAX / MMC / PTS / VIA Anonymous Pool ★

[jakiman]

PM Sent.

[chango]

Does the miner now supports 5850 cards  ??

[reorder]

Heavycoin GPU miner updated on http://hvc.1gh.com, hashrate is improved, please upgrade.

[reb0rn21]

Heavycoin GPU miner updated on http://hvc.1gh.com, hashrate is improved, please upgrade.

Tnx for hard work

[suchmoon]

Heavycoin GPU miner updated on http://hvc.1gh.com, hashrate is improved, please upgrade.

Every time I consider switching to mining something else you come up with a faster version. Keep it up

[pdaddy]

Heavycoin GPU miner updated on http://hvc.1gh.com, hashrate is improved, please upgrade.

Thx, went from 14.3 to 18.7 Mh/s on my 7950. 

[Xperianz]

Does the miner now supports 5850 cards  ??

yes but it's very slow on 5850, just above 4 Mh/s

[FoscoBurrows]

Anybody getting more than 18.36 Mh/s out of a 280X? I've got two Asus Direct CUII TOPs, currently running these settings:

-g 1
--xintensity 105
-w 256
--gpu-powertune -20
--gpu-engine 1150
--gpu-memclock 1600

[reorder]

Anybody getting more than 18.36 Mh/s out of a 280X? I've got two Asus Direct CUII TOPs, currently running these settings:

-g 1
--xintensity 105
-w 256
--gpu-powertune -20
--gpu-engine 1150
--gpu-memclock 1600

I'd suggest '-w 64' (register pressure is high with this kernel)

[FoscoBurrows]

Sweet baby Jesus... -w 64 took them up to 21.1 Mh/s!

reorder, you're the man! Thanks for the tip and keep up the awesome work!

[Starlightbreaker]

Anybody getting more than 18.36 Mh/s out of a 280X? I've got two Asus Direct CUII TOPs, currently running these settings:

-g 1
--xintensity 105
-w 256
--gpu-powertune -20
--gpu-engine 1150
--gpu-memclock 1600

19.5 mh/s

-g 6 -i 6 @ 1100/1200                                                                                                                                                                                                                               

[Junkey]

Should I be using the -p VIP feature?  I have a 7970 and 7770.  Mining HeavyCoin.

[reorder]

Should I be using the -p VIP feature?  I have a 7970 and 7770.  Mining HeavyCoin.

Probably yes, especially if you run them together.

[Junkey]

Should I be using the -p VIP feature?  I have a 7970 and 7770.  Mining HeavyCoin.

Probably yes, especially if you run them together.

Yes I do, in the same rig.  Will change it once I get home.  Thanks for the fast response.

[chango]

Anybody getting more than 18.36 Mh/s out of a 280X? I've got two Asus Direct CUII TOPs, currently running these settings:

-g 1
--xintensity 105
-w 256
--gpu-powertune -20
--gpu-engine 1150
--gpu-memclock 1600

I'd suggest '-w 64' (register pressure is high with this kernel)

Hi, until now I follow other peoples advice and put random numbers and testing the best results, what is the reason to set -w 64, what does it mean "register pressure is high with this kernel"?

[reorder]

Anybody getting more than 18.36 Mh/s out of a 280X? I've got two Asus Direct CUII TOPs, currently running these settings:

-g 1
--xintensity 105
-w 256
--gpu-powertune -20
--gpu-engine 1150
--gpu-memclock 1600

I'd suggest '-w 64' (register pressure is high with this kernel)

Hi, until now I follow other peoples advice and put random numbers and testing the best results, what is the reason to set -w 64, what does it mean "register pressure is high with this kernel"?

A thorough explanation would require quite a lot of introduction, let me just say that the opencl kernel uses too many registers and that makes -w 64 setting optimal for AMD (at least on GCN and with modern enough Catalyst, 13.11 and newer).

[chango]

Anybody getting more than 18.36 Mh/s out of a 280X? I've got two Asus Direct CUII TOPs, currently running these settings:

-g 1
--xintensity 105
-w 256
--gpu-powertune -20
--gpu-engine 1150
--gpu-memclock 1600

I'd suggest '-w 64' (register pressure is high with this kernel)

Hi, until now I follow other peoples advice and put random numbers and testing the best results, what is the reason to set -w 64, what does it mean "register pressure is high with this kernel"?

A thorough explanation would require quite a lot of introduction, let me just say that the opencl kernel uses too many registers and that makes -w 64 setting optimal for AMD (at least on GCN and with modern enough Catalyst, 13.11 and newer).

Ok, this doesn't explain much :p. Anyway I don't wan't to make you to waste much time, but I am quite interested in learn how this thing works, seems to be quite profitable . Do you have any good opencl book to recommend or should I just try to follow the docs ?

Thanks!

[reorder]

Anybody getting more than 18.36 Mh/s out of a 280X? I've got two Asus Direct CUII TOPs, currently running these settings:

-g 1
--xintensity 105
-w 256
--gpu-powertune -20
--gpu-engine 1150
--gpu-memclock 1600

I'd suggest '-w 64' (register pressure is high with this kernel)

Hi, until now I follow other peoples advice and put random numbers and testing the best results, what is the reason to set -w 64, what does it mean "register pressure is high with this kernel"?

A thorough explanation would require quite a lot of introduction, let me just say that the opencl kernel uses too many registers and that makes -w 64 setting optimal for AMD (at least on GCN and with modern enough Catalyst, 13.11 and newer).

Ok, this doesn't explain much :p. Anyway I don't wan't to make you to waste much time, but I am quite interested in learn how this thing works, seems to be quite profitable . Do you have any good opencl book to recommend or should I just try to follow the docs ?

Thanks!

AMD OpenCL reference, especially its chapters about optimization and hardware reference appendix is surprisingly good (given the quality of compiler itself and its support). Other than that, maybe just google and AMD support forums may be of value.

[Chello]

GPU 0  57,0C 2420RPM | 20,13M/20,1Mh/s | A:126 R:0 HW:0 U: 1,02/m I:0
GPU 1  52,0C 1995RPM | 20,13M/20,1Mh/s | A:122 R:0 HW:0 U: 0,99/m I:0

with:

"api-allow" : "W:127.0.0.1,W:192.168.0.247",
"api-listen" : true,
"api-mcast-port" : "4028",
"api-port" : "4028",
"gpu-engine" : "1100",
"gpu-memclock" : "900",
"gpu-memdiff" : "0",
"gpu-powertune" : "20",
"gpu-threads" : "1",
"gpu-vddc" : "0.000",
"no-submit-stale" : true,
"temp-target" : "72",
"temp-overheat" : "85",
"temp-cutoff" : "90",
"temp-hysteresis" : "3",
"xintensity" : "7",
"worksize" : "64"

here

[SpeedDemon13]

Will there be a HVC miner optimization for non-GCN cards, ie. HD 5850, 5870, 6950, 6970, etc? They run slow, barely 4 to 4.5 mhs.

Any plan to optimize the PTS miner?