ustcstone
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 49
Merit: 0
|
|
August 04, 2014, 01:13:05 PM Last edit: August 04, 2014, 01:27:26 PM by ustcstone |
|
[2014-08-04 11:11:45] thread 16: 3179920 hashes, 52.98 khash/s [2014-08-04 11:11:45] thread 29: 3179943 hashes, 52.98 khash/s [2014-08-04 11:11:45] thread 21: 3178083 hashes, 52.94 khash/s [2014-08-04 11:11:45] thread 26: 3182991 hashes, 53.03 khash/s [2014-08-04 11:11:45] thread 28: 3184239 hashes, 53.04 khash/s [2014-08-04 11:11:45] thread 0: 3180678 hashes, 52.98 khash/s [2014-08-04 11:11:45] thread 8: 3185592 hashes, 53.05 khash/s [2014-08-04 11:11:45] thread 7: 3176664 hashes, 52.90 khash/s [2014-08-04 11:11:45] thread 6: 3180061 hashes, 52.96 khash/s [2014-08-04 11:11:45] thread 23: 3178024 hashes, 52.91 khash/s [2014-08-04 11:11:45] thread 14: 3179769 hashes, 52.93 khash/s [2014-08-04 11:11:45] thread 30: 3179639 hashes, 52.92 khash/s [2014-08-04 11:11:49] thread 31: 3179764 hashes, 53.03 khash/s [2014-08-04 11:11:52] thread 27: 3177642 hashes, 53.00 khash/s [2014-08-04 11:11:58] thread 2: 3178923 hashes, 53.03 khash/s [2014-08-04 11:12:04] thread 4: 3175476 hashes, 52.93 khash/s [2014-08-04 11:12:09] thread 3: 1297180 hashes, 52.95 khash/s [2014-08-04 11:12:09] accepted: 63/67 (94.03%), 1696 khash/s (yay!!!) [2014-08-04 11:12:10] thread 5: 3175717 hashes, 52.94 khash/s
But when I mine with one server - all ok. This means your vardiff value has hiked too high. Please append unique suffixes to your workers usernames/addresses, for example, 'WALLET.SERVER1', 'WALLET.SERVER2' and so on so that they get a better vardiff each. Your displayed statistics will still be combined over all workers this way. it's working!thank you very much
|
|
|
|
cubydu
|
|
August 04, 2014, 05:37:03 PM |
|
too much booo [2014-08-04 17:36:10] thread 15: 270890 hashes, 53.32 khash/s [2014-08-04 17:36:10] accepted: 1321/1435 (92.06%), 1705 khash/s (booooo) [2014-08-04 17:36:10] thread 27: 287312 hashes, 53.32 khash/s [2014-08-04 17:36:10] accepted: 1321/1436 (91.99%), 1705 khash/s (booooo) [2014-08-04 17:36:10] thread 29: 295578 hashes, 53.19 khash/s [2014-08-04 17:36:10] accepted: 1321/1437 (91.93%), 1705 khash/s (booooo) [2014-08-04 17:36:12] thread 7: 391266 hashes, 53.21 khash/s [2014-08-04 17:36:12] accepted: 1321/1438 (91.86%), 1705 khash/s (booooo) [2014-08-04 17:36:13] thread 25: 432171 hashes, 53.32 khash/s [2014-08-04 17:36:13] accepted: 1321/1439 (91.80%), 1705 khash/s (booooo) [2014-08-04 17:36:13] thread 30: 435857 hashes, 53.22 khash/s [2014-08-04 17:36:13] accepted: 1321/1440 (91.74%), 1705 khash/s (booooo) [2014-08-04 17:36:13] thread 0: 451181 hashes, 53.28 khash/s [2014-08-04 17:36:13] accepted: 1321/1441 (91.67%), 1705 khash/s (booooo) [2014-08-04 17:36:14] thread 19: 474800 hashes, 53.31 khash/s [2014-08-04 17:36:14] accepted: 1321/1442 (91.61%), 1705 khash/s (booooo) [2014-08-04 17:36:14] thread 9: 482600 hashes, 53.35 khash/s [2014-08-04 17:36:14] accepted: 1321/1443 (91.55%), 1705 khash/s (booooo)
|
|
|
|
cubex
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 50
Merit: 0
|
|
August 04, 2014, 06:22:11 PM |
|
It does not match. Single CPU on dedicated address makes 340 khash in minerd, never shown more than 290 in pool (that is maximum), average hashrate @pool is around 250 khash. Boooo vs Yay is that Boooo-s are 7,8% We have started a server stratum+tcp://xcnpool-apac.1gh.com:7333 now, would you please kindly let me know if this one shows better results for you. can't connect to the server [2014-08-04 09:03:57] Stratum connection failed: Resolving timed out after 30539 milliseconds [2014-08-04 09:03:57] ...retry after 5 seconds I have just rechecked: [2014-08-04 05:06:58] Starting Stratum on stratum+tcp://xcnpool-apac.1gh.com:7333 [2014-08-04 05:06:58] 4 miner threads started, using 'm7' algorithm. [2014-08-04 05:07:08] thread 1: 262144 hashes, 30.36 khash/s It also only makes sense to use this server if you have better ping to it than to xcnpool.1gh.com I got similar error. [2014-08-05 02:20:07] 2 miner threads started, using 'm7' algorithm. [2014-08-05 02:20:07] Starting Stratum on stratum+tcp://xcnpool-apac.1gh.com:7333 [2014-08-05 02:20:07] Binding thread 1 to cpu 1 [2014-08-05 02:20:07] Binding thread 0 to cpu 0 [2014-08-05 02:20:28] Stratum connection failed: Failed to connect to xcnpool-apac.1gh.com port 7333: Timed out [2014-08-05 02:20:28] ...retry after 30 seconds
|
|
|
|
reorder
|
|
August 04, 2014, 06:27:48 PM |
|
It does not match. Single CPU on dedicated address makes 340 khash in minerd, never shown more than 290 in pool (that is maximum), average hashrate @pool is around 250 khash. Boooo vs Yay is that Boooo-s are 7,8% We have started a server stratum+tcp://xcnpool-apac.1gh.com:7333 now, would you please kindly let me know if this one shows better results for you. can't connect to the server [2014-08-04 09:03:57] Stratum connection failed: Resolving timed out after 30539 milliseconds [2014-08-04 09:03:57] ...retry after 5 seconds I have just rechecked: [2014-08-04 05:06:58] Starting Stratum on stratum+tcp://xcnpool-apac.1gh.com:7333 [2014-08-04 05:06:58] 4 miner threads started, using 'm7' algorithm. [2014-08-04 05:07:08] thread 1: 262144 hashes, 30.36 khash/s It also only makes sense to use this server if you have better ping to it than to xcnpool.1gh.com I got similar error. [2014-08-05 02:20:07] 2 miner threads started, using 'm7' algorithm. [2014-08-05 02:20:07] Starting Stratum on stratum+tcp://xcnpool-apac.1gh.com:7333 [2014-08-05 02:20:07] Binding thread 1 to cpu 1 [2014-08-05 02:20:07] Binding thread 0 to cpu 0 [2014-08-05 02:20:28] Stratum connection failed: Failed to connect to xcnpool-apac.1gh.com port 7333: Timed out [2014-08-05 02:20:28] ...retry after 30 seconds Would you please try now?
|
|
|
|
cubex
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 50
Merit: 0
|
|
August 04, 2014, 06:33:30 PM |
|
It does not match. Single CPU on dedicated address makes 340 khash in minerd, never shown more than 290 in pool (that is maximum), average hashrate @pool is around 250 khash. Boooo vs Yay is that Boooo-s are 7,8% We have started a server stratum+tcp://xcnpool-apac.1gh.com:7333 now, would you please kindly let me know if this one shows better results for you. can't connect to the server [2014-08-04 09:03:57] Stratum connection failed: Resolving timed out after 30539 milliseconds [2014-08-04 09:03:57] ...retry after 5 seconds I have just rechecked: [2014-08-04 05:06:58] Starting Stratum on stratum+tcp://xcnpool-apac.1gh.com:7333 [2014-08-04 05:06:58] 4 miner threads started, using 'm7' algorithm. [2014-08-04 05:07:08] thread 1: 262144 hashes, 30.36 khash/s It also only makes sense to use this server if you have better ping to it than to xcnpool.1gh.com I got similar error. [2014-08-05 02:20:07] 2 miner threads started, using 'm7' algorithm. [2014-08-05 02:20:07] Starting Stratum on stratum+tcp://xcnpool-apac.1gh.com:7333 [2014-08-05 02:20:07] Binding thread 1 to cpu 1 [2014-08-05 02:20:07] Binding thread 0 to cpu 0 [2014-08-05 02:20:28] Stratum connection failed: Failed to connect to xcnpool-apac.1gh.com port 7333: Timed out [2014-08-05 02:20:28] ...retry after 30 seconds Would you please try now? It works! Thanks!
|
|
|
|
PeaMine
|
|
August 04, 2014, 07:03:25 PM Last edit: August 04, 2014, 07:56:49 PM by PeaMine |
|
Thanks for the pool only one working right now. However I'm only getting 65% of my hashrate on the pool, accounting for bad shares as well(9%). This 250KH is max on the pool I've seen, dips down to 220 at times. Miner is showing 422KH +-15KH. This is over the past hour, and is just 1 computer. Edit: Also is there a way to set a custom difficulty ? [2014-08-04 19:05:07] accepted: 591/640 (92.34%), 427.29 khash/s (yay!!!) [2014-08-04 19:05:10] thread 6: 117584 hashes, 53.48 khash/s [2014-08-04 19:05:10] accepted: 592/641 (92.36%), 427.32 khash/s (yay!!!) [2014-08-04 19:05:12] thread 2: 259656 hashes, 53.48 khash/s [2014-08-04 19:05:12] accepted: 593/642 (92.37%), 427.33 khash/s (yay!!!) [2014-08-04 19:05:12] thread 2: 46541 hashes, 53.48 khash/s [2014-08-04 19:05:13] accepted: 594/643 (92.38%), 427.33 khash/s (yay!!!) [2014-08-04 19:05:13] thread 0: 345698 hashes, 52.49 khash/s [2014-08-04 19:05:13] accepted: 595/644 (92.39%), 427.07 khash/s (yay!!!) [2014-08-04 19:05:17] thread 6: 397927 hashes, 53.47 khash/s [2014-08-04 19:05:17] accepted: 596/645 (92.40%), 427.05 khash/s (yay!!!) [2014-08-04 19:05:17] thread 0: 214610 hashes, 52.76 khash/s [2014-08-04 19:05:17] accepted: 597/646 (92.41%), 427.32 khash/s (yay!!!) [2014-08-04 19:05:22] thread 1: 791102 hashes, 53.55 khash/s [2014-08-04 19:05:22] accepted: 598/647 (92.43%), 427.31 khash/s (yay!!!)
|
Datacenter Technician and Electrician. If you have any questions feel free to ask me as I am generally bored looking at logs and happy to help during free time.
|
|
|
reorder
|
|
August 04, 2014, 08:43:49 PM |
|
Thanks for the pool only one working right now. However I'm only getting 65% of my hashrate on the pool, accounting for bad shares as well(9%). This 250KH is max on the pool I've seen, dips down to 220 at times. Miner is showing 422KH +-15KH. This is over the past hour, and is just 1 computer. Edit: Also is there a way to set a custom difficulty ? [2014-08-04 19:05:07] accepted: 591/640 (92.34%), 427.29 khash/s (yay!!!) [2014-08-04 19:05:10] thread 6: 117584 hashes, 53.48 khash/s [2014-08-04 19:05:10] accepted: 592/641 (92.36%), 427.32 khash/s (yay!!!) [2014-08-04 19:05:12] thread 2: 259656 hashes, 53.48 khash/s [2014-08-04 19:05:12] accepted: 593/642 (92.37%), 427.33 khash/s (yay!!!) [2014-08-04 19:05:12] thread 2: 46541 hashes, 53.48 khash/s [2014-08-04 19:05:13] accepted: 594/643 (92.38%), 427.33 khash/s (yay!!!) [2014-08-04 19:05:13] thread 0: 345698 hashes, 52.49 khash/s [2014-08-04 19:05:13] accepted: 595/644 (92.39%), 427.07 khash/s (yay!!!) [2014-08-04 19:05:17] thread 6: 397927 hashes, 53.47 khash/s [2014-08-04 19:05:17] accepted: 596/645 (92.40%), 427.05 khash/s (yay!!!) [2014-08-04 19:05:17] thread 0: 214610 hashes, 52.76 khash/s [2014-08-04 19:05:17] accepted: 597/646 (92.41%), 427.32 khash/s (yay!!!) [2014-08-04 19:05:22] thread 1: 791102 hashes, 53.55 khash/s [2014-08-04 19:05:22] accepted: 598/647 (92.43%), 427.31 khash/s (yay!!!) Please tell if this has improved now.
|
|
|
|
wayla
Member
Offline
Activity: 71
Merit: 10
Wayla is sometimes a man!
|
|
August 04, 2014, 11:37:41 PM |
|
Thanks for the pool only one working right now. However I'm only getting 65% of my hashrate on the pool, accounting for bad shares as well(9%). This 250KH is max on the pool I've seen, dips down to 220 at times. Miner is showing 422KH +-15KH. This is over the past hour, and is just 1 computer. Edit: Also is there a way to set a custom difficulty ? [2014-08-04 19:05:07] accepted: 591/640 (92.34%), 427.29 khash/s (yay!!!) [2014-08-04 19:05:10] thread 6: 117584 hashes, 53.48 khash/s [2014-08-04 19:05:10] accepted: 592/641 (92.36%), 427.32 khash/s (yay!!!) [2014-08-04 19:05:12] thread 2: 259656 hashes, 53.48 khash/s [2014-08-04 19:05:12] accepted: 593/642 (92.37%), 427.33 khash/s (yay!!!) [2014-08-04 19:05:12] thread 2: 46541 hashes, 53.48 khash/s [2014-08-04 19:05:13] accepted: 594/643 (92.38%), 427.33 khash/s (yay!!!) [2014-08-04 19:05:13] thread 0: 345698 hashes, 52.49 khash/s [2014-08-04 19:05:13] accepted: 595/644 (92.39%), 427.07 khash/s (yay!!!) [2014-08-04 19:05:17] thread 6: 397927 hashes, 53.47 khash/s [2014-08-04 19:05:17] accepted: 596/645 (92.40%), 427.05 khash/s (yay!!!) [2014-08-04 19:05:17] thread 0: 214610 hashes, 52.76 khash/s [2014-08-04 19:05:17] accepted: 597/646 (92.41%), 427.32 khash/s (yay!!!) [2014-08-04 19:05:22] thread 1: 791102 hashes, 53.55 khash/s [2014-08-04 19:05:22] accepted: 598/647 (92.43%), 427.31 khash/s (yay!!!) Please tell if this has improved now. yes ,improved.
|
And sometimes a woMAN.................
|
|
|
PeaMine
|
|
August 05, 2014, 12:49:49 AM Last edit: August 05, 2014, 01:10:16 AM by PeaMine |
|
Has improved, getting 84% of expected hash rate, accounting for bad shares(which are now only 4-5%) [2014-08-05 00:48:41] accepted: 905/944 (95.87%), 425.24 khash/s (yay!!!) Edit: 88%~ currently, so things are improving.
|
Datacenter Technician and Electrician. If you have any questions feel free to ask me as I am generally bored looking at logs and happy to help during free time.
|
|
|
Yanakitu Tenatako
|
|
August 05, 2014, 02:21:41 AM |
|
Pinging xcnpool.1gh.com [142.4.218.34] with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 142.4.218.34: bytes=32 time=161ms TTL=50 Reply from 142.4.218.34: bytes=32 time=148ms TTL=50 Reply from 142.4.218.34: bytes=32 time=159ms TTL=50 Reply from 142.4.218.34: bytes=32 time=155ms TTL=50
Ping statistics for 142.4.218.34: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 148ms, Maximum = 161ms, Average = 155ms
We have now tuned servers to request a lot more shares of lower diff, to reduce stales. Please tell if it has helped. Latest changes = improvements. Will observe more.
|
|
|
|
cubex
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 50
Merit: 0
|
|
August 05, 2014, 07:18:13 PM |
|
It does not match. Single CPU on dedicated address makes 340 khash in minerd, never shown more than 290 in pool (that is maximum), average hashrate @pool is around 250 khash. Boooo vs Yay is that Boooo-s are 7,8% We have started a server stratum+tcp://xcnpool-apac.1gh.com:7333 now, would you please kindly let me know if this one shows better results for you. can't connect to the server [2014-08-04 09:03:57] Stratum connection failed: Resolving timed out after 30539 milliseconds [2014-08-04 09:03:57] ...retry after 5 seconds I have just rechecked: [2014-08-04 05:06:58] Starting Stratum on stratum+tcp://xcnpool-apac.1gh.com:7333 [2014-08-04 05:06:58] 4 miner threads started, using 'm7' algorithm. [2014-08-04 05:07:08] thread 1: 262144 hashes, 30.36 khash/s It also only makes sense to use this server if you have better ping to it than to xcnpool.1gh.com I got similar error. [2014-08-05 02:20:07] 2 miner threads started, using 'm7' algorithm. [2014-08-05 02:20:07] Starting Stratum on stratum+tcp://xcnpool-apac.1gh.com:7333 [2014-08-05 02:20:07] Binding thread 1 to cpu 1 [2014-08-05 02:20:07] Binding thread 0 to cpu 0 [2014-08-05 02:20:28] Stratum connection failed: Failed to connect to xcnpool-apac.1gh.com port 7333: Timed out [2014-08-05 02:20:28] ...retry after 30 seconds Would you please try now? I just downloaded the latest Windows built 64bit minerd and it does not work. It has the same problem above. I did not try the 32bit minerd.
|
|
|
|
reorder
|
|
August 05, 2014, 07:23:16 PM |
|
I just downloaded the latest Windows built 64bit minerd and it does not work. It has the same problem above. I did not try the 32bit minerd.
Sorry, this must be now something on your side this time: there are about 1000 nodes mining on xcnpool-apac right now, tests show it is accessible too.
|
|
|
|
mmmaybe
|
|
August 05, 2014, 11:08:54 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
cubex
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 50
Merit: 0
|
|
August 06, 2014, 03:42:55 AM |
|
I just downloaded the latest Windows built 64bit minerd and it does not work. It has the same problem above. I did not try the 32bit minerd.
Sorry, this must be now something on your side this time: there are about 1000 nodes mining on xcnpool-apac right now, tests show it is accessible too. It was not working. It works now. Strange.
|
|
|
|
wyj1888
|
|
August 06, 2014, 05:01:52 AM |
|
where is the AMD GPU minner for XCN?
|
|
|
|
mmmaybe
|
|
August 06, 2014, 05:55:31 AM |
|
where is the AMD GPU minner for XCN?
None has been released publicly yet. Only for Cuda so far.
|
|
|
|
wyj1888
|
|
August 06, 2014, 06:17:04 AM |
|
where is the AMD GPU minner for XCN?
None has been released publicly yet. Only for Cuda so far. what is the speed on 750TI?
|
|
|
|
hamer-xx
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
|
|
September 09, 2014, 11:12:51 PM |
|
I just want to publicly say THANK YOU Reorder for your patience and assistance in answering all of my questions and offering good advice. If you're searching for a fast and reliable pool with excellent support - Look no further --> *** 1gh.com ***
|
|
|
|
Spoetnik
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1011
FUD Philanthropist™
|
|
September 10, 2014, 03:56:22 AM |
|
hey quick question.. did something change on pool for Max Coin ? I normally get pay-pouts of 1 coin and now i the last two were about 0.8 here is some more info.. http://max.1gh.com/user?wallet=mKDAXN66THsZsBxaXQu2aYMxbt7ZmByjbtand that is just for my Nvidia 550Ti GPU mining with a custom build of cudaminer on Win 7 x64. normally i would get 3 coins then 2 coins, then 3 then 2 and so on.. per day showing in my transaction history in the wallet. so overall i think i average out to 2.5 coins per 24 hrs using the GPU. But it seems lower now and i'm wondering why.. i think they changed the block reward on that recent update too right ? Is that why maybe ? Not sure what it was before but i think it's 16 coins per block now ? if you have any thoughts guys thanks
|
FUD first & ask questions later™
|
|
|
reorder
|
|
September 10, 2014, 07:47:25 AM |
|
On the pool, nothing that could affect your payouts has happened, must be a statistical fluc. In fact, if your balance is less than 1 coin it is queued and payed out at any moment within 24 hours as soon as your turn comes, but as soon as you reach 1 coin it is 'prioritised' and payed out within 1 hour, this probably may explain it. Maxcoin block reward is changed from 48 to 16 with the latest update, block time still being 30 seconds due to a bug: https://github.com/Max-Coin/maxcoin/issues/47. With the next update it will become 60 seconds so there will be even less Maxcoins generated. hey quick question.. did something change on pool for Max Coin ? I normally get pay-pouts of 1 coin and now i the last two were about 0.8 here is some more info.. http://max.1gh.com/user?wallet=mKDAXN66THsZsBxaXQu2aYMxbt7ZmByjbtand that is just for my Nvidia 550Ti GPU mining with a custom build of cudaminer on Win 7 x64. normally i would get 3 coins then 2 coins, then 3 then 2 and so on.. per day showing in my transaction history in the wallet. so overall i think i average out to 2.5 coins per 24 hrs using the GPU. But it seems lower now and i'm wondering why.. i think they changed the block reward on that recent update too right ? Is that why maybe ? Not sure what it was before but i think it's 16 coins per block now ? if you have any thoughts guys thanks
|
|
|
|
|