halfcab123
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 224
Merit: 100
CabTrader v2 | crypto-folio.com
|
|
January 17, 2014, 05:03:40 AM |
|
Wouldd it even be possible for this coin to get those kind of returns like Mastercoin. I was under the impression it wouldn't be
|
DayTrade with less exposure to risk, by setting buy and sell spreads with CabTrader v2, buy now @ crypto-folio.com
|
|
|
mtbitcoin
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 876
Merit: 1000
Etherscan.io
|
|
January 17, 2014, 05:14:25 AM |
|
I've got like 6,700 XCP on 5 different BTC addresses -_____- Can someone please tell me how to consolidate this ?
Why would you do that? isn't more secure have them all separately? alternatively You can simply give me all yours private keys to these addresses and I will look after consolidation In theory, you can use the send command from Counterparty client to consolidate all your balances Cheers Is there any advantage of this? The advantages/disadvantages are as the same as consolidating your coins in Bitcoin. However, I see someone has already done it as we have a new RICH XCP address at http://blockscan.com/balance.aspx
|
|
|
|
halfcab123
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 224
Merit: 100
CabTrader v2 | crypto-folio.com
|
|
January 17, 2014, 05:34:12 AM |
|
I got like 8k XCP right now, considering getting some more. I like this project
|
DayTrade with less exposure to risk, by setting buy and sell spreads with CabTrader v2, buy now @ crypto-folio.com
|
|
|
BitThink
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 882
Merit: 1000
|
|
January 17, 2014, 05:39:02 AM |
|
Wouldd it even be possible for this coin to get those kind of returns like Mastercoin. I was under the impression it wouldn't be
More people burn now means less chance to get more than 10x return like Mastercoin in short time. Those kind of return (10x -> 1000x) requires that people highly suspect it in the beginning and then later found it real and useful. The extreme case is Nxt. Almost no one trusted it in the IPO stage (they got 21 BTC only), and then when the client came out and it worked, the price shot up because the demand suddenly increases but most chips are controlled in the hand of a few people and it's quite easy for they to hold and see the price up to the sky. For XCP, 1) people are already quite familiar with the idea due to MSC; 2) the 'Prove by Burn' removes the trust issue; 3) the client is working and we can see the source code, so you can see that there're already 1200 BTC burnt in less than half a month. The situation, however, is almost the same after the IPO. Most of people want to buy will burn now anyway. For the demand from those new comers, the supply (from those want quick profit of 30-40%) will be enough to keep the low price. Therefore, no reason to expect the price could rise significantly without any big news (e.g. a beautiful and user friendly client; a famous asset such as AM moves in; or a lot of bets like those in bitbet are available).
|
|
|
|
mtbitcoin
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 876
Merit: 1000
Etherscan.io
|
|
January 17, 2014, 05:49:14 AM Last edit: January 17, 2014, 07:36:37 AM by mtbitcoin |
|
Wouldd it even be possible for this coin to get those kind of returns like Mastercoin. I was under the impression it wouldn't be
More people burn now means less chance to get more than 10x return like Mastercoin in short time. Those kind of return (10x -> 1000x) requires that people highly suspect it in the beginning and then later found it real and useful. The extreme case is Nxt. Almost no one trusted it in the IPO stage (they got 21 BTC only), and then when the client came out and it worked, the price shot up because the demand suddenly increases but most chips are controlled in the hand of a few people and it's quite easy for they to hold and see the price up to the sky. For XCP, 1) people are already quite familiar with the idea due to MSC; 2) the 'Prove by Burn' removes the trust issue; 3) the client is working and we can see the source code, so you can see that there're already 1200 BTC burnt in less than half a month. The situation, however, is almost the same after the IPO. Most of people want to buy will burn now anyway. For the demand from those new comers, the supply (from those want quick profit of 30-40%) will be enough to keep the low price. Therefore, no reason to expect the price could rise significantly without any big news (e.g. a beautiful and user friendly client; a famous asset such as AM moves in; or a lot of bets like those in bitbet are available). +1 summed up well.. Which is why I mentioned that anyone expecting jumps like MSC (or quantum leaps like NXT) would be disappointed
|
|
|
|
doitnow
Member
Offline
Activity: 86
Merit: 10
|
|
January 17, 2014, 06:03:45 AM |
|
I've got like 6,700 XCP on 5 different BTC addresses -_____- Can someone please tell me how to consolidate this ?
Why would you do that? isn't more secure have them all separately? alternatively You can simply give me all yours private keys to these addresses and I will look after consolidation In theory, you can use the send command from Counterparty client to consolidate all your balances Cheers Is there any advantage of this? The advantages/disadvantages are as the same as consolidating your coins in Bitcoin. However, I see someone has already done it as we have a new RICH XCP address at http://blockscan.com/balance.aspx You shouldn't compare these two at that early stage. Counterpartyd hasn't been tested well (yet). Would you put all your stash on one address knowing that system may not be stable enough? (At this point)
|
|
|
|
tangboysomeone
Member
Offline
Activity: 67
Merit: 10
hello
|
|
January 17, 2014, 09:19:59 AM |
|
I install the installer in win7 64bit. When i ran the command counterpartyd server, when the blocknum reach 280518 i got such problem Status: RESTART Block: 280518 Traceback (most recent call last): File "C:\Python33\lib\site-packages\cx_Freeze\initscripts\Console3.py", line 2 7, in <module> exec(code, m.__dict__) File "C:\counterpartyd_build\dist\counterpartyd\counterpartyd.py", line 621, i n <module> File "C:\counterpartyd_build\dist\counterpartyd\lib\blocks.py", line 479, in f ollow File "C:\counterpartyd_build\dist\counterpartyd\lib\blocks.py", line 472, in f ollow File "C:\counterpartyd_build\dist\counterpartyd\lib\blocks.py", line 57, in pa rse_block File "C:\counterpartyd_build\dist\counterpartyd\lib\issuance.py", line 103, in parse File "C:\counterpartyd_build\dist\counterpartyd\lib\util.py", line 148, in cre dit AssertionError
anyone know
|
|
|
|
mtbitcoin
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 876
Merit: 1000
Etherscan.io
|
|
January 17, 2014, 09:57:06 AM |
|
You shouldn't compare these two at that early stage. Counterpartyd hasn't been tested well (yet). Would you put all your stash on one address knowing that system may not be stable enough? (At this point)
There is already "burning" service ongoing and how do you think the coins are getting "send"? The risk of the "send" command is no greater than burning your coins via the blockchain (at this point)
|
|
|
|
halfcab123
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 224
Merit: 100
CabTrader v2 | crypto-folio.com
|
|
January 17, 2014, 10:09:56 AM |
|
anyone care to help a noob use the send command?
|
DayTrade with less exposure to risk, by setting buy and sell spreads with CabTrader v2, buy now @ crypto-folio.com
|
|
|
halfcab123
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 224
Merit: 100
CabTrader v2 | crypto-folio.com
|
|
January 17, 2014, 10:53:31 AM |
|
im thinking 1 xcp should at least get to the 3 - 4 mBTC range
|
DayTrade with less exposure to risk, by setting buy and sell spreads with CabTrader v2, buy now @ crypto-folio.com
|
|
|
BitThink
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 882
Merit: 1000
|
|
January 17, 2014, 11:00:25 AM Last edit: January 17, 2014, 11:17:53 AM by BitThink |
|
im thinking 1 xcp should at least get to the 3 - 4 mBTC range
Your want it to be or you think it will be? If latter, may I know your reason? EDIT: it's a honest question. I really want to read some analysis with data. Something like how many new IPOs per month in Havelock, how many new bets in bitbet and how much XCP it needs if we have similar popularity.
|
|
|
|
PhantomPhreak (OP)
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 476
Merit: 300
Counterparty Chief Scientist and Co-Founder
|
|
January 17, 2014, 11:05:06 AM Last edit: January 17, 2014, 11:16:39 AM by PhantomPhreak |
|
Hi PhantomPhreak/xnovaI have noticed that duplicate ASSETs were allowed to be created. Please see http://blockscan.com/asset.aspx. You will notice that the duplicate asset names for "SPACE" and "NEXT" both were created by the same issuer. Wouldn't this lead to confusion? Cheers Those aren't duplicate issuances, but rather cumulative (with a max of 2^63 - 1). EDIT: I just tweaked this.
|
|
|
|
sumantso
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1050
Merit: 1000
|
|
January 17, 2014, 11:08:24 AM |
|
im thinking 1 xcp should at least get to the 3 - 4 mBTC range
Your want it to be or you think it will be? If latter, may I know your reason? He is just hoping I guess. I will start doing the same too once I have burned my BTC. By the time burning is over, there may be 3-4 million XCPs so I doubt there will be an immediate price hike. I do like it coz the devs seem to be approaching the right way (unlike NXT or MSC). It was working fine yesterday. However, today it refused to run claiming some module is missing so I deleted everything and starting from scratch. I am a total noob here too and thanks to all who kept replying and helping me set it up. EDIT: When I send from the command line, it just says from address and amount. Where is the fee? EDIT2: Its not running. Says Import Error: No module named 'apsw' Btw, how do you copy from cmd? Its a pain typing in errors manually in here.
|
|
|
|
BitThink
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 882
Merit: 1000
|
|
January 17, 2014, 11:14:07 AM |
|
Hi PhantomPhreak/xnovaI have noticed that duplicate ASSETs were allowed to be created. Please see http://blockscan.com/asset.aspx. You will notice that the duplicate asset names for "SPACE" and "NEXT" both were created by the same issuer. Wouldn't this lead to confusion? Cheers Those aren't duplicate issuances, but rather cumulative (with a max of 2^63 - 1). If Issuance takes only a small mining fee, is there a possibility that some malicious users may abuse it?
|
|
|
|
BitThink
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 882
Merit: 1000
|
|
January 17, 2014, 11:18:45 AM |
|
im thinking 1 xcp should at least get to the 3 - 4 mBTC range
Your want it to be or you think it will be? If latter, may I know your reason? He is just hoping I guess. I will start doing the same too once I have burned my BTC. By the time burning is over, there may be 3-4 million XCPs so I doubt there will be an immediate price hike. I do like it coz the devs seem to be approaching the right way (unlike NXT or MSC). It was working fine yesterday. However, today it refused to run claiming some module is missing so I deleted everything and starting from scratch. I am a total noob here too and thanks to all who kept replying and helping me set it up. EDIT: When I send from the command line, it just says from address and amount. Where is the fee? EDIT2: Its not running. Says Import Error: No module named 'apsw' Btw, how do you copy from cmd? Its a pain typing in errors manually in here. Right click and choose 'mark', then you can mark the part you want to copy.
|
|
|
|
sumantso
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1050
Merit: 1000
|
|
January 17, 2014, 11:23:13 AM |
|
im thinking 1 xcp should at least get to the 3 - 4 mBTC range
Your want it to be or you think it will be? If latter, may I know your reason? He is just hoping I guess. I will start doing the same too once I have burned my BTC. By the time burning is over, there may be 3-4 million XCPs so I doubt there will be an immediate price hike. I do like it coz the devs seem to be approaching the right way (unlike NXT or MSC). It was working fine yesterday. However, today it refused to run claiming some module is missing so I deleted everything and starting from scratch. I am a total noob here too and thanks to all who kept replying and helping me set it up. EDIT: When I send from the command line, it just says from address and amount. Where is the fee? EDIT2: Its not running. Says Import Error: No module named 'apsw' Btw, how do you copy from cmd? Its a pain typing in errors manually in here. Right click and choose 'mark', then you can mark the part you want to copy. Neat Well, heres the error then: C:\counterpartyd_build>C:\python33\python.exe run.py Traceback (most recent call last): File "C:\counterpartyd_build\dist\counterpartyd\counterpartyd.py", line 11, in <module> import apsw ImportError: No module named 'apsw'
|
|
|
|
sixteendigits
|
|
January 17, 2014, 12:05:47 PM |
|
im thinking 1 xcp should at least get to the 3 - 4 mBTC range
Your want it to be or you think it will be? If latter, may I know your reason? EDIT: it's a honest question. I really want to read some analysis with data. Something like how many new IPOs per month in Havelock, how many new bets in bitbet and how much XCP it needs if we have similar popularity. It needs none of those things to go that high or higher. All it needs is a whale who burned hundreds of BTC to corner the market and a trollbox screaming about the latest and greatest thing you must buy!! Seriously, the market cap of most crytpo assets are inflated and manipulated. Mark my words, the second there is an easy to use, bug free windows client and the burn period has ended, you will hear nothing but "XCP to the moon!!" for weeks in the trollbox, wouldn't surprise me if it hit .01 BTC
|
|
|
|
qtgwith
|
|
January 17, 2014, 12:24:50 PM |
|
Agree!!!:
More people burn now means less chance to get more than 10x return like Mastercoin in short time.
Those kind of return (10x -> 1000x) requires that people highly suspect it in the beginning and then later found it real and useful. The extreme case is Nxt. Almost no one trusted it in the IPO stage (they got 21 BTC only), and then when the client came out and it worked, the price shot up because the demand suddenly increases but most chips are controlled in the hand of a few people and it's quite easy for they to hold and see the price up to the sky.
For XCP, 1) people are already quite familiar with the idea due to MSC; 2) the 'Prove by Burn' removes the trust issue; 3) the client is working and we can see the source code, so you can see that there're already 1200 BTC burnt in less than half a month. The situation, however, is almost the same after the IPO. Most of people want to buy will burn now anyway. For the demand from those new comers, the supply (from those want quick profit of 30-40%) will be enough to keep the low price.
Therefore, no reason to expect the price could rise significantly without any big news (e.g. a beautiful and user friendly client; a famous asset such as AM moves in; or a lot of bets like those in bitbet are available).
|
|
|
|
mtbitcoin
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 876
Merit: 1000
Etherscan.io
|
|
January 17, 2014, 12:37:41 PM |
|
Hi PhantomPhreak/xnovaI have noticed that duplicate ASSETs were allowed to be created. Please see http://blockscan.com/asset.aspx. You will notice that the duplicate asset names for "SPACE" and "NEXT" both were created by the same issuer. Wouldn't this lead to confusion? Cheers Those aren't duplicate issuances, but rather cumulative (with a max of 2^63 - 1). EDIT: I just tweaked this. Noted. Any updates on when the "ImportError: No module named 'apsw'" issue will be fixed?
|
|
|
|
NewLiberty
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1204
Merit: 1002
Gresham's Lawyer
|
|
January 17, 2014, 12:46:10 PM |
|
Agree!!!:
More people burn now means less chance to get more than 10x return like Mastercoin in short time.
Also this may indicate a broader adoption, and greater implementation depth. Scarcity is less important than utility when assessing value.
|
|
|
|
|