arandy
|
|
March 19, 2014, 11:34:54 AM |
|
any news about the POS implementation? Is it really gonna happen and if so when?
|
|
|
|
kahir
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1050
Merit: 1000
|
|
March 19, 2014, 11:43:10 AM |
|
Any news on 42 lately? Anyone know where the bottom might be?
bottom is around 5 btc
|
|
|
|
VarDiff
|
|
March 19, 2014, 02:33:31 PM |
|
42 Coin added to altcoins database Good luck, miners
|
|
|
|
bigtimespaghetti
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1652
Merit: 1057
bigtimespaghetti.com
|
|
March 19, 2014, 10:06:48 PM |
|
Anyone else think this coin is crazy cheap at these levels? I understand that there isn't much in the way of utility yet, but still. Any word from the devs?
|
|
|
|
psikogeek
Member
Offline
Activity: 65
Merit: 10
|
|
March 20, 2014, 01:44:00 AM |
|
I say darn because I thought of buying earlier when it was 24 BTC. Now it is 36 BTC. If this proves to be a lasting turnaround, the bottom was 20.05 at Cryptsy.
Someone tried to predict the bottom in a previous post. He came up with 5 BTC. I'd like to know how he picked that number.
My floor calculation is as follows: barring that 42 becomes an accepted currency, it is a commodity with limited appeal. Mostly, I think the appeal is Douglas Adams fans. Not having an demographics to draw from, I guessed that the ratio of interest in BTC to interest in 42 might be a million to one. Given that the ratio of 42 to BTC should approach 42/21,000,000, a 42 might value at 0.5 BTC.
That depends on my wild 1,000,000 to 1 interest ratio though. Being off by only one order of magnitude could put me at 5 BTC. Also, there is the level emotional attraction to 42. Like real currency, some people buy them to collect them. The number is fairly famous. This is the ONLY altcoin I prioritize holding although the "quark" name was a good idea. "Credits", "sh1ts", "fux", "florins", "doubloons", "dilithium crystals", "Teradollars", and "thalers" are/would be good names.
Anyway, the shift to a new algorithm should shake things up.
|
|
|
|
DianaLime
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 52
Merit: 0
|
|
March 20, 2014, 01:51:52 AM |
|
I just bought some 42 for the first time and lets see what happens.
|
|
|
|
bigtimespaghetti
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1652
Merit: 1057
bigtimespaghetti.com
|
|
March 20, 2014, 06:36:53 AM |
|
I've been buying a little on the way down. Was hoping for a bottom between 15-18 to load the boat. Let's see what the coming weeks provide.
|
|
|
|
psikogeek
Member
Offline
Activity: 65
Merit: 10
|
|
March 20, 2014, 06:21:16 PM Last edit: March 20, 2014, 09:30:52 PM by psikogeek |
|
While we are on the topic of "bottom" and fantasizing about future value, does not the developing PoS (Proof of Stake) plan not mean that future 42 mining will not be proportional to your 42 holdings?
[Edited errant negation]
|
|
|
|
bigtimespaghetti
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1652
Merit: 1057
bigtimespaghetti.com
|
|
March 20, 2014, 07:00:14 PM |
|
While we are on the topic of "bottom" and fantasizing about future value, does not the developing PoS (Proof of Stake) plan not mean that future 42 mining will not be proportional to your 42 holdings?
I am not sure how this will work psiko, would love to hear from the devs.
|
|
|
|
vindyne8
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1009
|
|
March 21, 2014, 04:37:19 AM |
|
So, what's the most reliable pool?
4YLueUF3Pe7G1aWtoHokKJfXSaqUycAcXK
|
|
|
|
vindyne8
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1009
|
|
March 21, 2014, 04:41:32 AM |
|
Forgive my noob question, but
Unconfirmed 2.1E-7
Buh?
|
|
|
|
psikogeek
Member
Offline
Activity: 65
Merit: 10
|
|
March 21, 2014, 05:13:55 AM |
|
Unconfirmed 2.1E-7
might mean 0.00000021 as in 0.00000021 42 which is a small amount of money amounting to about 0.00000945 BTC or about $0.0054.
|
|
|
|
psikogeek
Member
Offline
Activity: 65
Merit: 10
|
|
March 21, 2014, 01:02:06 PM |
|
What a ride this morning.
Before retiring last night, I acquired a little 42 at 49 BTC. This morning, I wake to find that page open and the price at 75. I blink. then it is 85. A few minutes later, it is 122.
I'm thinking that one of you has valued it at somewhere around there.
|
|
|
|
smoky001
Member
Offline
Activity: 139
Merit: 10
Astrum
|
|
March 21, 2014, 01:16:24 PM |
|
yep today its looking pretty good finally some action going on
|
|
|
|
psikogeek
Member
Offline
Activity: 65
Merit: 10
|
|
March 21, 2014, 07:28:09 PM |
|
who heard about the new big bang update?
We are hoping you will tell us.
|
|
|
|
binaryclock
|
|
March 21, 2014, 09:13:02 PM |
|
42.DEDICATEDPOOL.COMMining Information- Custom stratum/mpos environment
- Vardiff enabled
- PPNLS payout system
- Everything is transparent - blocks, donations, fees.
Server Infrastructure- SIX(6) SERVERS IN CLUSTER
- DDoS level 7 cloudflare, 5 and 3 stratum, and level at 1 switch level
- 8 Core servers, 256GB DDR3 RAM, RAID 10 SSD
- Ramdisks, memcaches, to make things go extremely quick
|
DEDICATEDPOOL.COM
|
|
|
DianaLime
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 52
Merit: 0
|
|
March 21, 2014, 09:28:12 PM |
|
who heard about the new big bang update?
We are hoping you will tell us. wasn't there some focus against multipool dump prevention? I don't know a lot of info but someone was talking about it on irc, not sure.
|
|
|
|
psikogeek
Member
Offline
Activity: 65
Merit: 10
|
|
March 21, 2014, 10:46:05 PM |
|
wasn't there some focus against multipool dump prevention? I don't know a lot of info but someone was talking about it on irc, not sure.
I note that you just made your 42nd post, Diana. That number is only special on this thread. I imagine that Proof of Stake only solves multipool problems completely. I'd like to know when it is to be done. I see tx42 active on other parts of this forum. I'd PM him on this matter, but I'd only be a pest. Now, if other users also wanted an update..... ....then we could justify interrupting his programming efforts.
|
|
|
|
smoky001
Member
Offline
Activity: 139
Merit: 10
Astrum
|
|
March 23, 2014, 01:29:17 PM |
|
whats up with the lack of comunication? updates? news?
|
|
|
|
kahir
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1050
Merit: 1000
|
|
March 23, 2014, 03:50:14 PM |
|
one of two things ... if thats just a pump and dump then price will go further lower where the pump started ... it started at 22 btc
if not then price may be stable and rise
|
|
|
|
|