★★DigiByte|极特币★★[DGB]✔ Core v6.16.5.1 - DigiShield, DigiSpeed, Segwit

[tbearhere]

My wallet won't sync..I have the latest too. Maybe I need some nodes?
Anyone have any.  thx

[AiraFlex]

My wallet won't sync..I have the latest too. Maybe I need some nodes?
Anyone have any.  thx

My wallet is Ok!

[Delphinus]

Digibyte  had  an ambitious idea to launch  Mine Craft server, and the gaming marketplace. what happened with  these??

This was the work of small group of youngsters within the DigiByte community, it was great.  Shame, I think abuse and scam accusations after their project was confused with something official made them rethink their commitment to this project and the suitability of it to their peers but I don't know for sure.

Now bith sites are unavailable:
http://www.digibytegaming.com/
http://minethatdigy.org/

minethatdigi was the community project, I was talking about!

digibytegaming was an official project by the developers but had to be shut down because of flaws in the actual game APIs that were being abused to claim DGB.

Yes the community project did more harm to the Digibyte name than anything else...the idea of community projects is nice, but this really backfired big time.

[Two4D2]

Digibyte  had  an ambitious idea to launch  Mine Craft server, and the gaming marketplace. what happened with  these??

This was the work of small group of youngsters within the DigiByte community, it was great.  Shame, I think abuse and scam accusations after their project was confused with something official made them rethink their commitment to this project and the suitability of it to their peers but I don't know for sure.

Now bith sites are unavailable:
http://www.digibytegaming.com/
http://minethatdigy.org/

minethatdigi was the community project, I was talking about!

digibytegaming was an official project by the developers but had to be shut down because of flaws in the actual game APIs that were being abused to claim DGB.

Yes the community project did more harm to the Digibyte name than anything else...the idea of community projects is nice, but this really backfired big time.

Not really, it was just because people hyped it as it would be implemented as partnership or something with minecraft but it was only a private server...

[Cpt. Africa]

I'm very interested with the project. Do you expect launch it  tomorrow , am I right?)

[minerbro]

Any chance DGB will rise in the future. Any hype up news or time place in roadmap or we will stuck like this forever?

[Two4D2]

Any chance DGB will rise in the future. Any hype up news or time place in roadmap or we will stuck like this forever?

There are no bs hype news or whatever but there is proper roadmap and yes DGB will rise...https://digibytefoundation.org/

[Zontop]

Any chance DGB will rise in the future. Any hype up news or time place in roadmap or we will stuck like this forever?

For the moment market is moving very well with normal behavior sometimes little up and other times little down. No one can tell you when and how market will react at some certain point. DGB is being prepared and developed for real thing and use cases so wait and see. This is only advice for now.

[CryptoJohn]

Any chance DGB will rise in the future. Any hype up news or time place in roadmap or we will stuck like this forever?

There are no bs hype news or whatever but there is proper roadmap and yes DGB will rise...https://digibytefoundation.org/

I agree.

Jared always targeted a $1 - $5 per DGB price point long term. I think within 24 months we will be in these ranges.

Jared lives in asia and i suspect that will be the market that rockets DGB when its time has come.

[Two4D2]

Any chance DGB will rise in the future. Any hype up news or time place in roadmap or we will stuck like this forever?

There are no bs hype news or whatever but there is proper roadmap and yes DGB will rise...https://digibytefoundation.org/

I agree.

Jared always targeted a $1 - $5 per DGB price point long term. I think within 24 months we will be in these ranges.

Jared lives in asia and i suspect that will be the market that rockets DGB when its time has come.

Would be awesome if we could hit that target so soon

He doesnt live in asia tho

[klax]

yet somehow even with good news for DGB and adoption the price manages to tank. I wonder why that happens, was the price actually too high in the last few months or what is the explanation. Can anyone enlight me ?

manipulate trader, fudder, troller, bitcoin drama

I'm nothing of the above. It was just an observation. I am a DGB holder for 2 months now and I do not intent selling. Got in @368 satoshi and I am not complaining. I think the coin has a future otherwise I would have not invested in.

[metallicelmo]

I've had Digibyte for a long time and going to keep it. They were really on track with new things etc. Whats new with DGB?

[Midas111]

ive heard some good things are in store for dgb. amazing that this coin will have a comeback after so much

[cryptmebro]

So let me get this straight. Theres a bunch of people investing in specialized hardware to support and secure this network efficiently and you all want to punish them by switching mining algo's? They believe in DGB and want to accumulate as much as they can through mining, somehow there's a problem with it? It's called competition.

Yes, I can agree with switching out dead algo's such as qubit.

[carlo_0000]

So let me get this straight. Theres a bunch of people investing in specialized hardware to support and secure this network efficiently and you all want to punish them by switching mining algo's? They believe in DGB and want to accumulate as much as they can through mining, somehow there's a problem with it? It's called competition.

Yes, I can agree with switching out dead algo's such as qubit.

they will still be asic algo  but now if we do nothing they will be no cpu&gpu algo anymore  onyl asic

and you think it s fair  when someone is doing close to 1 million dgb a day and probably dumping it everyday?

[cryptmebro]

So let me get this straight. Theres a bunch of people investing in specialized hardware to support and secure this network efficiently and you all want to punish them by switching mining algo's? They believe in DGB and want to accumulate as much as they can through mining, somehow there's a problem with it? It's called competition.

Yes, I can agree with switching out dead algo's such as qubit.

they will still be asic algo  but now if we do nothing they will be no cpu&gpu algo anymore  onyl asic

and you think it s fair  when someone is doing close to 1 million dgb a day and probably dumping it everyday?

They are actively investing in the network. Swap the shitty qubit algo for a better cpu algo and leave the rest alone. No need to force the miners out so people can get their easy coins. If that happens, the network will be less secure and less valued overall.

[iikun]

So let me get this straight. Theres a bunch of people investing in specialized hardware to support and secure this network efficiently and you all want to punish them by switching mining algo's? They believe in DGB and want to accumulate as much as they can through mining, somehow there's a problem with it? It's called competition.

Yes, I can agree with switching out dead algo's such as qubit.

they will still be asic algo  but now if we do nothing they will be no cpu&gpu algo anymore  onyl asic

and you think it s fair  when someone is doing close to 1 million dgb a day and probably dumping it everyday?

They are actively investing in the network. Swap the shitty qubit algo for a better cpu algo and leave the rest alone. No need to force the miners out so people can get their easy coins. If that happens, the network will be less secure and less valued overall.

To a certain extent I have to agree. Fighting asics is like fighting against the natural progression of technology, which is weird, especially for new tech like crypto.
Would Bitcoin have grown as much as it has if everyone still used massive GPU farms, sucking down electricity like the proverbial?  Lower costs of mining mean fewer coins need to be dumped to pay for it, which is a good thing.

[stellerator]

Any chance DGB will rise in the future. Any hype up news or time place in roadmap or we will stuck like this forever?

There are no bs hype news or whatever but there is proper roadmap and yes DGB will rise...https://digibytefoundation.org/

I agree.

Jared always targeted a $1 - $5 per DGB price point long term. I think within 24 months we will be in these ranges.

Jared lives in asia and i suspect that will be the market that rockets DGB when its time has come.

Would be awesome if we could hit that target so soon

He doesnt live in asia tho

From technical perspectives Digibyte is not bad cryptocurrency, Fast transactions(~ 1 min), very large TPS (560 transaction per second), so rising is a matter of time   

[psiksenz]

As long as you are OK to carry on holding you will not be dissappointed.  We'll be getting a mass influx of people starting in the next few month.  Solid coins with good tech will get a massive boost, especially ones with such an awesome price history like DGB

[Tortoise75]

So let me get this straight. Theres a bunch of people investing in specialized hardware to support and secure this network efficiently and you all want to punish them by switching mining algo's? They believe in DGB and want to accumulate as much as they can through mining, somehow there's a problem with it? It's called competition.

Yes, I can agree with switching out dead algo's such as qubit.

they will still be asic algo  but now if we do nothing they will be no cpu&gpu algo anymore  onyl asic

and you think it s fair  when someone is doing close to 1 million dgb a day and probably dumping it everyday?

They are actively investing in the network. Swap the shitty qubit algo for a better cpu algo and leave the rest alone. No need to force the miners out so people can get their easy coins. If that happens, the network will be less secure and less valued overall.

To a certain extent I have to agree. Fighting asics is like fighting against the natural progression of technology, which is weird, especially for new tech like crypto.
Would Bitcoin have grown as much as it has if everyone still used massive GPU farms, sucking down electricity like the proverbial?  Lower costs of mining mean fewer coins need to be dumped to pay for it, which is a good thing.

To an extent I agree as well, that's why I wouldn't want to swap the strongest of the Baikal algos. But there's no need to keep 2 or more algos dominated by the same specialized hardware.

How is it better that it's now even more massive ASIC miner farms sucking down electricity like the proverbial? The individual machine may be hugely more efficient but since the gains are limited and controlled by the difficulty the whole thing is still mostly based on costs of electricity vs value of the mined coins as long as enough hardware is available. If the hardware is not available in those numbers, from several manufacturers in a variety of markets, it's a risk for the security of the blockchain, which is actually a concern lasting on Bitcoin for quite some while now and it still didn't cut down electricity use, not enough to stop all the 'Madness! Electricity enough to power cities wasted to generate useless electronic currency' stuff in the mainstream press at least, which, along that it's otherwise mostly only mentioned together with ransomware and other criminal activities, doesn't exactly help it's image.