Agreed the sentence can be interpreted either way - over to mjcmurfy to clarify whether we are being asked to consider an INCREASE in dividend frequency to once every two weeks or a DECREASE in frequency to once every two months.
Price wise I would be comparing to this service - https://www.giganews.com/signup
Then add a premium for the true anonymity provided from BTC payment for the service.
Looks to me that the current 0.05 BTC/GB price is about right - attractively low to encourage a building of the user base and repeated custom.
What is happening with the server hosting ?
When does the existing contract end ?
Is that still being provided by you at no cost to the BitCoinTorrentz.com company ?
How much longer will that continue ?
How much further can the userbase / usage expand before it will have to obtain it's own server hosting (presumably at the same location) ?
Should we consider obtaining it's own server to improve uptime / reliability ?
Do you feel that is impacting userbase growth / usage at all ?
Do you think it would be beneficial to increase advertising spending ?
What maximum monthly increase in userbase / usage could the service (you, the server and the software) cope with ?
How do you think we should go about achieving that ? (Is part of the driver of your question on whether the price should be dropped motivated by that ?)
Essentially I'm asking if the price were to drop by an "extreme" amount (P%) and we get an increase in usage of >P% (so that overall profit is greater) - what breaks first ?
The monthly (?) data limit for the server, the bandwidth limit for simultaneous torrent download, the bandwidth limit for simultaneous HTTP completed file download,
the software, your ability to deal with customer support issues (questions, complaints etc ...), the toleration of other users / services also using the server ?
The last thing I would want at this time is to drop the price and see an unsustainable increase in usage resulting in the free server resource being withdrawn.
I'm trying to think ahead to the company operation a year, 3 years and (ever optimistically) 10 years from now :O)
My understanding was that 2monthly = 2x per month. I would agree, however, that there is no need to reduce the price, and perhaps a price increase should be considered. As a consumer (as well as insignificant investor)... the price is ridiculously low, to the point where I've considered donating just because I feel like I've robbed you - and I'm a cheapskate in the extreme.