Warning__3
|
|
February 01, 2014, 10:34:22 PM |
|
That awkward moment when you realize premine is one of the most "green" coin, because it doesn't get or need as much proof of work as the rest
|
|
|
|
blueangel01
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 406
Merit: 250
Hello! Send me a message.
|
|
February 01, 2014, 10:39:19 PM Last edit: February 02, 2014, 06:31:07 AM by blueangel01 |
|
Giveaway is over....
|
Msg me if you want me to put anything here.
|
|
|
Triax
Member
Offline
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
|
|
February 01, 2014, 10:41:02 PM |
|
That awkward moment when you realize premine is one of the most "green" coin, because it doesn't get or need as much proof of work as the rest Why did I suddenly think of the rock driving meme?
|
DOGE: DJj2YmMx9eDwNZxvtc7et97goFYULJgdMN DGB: D8zdoa2URri6nWRdn95R1aRv9W7JYrTnAK PMC: 1M8xuqeLrNM9w1GzbYAfmmz4VLaN3dfs8 Free Premine
|
|
|
Nullu
|
|
February 01, 2014, 11:15:32 PM |
|
Is Freshmarket going to relist PMC at some point? Anyone talked to the owner? Or are we waiting until the next wallet update?
|
BTC - 14kYyhhWZwSJFHAjNTtyhRVSu157nE92gF
|
|
|
creditcoin_CRD (OP)
Member
Offline
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
|
|
February 01, 2014, 11:20:04 PM |
|
Is Freshmarket going to relist PMC at some point? Anyone talked to the owner? Or are we waiting until the next wallet update?
He was having an accounting issue last time I checked.
|
|
|
|
Pasco60
|
|
February 01, 2014, 11:50:31 PM |
|
Got a little problem can't start the new wallet (Windows . Saved blockstats, chain and the wallet.dat, deleted everything else. When I want to start premine-qt.exe (0.88) i get 2 errors "can't bind to 0.0.0.0:9336, maybe premine was already started" and "no port was found, if this is okay use listen=0" (getting german errors but I might got the point) Can anyone help? problem found had another wallet running closed it now premine is running
|
PMC: 1FERnGpCrQzUdYRN3guPoJ9YTgYSN6tCe5
|
|
|
The Grinder
Member
Offline
Activity: 72
Merit: 10
|
|
February 02, 2014, 12:59:01 AM |
|
Sry I'm no twitter user but I will gladly bump the issue in this thread.
|
|
|
|
blueangel01
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 406
Merit: 250
Hello! Send me a message.
|
|
February 02, 2014, 01:14:23 AM |
|
the difficulty is high;
20:13:31  { "blocks" : 19474, "currentblocksize" : 0, "currentblocktx" : 0, "difficulty" : 754.61419094, "errors" : "", "generate" : false, "genproclimit" : -1, "hashespersec" : 0, "pooledtx" : 12, "testnet" : false }
is there a lot of people mining this?
|
Msg me if you want me to put anything here.
|
|
|
creditcoin_CRD (OP)
Member
Offline
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
|
|
February 02, 2014, 01:26:09 AM |
|
the difficulty is high;
20:13:31  { "blocks" : 19474, "currentblocksize" : 0, "currentblocktx" : 0, "difficulty" : 754.61419094, "errors" : "", "generate" : false, "genproclimit" : -1, "hashespersec" : 0, "pooledtx" : 12, "testnet" : false }
is there a lot of people mining this?
19479 2014-02-02 01:20:37 7 1482.24624 754.625 498999.99996251 6.66912 10.8904 34.7072% 19478 2014-02-02 01:19:42 9 6523.135472 754.625 498999.99996251 6.6685 10.8898 34.7093% 19477 2014-02-02 01:18:32 12 4597.232912 754.625 498999.99996251 6.66779 10.889 34.711% 19476 2014-02-02 01:14:40 4 1993.86494 754.625 498999.99996251 6.66513 10.8863 34.7199% 19475 2014-02-02 01:13:47 11 3563.025187 754.625 498999.99996251 6.66453 10.8857 34.7218% 19474 2014-02-02 01:10:47 13 2300.09557085 754.625 498999.99996251 6.67115 10.8836 34.6437% 19473 2014-02-02 01:08:07 39 14186.040471 754.625 498999.99996251 6.66986 10.8817 34.6444% 19472 2014-02-02 00:54:33 7 1453.17504 754.625 498999.99996251 6.66084 10.8723 34.6725% we are well within target time, so at this rate we will see an increase in difficulty.
|
|
|
|
Nullu
|
|
February 02, 2014, 02:06:30 AM |
|
So those are the sort of block sizes we should expect to see from now on? How much hashpower is there on the network?
|
BTC - 14kYyhhWZwSJFHAjNTtyhRVSu157nE92gF
|
|
|
blueangel01
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 406
Merit: 250
Hello! Send me a message.
|
|
February 02, 2014, 02:11:41 AM |
|
So those are the sort of block sizes we should expect to see from now on? How much hashpower is there on the network?
I am wondering about the same thing
|
Msg me if you want me to put anything here.
|
|
|
|
_CR_
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 34
Merit: 0
|
|
February 02, 2014, 10:53:45 AM |
|
what about atomic-trade adding pmc?
|
|
|
|
Bergmannx
|
|
February 02, 2014, 10:57:09 AM |
|
Any chance to set a proportionate txfee like 0.5% instead of a static fee in the new wallet? A static fee would make the coin unusable for smaller transactions.
|
|
|
|
Burninj
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1000
|
|
February 02, 2014, 11:37:56 AM |
|
Any chance to set a proportionate txfee like 0.5% instead of a static fee in the new wallet? A static fee would make the coin unusable for smaller transactions.
maybe not a static proportional... This parameter will be the hardest to set for premine to live...
|
|
|
|
deodecagone
|
|
February 02, 2014, 11:57:36 AM |
|
should consider the difficulty , I am not sure the amount will have to be considered as the diifuclty will be correlated to the average transaction amount
edit : the more itnerest there is, the more difficult it wil be , and the avg transaction amount will lower
|
|
|
|
Nullu
|
|
February 02, 2014, 12:06:47 PM |
|
I mused over the idea over a proportional tx fee, but it is wrought with problems.
If the tx fee was variable by difficulty, and the difficulty became low, it would increase the tx fee and less people would move their coins, decreasing the total amount available to miners for mining. You would potentially end up in a spiral where continued low difficulty and high tx fees would feed off one another, causing less movement, less tx fee generation, until the coin stagnated. Very bad idea.
You could make the tx fee variable based on the amount of coins you hold, but it would have to be a much smaller percentage. The beauty of that would be, you wouldn't benefit from sending coins to yourself, because you'll always be paying the same tx fee based on what you have in your wallet, regardless of how few or many you have - it will just be relative to your total balance. You couldn't cheat your way out of that. Infact trying to do so would cost you more in tx fees as you moved your coins around. This also means higher stake holders would have to pay their fair share if they wanted to move a lot of coins.
If you can make the tx fee based on the coins you hold in a particular account, then that would make it manageable for coin movers who like to keep accounting records and so on.
|
BTC - 14kYyhhWZwSJFHAjNTtyhRVSu157nE92gF
|
|
|
Benezivas
|
|
February 02, 2014, 12:37:41 PM |
|
I got myself some neatly cheap PMC over night, thank you, dumpers My thoughts about the TX fees: I am not of the opinion that a proportional fee is actually needed, and that a low base fee will suffice, if there isn't a huge influx in value in a short period of time. To challenge this scenario, here is a pseudo-proportional idea: Link the tx fee to the time that these coins were moved last (Bitcoin days destroyed, I have yet to read into that topic), so that the longer you wait to move your coins, the higher the tx fee will become (I am thinking of a base fee of maybe 0.001% that has a cap of 0.01% if, say, you kept your coins resting in your wallet for a year or so. If we choose the base tx and cap wisely, we could encourage the money flow in the network, which would also be supported by holders sending their stake to themselves in order to avoid big fees.
|
|
|
|
Nullu
|
|
February 02, 2014, 01:55:39 PM |
|
It's an interesting idea, but it would be difficult to work out the tx you pay and would dissuade movement of coin investors. A percentage based on what you hold will be fair for everyone.
|
BTC - 14kYyhhWZwSJFHAjNTtyhRVSu157nE92gF
|
|
|
yogibaer
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1131
Merit: 1001
|
|
February 02, 2014, 02:49:15 PM |
|
It's an interesting idea, but it would be difficult to work out the tx you pay and would dissuade movement of coin investors. A percentage based on what you hold will be fair for everyone.
That means for example someone holds 1000 PMC and the TX fee for any transacation will be calculated on this amount? Well when this someone makes a lot of small transaction he pays a lot of fees, when he makes a single big transaction the fees are much less of course. Fees should be only calculated on the amount which is transferred with a min. and max. tx fee.
|
|
|
|
|