Why should signature bounty be given the highest pool?

[Christinebeauty]

I believe every project has its target market. The target market for ICOs is crypto community and the best place to find them is the crypto forums. It is more economical to reach out to 5k members on the forum that reaching out to 20k people on facebook. So i think they deserve it.

[1715027462]

1715027462

[1715027462]

1715027462

[ar72]

In my opinion signature is biggest pool in bounty baecause signature campaign gives big contribution to promote ico project. And especially I am sure many developers is in this forum.

[Dacosta Osei-Tutu]

because I think we can only choose one signature so that the signature is given a bigger allocation compared to other campaigns, because other campaign we can participate more than one.

Yes. I think you also have a point here. You can use your account to participate in only one campaign at a time but your social media accounts can be used for so many other bounties. It becomes worse when you are to wear the signature for more than 2 months

[baghdatis1990]

        The ICO project is better promoted through the signing campaign than through socializing campaigns (twitter and facebook). This would be the explanation for the stakes raised in the participants of the signing campaigns and the high percentage of the coins offered in the signing campaign. If you have a good bitcointalk rank, you do not even need a job. I am just a Member, but I like to participate in signing campaigns, being very profitable.

[emmaong12]

Gets a lot more targeted views than the social media bounties, social media bounties seem to be bots spamming 50 different bounties at a time.

[ranman09]

Because it's "limited". Anyone can have a twitter or facebook account, but a bitcointalk with a high rank and good quality post? It requires time and dedication. And you are basically advertising in a website that talks all the time about the niche of your product (icos, blockchains, etc).

I somehow agree with this. Before when bitcointalk doesn't have merit a simple day to day of being active in the forum can help your rank up. Rank up can lead to higher pay in bounty campaigns. But now we have merit it will take more effort than before to have a high rank. Which leads to small numbers of ranked members for campaigns.

The same reason why most signature nowadays has erasures of signature members leaving campaigns and shifting to other more promising campaigns.

[xandebnu]

I think this is because so many people when deciding on investing (icos or coins) read this forum and rely on the opinions of its regulars 

[BagzMM]

because the users in this bitcointalk forum are their target to participate in their crowd sale. Many users here are investors and also those bounty hunters can be a potential investors as they have knowledge in dealing cryptocurrency and can hold their bounty token or can use it in daily trading to create a price movement.

[Bay_Harbour_Butcher]

because the signature campaign should not be more than one project followed, so one account may only follow one signature campaign, unlike other bounty campaigns, such as social media, translation, content creation, which can be more than one project, so it is reasonable to allocate signature campaign is bigger than the others

[Torrenth]

in addition, for the confidence of each project may also be determined by rank, higher ratings will enable other audiences to follow the project and start investing,

[BigBrother]

Yes, signing on the forum is a good way to advertise the project, as it is aimed at the right audience. But I still think it's more likely to attract bounty hunters than investors.
Perhaps those who have higher grades, things are different, because they have more trust.

[tycsols]

I have seen many campaigns now that are alloting less percentage for signature campaign but their project is not getfing the required exposure and hype in the community so i think thaf signature campaign with high percentage is required to attract more forum.members and make the ico go viral and be noticed.

[cryptosuotor]

Yes because signature campaign is the bounty campaign which reaches out to the target customers of the ICOs and so must always be given the highest bounty pools.

[konflikkastil]

because I think signature campaigns have more role to attract investors especially see the signatures used by legendary, social media many have fake account so make them have small allocation

[St4yInTh3D4rk]

When i initially joined bounty campaign, i didn't agree to the fact that signature campaign should be given a higher percentage in the bounty pool, especially when it has a relatively fewer participants compared to blog and social media. But i have now come to the realization that, signature campaign is the best form of advertisement for every ico. It helps to advertise the project to its target population. Almost every member on this forum is a potential crypto investor. Even bounty hunters can invest in their own small ways. Social media campaign has the potential of spreading the project to wider audience but not everyone they reach out to would be interested in investing in crypto. If we are talking about bounty campaign which ensures value for money, then i think its signature campaign. Friends what do you also think?

Yes,it is and it has been discussed over many times already.But I like that point that bounty hunters also will invest on the ICOs yes that is true even many hunters invest on the potential project because they know what is the potential level of the project (supposed to be).

[natsu01]

As a bounty hunter, I also noticed that signature campaign is mostly had the most allocated amount of funds among all bounty programs. I think it is simply because, public investors are usually seeking gopd ICOS to invest with in this bitcoin forum than on social media sites or ICO rating sites. Thats why signature campaigns had the most because it is only exclusive to post in this forum only.

[A A Aziz]

When i initially joined bounty campaign, i didn't agree to the fact that signature campaign should be given a higher percentage in the bounty pool, especially when it has a relatively fewer participants compared to blog and social media. But i have now come to the realization that, signature campaign is the best form of advertisement for every ico. It helps to advertise the project to its target population. Almost every member on this forum is a potential crypto investor. Even bounty hunters can invest in their own small ways. Social media campaign has the potential of spreading the project to wider audience but not everyone they reach out to would be interested in investing in crypto. If we are talking about bounty campaign which ensures value for money, then i think its signature campaign. Friends what do you also think?

Yes, of course worthy signature campaigns with a higher percentage than other campaigns. That's because with the signature campaign information related to the project can be directly seen by the forum members, so that the investor as the target of the advertisements that are in the forum get information about the project.

[zeze18]

When i initially joined bounty campaign, i didn't agree to the fact that signature campaign should be given a higher percentage in the bounty pool, especially when it has a relatively fewer participants compared to blog and social media. But i have now come to the realization that, signature campaign is the best form of advertisement for every ico. It helps to advertise the project to its target population. Almost every member on this forum is a potential crypto investor. Even bounty hunters can invest in their own small ways. Social media campaign has the potential of spreading the project to wider audience but not everyone they reach out to would be interested in investing in crypto. If we are talking about bounty campaign which ensures value for money, then i think its signature campaign. Friends what do you also think?

It's simply because i account can only join 1 signature bounty at one time and also the task is more than any type of bounty.
So, it's normal that signature bounty gives the best amount of reward

[Olena9797]

Cause here is the biggest crypto community. Not Twitter, not Facebook. People are searching where to invest, reading different opinions, whach how people support. So managers give more money for signature to expand projects here

[iTradeChips]

Exactly the same sentiment that I have. Signature bounties should be given a big chunk of the payments. My experience so far is abysmal when it comes to being paid for the signature bounties that I joined in. I seldom get the good ones even with the rank that I am in. That is why there was a time I only stick to day trading, which I still do now.