cinnamon_carter
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1018
It's about time -- All merrit accepted !!!
|
 |
January 11, 2016, 03:26:40 AM |
|
i guess difficulty is picking up
|
Check out my coin Photon Merge Mine 5 other Blake 256 coins - 6x your hash power https://www.blakecoin.org/The obvious choice is not always the best choice. LOOK DEEPER - Look into the Blake 256 Family -- CC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you see garbage posts (off-topic, trolling, spam, no point, etc.), use the "report to moderator" links. All reports are investigated, though you will rarely be contacted about your reports.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
Simba84
|
|
January 12, 2016, 10:39:33 AM |
|
DDoS attacks continue but... Server is working well! If someone has problems to connect with miners let me know via PM or at inforiepool@gmail.comThank you and good 0% Fees mining  |
|
|
|
|
AGD
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2069
Merit: 1164
Keeper of the Private Key
|
|
January 13, 2016, 06:52:29 AM |
|
Any official statement from ypool, yet?
|
|
|
|
|
My9bot
|
|
January 13, 2016, 01:18:41 PM |
|
yeah whats up with ypool?
|
|
|
|
|
one4many
|
|
January 13, 2016, 04:43:40 PM |
|
yeah whats up with ypool?
Dead for good now ... by the looks of it. Still have 140 RICs there, but who cares at the moment ;-) one4many |
|
|
|
|
|
My9bot
|
|
January 13, 2016, 07:35:12 PM |
|
yeah whats up with ypool?
Dead for good now ... by the looks of it. Still have 140 RICs there, but who cares at the moment ;-) one4many but why ? a big pool like ypool and no official statement |
|
|
|
|
Simba84
|
|
January 13, 2016, 07:49:30 PM |
|
I finished work on the server! They are enhanced connection management and prevention against DDoS attacks. If someone wants to, can move some of miners on RiePool ( http://riepool.ovh:8000) to test the new performance! Thanks a lot to everyone |
|
|
|
|
cinnamon_carter
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1018
It's about time -- All merrit accepted !!!
|
|
January 14, 2016, 08:20:42 AM |
|
things seem to be running more stable now vs. weeks past , let's hope it continues all year
|
Check out my coin Photon Merge Mine 5 other Blake 256 coins - 6x your hash power https://www.blakecoin.org/The obvious choice is not always the best choice. LOOK DEEPER - Look into the Blake 256 Family -- CC |
|
|
|
Simba84
|
|
January 14, 2016, 11:36:12 AM |
|
Riecoin price rise up! About $ 0.015/RIC now  |
|
|
|
|
|
xpoolx
|
|
January 14, 2016, 12:22:04 PM |
|
Hi all
Thanks to all the miners who mined in xpoolx in last months no more funds are needed so XpoolX is now 0% Fee.
We continue working on the mining performance and security of the pool to do it more competitive and for secure of riecoin network.
Thanks to all riecoin miners
|
|
|
|
|
bcie
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 16
Merit: 0
|
|
January 14, 2016, 01:27:31 PM |
|
excellent - thanks xpoolx.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xpoolx
|
|
January 16, 2016, 12:35:30 PM |
|
Hi all Changes on XpoolX: - Yesterday i had a DDoS attack (again..) so finally the proxy is set up and you can connect to mining.xpoolx.com:5000- Mining speed improved, just connect and compare your KHs before and after - Fixed some webpage bugs, thanks for submiting. - Opened 20 stratum servers in total. Just connect to port 5000 and you will be distributed around the other servers If you have any question, please contact me at: infoxpoolx@gmail.comI need some testing miners on mining.xpoolx.com:5000 please if you can connect that ip and post me a reply explaining if it's working well or not i'll be gratefull Thanks all! |
|
|
|
|
danbrown
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 6
Merit: 0
|
|
January 16, 2016, 03:56:52 PM |
|
Hello everyone I'm Daniel and I'm a Riecoin fan. I was trying to mine on two pools, xpoolx and riepool Here there is something wrong! First of all, you can improve the performance of mining directly by servers or by the pool as stated by xpoolx because it's the miner who works on a particular algorithm that produces the work! My test system consists of an Intel i7-4790 CPU with 8GB of ram and tried both the pool for about 30 minutes with xptminer 1.7dga c16 for stratum with current difficulty equal to 1426.0 See the results below! XpoolX http://imageshack.com/a/img907/2600/U2FIN5.jpgRiePool http://imageshack.com/a/img907/1584/q87SfH.jpgRiepool shows the correct Shares/sec values as 4ch/s on xptminer while xpoolx seems rigged in Hashrate values!!! Why with the same REAL Shares/sec riepool shows a concrete Hashrate of about 3600 KH/s while xpoolx shows a value of nearly 5000 KH/s  Someone, or rather administrators of the respective pools can give me some logical explanation? I finally tested xptminer 2.0 downloaded from riepool and with this miner will get really superior performance from 0.21 to 0.28 Shares/sec!!! Below the link of my dashboard on riepool http://imageshack.com/a/img911/3411/e3ECjE.jpgI conclude to congratulate those who have improved the algorithm of miner and remember that the true values are those indicated by the miner himself and not the data shown by some pools...... |
|
|
|
|
|
xpoolx
|
|
January 16, 2016, 04:53:04 PM |
|
Hello everyone I'm Daniel and I'm a Riecoin fan. I was trying to mine on two pools, xpoolx and riepool Here there is something wrong! First of all, you can improve the performance of mining directly by servers or by the pool as stated by xpoolx because it's the miner who works on a particular algorithm that produces the work! My test system consists of an Intel i7-4790 CPU with 8GB of ram and tried both the pool for about 30 minutes with xptminer 1.7dga c16 for stratum with current difficulty equal to 1426.0 See the results below! XpoolX http://imageshack.com/a/img907/2600/U2FIN5.jpgRiePool http://imageshack.com/a/img907/1584/q87SfH.jpgRiepool shows the correct Shares/sec values as 4ch/s on xptminer while xpoolx seems rigged in Hashrate values!!! Why with the same REAL Shares/sec riepool shows a concrete Hashrate of about 3600 KH/s while xpoolx shows a value of nearly 5000 KH/s Someone, or rather administrators of the respective pools can give me some logical explanation? I finally tested xptminer 2.0 downloaded from riepool and with this miner will get really superior performance from 0.21 to 0.28 Shares/sec!!! Below the link of my dashboard on riepool http://imageshack.com/a/img911/3411/e3ECjE.jpgI conclude to congratulate those who have improved the algorithm of miner and remember that the true values are those indicated by the miner himself and not the data shown by some pools...... Activity: 1 Super trusty, keep trying simba  |
|
|
|
|
danbrown
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 6
Merit: 0
|
|
January 16, 2016, 05:05:23 PM |
|
simba?? I asked for a technical explanation sir |
|
|
|
|
rhombus_77
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 33
Merit: 0
|
|
January 16, 2016, 10:08:32 PM |
|
Hey guys. What do I need to do to have xptminer automatically restart after disconnecting from the mining server. I am running Ubuntu on this particular computer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
merc84
|
|
January 17, 2016, 02:34:51 AM |
|
Hey guys. What do I need to do to have xptminer automatically restart after disconnecting from the mining server. I am running Ubuntu on this particular computer.
It should automatically reconnect once the chosen pool is available again. Hello everyone I'm Daniel and I'm a Riecoin fan. I was trying to mine on two pools, xpoolx and riepool Here there is something wrong! First of all, you can improve the performance of mining directly by servers or by the pool as stated by xpoolx because it's the miner who works on a particular algorithm that produces the work! My test system consists of an Intel i7-4790 CPU with 8GB of ram and tried both the pool for about 30 minutes with xptminer 1.7dga c16 for stratum with current difficulty equal to 1426.0 See the results below! XpoolX http://imageshack.com/a/img907/2600/U2FIN5.jpgRiePool http://imageshack.com/a/img907/1584/q87SfH.jpgRiepool shows the correct Shares/sec values as 4ch/s on xptminer while xpoolx seems rigged in Hashrate values!!! Why with the same REAL Shares/sec riepool shows a concrete Hashrate of about 3600 KH/s while xpoolx shows a value of nearly 5000 KH/s Someone, or rather administrators of the respective pools can give me some logical explanation? I finally tested xptminer 2.0 downloaded from riepool and with this miner will get really superior performance from 0.21 to 0.28 Shares/sec!!! Below the link of my dashboard on riepool http://imageshack.com/a/img911/3411/e3ECjE.jpgI conclude to congratulate those who have improved the algorithm of miner and remember that the true values are those indicated by the miner himself and not the data shown by some pools...... Honestly who cares both pools are 0% fee kh/s is hardly an accurate unit of measurement for ric, better would be share/s or the same metric used by the mining software. |
|
|
|
|
rhombus_77
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 33
Merit: 0
|
|
January 17, 2016, 03:07:32 AM |
|
Merc84: it doesn't reconnect. It just goes back to the command prompt after a 10 second timeout
|
|
|
|
|
|
Simba84
|
|
January 17, 2016, 03:15:59 AM |
|
Merc84: it doesn't reconnect. It just goes back to the command prompt after a 10 second timeout
Hello, if you're talking about xptMiner 2.0 I have not encountered yet this problem. I will check better by doing some tests. Thank you for reporting |
|
|
|
|
|
