[ANN][AUTO-SWITCH] Profit-switch auto-exchange pool: CleverMining.com

[Terk]

Real-time hashrate and rejected percentage data is available on user pages. It's updated every minute and shows last 60 minutes in 10-minute intervals. It isn't very pretty but it's working. The user page starts growing so I think I'll split it into some subpages soon so that you don't load all this data when refreshing the page.

Hashrate stats update every minute, so for example at 02:55 the “-10 min” data shows data for 02:45 - 02:54, “-20 min” for 02:35 - 02:44, and so on. One minute later they will be showing 02:46 - 02:55 and so on.

Let me know if the above is obvious from the charts or should I explain it somewhere on the website.

Rejected percentage shows both your rejected and average pool-wide rejected. It allows comparing your rejected ratio to average ratio so you could tell if a sudden spike in your rejected ratio is something you should worry (if pool average didn't spike) or is it just some faster coin being mined at the moment (if pool average spiked as well).

This is how it looks:

[1714925319]

1714925319

[1714925319]

1714925319

[1714925319]

1714925319

[1714925319]

1714925319

[Terk]

I enabled DOGE even if we're still small, but there are moments today when it's too much more profitable than other coins to ignore it. So we will be mining it when it is the most profitable.

There will be much more hourly variance because of that and we can have couple hours with very low results or even without any block found. You shouldn't worry, finally there will come an hour when we find a block and make up for previous hours. During times when DOGE isn't that profitable, we will be mining other coins as usual.

[Capttech08]

I am not sure why people are so obsessed with vardiff.  Changing the difficulty of submitted shares does nothing to find blocks faster or slower.  I was fine at middlecoin with diffs of 1024.  The pool doesn't get paid by shares, it gets paid by blocks.  I just like the website here better.

Because we have one crappy card, and 516 is too hard for shares.

What is your gpu? I got r9 290 with 883 kh/s mining in middlecoin. I mined yesterday in middlecoin for 24 hrs now and my Total BTC in a day is 0.12. I will switch to this pool after it is stable.

883kh/s? What settings good sir? I have 4 and they dont hit near that high. Which cards too? I run the 1st gen reference cards. Thanks in advanced

[buffalojr]

Terk,

Great updates only I think there is a problem. Instead of plotting the average of every 10 minutes, I think you are plotting the hashrate/reject rate for every minute.

When I compare a screen capture of my current hashrate graph to my old hashrate graph that is 10 minutes old, it should match up to one another(everything but the new data point). It doesn't. Don't want to rain on your parade hopefully this is a small bug.

Is anyone else seeing this? Hopefully its not only my problem. I tried to post screen-captures, but I'm having trouble get the image to show up right.

Great work so far. I am a fan.

Thanks,
George Jr.

[element515]

Terk,

Great updates only I think there is a problem. Instead of plotting the average of every 10 minutes, I think you are plotting the hashrate/reject rate for every minute.

When I compare a screen capture of my current hashrate graph to my old hashrate graph that is 10 minutes old, it should match up to one another(everything but the new data point). It doesn't. Don't want to rain on your parade hopefully this is a small bug.

Is anyone else seeing this? Hopefully its not only my problem. I tried to post screen-captures, but I'm having trouble get the image to show up right.

Great work so far. I am a fan.

Thanks,
George Jr.

I'm not 100% sure, but it looks fairly close to me. I was just gaming on my computer and the timeline doesn't seem too far off from when I went back to mining.

[Terk]

Great updates only I think there is a problem. Instead of plotting the average of every 10 minutes, I think you are plotting the hashrate/reject rate for every minute.

When I compare a screen capture of my current hashrate graph to my old hashrate graph that is 10 minutes old, it should match up to one another(everything but the new data point). It doesn't. Don't want to rain on your parade hopefully this is a small bug.

It is exactly as it should be, you just don't consider that the graph scale might change. So while the numbers are exactly the same, the shape might be a little bit different (higher or lower depending on how the scale changed).

I made a test on top hashrate user. There are two following screenshots with 10 minute intervals. I made a screen with hovering above three points. You will see that the numbers for -10, -40 and -50 minutes are exactly matching numbers for -20, -50 and -60 minutes measured ten minutes later.

[buffalojr]

Looks like I was wrong. I must of not refreshed my page when I did my first screen capture and it was more than 10 minutes separating the two captures. Everything looks fine now.

Apologies for the false alarm.

George Jr.

[Damnsammit]

I am not sure why people are so obsessed with vardiff.  Changing the difficulty of submitted shares does nothing to find blocks faster or slower.  I was fine at middlecoin with diffs of 1024.  The pool doesn't get paid by shares, it gets paid by blocks.  I just like the website here better.

Because we have one crappy card, and 516 is too hard for shares.

Because you have a crappy card the whole pool must change for you? are you serious? are you a spoiled child?  ohh and its 256/512/1024

No, dude, you don't get it!  If you are mining for longer than a few hours it doesn't matter at all.  Crappy card or not, your hashes submitted will always have the same chance to get a share at any time.  With a higher difficulty the only thing that changes is the variance, which averages out over time.

[beanhead]

I am not sure why people are so obsessed with vardiff.  Changing the difficulty of submitted shares does nothing to find blocks faster or slower.  I was fine at middlecoin with diffs of 1024.  The pool doesn't get paid by shares, it gets paid by blocks.  I just like the website here better.

Because we have one crappy card, and 516 is too hard for shares.

What is your gpu? I got r9 290 with 883 kh/s mining in middlecoin. I mined yesterday in middlecoin for 24 hrs now and my Total BTC in a day is 0.12. I will switch to this pool after it is stable.

Surely you mean 0.012 BTC in 24 hours with that hashrate?   0.12 is just not possible!

[dency45]

I am not sure why people are so obsessed with vardiff.  Changing the difficulty of submitted shares does nothing to find blocks faster or slower.  I was fine at middlecoin with diffs of 1024.  The pool doesn't get paid by shares, it gets paid by blocks.  I just like the website here better.

Because we have one crappy card, and 516 is too hard for shares.

What is your gpu? I got r9 290 with 883 kh/s mining in middlecoin. I mined yesterday in middlecoin for 24 hrs now and my Total BTC in a day is 0.12. I will switch to this pool after it is stable.

Surely you mean 0.012 BTC in 24 hours with that hashrate?   0.12 is just not possible!

It is a typo. Apology.

[Ritual]

No, dude, you don't get it!  If you are mining for longer than a few hours it doesn't matter at all.  Crappy card or not, your hashes submitted will always have the same chance to get a share at any time.  With a higher difficulty the only thing that changes is the variance, which averages out over time.

I'd have to agree with this. I'm not any kind of expert and am still learning about stuff like shares and vardiff, but speaking as someone who is mining in this pool with only 240Khash, the difficulty change hasn't affected me. In fact it seems the opposite - I am seeing higher returns than I expected.

Whatever Terk is doing seems to be working well

Rit.

[sgsdebruijn]

Are you investigating Clevermining and leave Middlecoin? 

[shango]

My rejected graph looks incredibly bad!
How is yours?

[lordshawk]

Started mining on this pool and my discard rate percentage is crazy.

Getworks   Accepted   Rejected   Hardware Errors   Utility   Discarded
337           39           9           0                   1.765           669


scan time = 28
expiry = 7
queue = 1

even at queue 0 it was this bad.. tried 30/30 on scan and expiry and no diff..

is this normal for the pool ?

[sgsdebruijn]

Will give it another try, mining since 15min

3.2Mh/s tonight 1 extra 280x card

[beanhead]

Started mining on this pool and my discard rate percentage is crazy.

Getworks   Accepted   Rejected   Hardware Errors   Utility   Discarded
337           39           9           0                   1.765           669


scan time = 28
expiry = 7
queue = 1

even at queue 0 it was this bad.. tried 30/30 on scan and expiry and no diff..

is this normal for the pool ?

Scan time  and Expiry shouldn't really have any effect on a Stratum pool.  But I wouldn't set my Expiry that low in any case.  Put them back to default Scan = 30, Expiry = 120 and see what happens.

You really only need to play with these setting if your solo mining or using a Getwork pool, so you would have a low scan time to detect new blocks.  But Stratum pools will tell you when there is a new block, so it's not necessary.

[sgsdebruijn]

How often does the unexchanged be refreshed?

[SanderHelgesen.]

once an hour i think

[pdaddy]

My rejected graph looks incredibly bad!
How is yours?
https://i.imgur.com/bQSCXwT.png

That is really nothing to worry about, my last hour looks like below, yet over 11 hours the rejects are just 3.6%.

http://i58.tinypic.com/2ilkbgx.jpg

[tpaclassic]

Thank you!  This right here is one of the main reasons I wanted to mine here.  I really like the way the stats are shown and provided.  Well that and the profitability.   

I'm also happy to say my rejects continue to be at a lower acceptable level after that last update.  The chart shows I'm around a constant 2-3% and that's perfectly fine by me.  Please keep doing what you're doing and thank you again for it!

Real-time hashrate and rejected percentage data is available on user pages. It's updated every minute and shows last 60 minutes in 10-minute intervals. It isn't very pretty but it's working. The user page starts growing so I think I'll split it into some subpages soon so that you don't load all this data when refreshing the page.