[ANN][AUTO-SWITCH] Profit-switch auto-exchange pool: CleverMining.com

[Axco]

For sure the amount can go up or down in the unexchanged or immature box.

That will be purely down to the exchange rate changing and beyond Terks or miners control.

The box that should not go down and only up is the ready for payout box.

So even the total profit box can go up and down as it says EXPECTED AS IT IS THE SUM OF THE 2 OTHER BOXES IMMATURE AND UNEXCHANGED.

I don't think it is anything to worry about.

Axco.

[1713912101]

1713912101

[1713912101]

1713912101

[1713912101]

1713912101

[FoFFiFFe]

Website is offline, error 522.

Same here. 

[Sinyk7]

"rejected untracked stratum share from pool 0"

Why am I getting these messages?

[DLXS]

I just have rejects and more rejects while in other pools I'm fine... Any help??

This is how I call my cgminer:

cgminer-3.6.0-windows>cgminer --scrypt -o stratum+tcp://us.clevermining.com:3333 -u 1..... -p x --thread-concurrency 7000 -I 11 -g 1 -w 256


And this is how bad it looks:



Why my rejects are crazily high? Doesn't matter if it's mining 5' or 2h or 10h. My rejection rate is huge.

Need some help, thanks.

[Axco]

Website is online ok for me.

rejected untracked stratum share, only means your miner program has got rid of that share from its memory and the server just sent you confirmation of it now, it still counts as a share for you. This info is a few pages back in the thread.

I also just received payout.

Thanks,
Axco.

[Starscream]

Website is offline, error 522.

It's up again and all the unexchanged changed, wonder if it's related.
Nonetheless, my payout jumped dramatically up  

[atp1916]

For all having issues with rejects -

-- Keep intensity below 19, try 18 (on -g 1 configs).

-- Insert -E 10 -s 5 -Q 0 settings into your config(s).

[talisin]

i know its a bit off topic, but im considering pointing my SHA power somewhere new, anyone got a SHA alternative similar to CM that pay's out in BTC?

[re9ister]

Website is offline, error 522.

BTC-E.com was offline too. Same error, same time.

[pengoau]

i know its a bit off topic, but im considering pointing my SHA power somewhere new, anyone got a SHA alternative similar to CM that pay's out in BTC?

tompool.org/index.jsp

[Terk]

Website offline was due to CloudFlare problems.

I just fetched manual trades from the last two days in the database and huge payouts has been sent.

Unexchanged and immature balance are only estimates and always can change. Total amount includes these estimates so it also can change. The change might be higher for manual trades because of bigger time difference between the actual deposit, trade and accounting in the pool software. Coins prices fluctuate and affect estimates.

Price of one of the coins that are not exchanged automatically (because it's not on any exchange with a decent API) has been going up and down in the last two days and it affected our estimates. I just fetched manual trades from the last 48 hours so it was really lot of blocks and the difference was noticeable.

Almost all trades are done automatically and the difference between estimates is tiny. For trades that are done manually, there might be bigger differences. These differences change your balance sometimes up and sometimes down, it's just nobody ever notices or complains when the estimated values go up.

Once again: unexchanged and immature are just estimated based on exchange rate. They're very accurate when we're able to exchange coins automatically, but when we need to do it manually and when the coin price changes a lot - what did happen yesterday - they change more (up or down).

I hate manual trades much more more than you might do, but sometimes a new coin is rising and it's worth to include it in the mix.

[pdaddy]

Last night I decided to give the pool another test. After 18 hours testing I feel safe to say that all seems to work fine for me. My ping to the pool is 217ms. Mining on a 7950.

[18:48:22] Started at [2014-02-24 00:45:34]
[18:48:22] Runtime: 18 hrs : 2 mins : 42 secs
[18:48:22] Average hashrate: 621.0 Kilohash/s
[18:48:22] Solved blocks: 1
[18:48:22] Best share difficulty: 1.48M
[18:48:22] Share submissions: 1213
[18:48:22] Accepted shares: 1132
[18:48:22] Rejected shares: 81
[18:48:22] Accepted difficulty shares: 579584
[18:48:22] Rejected difficulty shares: 41472
[18:48:22] Reject ratio: 6.7%
[18:48:22] Hardware errors: 0
[18:48:22] Utility (accepted shares / min): 1.05/min
[18:48:22] Work Utility (diff1 shares solved / min): 576.14/min

[Terk]

Also, for some users the balance decreased, but for some increased, depending on when you were mining. I had a browser tab open with yesterday stats and it was 0.010191 BTC/day at the end of the day. It was updated to 0.012777 BTC/day now after processing these manual trades. For yesterday's mining, unexchanged estimate increased (and was already paid out), because the coin which we were mining significantly increased in value. For this morning mining, estimate decreased as the price of this coin dropped back down significantly.

All of this is very rare at this pool because I aim to automate everything what's possible. As for now, we mine mostly coins which are fully automated on our end as these non-automated went back from being profitable to mediocre.

[big_coins]

thanks for the update, I understand what your saying.

Do you have an ETA for the euro servers ?

[Terk]

Do you have an ETA for the euro servers ?

Wednesday.

[ryancpwalsh]

For all having issues with rejects -

-- Keep intensity below 19, try 18 (on -g 1 configs).

-- Insert -E 10 -s 5 -Q 0 settings into your config(s).

Can you explain why you are suggesting this? 

Lowering my intensity lowers my overall hashrate - and on other pools I have close to 0% rejection rate (only here do I have a higher rate)

Can you explain what -E, -S, and -Q are as well, what their default values are, and why you're changing up or down instead of giving blind advice?

[byt411]

For all having issues with rejects -

-- Keep intensity below 19, try 18 (on -g 1 configs).

-- Insert -E 10 -s 5 -Q 0 settings into your config(s).

Can you explain why you are suggesting this? 

Lowering my intensity lowers my overall hashrate - and on other pools I have close to 0% rejection rate (only here do I have a higher rate)

Can you explain what -E, -S, and -Q are as well, what their default values are, and why you're changing up or down instead of giving blind advice?

Even if you lower your hashrate, (by the way, everyone knows that lowering intensity = lower hashrate, so no need to tell us) you still earn more than on other pools.
If you don't like CleverMining, then go away.

[phaddie]

Hey my last deposit is an hour old and still have no confirmations.  Is there something I can do?

[pengoau]

For all having issues with rejects -

-- Keep intensity below 19, try 18 (on -g 1 configs).

-- Insert -E 10 -s 5 -Q 0 settings into your config(s).

Can you explain why you are suggesting this? 

Lowering my intensity lowers my overall hashrate - and on other pools I have close to 0% rejection rate (only here do I have a higher rate)

Can you explain what -E, -S, and -Q are as well, what their default values are, and why you're changing up or down instead of giving blind advice?

cgminer/sgminer --help
for futher help

-E = expiry
-s = scan time
-Q = queue

[Starscream]

For all having issues with rejects -

-- Keep intensity below 19, try 18 (on -g 1 configs).

-- Insert -E 10 -s 5 -Q 0 settings into your config(s).

Can you explain why you are suggesting this? 

Lowering my intensity lowers my overall hashrate - and on other pools I have close to 0% rejection rate (only here do I have a higher rate)

Can you explain what -E, -S, and -Q are as well, what their default values are, and why you're changing up or down instead of giving blind advice?

--expiry|-E <arg>   Upper bound on how many seconds after getting work we consider a share from it stale (default: 120)
--scan-time|-s <arg> Upper bound on time spent scanning current work, in seconds (default: 60)
--queue|-Q <arg>    Minimum number of work items to have queued (0 - 10) (default: 1)

What atp1916 suggested works best for R9 290, other cards might require different values.