[ANN][AUTO-SWITCH] Profit-switch auto-exchange pool: CleverMining.com

[phzi]

--expiry|-E <arg>   Upper bound on how many seconds after getting work we consider a share from it stale (default: 120)
--scan-time|-s <arg> Upper bound on time spent scanning current work, in seconds (default: 60)
--queue|-Q <arg>    Minimum number of work items to have queued (0 - 10) (default: 1)

What atp1916 suggested works best for R9 290, other cards might require different values.

It has much more to do with the coin you are mining, not what cards you have.  10, 5, 0 are good values for a multi-pool.  You can go down to 2, 1, 0, but there isn't likely to be much change.  (some people use 1, 1, 0, but I find this results in too much work expiring).

Queue 0 is the most important.  Expiry is fairly irrelevant.

[1715092106]

1715092106

[1715092106]

1715092106

[1715092106]

1715092106

[1715092106]

1715092106

[CraftyMiner]

Hi CleverMining - are there any server alternatives I can use other than us.clevermining.com?

I get a ping of up to 290ms from New Zealand to us.clevermining.com, but a ping of around 100 to clevermining.com (without the us subdomain).

Your US West server should give me a reasonable ping if I can manually connect to it. OR will us.clevermining automatically connect me to your fastest/closest server?

Tx

[bloodrainer]

erm... last 63 pages kind of talk about servers and the fact that there is only one.

[talisin]

i know its a bit off topic, but im considering pointing my SHA power somewhere new, anyone got a SHA alternative similar to CM that pay's out in BTC?

tompool.org/index.jsp

thanks i will take a look

[dazz]

No missing coins here.
I did the math over the last 12 hours and I got about 95% of the coins I would at my current hashrate. The other 5% accounts for rejects (great improvement there by the way) so the figures in my stats page are spot on.
If the EU server helps knock down the reject rate a couple extra % points, better than good  

[superman3486]

I hope he does an USEAST, am still getting 12% with spikes of 15-20%

[CraftyMiner]

erm... last 63 pages kind of talk about servers and the fact that there is only one.

erm, well, excuse me. I started 6 pages back and couldn't see anything. Sorry to ask the same Q if it's been asked before, but I've been reading snippets about new servers coming online, .eu on Weds, perhaps... so it seems possible.
Additionally, I get 100ms to clevermining, but 300ms to us.clevermining - so there definitely is another server, whether it's a pool node or not is another Q.

[igroock]

I hope he does an USEAST, am still getting 12% with spikes of 15-20%

This

[bloodrainer]

erm... last 63 pages kind of talk about servers and the fact that there is only one.

erm, well, excuse me. I started 6 pages back and couldn't see anything. Sorry to ask the same Q if it's been asked before, but I've been reading snippets about new servers coming online, .eu on Weds, perhaps... so it seems possible.
Additionally, I get 100ms to clevermining, but 300ms to us.clevermining - so there definitely is another server, whether it's a pool node or not is another Q.

sorry i might have sounded a bit too harsh, Terk 6 posts above yours did an ETA on the next servers (EU), comming around wednesday

[CraftyMiner]

erm... last 63 pages kind of talk about servers and the fact that there is only one.

erm, well, excuse me. I started 6 pages back and couldn't see anything. Sorry to ask the same Q if it's been asked before, but I've been reading snippets about new servers coming online, .eu on Weds, perhaps... so it seems possible.
Additionally, I get 100ms to clevermining, but 300ms to us.clevermining - so there definitely is another server, whether it's a pool node or not is another Q.

sorry i might have sounded a bit too harsh, Terk 6 posts above yours did an ETA on the next servers (EU), comming around wednesday

No worries, I know it's frustrating when people post same Q's repeatedly. It's just a lot of time to go through 63 pages looking for one thing... and I was sure I'd read a hint of a West server.
Thanks

[sgsdebruijn]

That's why we have a search possibility on the toprightcorner

[_Crash_]

How exactly are we losing profitability against LTC if it's profit-switching? Surely it would switch to LTC if it's more profitable instead of mining lower profitable coins I just don't see the logic there.

[KC82]

How exactly are we losing profitability against LTC if it's profit-switching? Surely it would switch to LTC if it's more profitable instead of mining lower profitable coins I just don't see the logic there.

My take is that there is some variance involved. We got less shares than normal for an hour, but an average number of shares would have yielded better than LTC. Just look at the daily averages.

[phzi]

How exactly are we losing profitability against LTC if it's profit-switching? Surely it would switch to LTC if it's more profitable instead of mining lower profitable coins I just don't see the logic there.

Even if you mined only LTC, you would dip below and above expected profitability constantly.  It's called variance, or luck.

[Slight0]

For all having issues with rejects -

-- Keep intensity below 19, try 18 (on -g 1 configs).

-- Insert -E 10 -s 5 -Q 0 settings into your config(s).

I have always ran my r9 290 miners at -I 20 and seen little issues on other profit switching pools. However I'm getting >10% rejects on clevermining.

Can you explain why -I 18 is supposedly better in this case even though it appears to result in less WU and hashrate?

[wntrsnowg]

Hey guys, new to the forum and also to this server.  I have been mining for a couple weeks now on other pools with a 3x xfx r9 270 setup making ~1.4Mh with <1% errors.   I have been running on this server for almost a day now and CGWatcher reports 50% or more rejected.  However, cgminer reports ~2% rejects, 0 HW error.  (My personal computer also mines as well and has even higher rejects.)  The computers are located in Southern California with good internet, so latency shouldn't be an issue.  Last time i pinged it, got 55ms or so.

Is there a specific problem with my settings? (xfx r9 270 machine)

setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100
setx GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1
cgminer.exe --scrypt -o stratum+tcp://us.clevermining.com:3333 -u ~~~~ -p ~~~~~~~ -g 1 --worksize 128 -I 18 --thread-concurrency 21568 --gpu-vddc 1.17,1.18,1.18 --gpu-fan 85 --temp-overheat 90 --temp-cutoff 95 --lookup-gap 2 --gpu-engine 1060,1100,1100 --gpu-memclock 1450,1490,1490 --gpu-powertune 20 --no-submit-stale --failover-only

I have tried using the "-E 10, -S 5, -Q 0" and there is little/no impact on rejected.
Any help is appreciated. TIA

[csa1234]

4x Sapphire TOXIC R9 280X at 3.000 Kh/s for 24 hours, total profit on this pool: 0.01052211 BTC   what a joke!!! i can get 0.03 BTC on another pool

My miner is reporting 35% rejected shares totally on a 24 hour window period,  web page just reporting 0.02% pfffrrrrr GET REAL!!!

[rwo]

I have been testing out this nice pool for the last 4 hours..

my computer is mining with 600kb/s and the web pages show this too.

Looking at the rejects its around 3-7% according to web page.. but when I stopped cgminer it claimed that I had 60% reject. Now I'm wondering who is right?

my ping times is around 188ms, so a eu server would be nice.

Also as a miner its nice to know what your mining.. I know you don't like to post that.. but maybe you could make a Top20 list each month were we could see how much time we used on each coin.

[element515]

4x Sapphire TOXIC R9 280X at 3.000 Kh/s for 24 hours, total profit on this pool: 0.01052211 BTC   what a joke!!! i can get 0.03 BTC on another pool

My miner is reporting 35% rejected shares totally on a 24 hour window period,  web page just reporting 0.02% pfffrrrrr GET REAL!!!

Is this what is paid out to you or including your unexchanged and immature? If it is not just your payout, then something is wrong on your end because I make nearly .01BTC with .9Mh/s.

[meepstone]

I wish the real-time hashrate graph was accurate. im averaging 10% reject but my hashrate is always half on the 10 minute updates.