Bounty Hunters the cause of token dumping ?

[L A R A]

Again they become troubled by the community or team prices that have decreased. but in my opinion the wrong team is because they should have thought about this. maybe by holding a trading competition is one of the problems that can be overcome by a dump. because it makes the attractiveness of traders increase. we cannot blame the bounty hunter. regarding sales or not is their right.

I agree with you, we cannot blame the bounty hunter
Because usually the price of tokens or coins that are DUMPED at the beginning of the market entry is caused by:

• A less strong community
• Too many bonuses are given to investors during ICO

and also usually the bounty token is distributed after the price of the token is DUMPED

[LogitechMouse]

Most of the percentage are selling their tokens once the token listed to the market and that is really true. Im not saying all but yah they have bounty hunters are hding their tokens for longterm but only few so it means the number 1 cause of falling token price is the bounty hunters and we know all that because we know how bounty hunters do.

I believe in this. Who the hell will hold their tokens and hoping that their coin will increase after listing on an exchange? Maybe some stupid bounty hunters will do it but in my experience, I didn't see any token that increased its price after listing on an exchange.

To be honest, its not only the bounty hunters that causes the price of the token to plummet but also the investors and the team themselves too. Maybe we can't see it but we know that aside from the bounty hunters who want to get their profit, the investors and the team want to get some profit too so they will sell the tokens immediately after listing on an exchange.

[babarian]

Bounty hunters are always blamed, why is that? it seems that not all bounty hunters throw away the tokens they get when they enter the stock exchange.

Remember investors who get bonuses reach 50% of their tokens purchased when token sale? they could just throw the bonus tokens they got at the beginning of launching on the stock exchange.

[Apaxy]

Bounty hunters are always blamed, why is that? it seems that not all bounty hunters throw away the tokens they get when they enter the stock exchange.

Remember investors who get bonuses reach 50% of their tokens purchased when token sale? they could just throw the bonus tokens they got at the beginning of launching on the stock exchange.

The fact is that today almost all projects have a drop in prices for their coins after listing, and even an investor who bought tokens with a 50 percent discount is not profitable to sell coins immediately on the exchange.

[taktik]

Bounty hunters are always blamed, why is that? it seems that not all bounty hunters throw away the tokens they get when they enter the stock exchange.

Remember investors who get bonuses reach 50% of their tokens purchased when token sale? they could just throw the bonus tokens they got at the beginning of launching on the stock exchange.

The fact is that today almost all projects have a drop in prices for their coins after listing, and even an investor who bought tokens with a 50 percent discount is not profitable to sell coins immediately on the exchange.

Exactly.  That is why the majority of the investor went shopping immediately on the stock exchange, and did not buy the company during ico.  and there already appeared a new concept for the development of new IEO projects, which in any case will improve investor confidence in their investments.

[LUCKMCFLY]

Bounty hunters are alwasy blame for selling their tokens so quickly without waiting for the project develpment as outline in the roadmap.  I don't think bounty hunters are to blame because a lot of bounty hunters hold their coins for years.

This is a very sensitive issue, because if so, I have usually been in projects where they have had a very large community, where the moment came when the project was on the cusp and when the developers and creators of the project started doing things bad with the community, the massive dumps began and it was so much, that today they have not yet been able to raise in price, reached almost 20USD the currency, and now it is in less than 1 USD.

Now the projects impose some rules to avoid the dum of the bounty hunters, because many times the projects do not have liquidity to support the massive dump, in the case that there are not many investors, the ones that can be united in a great way are the bounty hunters that are ready to do the dump at any time, that is why they have an impact.

[pealr12]

I dont think bounty  hunters are always to blame when it comes to token dumping.  The reward for bounty is only 1%  of the total amout of token so how can they say that bounty hunters always start the dump. Token sale, advisor and for the team has the most percentage of the token.

[Joanne Wayne]

In my opinion, it is not fair to accuse the participants of the Bounty company in the total fall in prices for tokens after the listing, although this does not happen without their participation. First, pay attention to the entire cryptocurrency market, because if you follow the price level until the end of 2018, prices fell on all cryptocurrencies, including the most rated ones. So what can we say about new projects in this situation? Of course, new coins did not withstand competition. Secondly, the total sale of all cryptocurrency and withdrawal, for example, Bitcoin and ethereum in Fiat, provoked price cuts, and therefore investors and participants of Bounty companies, to return at least the money spent, sell new counters for Ethereum and Bitcoin, which reduces the value of these coins. I think that there are a lot of reasons for the fall in prices for tokens and here we need to understand comprehensively, and not blame the participants of the Bounty company individually. Today, investors in the cryptocurrency market are not the most deceived people, because participants of the Bounty companies have no protection and their work today is not appreciated. Therefore, Bounty Hunters are also victims, not evil.

[n0ne]

I dont think bounty  hunters are always to blame when it comes to token dumping.  The reward for bounty is only 1%  of the total amout of token so how can they say that bounty hunters always start the dump. Token sale, advisor and for the team has the most percentage of the token.

Well, the bounty allocation is very small in comparison to the total supply availability. The token sale and the rewards were entirely different from the bounty. Bounty is provided for the work done by the users for the promotion of that particular product or project. These days after certain time period the bounty tokens were distributed, upon which it is true that bounty hunters weren't the reason for the dumping of the price of the tokens.

[edisystem]

I dont think bounty  hunters are always to blame when it comes to token dumping.  The reward for bounty is only 1%  of the total amout of token so how can they say that bounty hunters always start the dump. Token sale, advisor and for the team has the most percentage of the token.

In my opinion is not totally bounty hunters fault but bounty hunters is also one of the reason why token dumping. Even the total coins from bounty is only 1% but if all 1% being sold, it will makes the price fall for sure. Advisor and the team has more tokens true, but obviously they are not the one who sell the token.

[Landak]

I disagree with this, because if the price is dumped by a bounty hunter who sells his token, it means that the project is weak, if the project is strong/good, no matter whether the dump comes from a bounty hunter, the project and the community will remain strong to hold sales by bounty hunters.
the point is, if the bounty hunter sells tokens and the price drops, that means the project is weak

[Distinctin]

I dont think bounty  hunters are always to blame when it comes to token dumping.  The reward for bounty is only 1%  of the total amout of token so how can they say that bounty hunters always start the dump. Token sale, advisor and for the team has the most percentage of the token.

In my opinion is not totally bounty hunters fault but bounty hunters is also one of the reason why token dumping. Even the total coins from bounty is only 1% but if all 1% being sold, it will makes the price fall for sure. Advisor and the team has more tokens true, but obviously they are not the one who sell the token.

Bounty hunters is part of the success of the crowdsale, of course they will have to enjoy the reward given to them.
If the team does not want the price to dump, they have to make the right action, either to delay the payment or just find a liquid exchange.
Some just allow the price to dump and make some investors upset, but if investors really understands the potential, they can wait and hold, and even accumulate.

[hovrah]

In my opinion, it is not fair to accuse the participants of the Bounty company in the total fall in prices for tokens after the listing, although this does not happen without their participation. First, pay attention to the entire cryptocurrency market, because if you follow the price level until the end of 2018, prices fell on all cryptocurrencies, including the most rated ones. So what can we say about new projects in this situation? Of course, new coins did not withstand competition. Secondly, the total sale of all cryptocurrency and withdrawal, for example, Bitcoin and ethereum in Fiat, provoked price cuts, and therefore investors and participants of Bounty companies, to return at least the money spent, sell new counters for Ethereum and Bitcoin, which reduces the value of these coins. I think that there are a lot of reasons for the fall in prices for tokens and here we need to understand comprehensively, and not blame the participants of the Bounty company individually. Today, investors in the cryptocurrency market are not the most deceived people, because participants of the Bounty companies have no protection and their work today is not appreciated. Therefore, Bounty Hunters are also victims, not evil.

You really put it correctly, lead really there are a lot of reasons that influence the pricing beckons from the New projects, among which, of course, the participants of the Bounty companies.  But it seems to me that all this excitement around the association of Bounty Hunters has certain goals.  Probably they want to specifically reduce or destroy this type of activity.

[Irazzzta]

in my opinion, maybe it's true that Bounty Hunter made the price of a new token listing dump. But the price dump was not significant, it was only for a moment. Which makes the price of coins dump, I think it depends on developers and communities. Prices can drop significant because the product results from the project do not match with the main goal, or community investor not solid because don't trust the developer. don't forget general market conditions also have the potential to affect dump prices.

[Seeker#9]

Some of the bounty hunters can be partly blamed for a token dumping because these people want a quick profit. Investors of the token during its ICO can also cause a dump in the price of the token by selling some of their coin after it listed in the exchange for thefirst time. The bounty hunters are also the first one to complain of very low token price when it is listed in the exchanges. I'm also a bounty hunter but if the token has a bright potential, I'd rather hold it till its price go up.

[ropyu1978]

Bounty hunters are alwasy blame for selling their tokens so quickly without waiting for the project develpment as outline in the roadmap.  I don't think bounty hunters are to blame because a lot of bounty hunters hold their coins for years.

this is how the team and the developer have a strategy to deal with each dump situation after entering an exchange.
of course not all bounty hunters will release their tokens after entering the exchange. so I'm not sure this is the only problem.
the lack of experience of the team and the developer is the main factor. yes, in my opinion

[ciang huang]

Not all bounty hunters will sell everything at the Exchange, because I'm sure if the token has been entered on the Exchange, everyone has the right to sell and buy, so this is normal, investors can also cause prices to fall because they can find profits to buy again at low prices Dan if it is sold again it will get a lot of big profits

[Siren]

Not all bounty hunters will sell everything at the Exchange, because I'm sure if the token has been entered on the Exchange, everyone has the right to sell and buy, so this is normal, investors can also cause prices to fall because they can find profits to buy again at low prices Dan if it is sold again it will get a lot of big profits

And the amount thay bounty hunter's accumulated from the ico project is just a tin part.of the whole tokens/coins so why always blamed the Hunter's?

We are only working to help the project at the same timw to earn some amount in exchange to our work and effort so please stop blaming the bounty Hunter's instead help us to get right value because in many instance bounty hunters has been scammed by the team itself by paying smaller from the promised payments

[Silberman]

Bounty hunters are alwasy blame for selling their tokens so quickly without waiting for the project develpment as outline in the roadmap.  I don't think bounty hunters are to blame because a lot of bounty hunters hold their coins for years.

The developers should rather be blame and not the bounty Hunters because they are one who want free service. Many bounty project are out to scam investors as we have seeing over the years in the crypto currency community.

because those developers are too greedy and they don't wanna spent their money to create a good partnership with the exchange site. The developer must be a party that must have blamed. as long as the dev think liquidity is very important and the dump will not happen dude.

It's not that simple to be honest, even if the token get listed on exchange, the price can also dumping too.

There are many reasons why the price of token dumping and yes one of the is because of bounty hunters, because as people know, bounty hunters always sell their token directly after they received the tokens from bounty.

Bounty hunters get most of the blame but when you look at the data it does not make sense, the amount of tokens bounty hunters receive is very small compared to the amount of coins whales have at their disposal, so if a coin dumps after it hits the market it is most likely because a whale is selling his coins and this makes everyone to try to get out of the market as well.

[mrdeposit]

I do not think this thought is right. If the projects want to make a promotion, they should take action. Besides, if the price is dumped with 1-2% of the amount sold, the project is already weak.