Bitcoin Forum
December 07, 2019, 06:30:28 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 0.19.0.1 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  

Warning: Moderators do not remove likely scams. You must use your own brain: caveat emptor. Watch out for Ponzi schemes. Do not invest more than you can afford to lose.

Warning: One or more bitcointalk.org users have reported that they strongly believe that the creator of this topic is a scammer. (Login to see the detailed trust ratings.) While the bitcointalk.org administration does not verify such claims, you should proceed with extreme caution.
Pages: « 1 ... 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 [186] 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 ... 272 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ActiveMining] Official Shareholder Discussion Thread [Moderated]  (Read 629452 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic.
Bargraphics
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 518
Merit: 500


Every man is guilty of all the good he did not do.


View Profile
June 02, 2014, 09:49:43 PM
 #3701

The law would not tell Ken to refund people in Bitcoin.  They don't recognize Bitcoin as a currency.  So the refunds would be in cash.  If you paid $140, he'll have to refund you $140.  Based on what you paid in cash is what you will get reimbursed.    

 

So it would be off IPO price then?

Most likely, but which one? >.>
1575700228
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1575700228

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1575700228
Reply with quote  #2

1575700228
Report to moderator
1575700228
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1575700228

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1575700228
Reply with quote  #2

1575700228
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
SebastianJu
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2450
Merit: 1043


Legendary Escrow Service - Tip Jar in Profile


View Profile WWW
June 02, 2014, 09:53:17 PM
 #3702

The law would not tell Ken to refund people in Bitcoin.  They don't recognize Bitcoin as a currency.  So the refunds would be in cash.  If you paid $140, he'll have to refund you $140.  Based on what you paid in cash is what you will get reimbursed.    

 

Are you sure about that? Its not that people invested fiat into ken, they invested bitcoins. So in case they would have given him gold instead of bitcoins he would need to give back gold i guess.

Please ALWAYS contact me through bitcointalk pm before sending someone coins.
bigdude
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 854
Merit: 500


View Profile
June 02, 2014, 09:55:53 PM
 #3703

Clearly Ken needs to get his head out of the sand and make a statement to investors
damiano
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1246
Merit: 1000


103 days, 21 hours and 10 minutes.


View Profile
June 02, 2014, 10:06:10 PM
 #3704

I sold a lot weeks ago... I'm out a lot.  Should I re purchase what I sold? For refund/accounting purposes?
kslaughter
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 476
Merit: 250



View Profile WWW
June 02, 2014, 10:07:59 PM
 #3705

Active Mining will have to use non-investor funds to pay a fine of up to $100,000 this will have to come from
the mining account only.  The balance in the mining account will used to fund operations.
hazryder
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 208
Merit: 100



View Profile WWW
June 02, 2014, 10:09:20 PM
 #3706

Active Mining will have to use non-investor funds to pay a fine of up to $100,000 this will have to come from
the mining account only.  The balance in the mining account will used to fund operations.

How can we get reimbersed for our shares?
GTR_JOEY
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 99
Merit: 10


View Profile
June 02, 2014, 10:11:07 PM
 #3707

Ffs.. You fucking monkeys.. Wait no, monkeys would do a better job
kslaughter
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 476
Merit: 250



View Profile WWW
June 02, 2014, 10:12:47 PM
 #3708

Active Mining will have to use non-investor funds to pay a fine of up to $100,000 this will have to come from
the mining account only.  The balance in the mining account will used to fund operations.

How can we get reimbersed for our shares?

This will be announced at a latter time.
damiano
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1246
Merit: 1000


103 days, 21 hours and 10 minutes.


View Profile
June 02, 2014, 10:14:13 PM
 #3709

Active Mining will have to use non-investor funds to pay a fine of up to $100,000 this will have to come from
the mining account only.  The balance in the mining account will used to fund operations.

How can we get reimbersed for our shares?

This will be announced at a latter time.

When will the remaining dividends be paid out?  How do you feel about ACTM end of 2014?
knybe
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 658
Merit: 500


decentralize EVERYTHING...


View Profile
June 02, 2014, 10:16:55 PM
 #3710

Active Mining will have to use non-investor funds to pay a fine of up to $100,000 this will have to come from
the mining account only.  The balance in the mining account will used to fund operations.

How can we get reimbersed for our shares?

This will be announced at a latter time.

Ken, STOP DRAGGING THIS OUT.

Reimburse those that want out and be done with it so you can concentrate and continue with your business.

please.
tempestb
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 729
Merit: 500



View Profile
June 02, 2014, 10:18:50 PM
 #3711

Are you sure about that? Its not that people invested fiat into ken, they invested bitcoins. So in case they would have given him gold instead of bitcoins he would need to give back gold i guess.

The Government doesn't recognize gold as a currency, you would have to refund people in cash.  For instance, in court cases that involve broken engagements, a court cannot force one party to return an engagement ring.  Instead the court fines that person in cash.  The courts deal with cash.  Property sometimes, but that is usually auctioned off for cash.  At no point does the court say, "You gave him a 1978 Jeep.  You need to return him a 1978 Jeep."   Never happens.  The refund will have to be in cash.


1D7JwRnoungL1YQy7sJMsqmA8BHkPcKGDJ
We mine as we dream...  Alone
Mutated btc
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 84
Merit: 10


View Profile
June 02, 2014, 10:19:05 PM
 #3712

Active Mining will have to use non-investor funds to pay a fine of up to $100,000 this will have to come from
the mining account only.  The balance in the mining account will used to fund operations.

and the rest of share?

i sended email 20th may,

how long is few days?
kslaughter
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 476
Merit: 250



View Profile WWW
June 02, 2014, 10:21:38 PM
 #3713

I sold a lot weeks ago... I'm out a lot.  Should I re purchase what I sold? For refund/accounting purposes?

The refund will only be for the current price you purchased at this time, not for your previous price.
Mutated btc
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 84
Merit: 10


View Profile
June 02, 2014, 10:26:53 PM
 #3714

I sold a lot weeks ago... I'm out a lot.  Should I re purchase what I sold? For refund/accounting purposes?

The refund will only be for the current price you purchased at this time, not for your previous price.

answer me too ken please

update me on the rest of share verification, sended before deadline,

say not yet, if you didnt, for peace of my mind
thefunkybits
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1218
Merit: 1000


View Profile
June 02, 2014, 10:27:49 PM
 #3715

I sold a lot weeks ago... I'm out a lot.  Should I re purchase what I sold? For refund/accounting purposes?

The refund will only be for the current price you purchased at this time, not for your previous price.

what happens to shares that are bought out? are they destroyed or do they become the company's?
HardwareReviewer
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 256
Merit: 250


View Profile
June 02, 2014, 10:30:16 PM
 #3716

Active Mining will have to use non-investor funds to pay a fine of up to $100,000 this will have to come from
the mining account only.  The balance in the mining account will used to fund operations.

So instead of refunding customers, you will use the income of the mining farm to pay the fine.
Great story.

Prepare to enter a world of stress
shaofis
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 106
Merit: 10


View Profile
June 02, 2014, 10:37:13 PM
 #3717

The balance in the mining account will used to fund operations.

Which operations? There are still two companies here right... are you taking the ActM profits to fund VMC's failures?
finlof
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 630
Merit: 500


View Profile
June 02, 2014, 10:37:30 PM
 #3718


Let's not flood this thread with "LEMMEOUTZBRO!" Send him an e-mail or a PM.  Cheesy

Edit: I would be curious what other investors interpret "Reimbursement" to be. Original IPO value (.0005), IPO 2.0 (.0025), or some other value?

fuck it. I only look forward to the day I never have to read this godforsaken thread ever again.

you wont be able to stop looking.  you will keep coming back for more.  you're an addict and this is your drug.  prove me wrong...
Ozymandias2
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 98
Merit: 10


View Profile
June 02, 2014, 10:50:20 PM
 #3719

What are the other [relevant] repercussions aside from the up to $100,000 fine? The further issuing of shares is obviously irrelevant since the currently issued shares are non-dilutable.
arousedrhino
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 347
Merit: 250


View Profile
June 02, 2014, 10:55:36 PM
 #3720

So, some motherfucker snitched on Ken and now we are all fucked...

No, it was Ken's actions that did this. The secretary of state guy said Ken has done it before with another company in Misouri.


Sure, we are all very fond of government involvement here.

Probably, the funds left will go for lawyers and government fines...

No it was an investor that does not understand risk. Who then whined to his government even though he was using an unregulated currency. We all knew the risks those who involved the government should never have been using BTC in the first place.
Pages: « 1 ... 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 [186] 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 ... 272 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!