[ANN][ICO] ⚡️⚡️ SKYNET 🚀 Infinity Chain Blockchain + First Blockchain Chip ⚡️⚡️

[AndreiYoung]

Until now there has been no recent news regarding the evidence of partnerships such as those on the website. How can you prove the truth?

Currently Skynet is developing a core RISC-V blockchain with a standard ISA. You can find them here: https://riscv.org/members-at-a-glance/. Regarding other companies, Skynet approached them about the possibility for them to use Skynet's core later. Since Skynet does not yet have a functioning product, then Skynet is an official technology partner with most of them but has no current employment relationship. This is the only information I get so far about the Skynet partnership.

So they are merely an official technology partner with them because it is still a shade in the RISC-V Foundation but there is no work bond. But why are they on the partners list of this project on the website, as if there were already some work bonds between them? Do you also know information about this?

Regarding this I don't know for sure, because I've never read this before. It seems that only teams know better why the names of these companies are on their partnership list for this project as it's on the Skynet website.

[1715165491]

1715165491

[YaoShang]

I've heard that Skynet doesn't make full chips and only makes a core design similar to the Arm model with greater scalability and lower cost. Then who will make the chip?

[Lonelly_Mode]

I've heard that Skynet doesn't make full chips and only makes a core design similar to the Arm model with greater scalability and lower cost. Then who will make the chip?

I think this has been discussed before but well, it seems they will work with ASIC vendors and IoT companies to produce ASICs with Skynet core in them. And as you see in the organization, all the semiconductors (excluding arm and including OpenSingularity) like Nvidia, Google, NXP, Qualcomm, Samsung, etc are working together to disrupt the dominance of ARM through RISC-V. At the moment, if you wanted to provide a competitor, it's basically impossible. The only way is making the core license free, and that's what Skynet doing, and as a result of providing a competitive alternative, many IoT companies they approached are willing to work with them to deploy low cost IoT blockchain chips. I guess so.

[keinelaa]

I've heard that Skynet doesn't make full chips and only makes a core design similar to the Arm model with greater scalability and lower cost. Then who will make the chip?

I think this has been discussed before but well, it seems they will work with ASIC vendors and IoT companies to produce ASICs with Skynet core in them. And as you see in the organization, all the semiconductors (excluding arm and including OpenSingularity) like Nvidia, Google, NXP, Qualcomm, Samsung, etc are working together to disrupt the dominance of ARM through RISC-V. At the moment, if you wanted to provide a competitor, it's basically impossible. The only way is making the core license free, and that's what Skynet doing, and as a result of providing a competitive alternative, many IoT companies they approached are willing to work with them to deploy low cost IoT blockchain chips. I guess so.

If so, can you provide a list of the names of the IoT companies? Just as evidence only if they establish a cooperative relationship. Have you got information from it?

[Lonelly_Mode]

I've heard that Skynet doesn't make full chips and only makes a core design similar to the Arm model with greater scalability and lower cost. Then who will make the chip?

I think this has been discussed before but well, it seems they will work with ASIC vendors and IoT companies to produce ASICs with Skynet core in them. And as you see in the organization, all the semiconductors (excluding arm and including OpenSingularity) like Nvidia, Google, NXP, Qualcomm, Samsung, etc are working together to disrupt the dominance of ARM through RISC-V. At the moment, if you wanted to provide a competitor, it's basically impossible. The only way is making the core license free, and that's what Skynet doing, and as a result of providing a competitive alternative, many IoT companies they approached are willing to work with them to deploy low cost IoT blockchain chips. I guess so.

If so, can you provide a list of the names of the IoT companies? Just as evidence only if they establish a cooperative relationship. Have you got information from it?

As I said before, until now there has been no latest news related to this project partnership contract work. Because, whether it's on their website, social media, or blog in the medium, it doesn't seem to broadcast it yet, so I can't assume anything about it. Sory about that.

[keinelaa]

I've heard that Skynet doesn't make full chips and only makes a core design similar to the Arm model with greater scalability and lower cost. Then who will make the chip?

I think this has been discussed before but well, it seems they will work with ASIC vendors and IoT companies to produce ASICs with Skynet core in them. And as you see in the organization, all the semiconductors (excluding arm and including OpenSingularity) like Nvidia, Google, NXP, Qualcomm, Samsung, etc are working together to disrupt the dominance of ARM through RISC-V. At the moment, if you wanted to provide a competitor, it's basically impossible. The only way is making the core license free, and that's what Skynet doing, and as a result of providing a competitive alternative, many IoT companies they approached are willing to work with them to deploy low cost IoT blockchain chips. I guess so.

If so, can you provide a list of the names of the IoT companies? Just as evidence only if they establish a cooperative relationship. Have you got information from it?

As I said before, until now there has been no latest news related to this project partnership contract work. Because, whether it's on their website, social media, or blog in the medium, it doesn't seem to broadcast it yet, so I can't assume anything about it. Sory about that.

No need to apologize, we are just exchanging information about this project. One more thing if I may to ask, if all these companies contribute to making this new chip type and the Skynet roll is to add blockchain / IoT technology to this chip which will eventually be used by the manifacture company that is part of the RISC-V collaboration. Does this mean the Skynet protocol / technology exists on every RISC-V chip? Or does manufacturing make RISC-V chips have the option to include or exclude Skynet protocols?

[Lonelly_Mode]

I've heard that Skynet doesn't make full chips and only makes a core design similar to the Arm model with greater scalability and lower cost. Then who will make the chip?

I think this has been discussed before but well, it seems they will work with ASIC vendors and IoT companies to produce ASICs with Skynet core in them. And as you see in the organization, all the semiconductors (excluding arm and including OpenSingularity) like Nvidia, Google, NXP, Qualcomm, Samsung, etc are working together to disrupt the dominance of ARM through RISC-V. At the moment, if you wanted to provide a competitor, it's basically impossible. The only way is making the core license free, and that's what Skynet doing, and as a result of providing a competitive alternative, many IoT companies they approached are willing to work with them to deploy low cost IoT blockchain chips. I guess so.

If so, can you provide a list of the names of the IoT companies? Just as evidence only if they establish a cooperative relationship. Have you got information from it?

As I said before, until now there has been no latest news related to this project partnership contract work. Because, whether it's on their website, social media, or blog in the medium, it doesn't seem to broadcast it yet, so I can't assume anything about it. Sory about that.

No need to apologize, we are just exchanging information about this project. One more thing if I may to ask, if all these companies contribute to making this new chip type and the Skynet roll is to add blockchain / IoT technology to this chip which will eventually be used by the manifacture company that is part of the RISC-V collaboration. Does this mean the Skynet protocol / technology exists on every RISC-V chip? Or does manufacturing make RISC-V chips have the option to include or exclude Skynet protocols?

In each of these cores, Skynet has an embedded hardware wallet like Ledger. Each of these cores will be equipped with several cryptocurrencies from Skynet. Their core is optimized for the network, and the network pushes the actual functionality and applications back to the core (or device). Of course IoT vendors would prefer to include only cryptocurrency instead of paying 10m for ARM upfront fees and paying 2% royalties for all the income they generate. As a result, Skynet believes they can achieve projected devices connected several billion in the next few years because Skynet Core can drive all existing IOT devices rather than customized for a very very specific market. Skynet also plans to become the most adopted network for IoT. Because the way they will not go bankrupt by handing out free cores is the same as raising the value of the cryptocurrencies they distribute. Hopefully this explanation can help and not make you confused because it is too long and somewhat exaggerated. Because of this information I got so far.

[keinelaa]

I've heard that Skynet doesn't make full chips and only makes a core design similar to the Arm model with greater scalability and lower cost. Then who will make the chip?

I think this has been discussed before but well, it seems they will work with ASIC vendors and IoT companies to produce ASICs with Skynet core in them. And as you see in the organization, all the semiconductors (excluding arm and including OpenSingularity) like Nvidia, Google, NXP, Qualcomm, Samsung, etc are working together to disrupt the dominance of ARM through RISC-V. At the moment, if you wanted to provide a competitor, it's basically impossible. The only way is making the core license free, and that's what Skynet doing, and as a result of providing a competitive alternative, many IoT companies they approached are willing to work with them to deploy low cost IoT blockchain chips. I guess so.

If so, can you provide a list of the names of the IoT companies? Just as evidence only if they establish a cooperative relationship. Have you got information from it?

As I said before, until now there has been no latest news related to this project partnership contract work. Because, whether it's on their website, social media, or blog in the medium, it doesn't seem to broadcast it yet, so I can't assume anything about it. Sory about that.

No need to apologize, we are just exchanging information about this project. One more thing if I may to ask, if all these companies contribute to making this new chip type and the Skynet roll is to add blockchain / IoT technology to this chip which will eventually be used by the manifacture company that is part of the RISC-V collaboration. Does this mean the Skynet protocol / technology exists on every RISC-V chip? Or does manufacturing make RISC-V chips have the option to include or exclude Skynet protocols?

In each of these cores, Skynet has an embedded hardware wallet like Ledger. Each of these cores will be equipped with several cryptocurrencies from Skynet. Their core is optimized for the network, and the network pushes the actual functionality and applications back to the core (or device). Of course IoT vendors would prefer to include only cryptocurrency instead of paying 10m for ARM upfront fees and paying 2% royalties for all the income they generate. As a result, Skynet believes they can achieve projected devices connected several billion in the next few years because Skynet Core can drive all existing IOT devices rather than customized for a very very specific market. Skynet also plans to become the most adopted network for IoT. Because the way they will not go bankrupt by handing out free cores is the same as raising the value of the cryptocurrencies they distribute. Hopefully this explanation can help and not make you confused because it is too long and somewhat exaggerated. Because of this information I got so far.

Yes it's a long explanation.
But by the way thanks for the answer I appreciate it. Let's hope that the team can realize it all, although there are still some things I still want to know.

[Pab]

I have been reading your page and white paper for last 40 min and even that 40 min is not enough.Whatever SkyNet is representing future what is now and you have very impressive team
Best Regards
Pab

[GrahamHood]

Does anyone know the current condition of private sales, is it done or is it still going on?

[HarryJoett]

Does anyone know the current condition of private sales, is it done or is it still going on?

As I know is that private sales are still going on. Maybe.

[GrahamHood]

Does anyone know the current condition of private sales, is it done or is it still going on?

As I know is that private sales are still going on. Maybe.

Well, but when I tried the website but it doesn't let me choose a stage. Are currently still in stage one? Do you know about this?

[HarryJoett]

Does anyone know the current condition of private sales, is it done or is it still going on?

As I know is that private sales are still going on. Maybe.

Well, but when I tried the website but it doesn't let me choose a stage. Are currently still in stage one? Do you know about this?

They are not. Private sale is a closed round. You'll be able to click on one during their token distribution event. I guess.

[GrahamHood]

Does anyone know the current condition of private sales, is it done or is it still going on?

As I know is that private sales are still going on. Maybe.

Well, but when I tried the website but it doesn't let me choose a stage. Are currently still in stage one? Do you know about this?

They are not. Private sale is a closed round. You'll be able to click on one during their token distribution event. I guess.

Okay, it sounds pretty solid. 50% pre-sale I think is quite high. Do private sales investors get bigger discounts or are the information classified? Do you have any additional information about this?

[HarryJoett]

Does anyone know the current condition of private sales, is it done or is it still going on?

As I know is that private sales are still going on. Maybe.

Well, but when I tried the website but it doesn't let me choose a stage. Are currently still in stage one? Do you know about this?

They are not. Private sale is a closed round. You'll be able to click on one during their token distribution event. I guess.

Okay, it sounds pretty solid. 50% pre-sale I think is quite high. Do private sales investors get bigger discounts or are the information classified? Do you have any additional information about this?

I just got the information that Skynet changed their token metrics but the changes are not yet alive. They will make sure it is fair for private sales investors and public sales investors. And their team will keep the process transparent. I feel like that.

[YaoShang]

Are all blockchains able to connect to Skynet? Or just specific? And are certain blockchains better suited to it than others? Can anyone help me find that answer?

[enginsev]

Very low sync.

[AndreiYoung]

Are all blockchains able to connect to Skynet? Or just specific? And are certain blockchains better suited to it than others? Can anyone help me find that answer?

I read the white paper and there they mention how the Tendermint team built something called ETGate, which is their method of creating a bridge between Ethereum and the Tendermint consensus. The same protocol type can be built for any other network if there is some way to determine the finality of each block and whether the block is returned. Skynet is still in the early stages of building what they call a "chain of entangled".

[YaoShang]

Are all blockchains able to connect to Skynet? Or just specific? And are certain blockchains better suited to it than others? Can anyone help me find that answer?

I read the white paper and there they mention how the Tendermint team built something called ETGate, which is their method of creating a bridge between Ethereum and the Tendermint consensus. The same protocol type can be built for any other network if there is some way to determine the finality of each block and whether the block is returned. Skynet is still in the early stages of building what they call a "chain of entangled".

If it were like that would a fast and friendly IoT blockchain be more appealing to Skynet? Or it doesn't matter because eventually the transaction will be done on the Skynet blockchain? Do you know the information? Because if I look at whitepaper only Ethereum and EOS mentioned.

[AndreiYoung]

Are all blockchains able to connect to Skynet? Or just specific? And are certain blockchains better suited to it than others? Can anyone help me find that answer?

I read the white paper and there they mention how the Tendermint team built something called ETGate, which is their method of creating a bridge between Ethereum and the Tendermint consensus. The same protocol type can be built for any other network if there is some way to determine the finality of each block and whether the block is returned. Skynet is still in the early stages of building what they call a "chain of entangled".

If it were like that would a fast and friendly IoT blockchain be more appealing to Skynet? Or it doesn't matter because eventually the transaction will be done on the Skynet blockchain? Do you know the information? Because if I look at whitepaper only Ethereum and EOS mentioned.

Regarding to that in my personal response, Skynet hopes that all future transactions will be done on the Skynet Open Network and ecosystem. However, I think they found another way to think about their Skynet Core business model is to be the "Android" of IoT where most of the IoT devices will be built on the Skynet core. The network will be something similar to Google Search and Google Store App where the default device for their cryptocurrency / application. Of course, while Skynet wants everyone to use Google Search, they want to support other popular platforms like Firefox or Bing because their goal is to provide widespread blockchain adoption. I guess so.