Hollowman338
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1246
Merit: 1000
|
|
March 10, 2014, 12:56:19 AM Last edit: March 10, 2014, 04:07:20 AM by Hollowman338 |
|
OpenEX is shutting down.
|
|
|
|
eddywise
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 253
Merit: 250
Let's Boolberry
|
|
March 10, 2014, 07:04:56 AM |
|
cannot conected the pool
|
Boolberry : @eddywise DRK: XqTbkj1hpCWBpBSvbWtzBRu5PxzJ2KoA3F BTC: 1FZYvzY4cPLwwZmU8rGPM7xGYjfjiZUmuZ Once desperately want, now desperate to forget
|
|
|
MiningViking
Member
Offline
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
|
|
March 10, 2014, 10:35:32 AM |
|
Time Since Last Block 3 hours 50 minutes 20 seconds with more then 2/3 of the network on the pool!?
|
Iraq!? Afghanistan!? Bring your boys back home and drop a few big ones!!
|
|
|
barwizi (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 882
Merit: 1000
|
|
March 10, 2014, 10:38:26 AM |
|
Time Since Last Block 3 hours 50 minutes 20 seconds with more then 2/3 of the network on the pool!? 12:15:55  { "blocks" : 8338, "currentblocksize" : 1000, "currentblocktx" : 0, "difficulty" : 0.00003799, "errors" : "", "generate" : false, "genproclimit" : -1, "hashespermin" : "No information yet. Wait at least 4 minutes after starting mining for estimate.", "networkhashps" : 857, "pooledtx" : 0, "testnet" : false } 12:37:00  getmininginfo 12:37:00  { "blocks" : 8345, "currentblocksize" : 1000, "currentblocktx" : 0, "difficulty" : 0.00003841, "errors" : "", "generate" : false, "genproclimit" : -1, "hashespermin" : "No information yet. Wait at least 4 minutes after starting mining for estimate.", "networkhashps" : 851, "pooledtx" : 0, "testnet" : false } block are going slower as the difficulty adjusts. But i think there is something wrong with the pool.
|
|
|
|
MiningViking
Member
Offline
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
|
|
March 10, 2014, 12:05:46 PM |
|
block are going slower as the difficulty adjusts. But i think there is something wrong with the pool.
Well pool seems to be finding blocks again, it might just been extremely unlucky and i mean waiting for the bus and get a Boeing 737 in the head kind of unlucky. Nice to see NRS get some love at Poloniex, trade volume up almost x10 since yesterday
|
Iraq!? Afghanistan!? Bring your boys back home and drop a few big ones!!
|
|
|
pinwc4
Member
Offline
Activity: 100
Merit: 10
|
|
March 10, 2014, 01:41:56 PM Last edit: March 10, 2014, 02:14:17 PM by pinwc4 |
|
block are going slower as the difficulty adjusts. But i think there is something wrong with the pool.
Thanks for the notice. The pool was still finding the blocks and getting shares from people. Just the website just was not reflecting this. It has caught up once again and the shares were portioned out to the miners. There is a job that runs every minute to update the statistics on the site and pay out but it stopped early in the morning. This is the standard MPOS mechanism, we will have to tweak this a little to catch failures like this. We are also looking into the connection failures. Not sure what is going on with that yet though. Every computer we try from connects fine so a little harder to troubleshoot without being able to replicate.
|
|
|
|
miningcrew
Member
Offline
Activity: 117
Merit: 10
|
|
March 10, 2014, 04:04:08 PM |
|
I know it is peanuts but im willing to donate 0.1BTC to whoever puts up a working pool for NRS.
Now there is a pool... - network hashrate increased from 85 to 1000+ within 24 hours. But immediately there are miners, who are prepared to sell coins at costs (+10%, 20 %), if I look at prices at Poloniex There will not be many NRS and the reward (per block) is decreasing quickly - why some people sell at such low prices (volume is pretty high)?
|
|
|
|
criptonauta
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 37
Merit: 0
|
|
March 10, 2014, 04:17:06 PM |
|
How come the pool only shows 1 active worker if I have 2 and am seeing them mine?
|
|
|
|
barwizi (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 882
Merit: 1000
|
|
March 10, 2014, 04:35:52 PM |
|
Are you planning to repair Noirbits?
My client syncs correctly meaning (hopefully) the chain is functional, however, once i get time i am either updating it to the latest litecoin-codebase or moving it to an altogether new algorithm. noirbits.com is offline, NoirBits information will be uploaded to the Noir Investment Group website, along with other important info like pools.
|
|
|
|
r3wt
|
|
March 10, 2014, 05:27:57 PM |
|
you may want to go ahead and remove openex from your exchange list. we will not be back for likely a very long time.
|
My negative trust rating is reflective of a personal vendetta by someone on default trust.
|
|
|
pinwc4
Member
Offline
Activity: 100
Merit: 10
|
|
March 10, 2014, 06:46:49 PM |
|
How come the pool only shows 1 active worker if I have 2 and am seeing them mine?
Did you create 2 separate workers? If you point all your clients to one worker name the pool will only display it as one worker.
|
|
|
|
toldy
|
|
March 10, 2014, 09:39:09 PM Last edit: March 10, 2014, 11:07:53 PM by toldy |
|
I had NoirSharesd running for over 24 hours. I bought coins and transferred them successfully to the wallet. I shut down the daemon. I added gen=1 to the NoirShares.conf file to see if I could mine with the Daemon This is the error: NoirSharesd: kernel.cpp:368: unsigned int GetStakeModifierChecksum(const CBlockIndex*): Assertion `pindex->pprev || pindex->GetBlockHash() == (!fTestNet ? hashGenesisBlock : hashGenesisBlockTestNet)' failed. Now I've set gen=0, and tried to start the daemon, and it's the same error. I've rebuilt the daemon, and it's the same error. I'm ready to delete the downloaded blockchain and see if that helps. This appears to be a problem with the NoirSharesd code though. I'm trying this on Ubuntu, 32-bit *** glibc detected *** NoirSharesd: double free or corruption (!prev): 0x099eb758 *** ======= Backtrace: ========= /lib/i386-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(+0x75ee2)[0xb7051ee2] /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6(_ZdlPv+0x1f)[0xb727a51f] NoirSharesd[0x80e3093] NoirSharesd[0x80e316a] /usr/lib/libboost_thread.so.1.48.0(+0xb1cc)[0xb76931cc] /lib/i386-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0(+0x6d4c)[0xb72bcd4c] /lib/i386-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(clone+0x5e)[0xb70cbbae] ======= Memory map: ========
UPDATE:This part is the most problematic it seems: double free or corruption (!prev)What I did, was run it again, exported my private keys before the crash. I removed all references to gen=1 and gen=0 from my NoirShares.conf. Created a completely new data directory, which generated a new wallet. I imported the private keys again, and resynced the block chain. My coins are back, and everything is good. Word of warning, never put gen=1 or gen=0 in your conf file otherwise apparently you corrupt some of the data files or your wallet. This is my findings anyway. By the way, this miner: https://github.com/reorder/momentum-getwork..doesn't work for me. I can run it, but then it segmentation faults on me at this exact part of ptc.py: hasher = PTSHasher(0, 0) Segmentation fault (core dumped) Can we not get a cgminer fork that has momentum algo in it? Even if it comes off cgminer 2.x which had CPU capability in it?
|
|
|
|
pvkpgp
|
|
March 11, 2014, 02:17:01 AM |
|
The pool can't connect
attempting to connect to nrs.blockquarry.com 3197931ms th_b miner.cpp:106 main ] 107.16 1.23.73:4444 3219023ms th_b miner.cpp:112 main ] unspec ified 由于连接方在一段时间后没有正确答复或连接的主机没有反应,连接尝试失败。 {"message":"由于连接方在一段时间后没有正确答复或连接的主机没有反应,连接尝试 失败。"}
|
|
|
|
pinwc4
Member
Offline
Activity: 100
Merit: 10
|
|
March 11, 2014, 02:25:15 AM |
|
The pool can't connect
attempting to connect to nrs.blockquarry.com 3197931ms th_b miner.cpp:106 main ] 107.16 1.23.73:4444 3219023ms th_b miner.cpp:112 main ] unspec ified 由于连接方在一段时间后没有正确答复或连接的主机没有反应,连接尝试失败。 {"message":"由于连接方在一段时间后没有正确答复或连接的主机没有反应,连接尝试 失败。"}
Sorry to say we are still seeing issues with people trying to connect from the Asia region. I am not sure what is blocking the communication. For testing we bypassed any DDOS protection we had placed on the server to rule it out and one user has reported that using a VPN worked so it seems that something between the miners in that region and the server is blocking communication. Still trying to figure it out because we do not have a good answer.
|
|
|
|
yvg1900
Member
Offline
Activity: 66
Merit: 10
Dev of yam miner
|
|
March 11, 2014, 07:32:58 AM |
|
Sorry to say we are still seeing issues with people trying to connect from the Asia region. I am not sure what is blocking the communication. For testing we bypassed any DDOS protection we had placed on the server to rule it out and one user has reported that using a VPN worked so it seems that something between the miners in that region and the server is blocking communication. Still trying to figure it out because we do not have a good answer.
Is your pool using getwork? I may add support for your pool in upcoming yam release. yvg1900
|
Follow @yvg1900 on Twitter for yam miner updates
|
|
|
MiningViking
Member
Offline
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
|
|
March 11, 2014, 09:51:28 AM |
|
Sorry to say we are still seeing issues with people trying to connect from the Asia region. I am not sure what is blocking the communication. For testing we bypassed any DDOS protection we had placed on the server to rule it out and one user has reported that using a VPN worked so it seems that something between the miners in that region and the server is blocking communication. Still trying to figure it out because we do not have a good answer.
Is your pool using getwork? I may add support for your pool in upcoming yam release. yvg1900 That would be awesomesauce..
|
Iraq!? Afghanistan!? Bring your boys back home and drop a few big ones!!
|
|
|
lumeire
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1848
Merit: 1009
Next-Gen Trade Racing Metaverse
|
|
March 11, 2014, 12:10:30 PM |
|
This one's more profitable to mine than MMC imo.
|
|
|
|
pinwc4
Member
Offline
Activity: 100
Merit: 10
|
|
March 11, 2014, 04:00:57 PM |
|
Sorry to say we are still seeing issues with people trying to connect from the Asia region. I am not sure what is blocking the communication. For testing we bypassed any DDOS protection we had placed on the server to rule it out and one user has reported that using a VPN worked so it seems that something between the miners in that region and the server is blocking communication. Still trying to figure it out because we do not have a good answer.
Is your pool using getwork? I may add support for your pool in upcoming yam release. yvg1900 This would be great. We are using the coyote miner created by bytemaster on bitsharestalk.org, https://github.com/InvictusInnovations/coyote_minerThis miner is not getwork based. Unfortunately from looking at the source I do not think it is based on any existing protocol. We did not modify the pool miner from that project, our only modifications were server side so the network protocol is the same.
|
|
|
|
pocketbits
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 39
Merit: 0
|
|
March 11, 2014, 07:39:04 PM |
|
bump! please support my wallet! 9qAvA2wD58tCfsZF8Es2JPYwQQsA8Wiwe4 i can't mine or install wallet until I get home from work in 9 hours!
|
|
|
|
barwizi (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 882
Merit: 1000
|
|
March 11, 2014, 08:27:39 PM |
|
Having the client updated soon. Please read the Noir Investment Groupand Investment Optionsdocuments to understand what the next move is, now that we have established a stable network. For now only the General Fund will be open. If you have any questions, please let me know.
|
|
|
|
|