[ANN][FLAP] FlappyCoin ★ OLD/DEAD THREAD GO TO NEW ONE ★

[alchebyte]

Do we have a bounty set up for the guy compiling the Windows wallet?

so we can expect the new wallet shortly?

thimo, are you doing a Gitian build or trying to build this with mingw on Windows?

I don't think you can get the expected executable without doing the Gitian build...

Im doing it with mingw and it seems to be working:

https://i.imgur.com/Ca2lDyy.png

Cool, how did you end up resolving the winsock2 header issue?

[1715134179]

1715134179

[1715134179]

1715134179

[1715134179]

1715134179

[thimo]

Do we have a bounty set up for the guy compiling the Windows wallet?

so we can expect the new wallet shortly?

thimo, are you doing a Gitian build or trying to build this with mingw on Windows?

I don't think you can get the expected executable without doing the Gitian build...

Im doing it with mingw and it seems to be working:

cut

Cool, how did you end up resolving the winsock2 header issue?

I never have problems with that, but you should probably add the compiler flag -lws32!

Here are the binaries, i'll upload to github in a minute

http://slothcoin.org/download/flappycoin-windows 2.0.0.1.rar

please test it thouroughly and report any bug!

[danfred]

I don't think you can get the expected executable without doing the Gitian build...

I not a C++ programmer... but I've learned from Google that the official wallet builds for Litecoin are made using Gitian build process.

[cyberhacker]

we are ready to go!!!!!!!!!!!!

[thimo]

Okay first problem, it seems the blockchain won't go further than 5999... I see that there's a diffmode change at block 6000


in main.cpp

Code:

unsigned int static GetNextWorkRequired(const CBlockIndex* pindexLast, const CBlockHeader *pblock)
{
	int DiffMode = 1;
	if (fTestNet) {
		if (pindexLast->nHeight+1 >= 50) { DiffMode = 2; }
	}
	else {
		if (pindexLast->nHeight+1 >= 6000) { DiffMode = 2; } <----- this
	}

	if		(DiffMode == 1) { return GetNextWorkRequired_V1(pindexLast, pblock); }
	else if	(DiffMode == 2) { return GetNextWorkRequired_V2(pindexLast, pblock); }
	return GetNextWorkRequired_V2(pindexLast, pblock);
}

[alchebyte]

we are ready to go!!!!!!!!!!!!

Slow down, there needs to be some testing first

[flappycoin]

Do we have a bounty set up for the guy compiling the Windows wallet?

so we can expect the new wallet shortly?

thimo, are you doing a Gitian build or trying to build this with mingw on Windows?

I don't think you can get the expected executable without doing the Gitian build...

Im doing it with mingw and it seems to be working:

cut

Cool, how did you end up resolving the winsock2 header issue?

I never have problems with that, but you should probably add the compiler flag -lws32!

Here are the binaries, i'll upload to github in a minute

http://slothcoin.org/download/flappycoin-windows 2.0.0.1.rar

please test it thouroughly and report any bug!

Will do. Just one moment downloading now for testing. What's your flap address by the way?

[thimo]

Will do. Just one moment downloading now for testing. What's your flap address by the way?

Hold on, let's first get it working properly.

You have added the KGW fix yourself right?

[flappycoin]

Will do. Just one moment downloading now for testing. What's your flap address by the way?

Hold on, let's first get it working properly.

You have added the KGW fix yourself right?

I have.

Are you looking at the below fork or the old fork?

We don't have access to flappycoin of github, so we had to do a fork awhile back off the master fork listed at FlapCoin.

https://github.com/FlapCoin/flapcoin/commits/master

You'll see commits there. At the same point the KGW exploit fix was implemented then it's block number changed.

[thimo]

Okay fixed it, i'm downloading the entire chain to make sure everything is okay. Then i will compile wallets and upload.

[alchebyte]

Okay first problem, it seems the blockchain won't go further than 5999... I see that there's a diffmode change at block 6000


in main.cpp

Code:

unsigned int static GetNextWorkRequired(const CBlockIndex* pindexLast, const CBlockHeader *pblock)
{
	int DiffMode = 1;
	if (fTestNet) {
		if (pindexLast->nHeight+1 >= 50) { DiffMode = 2; }
	}
	else {
		if (pindexLast->nHeight+1 >= 6000) { DiffMode = 2; } <----- this
	}

	if		(DiffMode == 1) { return GetNextWorkRequired_V1(pindexLast, pblock); }
	else if	(DiffMode == 2) { return GetNextWorkRequired_V2(pindexLast, pblock); }
	return GetNextWorkRequired_V2(pindexLast, pblock);
}

I hope that's not from the original source, that's pretty ugly logic there

[spartagates]

 

[flappycoin]

You have no idea how much we appreciate the work; and we are getting things ready now. Discussing/sending information for DNS switching, we can begin to update links afterwards, the website, and setting up tipbot VPS as we speak.

You also have no idea how much; to everyone for what it is worth we can not apologise enough for this situation.

[dogechode]

Okay fixed it, i'm downloading the entire chain to make sure everything is okay. Then i will compile wallets and upload.

Awesome thanks!! Looking forward to this. Thimo, are you planning to stay on the team for future compiles or is this a one time thing?

[thimo]

Okay first problem, it seems the blockchain won't go further than 5999... I see that there's a diffmode change at block 6000


in main.cpp

Code:

unsigned int static GetNextWorkRequired(const CBlockIndex* pindexLast, const CBlockHeader *pblock)
{
	int DiffMode = 1;
	if (fTestNet) {
		if (pindexLast->nHeight+1 >= 50) { DiffMode = 2; }
	}
	else {
		if (pindexLast->nHeight+1 >= 6000) { DiffMode = 2; } <----- this
	}

	if		(DiffMode == 1) { return GetNextWorkRequired_V1(pindexLast, pblock); }
	else if	(DiffMode == 2) { return GetNextWorkRequired_V2(pindexLast, pblock); }
	return GetNextWorkRequired_V2(pindexLast, pblock);
}

I hope that's not from the original source, that's pretty ugly logic there

That's pretty hard to read code, but getting it to work is top priority of course!

It isn't that bad, it works.

Code:

unsigned int static GetNextWorkRequired(const CBlockIndex* pindexLast, const CBlockHeader *pblock)
{
	if (fTestNet) {
		if (pindexLast->nHeight+1 >= 50) {  return GetNextWorkRequired_V2(pindexLast, pblock); }
	}

	if (pindexLast->nHeight+1 >= 6000) { return GetNextWorkRequired_V2(pindexLast, pblock); }
	return GetNextWorkRequired_V1(pindexLast, pblock);
}

Would work as well

[cyberhacker]

You have no idea how much we appreciate the work; and we are getting things ready now. Discussing/sending information for DNS switching, we can begin to update links afterwards, the website, and setting up tipbot VPS as we speak.

You also have no idea how much; to everyone for what it is worth we can not apologise enough for this situation.

Simply do not disappear forever!

 

[flappycoin]

You have no idea how much we appreciate the work; and we are getting things ready now. Discussing/sending information for DNS switching, we can begin to update links afterwards, the website, and setting up tipbot VPS as we speak.

You also have no idea how much; to everyone for what it is worth we can not apologise enough for this situation.

Simply do not disappear forever!

 

I won't. I won't make excuses either. I nearly abandoned the project when half my team quit and my compile guys ended up not delivering. Though that's not fair to everyone; and this is why the old developer left to a couple weeks back(Nearly same situation for him and his team actually). Unable to come up with a solution. After my whole "Is it worth it? What can I do?" I came to the realization that this project needs honesty. It needs maturity and it deserves someone willing to stay and take the blame and attempt to move forward with the community to fix these issues.

[cyberhacker]

You have no idea how much we appreciate the work; and we are getting things ready now. Discussing/sending information for DNS switching, we can begin to update links afterwards, the website, and setting up tipbot VPS as we speak.

You also have no idea how much; to everyone for what it is worth we can not apologise enough for this situation.

Simply do not disappear forever!

 

I won't. I won't make excuses either. I nearly abandoned the project when half my team quit and my compile guys ended up not delivering. Though that's not fair to everyone; and this is why the old developer left to a couple weeks back(Nearly same situation for him and his team actually). Unable to come up with a solution. After my whole "Is it worth it? What can I do?" I came to the realization that this project needs honesty. It needs maturity and it deserves someone willing to stay and take the blame and attempt to move forward with the community to fix these issues.

now we have thimo, let's move on

[MarketMagic]

Do we have a bounty set up for the guy compiling the Windows wallet?

When this is done I am putting up 10,000,000 FLAP towards bounty for guys that sort this problem out after I get a few trades on FLAP when market moves.Then depending on how price works out will donate 10% off all profits back into FLAP organisation.

[spartagates]

I will be sending some flap aswell