Holdaaja
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1274
Merit: 1000
|
|
March 28, 2014, 11:47:07 AM |
|
You can see tx id's of withdrawals
|
|
|
|
|
everydice (OP)
|
|
March 28, 2014, 12:19:03 PM Last edit: March 28, 2014, 12:33:50 PM by everydice |
|
Hi Shitaifan, Good question actually The deposited BTC didn't actually go into a single 'hot wallet' address, all players' deposit address are belong to our wallet. You can check this when you deposit (with account that doesn't use Blockchain's service of course) the BTC doesn't go anywhere, but already calculated to your balance. We just prove this by manually sending all the BTC to 1EDiceWi5LtofKBZ25V4yXg951rqCcVnpb via this transaction: https://blockchain.info/tx/158b7cf62c5cb6e0b5895e89918aaced342df20f4c9592919a1b8310ecf943bd. You can recalculate again now Regarding your withdrawal Tx Id, it actually can be deleted automatically by the Bitcoin system over time, however we will check again on this issue to ensure this is the case. The deposit Tx Id is already in the history log now Warm Regards, Ed
|
|
|
|
uptweets
|
|
March 28, 2014, 12:32:30 PM |
|
I've experienced this too, blockchain.info didn't forward my deposit until one day later. I don't think it's the site's fault but they always make quick response.
|
|
|
|
shitaifan2013
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 874
Merit: 1000
monero
|
|
March 28, 2014, 04:35:15 PM |
|
Hi Shitaifan, Good question actually The deposited BTC didn't actually go into a single 'hot wallet' address, all players' deposit address are belong to our wallet. You can check this when you deposit (with account that doesn't use Blockchain's service of course) the BTC doesn't go anywhere, but already calculated to your balance. We just prove this by manually sending all the BTC to 1EDiceWi5LtofKBZ25V4yXg951rqCcVnpb via this transaction: https://blockchain.info/tx/158b7cf62c5cb6e0b5895e89918aaced342df20f4c9592919a1b8310ecf943bd. You can recalculate again now Regarding your withdrawal Tx Id, it actually can be deleted automatically by the Bitcoin system over time, however we will check again on this issue to ensure this is the case. The deposit Tx Id is already in the history log now Warm Regards, Ed really fast reaction, thx a lot and the numbers from the three 1ED-adresses do match with the bankroll now too have a nice weekend!
|
|
|
|
Holdaaja
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1274
Merit: 1000
|
|
March 28, 2014, 04:51:52 PM |
|
Why I can withdraw so low amount daily
|
|
|
|
everydice (OP)
|
|
March 28, 2014, 05:14:19 PM |
|
Why I can withdraw so low amount daily Hi Holdaaja, actually the withdrawal limit is higher before player1 and noana case few weeks ago. We lower this limit for additional security layer for the investors. However we will start increasing this limitation / change the calculation by time and and when some players start hitting the limitation
|
|
|
|
Holdaaja
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1274
Merit: 1000
|
|
March 28, 2014, 05:17:05 PM |
|
Why I can withdraw so low amount daily Hi Holdaaja, actually the withdrawal limit is higher before player1 and noana case few weeks ago. We lower this limit for additional security layer for the investors. However we will start increasing this limitation / change the calculation by time and and when some players start hitting the limitation What is player1 and noana cases?
|
|
|
|
Kyraishi
|
|
March 28, 2014, 05:19:55 PM |
|
But much to say, time is money.
|
|
|
|
everydice (OP)
|
|
March 28, 2014, 05:39:12 PM |
|
Why I can withdraw so low amount daily Hi Holdaaja, actually the withdrawal limit is higher before player1 and noana case few weeks ago. We lower this limit for additional security layer for the investors. However we will start increasing this limitation / change the calculation by time and and when some players start hitting the limitation What is player1 and noana cases? Long story short ... In the early days of ED, a player using player1 and noana account is able to make a false bet and withdraw some false winnings, so we had to take cover all the losses to make everything back to normal
|
|
|
|
mattyon9
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 34
Merit: 0
|
|
March 28, 2014, 10:19:21 PM |
|
You need to find yourself some high rollers ! I've been away forever yet no one has topped any of my bets !
|
|
|
|
FUR11
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 378
Merit: 250
FURring bitcoin up since 1762
|
|
March 28, 2014, 11:05:46 PM |
|
You need to find yourself some high rollers ! I've been away forever yet no one has topped any of my bets !
That's because those are max bets. It doesn't make sense to bet large with such low max bets because any progression will be stopped very quickly.
|
|
|
|
mattyon9
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 34
Merit: 0
|
|
March 28, 2014, 11:50:08 PM |
|
You need to find yourself some high rollers ! I've been away forever yet no one has topped any of my bets !
That's because those are max bets. It doesn't make sense to bet large with such low max bets because any progression will be stopped very quickly. Yes but I got on those ranks when max win was 0.6xx BTC. Gambling up to 0.2 for a return of 0.6xx 3x payout !
|
|
|
|
FUR11
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 378
Merit: 250
FURring bitcoin up since 1762
|
|
March 28, 2014, 11:56:13 PM |
|
You need to find yourself some high rollers ! I've been away forever yet no one has topped any of my bets !
That's because those are max bets. It doesn't make sense to bet large with such low max bets because any progression will be stopped very quickly. Yes but I got on those ranks when max win was 0.6xx BTC. Gambling up to 0.2 for a return of 0.6xx 3x payout ! Right, I'm saying that's not smart. And yes, I fully understand the lunacy of suggesting that one -ev bet is smarter then another -ev bet.
|
|
|
|
mattyon9
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 34
Merit: 0
|
|
March 29, 2014, 12:08:23 AM |
|
You need to find yourself some high rollers ! I've been away forever yet no one has topped any of my bets !
That's because those are max bets. It doesn't make sense to bet large with such low max bets because any progression will be stopped very quickly. Yes but I got on those ranks when max win was 0.6xx BTC. Gambling up to 0.2 for a return of 0.6xx 3x payout ! Right, I'm saying that's not smart. And yes, I fully understand the lunacy of suggesting that one -ev bet is smarter then another -ev bet. Sure it isn't smart but gives you hell of a return if you do it right
|
|
|
|
FUR11
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 378
Merit: 250
FURring bitcoin up since 1762
|
|
March 29, 2014, 12:17:13 AM |
|
You need to find yourself some high rollers ! I've been away forever yet no one has topped any of my bets !
That's because those are max bets. It doesn't make sense to bet large with such low max bets because any progression will be stopped very quickly. Yes but I got on those ranks when max win was 0.6xx BTC. Gambling up to 0.2 for a return of 0.6xx 3x payout ! Right, I'm saying that's not smart. And yes, I fully understand the lunacy of suggesting that one -ev bet is smarter then another -ev bet. Sure it isn't smart but gives you hell of a return if you do it right That's what I'm saying. "Doing it right" infers a maximum martingale progression. With such a low max bet, you have to decide between winning very small amounts per iteration or having a much higher risk of ruin. That's why I don't like a standard 2x martingale with such a low max bet, you're going to bump up against it very often.
|
|
|
|
boumalo
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1918
Merit: 1018
|
|
March 29, 2014, 12:44:13 AM |
|
You need to find yourself some high rollers ! I've been away forever yet no one has topped any of my bets !
That's because those are max bets. It doesn't make sense to bet large with such low max bets because any progression will be stopped very quickly. Yes but I got on those ranks when max win was 0.6xx BTC. Gambling up to 0.2 for a return of 0.6xx 3x payout ! Right, I'm saying that's not smart. And yes, I fully understand the lunacy of suggesting that one -ev bet is smarter then another -ev bet. Sure it isn't smart but gives you hell of a return if you do it right That's what I'm saying. "Doing it right" infers a maximum martingale progression. With such a low max bet, you have to decide between winning very small amounts per iteration or having a much higher risk of ruin. That's why I don't like a standard 2x martingale with such a low max bet, you're going to bump up against it very often. Instead of doing a martingale you can do a big bet with a 1.05 or 1.1 payout, it is the same thing mathematically speaking I see a few new players coming on ED everyday and some come back, it is picking up very slowly, do we have stats on new players and traffic?
|
|
|
|
leepsteer00
|
|
March 29, 2014, 08:16:06 AM |
|
Invested a little on your site. Probably will invest more in the future.
|
|
|
|
everydice (OP)
|
|
March 29, 2014, 02:01:25 PM |
|
You need to find yourself some high rollers ! I've been away forever yet no one has topped any of my bets !
That's because those are max bets. It doesn't make sense to bet large with such low max bets because any progression will be stopped very quickly. Yes but I got on those ranks when max win was 0.6xx BTC. Gambling up to 0.2 for a return of 0.6xx 3x payout ! Right, I'm saying that's not smart. And yes, I fully understand the lunacy of suggesting that one -ev bet is smarter then another -ev bet. Sure it isn't smart but gives you hell of a return if you do it right That's what I'm saying. "Doing it right" infers a maximum martingale progression. With such a low max bet, you have to decide between winning very small amounts per iteration or having a much higher risk of ruin. That's why I don't like a standard 2x martingale with such a low max bet, you're going to bump up against it very often. Instead of doing a martingale you can do a big bet with a 1.05 or 1.1 payout, it is the same thing mathematically speaking I see a few new players coming on ED everyday and some come back, it is picking up very slowly, do we have stats on new players and traffic? Actually traffic from BitcoinTalk is increasing in the last 7 days, also all of bets you see in ED are guaranteed to be from real players. However we are still finding a way to push ED to get traffic from outside BitcoinTalk too. Invested a little on your site. Probably will invest more in the future. Thanks a lot leepsteer! We will do our best to grow your investment
|
|
|
|
everydice (OP)
|
|
March 29, 2014, 02:21:02 PM |
|
UPDATE 29 March 2014: Players are now able to see how many players are being their referral!@Boumalo: we believe you are waiting for this feature
|
|
|
|
|