king_of_alts
Member
 Offline
Activity: 476
Merit: 10
|
 |
October 03, 2018, 12:06:00 PM |
|
Bonuses also can be useful, it really depends on the project.
In the long term it doesnt matter which method you choose I think.
In short term, bonuses are very crucial. But looking for the long term, the project itself and how it will be executed is the only important thing. agreed, my opinion is that there is a place for bonuses and bounties to promote the projects. In the current state of the market I don't think bounties mean that much. It makes more sense now to target institutional investors. Bonuses probably should be considered, but bounties...I don't know. They have a bounty program with a small budget, it seems to me that this will not make big affect of token price in the first listing. I love projects with no bounty or little bounty. Otherwise, it causes a big dump. Lane Axis's bounty budget is really nothing to fear about. You are right, big bounty budget always results in a bigger dump. I think they should balance amount raised and decide bounty later ? Most projects allocate 1% of the sold tokens to the bounty campaign. this is not much but it is still enough to cause dumps. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
loup
|
|
October 03, 2018, 12:22:32 PM |
|
Bonuses also can be useful, it really depends on the project.
In the long term it doesnt matter which method you choose I think.
In short term, bonuses are very crucial. But looking for the long term, the project itself and how it will be executed is the only important thing. agreed, my opinion is that there is a place for bonuses and bounties to promote the projects. In the current state of the market I don't think bounties mean that much. It makes more sense now to target institutional investors. Bonuses probably should be considered, but bounties...I don't know. They have a bounty program with a small budget, it seems to me that this will not make big affect of token price in the first listing. I love projects with no bounty or little bounty. Otherwise, it causes a big dump. Lane Axis's bounty budget is really nothing to fear about. You are right, big bounty budget always results in a bigger dump. I think they should balance amount raised and decide bounty later ? Most projects allocate 1% of the sold tokens to the bounty campaign. this is not much but it is still enough to cause dumps. Because there are not just bounty hunters, there are also some investors that buy with huge bonus and sell quickly to have fast profit. |
|
|
|
|
levyashin
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 980
Merit: 276
$CYBERCASH METAVERSE
|
|
October 03, 2018, 12:40:19 PM |
|
Bonuses also can be useful, it really depends on the project.
In the long term it doesnt matter which method you choose I think.
In short term, bonuses are very crucial. But looking for the long term, the project itself and how it will be executed is the only important thing. agreed, my opinion is that there is a place for bonuses and bounties to promote the projects. In the current state of the market I don't think bounties mean that much. It makes more sense now to target institutional investors. Bonuses probably should be considered, but bounties...I don't know. They have a bounty program with a small budget, it seems to me that this will not make big affect of token price in the first listing. I love projects with no bounty or little bounty. Otherwise, it causes a big dump. Lane Axis's bounty budget is really nothing to fear about. It's true, but on the other hand there will be few participants in such a bounty program, and this action will be ineffective. I think that the best way when bounty budget somewhere in the middle. Actually i am not sure about it. Because i saw too many projects with smaller bounty budget and more people than huge bounty budgets. It is mostly about the bounty manager. |
|
|
|
king_of_alts
Member
Offline
Activity: 476
Merit: 10
|
|
October 03, 2018, 01:40:48 PM |
|
Bonuses also can be useful, it really depends on the project.
In the long term it doesnt matter which method you choose I think.
In short term, bonuses are very crucial. But looking for the long term, the project itself and how it will be executed is the only important thing. agreed, my opinion is that there is a place for bonuses and bounties to promote the projects. In the current state of the market I don't think bounties mean that much. It makes more sense now to target institutional investors. Bonuses probably should be considered, but bounties...I don't know. They have a bounty program with a small budget, it seems to me that this will not make big affect of token price in the first listing. I love projects with no bounty or little bounty. Otherwise, it causes a big dump. Lane Axis's bounty budget is really nothing to fear about. You are right, big bounty budget always results in a bigger dump. I think they should balance amount raised and decide bounty later ? Most projects allocate 1% of the sold tokens to the bounty campaign. this is not much but it is still enough to cause dumps. Because there are not just bounty hunters, there are also some investors that buy with huge bonus and sell quickly to have fast profit. Yes, I think this is a good point. presale whales will also dump. The best thing would be no bonusses and only a small bounty campaign but most projects need the advertisement from bounty hunters and the presale money. |
|
|
|
|
|
belechau
|
|
October 03, 2018, 02:41:43 PM |
|
Bonuses also can be useful, it really depends on the project.
In the long term it doesnt matter which method you choose I think.
In short term, bonuses are very crucial. But looking for the long term, the project itself and how it will be executed is the only important thing. agreed, my opinion is that there is a place for bonuses and bounties to promote the projects. In the current state of the market I don't think bounties mean that much. It makes more sense now to target institutional investors. Bonuses probably should be considered, but bounties...I don't know. They have a bounty program with a small budget, it seems to me that this will not make big affect of token price in the first listing. I love projects with no bounty or little bounty. Otherwise, it causes a big dump. Lane Axis's bounty budget is really nothing to fear about. You are right, big bounty budget always results in a bigger dump. I think they should balance amount raised and decide bounty later ? Most projects allocate 1% of the sold tokens to the bounty campaign. this is not much but it is still enough to cause dumps. Because there are not just bounty hunters, there are also some investors that buy with huge bonus and sell quickly to have fast profit. Yes, I think this is a good point. presale whales will also dump. The best thing would be no bonusses and only a small bounty campaign but most projects need the advertisement from bounty hunters and the presale money. The point is that rampant rewards campaigns, although in the long run bring in some investors, also cause big dumps and maybe even faster, the bonus is more efficient if applied intensive marketing, and attracts more investments in the short term, but also need control and caution |
|
|
|
|
Token Williams
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 310
Merit: 0
|
|
October 03, 2018, 02:55:50 PM |
|
I checked the telegram right now, it seems %50 bonus can still be alive.
But still, they need to communicate better. I mean way better.
Just 25% bonus left. Seems 50% was one-time (may be 1 day or so) as a special bonus. Or may be they had some error. It would be better if someone from the team clarify about this. I read in telegram this (that only 25% bonus avaliable). But right now they have again 50% bonus on the site. Maybe they decided to extend bonus? 50% is too much! imagine what presale investors got! That creates immediate selling pressure once it hits exchanges I agree. 50% bonus is really too big. The greater the bonus, the greater the impression that they want to sell the product at all costs. This may subsequently have a negative impact on the project. Curious how Consensys would think about this, since they don't condone stuff like this in their Brooklyn Project token sale program I think ConsenSys already knew about this project and did a diligent research before forging a partnership with them and I think they approved it. I agree, partnerships are long processes sometimes it takes a year to move a step forward, so i am sure they did their homework before. For the work and professionalism presented so far, I think that each step taken by the Team was studied in advance, avoiding side effects, should be the case of the announcement. I only miss it at the moment of greater support, but it is something to improve gradually i agree, i think this levels of professionalism comes from that the company established long time ago and still working on the field. Not just some crypto enthusiasts with a brilliant idea. Any idea as to whether or not this company could have also funded the project by themselves? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PS92
|
|
October 03, 2018, 03:58:36 PM |
|
Bonuses also can be useful, it really depends on the project.
In the long term it doesnt matter which method you choose I think.
In short term, bonuses are very crucial. But looking for the long term, the project itself and how it will be executed is the only important thing. agreed, my opinion is that there is a place for bonuses and bounties to promote the projects. In the current state of the market I don't think bounties mean that much. It makes more sense now to target institutional investors. Bonuses probably should be considered, but bounties...I don't know. They have a bounty program with a small budget, it seems to me that this will not make big affect of token price in the first listing. I love projects with no bounty or little bounty. Otherwise, it causes a big dump. Lane Axis's bounty budget is really nothing to fear about. You are right, big bounty budget always results in a bigger dump. I think they should balance amount raised and decide bounty later ? Most projects allocate 1% of the sold tokens to the bounty campaign. this is not much but it is still enough to cause dumps. Because there are not just bounty hunters, there are also some investors that buy with huge bonus and sell quickly to have fast profit. Yes, I think this is a good point. presale whales will also dump. The best thing would be no bonusses and only a small bounty campaign but most projects need the advertisement from bounty hunters and the presale money. do they have a bounty program that you know of? |
|
|
|
|
jonnytracker
|
|
October 03, 2018, 04:08:44 PM |
|
I havent read the whitepaper so it would be great to get the general idea, is this like Fedx or other shipping company ?
|
|
|
|
|
|
nobytes
|
|
October 03, 2018, 04:19:18 PM |
|
I havent read the whitepaper so it would be great to get the general idea, is this like Fedx or other shipping company ?
More like providing a platform to firms in logistics. |
|
|
|
|
king_of_alts
Member
Offline
Activity: 476
Merit: 10
|
|
October 03, 2018, 04:26:17 PM |
|
Bonuses also can be useful, it really depends on the project.
In the long term it doesnt matter which method you choose I think.
In short term, bonuses are very crucial. But looking for the long term, the project itself and how it will be executed is the only important thing. agreed, my opinion is that there is a place for bonuses and bounties to promote the projects. In the current state of the market I don't think bounties mean that much. It makes more sense now to target institutional investors. Bonuses probably should be considered, but bounties...I don't know. They have a bounty program with a small budget, it seems to me that this will not make big affect of token price in the first listing. I love projects with no bounty or little bounty. Otherwise, it causes a big dump. Lane Axis's bounty budget is really nothing to fear about. You are right, big bounty budget always results in a bigger dump. I think they should balance amount raised and decide bounty later ? Most projects allocate 1% of the sold tokens to the bounty campaign. this is not much but it is still enough to cause dumps. Because there are not just bounty hunters, there are also some investors that buy with huge bonus and sell quickly to have fast profit. Yes, I think this is a good point. presale whales will also dump. The best thing would be no bonusses and only a small bounty campaign but most projects need the advertisement from bounty hunters and the presale money. do they have a bounty program that you know of? No, I haven't checked for a bounty program. I was speaking in general. |
|
|
|
|
mandibleclaw
Member
Offline
Activity: 532
Merit: 50
ONe Social Network.
|
|
October 03, 2018, 04:47:21 PM |
|
I checked the telegram right now, it seems %50 bonus can still be alive.
But still, they need to communicate better. I mean way better.
Just 25% bonus left. Seems 50% was one-time (may be 1 day or so) as a special bonus. Or may be they had some error. It would be better if someone from the team clarify about this. I read in telegram this (that only 25% bonus avaliable). But right now they have again 50% bonus on the site. Maybe they decided to extend bonus? 50% is too much! imagine what presale investors got! That creates immediate selling pressure once it hits exchanges I agree. 50% bonus is really too big. The greater the bonus, the greater the impression that they want to sell the product at all costs. This may subsequently have a negative impact on the project. Curious how Consensys would think about this, since they don't condone stuff like this in their Brooklyn Project token sale program I think ConsenSys already knew about this project and did a diligent research before forging a partnership with them and I think they approved it. I agree, partnerships are long processes sometimes it takes a year to move a step forward, so i am sure they did their homework before. For the work and professionalism presented so far, I think that each step taken by the Team was studied in advance, avoiding side effects, should be the case of the announcement. I only miss it at the moment of greater support, but it is something to improve gradually i agree, i think this levels of professionalism comes from that the company established long time ago and still working on the field. Not just some crypto enthusiasts with a brilliant idea. Any idea as to whether or not this company could have also funded the project by themselves? Nice catch, I was thinking the same since they're working on it since 2014 and they're US patented already. Maybe if the aim was just to distribute tokens they could have distributed them to interested parties, interested in their app |
|
|
|
|
nobytes
|
|
October 03, 2018, 05:05:58 PM
Last edit: October 03, 2018, 05:59:23 PM by nobytes |
|
I checked the telegram right now, it seems %50 bonus can still be alive.
But still, they need to communicate better. I mean way better.
Just 25% bonus left. Seems 50% was one-time (may be 1 day or so) as a special bonus. Or may be they had some error. It would be better if someone from the team clarify about this. I read in telegram this (that only 25% bonus avaliable). But right now they have again 50% bonus on the site. Maybe they decided to extend bonus? 50% is too much! imagine what presale investors got! That creates immediate selling pressure once it hits exchanges I agree. 50% bonus is really too big. The greater the bonus, the greater the impression that they want to sell the product at all costs. This may subsequently have a negative impact on the project. Curious how Consensys would think about this, since they don't condone stuff like this in their Brooklyn Project token sale program I think ConsenSys already knew about this project and did a diligent research before forging a partnership with them and I think they approved it. I agree, partnerships are long processes sometimes it takes a year to move a step forward, so i am sure they did their homework before. For the work and professionalism presented so far, I think that each step taken by the Team was studied in advance, avoiding side effects, should be the case of the announcement. I only miss it at the moment of greater support, but it is something to improve gradually i agree, i think this levels of professionalism comes from that the company established long time ago and still working on the field. Not just some crypto enthusiasts with a brilliant idea. Any idea as to whether or not this company could have also funded the project by themselves? Nice catch, I was thinking the same since they're working on it since 2014 and they're US patented already. Maybe if the aim was just to distribute tokens they could have distributed them to interested parties, interested in their app I am not sure if there would even be a way to check this in any ico unless they want to be transparent about such things. But i don't think that even matters. Edit* (i messed up the quotes) |
|
|
|
|
|
loup
|
|
October 03, 2018, 05:36:57 PM |
|
I checked the telegram right now, it seems %50 bonus can still be alive.
But still, they need to communicate better. I mean way better.
Just 25% bonus left. Seems 50% was one-time (may be 1 day or so) as a special bonus. Or may be they had some error. It would be better if someone from the team clarify about this. I am not sure if there would even be a way to check this in any ico unless they want to be transparent about such things. But i don't think that even matters. I read in telegram this (that only 25% bonus avaliable). But right now they have again 50% bonus on the site. Maybe they decided to extend bonus? 50% is too much! imagine what presale investors got! That creates immediate selling pressure once it hits exchanges I agree. 50% bonus is really too big. The greater the bonus, the greater the impression that they want to sell the product at all costs. This may subsequently have a negative impact on the project. Curious how Consensys would think about this, since they don't condone stuff like this in their Brooklyn Project token sale program I think ConsenSys already knew about this project and did a diligent research before forging a partnership with them and I think they approved it. I agree, partnerships are long processes sometimes it takes a year to move a step forward, so i am sure they did their homework before. For the work and professionalism presented so far, I think that each step taken by the Team was studied in advance, avoiding side effects, should be the case of the announcement. I only miss it at the moment of greater support, but it is something to improve gradually i agree, i think this levels of professionalism comes from that the company established long time ago and still working on the field. Not just some crypto enthusiasts with a brilliant idea. Any idea as to whether or not this company could have also funded the project by themselves? Nice catch, I was thinking the same since they're working on it since 2014 and they're US patented already. Maybe if the aim was just to distribute tokens they could have distributed them to interested parties, interested in their app Yes, I think thay had this idea a long time ago and they have found in crypto the way to find the necesary funds. |
|
|
|
|
mandibleclaw
Member
Offline
Activity: 532
Merit: 50
ONe Social Network.
|
|
October 03, 2018, 05:40:52 PM |
|
Or maybe they tried to get funded by venture capitalists but they failed at it, we will never know. For sure the easier way right now is trough an ICO / token generation event whatever you wanna call it
|
|
|
|
|
PS92
|
|
October 03, 2018, 07:06:12 PM |
|
Bonuses also can be useful, it really depends on the project.
In the long term it doesnt matter which method you choose I think.
In short term, bonuses are very crucial. But looking for the long term, the project itself and how it will be executed is the only important thing. agreed, my opinion is that there is a place for bonuses and bounties to promote the projects. In the current state of the market I don't think bounties mean that much. It makes more sense now to target institutional investors. Bonuses probably should be considered, but bounties...I don't know. They have a bounty program with a small budget, it seems to me that this will not make big affect of token price in the first listing. I love projects with no bounty or little bounty. Otherwise, it causes a big dump. Lane Axis's bounty budget is really nothing to fear about. You are right, big bounty budget always results in a bigger dump. I think they should balance amount raised and decide bounty later ? Most projects allocate 1% of the sold tokens to the bounty campaign. this is not much but it is still enough to cause dumps. Because there are not just bounty hunters, there are also some investors that buy with huge bonus and sell quickly to have fast profit. Yes, I think this is a good point. presale whales will also dump. The best thing would be no bonusses and only a small bounty campaign but most projects need the advertisement from bounty hunters and the presale money. do they have a bounty program that you know of? No, I haven't checked for a bounty program. I was speaking in general. ok, thanks for the reply |
|
|
|
cevap
Member
Offline
Activity: 490
Merit: 10
www.Zercados.com
|
|
October 03, 2018, 07:10:52 PM |
|
Maybe they will update it when an event already passed...But surely they participated in events since May? |
|
|
|
|
loup
|
|
October 03, 2018, 07:15:41 PM |
|
Maybe they will update it when an event already passed...But surely they participated in events since May? I guess they didn't update the webpage. I find hard to believe they have not ptake part inany event since then. |
|
|
|
|
|
rjp55
|
|
October 03, 2018, 07:32:04 PM |
|
Or maybe they tried to get funded by venture capitalists but they failed at it, we will never know. For sure the easier way right now is trough an ICO / token generation event whatever you wanna call it
Yeah last year we have seen lots of projects funded themselves by icos after failing raising enough money for their investments. |
|
|
|
|
ParRus
|
|
October 03, 2018, 07:51:17 PM |
|
Maybe they will update it when an event already passed...But surely they participated in events since May? I guess they didn't update the webpage. I find hard to believe they have not ptake part inany event since then. Participation in various crypto events would be very useful for the project - there you can get acquainted with investors, and find new partnerships. |
|
|
|
|
|
