[ANN][ICO] LANEAXIS (U.S Patented): Blockchain Solution For Transportaion

[lvsca]

Which competitors of this project? Does anyone know? They have a comparison with existed competitors?

As far as I know there is no comparison sheet among its perceived competitors but the only thing I know is that this one has a major advantage over them since its already in operation for several years now.

There are severeal blockchain projects that aim to track temperature and other metrics of a shipment so if these projects add a gps tracker they will be competitors.

Could you name some of these please, want to look into them.

There is modum, Ambrosus, te-food and wabi for example.Basically all supply chain projects.

I dont know Modum, but I know Ambrosus, Te-food and Wabi. They ar made good xx since ICO. This is a strong competitors. So what about a comparison with this projects?

I read somewhere that the company IBM is planning to engage in similar activities, they also want connect logistics and blockchain technology.

Those competitions meant that blockchain tech is really important and inevitable. Moreover, competitions will inspire innovations among them to make more efficient and effective products in the long run.

so, laneaxis will be 'fight' with IBM? it will be hard competition.

[Rigorous]

Only things ICO rating websites are good for are the overview of projects and general information about the project. The ratings themselves seem to be random if not bought or based on nonsense like the number of social media accounts.

[levyashin]

Only things ICO rating websites are good for are the overview of projects and general information about the project. The ratings themselves seem to be random if not bought or based on nonsense like the number of social media accounts.

I can't agree more. They have a little use as you said but they don't show anything about how good or bad the project is.

[omwibya]

Only things ICO rating websites are good for are the overview of projects and general information about the project. The ratings themselves seem to be random if not bought or based on nonsense like the number of social media accounts.

I can't agree more. They have a little use as you said but they don't show anything about how good or bad the project is.

I see them as a way to see what's new and looking at a project at a glance. nothing more.

[loup]

Only things ICO rating websites are good for are the overview of projects and general information about the project. The ratings themselves seem to be random if not bought or based on nonsense like the number of social media accounts.

I can't agree more. They have a little use as you said but they don't show anything about how good or bad the project is.

I see them as a way to see what's new and looking at a project at a glance. nothing more.

I use them to get an idea of ​​the potential of the project.

[king_of_alts]

Only things ICO rating websites are good for are the overview of projects and general information about the project. The ratings themselves seem to be random if not bought or based on nonsense like the number of social media accounts.

I can't agree more. They have a little use as you said but they don't show anything about how good or bad the project is.

I see them as a way to see what's new and looking at a project at a glance. nothing more.

I use them to get an idea of ​​the potential of the project.

Many sites accept money in return for a good rating so you should be careful all the time,

[PS92]

Another rating in addition to those links to which are on the site:
https://icobazaar.com/v2/laneaxis

Those rating sites suck. can't trust them not to be paid.

Not saying that LA paid them though

You are right, most rating platforms are not objective - you always need to conduct your own research, and this platforms are needed only to make it easier to find and analyze information in search of which in whitepapers will take more time.

rating sites are useful only to find more information about a project that interests me, which are perhaps more synthetic and easy to find(informations) rather than looking for them in whitepapers, at the rating level the only one i follow is icobench,is in any case an excellent further publicity...

Exactly, there are many people using the service to profit, without much reliability to the actual classification, but nothing that replaces our own research, and our own classification

Hear, hear!

[rjp55]

Only things ICO rating websites are good for are the overview of projects and general information about the project. The ratings themselves seem to be random if not bought or based on nonsense like the number of social media accounts.

I can't agree more. They have a little use as you said but they don't show anything about how good or bad the project is.

I see them as a way to see what's new and looking at a project at a glance. nothing more.

I use them to get an idea of ​​the potential of the project.

Many sites accept money in return for a good rating so you should be careful all the time,

Yeah i agree that too, investing an ico due to its rating from a website is naive in my opinion.

[mandibleclaw]

Which competitors of this project? Does anyone know? They have a comparison with existed competitors?

As far as I know there is no comparison sheet among its perceived competitors but the only thing I know is that this one has a major advantage over them since its already in operation for several years now.

There are severeal blockchain projects that aim to track temperature and other metrics of a shipment so if these projects add a gps tracker they will be competitors.

Could you name some of these please, want to look into them.

There is modum, Ambrosus, te-food and wabi for example.Basically all supply chain projects.

I dont know Modum, but I know Ambrosus, Te-food and Wabi. They ar made good xx since ICO. This is a strong competitors. So what about a comparison with this projects?

I read somewhere that the company IBM is planning to engage in similar activities, they also want connect logistics and blockchain technology.

Those competitions meant that blockchain tech is really important and inevitable. Moreover, competitions will inspire innovations among them to make more efficient and effective products in the long run.

so, laneaxis will be 'fight' with IBM? it will be hard competition.

Everything will be in fight with IBM and Linux foundation's Hyperledger, it's up to people if they want to use a centralized system (again ?!?) or a decentralized. I know that IBM is using Stellar's chain for microtransaction btw

[zgrdyg]

Competion is always good for the market, investors, companies and the people using tech. So competing with IBM is nearly impossible for instance but everyone is on the same position inhere. Beginning!

[mandibleclaw]

Competion is always good for the market, investors, companies and the people using tech. So competing with IBM is nearly impossible for instance but everyone is on the same position inhere. Beginning!

I don't know what IBM is doing but I doubt that it's developing a dapp with the purpose to let people in trasportation save money

[king_of_alts]

Competion is always good for the market, investors, companies and the people using tech. So competing with IBM is nearly impossible for instance but everyone is on the same position inhere. Beginning!

I don't think that IBM will do an ICO for their hyperledger so people will naturally look for something else to invest in.

[sge99]

Competion is always good for the market, investors, companies and the people using tech. So competing with IBM is nearly impossible for instance but everyone is on the same position inhere. Beginning!

I don't know what IBM is doing but I doubt that it's developing a dapp with the purpose to let people in trasportation save money

As far as I know they have a partnership with Maersk, a container shipping company. I think their focus is more on ocean freight, so not a direct competitor to Laneaxis.

[levyashin]

I don't think competition is an issue even an opportunity.

They must perform their best to become a success. It is a big market and everyone can have its share. But competition drive them to perform better. Not a bad thing in my opinion.

[mandibleclaw]

Competion is always good for the market, investors, companies and the people using tech. So competing with IBM is nearly impossible for instance but everyone is on the same position inhere. Beginning!

I don't think that IBM will do an ICO for their hyperledger so people will naturally look for something else to invest in.

Hyperledger is developed by the Linux Foundation, not IBM and we won't see any ICO since it's open source and even you can build whatever you want

[shoha]

Interesting project, have been mining since yesterday and the pool is working well.  Receiving payouts as expected and I will stick with it.  Hope to see this project develop more in the future.

[zgrdyg]

Interesting project, have been mining since yesterday and the pool is working well.  Receiving payouts as expected and I will stick with it.  Hope to see this project develop more in the future.

Are you talking about another project or i missed about the huge mining part.

ocean freight and trucking are very different from each other as far as i know.

[wissy]

I don't think competition is an issue even an opportunity.

They must perform their best to become a success. It is a big market and everyone can have its share. But competition drive them to perform better. Not a bad thing in my opinion.

For users competition is always good, but from a company's point of view it might be tough. But you're right, thanks to competition you always seek to develop your product, to improve it, so it's better and has more advantages than similar ones on the market.

[batako]

I don't think competition is an issue even an opportunity.

They must perform their best to become a success. It is a big market and everyone can have its share. But competition drive them to perform better. Not a bad thing in my opinion.

Competition is a trigger so that a project continues to develop their platform therefore it is not left behind by others. Competition is good thing if treated correctly!

[Frank37]

I don't think competition is an issue even an opportunity.

They must perform their best to become a success. It is a big market and everyone can have its share. But competition drive them to perform better. Not a bad thing in my opinion.

For users competition is always good, but from a company's point of view it might be tough. But you're right, thanks to competition you always seek to develop your product, to improve it, so it's better and has more advantages than similar ones on the market.

In our current time, competition is needed, but i can imagine a society in the future, where everyone wants to produce a product that is durable and easy to use, also without competition.