Do you trust ICO Rating sites?

[markgayamo]

It is also good that you trust ICO ratings when you see it in a bounty campaign and it depends on their ratings if it has a higher rate it means that ICO is good and can be trusted. Nowadays there is a lot of ICO that are launching and inviting people participants to join and to invest in the ICO always check the background of the ICO and the team that compose of that ICO. Always be aware of that when it comes to bounty campaigns.

[1715586284]

1715586284

[1715586284]

1715586284

[1715586284]

1715586284

[1715586284]

1715586284

[1715586284]

1715586284

[datmacro]

ICO ratings sites are only for reference, you should not rely too much on numbers, you should look at the idea of the ICO, how the project is going and the development team Who, all must be clear

[bezygly]

They seem biased to me. A friend of mine who's doing an ICO told me that they paid 10ETH for 5 quality ratings and that's that! I noticed that some ICOs with good project, team, and good social media presence are struggling with getting good reviews.

With all that said, should it still be a factor to look at when investing in ICO?

There everything is bought, it's a crypto currency! They want a lot of attention and a lot of money, often much more than they really need. I personally do not trust them, I know that they put all the estimates for money, but I look, that would understand how much the project is under the attention of people.

[RobotNIK]

In this case, this explains why the ratings do not always match the prospects of projects!

[R3ffun]

They seem biased to me. A friend of mine who's doing an ICO told me that they paid 10ETH for 5 quality ratings and that's that! I noticed that some ICOs with good project, team, and good social media presence are struggling with getting good reviews.

With all that said, should it still be a factor to look at when investing in ICO?

Yes but not all the time, As bounty hunters we still need to review and verify if the ICOs project is legitimate so our time and effort during participation will not turn into waste.

actually, i never trust an ICO rating site when i will join in the ICO project, a lot of ICO which have a high rating not always a success on their token sale. very hard to find a good ICO right now

[WonkaLuisAL]

I generally check the ICOs I am interested in on ICObench but I also try to search for them myself, the ICO promoted there most of the time have a team that is public and you can check them on google yourself.

[Adunni6758]

I do not trust so many of them, rather instead of just following them totally by engaging in what they have listed, I use them as basis for my own research.

[bagas79]

I think ICO ratings can be an option for investment, but we also have to be smart in making decisions when we are going to invest, we must first assess the development team, the bounty manager, the project objectives. Because the ranking also cannot mark the project properly, because it could be that the project becomes a scam

[Dannaey]

I don't rely too much but then it helps me in a way that they give me idea on what ICO should I be looking for. With that, I won't go over to all the ICOs because that's very time consuming. In short, they summarizes the ICOs that they think that are good. Then I will analyze each of their suggested best ICOs. I will have my own research.

[the1arty]

They seem biased to me. A friend of mine who's doing an ICO told me that they paid 10ETH for 5 quality ratings and that's that! I noticed that some ICOs with good project, team, and good social media presence are struggling with getting good reviews.

With all that said, should it still be a factor to look at when investing in ICO?

They are like rating agencies moody's s&p fitch, who rates everything, and interest rate of some Central Banks depend on them.
Rating agencies in crypto some of them do not accept funds and put rating based on their script, what they think is the most important. Some of them surely, like you can pay and get a good rating. The best analysis is what you do, those ones you should just use as a reference

[alttravel]

Do not trust sites that evaluate crypto projects, these are very questionable conclusions. Firstly, it is possible that the estimates can be paid for, and secondly, the services themselves can also earn by selling their crypto coins, which they receive on a private sale.

[Sponsoredby15]

They seem biased to me. A friend of mine who's doing an ICO told me that they paid 10ETH for 5 quality ratings and that's that! I noticed that some ICOs with good project, team, and good social media presence are struggling with getting good reviews.

With all that said, should it still be a factor to look at when investing in ICO?

I don't trust any ICO site ratings because all of them are being paid to have a good review on their ICO. But you can use it as a reference if you are doing a research in choosing a good ICO that you want to invest.

[chemba]

According to researchers, a new attack is being carried out by a North Korean hacker group responsible for the cryptographer Hermes. Several attributes indicate this at once, including a script called "window.bat", paths and special markers

[Topilsimn]

The ICO trick has upset the whole market, financial specialists lost certainty and cash, and many rating sites are not definitive. Basically depending on some news to rank the ICO venture has framed a terrible guide for financial specialists.

ICO's appraising offices need to tolerate a great deal of obligations, for example, the credibility of the venture, the check of assets, and numerous different issues. On the off chance that conceivable, such a site will be more famous, and financial specialists can peruse more expert investigation on the website.safer ventures, this is the thing that we are anticipating!

[seyola89]

Well I like to use some ICO rating websites when I'm looking for a good ico or bounty to participate in. But I don't take it as the ultimate decision. I only use it as part of my findings and I still do a lot of other personal evaluations before I finally decide which is worth my money and time.

[bitcon]

They seem biased to me. A friend of mine who's doing an ICO told me that they paid 10ETH for 5 quality ratings and that's that! I noticed that some ICOs with good project, team, and good social media presence are struggling with getting good reviews.

With all that said, should it still be a factor to look at when investing in ICO?

very good info now I know that ico review websites earn a huge amount of profit. I still look on ICO review to base my investment perhaps we still need a forecast on this type of investment , I just need to do more research before I put my investment on the ico that they suggest.

Yes, they do. But these sites help us a lot to get more information about currency and future ICOs, compare them, check their ratings, etc. When I want to get the information about a project, I often use https://icorating.com/.

[Lorik777]

I also heard about the case of corruption in the rating agency. I talked with a representative of one ISO team. Their project seemed to me interesting, I started participating in their Bounty campaign. Then I told this person that I'm sorry that they do not have a good evaluation. He told me that he was told that he had to pay a good price.
After this incident, I do not trust the estimates.

[Uhde]

i dont trust to any ico rating site. their ratings are mostly fake for manipulating the market. but i follow them because even if they are fake they have affect on the hype of projects.

[VasiloviKola]

I trust only to www.icoguide.com rates, they are not paid and very realistic. So I am always looking at their rates and scores when making decision/.

[BitPotus]

ICOs are scammy as fuck.

And all these sites are by default scammy as well.

So NO!!!