Do you trust ICO Rating sites?

[johnleo]

I still consider their rating as one factor for my own review. Even if they paid those site, I will count it as good marketing. I have many factors in my own review, so I don't depend much on those rating site.

[Marnihughes82]

In the past I was very confident in the ICO rating sites. But now I do not believe anymore, there are ICO is highly rated but still scam

[vasilisc555]

What can be credibility sites rating? I think no, because any rating can be bought. It is worth relying only on yourself. You make the final decision.

[humantraffic]

In my opinion, you should not trust strongly rating sites. All this is a purely subjective opinion of people. Also, many rating sites sell their ratings. I do not advise you to use the site ICOBENCH.

[virtual_miner]

Actually the ICO Rating does not bring much confidence to investors. I just found the website listed in detail and clear information about the project that has helped investors like me to easily understand the project and give the assessment for themselves.

[xprince1996]

Me personally i dont trust them not all their ratings give a success project

[Evushko]

I pay attention to the ratings, but I take the final decision on other parameters: manager, team, etc.

[Veter2000]

I mainly look at these sites not at the overall rating, but at verifying the authenticity of project team members and their participation in other projects.

[ForTheAzerot]

I really do not trust the rating and always try to verify the information. But now I don’t invest in ICO, so I don’t need ratings.

[mdenys]

I like ico rating sites,they give a lot of useful information about ongoing and upcoming icos,but I don't trust them too much,I think the founders of projects pay a few bitcoins to the sites for receiving high ratings.

[5thangel]

No, I don't trust them. I mean, how can you trust someone who won't be honest about what they're doing?

[rachman mahesa]

Usually we must first know the ICO rating. And not only that is seen. You can analyze yourself after knowing the ico rating. And the big decision is you, of course, with your own analysis of the ICO rating. it might be better.

[Duogembrot]

with this ico rating can help me to find and choose the best ico available and this is needed by many people and even many investors, so at least this ICO rating helps to choose the best ICO for investors.

[Luna0120]

They do not check the data that is listed at their own websites. For what unholy reason should I trust any of them? They need to become more professional.

[Suwycu]

No, I do not trust.  Honestly, I myself do not understand sometimes what they are based on when they make these ratings!

[bep42]

Rating sites are just one of the factors for choosing ICO, and it ranks last. In the priority you should learn a project yourself.

[castiloros]

When the site rating required by the system pay certainly it could have been manipulated. for those who dare to pay expensive will certainly be given a good ranking. This can be a convenient way for scammers to search results easily by making false ICO. It's better to own than relying on analysis of the site's rating because it cannot be trusted completely.

[zacad]

Such a website can only be used for reference. After observation, it was found that the 3.0-4.5 project rating is the most worthwhile investment. 5.0 projects usually work with rating companies, which may pose greater risks. This requires a slow learning process.

[Crypto_lion]

They seem biased to me. A friend of mine who's doing an ICO told me that they paid 10ETH for 5 quality ratings and that's that! I noticed that some ICOs with good project, team, and good social media presence are struggling with getting good reviews.

With all that said, should it still be a factor to look at when investing in ICO?

I just use ico tracking or rating sites as an aggregate to get the links of all ico that is going on at a specific point of time.If you want review go for specific sites.

[BILGPS]

I am following ICO rating site like icobench and i trust this site  because they have described the whole team of crypto and we are unaware of the facts and figures of new ICOs but these can help out us and we can become profitable through their opinion.