★★★ EARN A WHOPPING 25% ON PROFITS - RitzGrandCasino.com ★★★

[BitCoinDream]

@Ritz As I can see u have got enough +ve Trust from Equate. So why the trust is still showing -ve in your case ? Have you contacted the Mods regarding this ? It should be all green now ...IMO

[forever21]

he will not as long as those 2 member who in his trust list be added to his trust circle

[newIndia]

he will not as long as those 2 member who in his trust list be added to his trust circle

So, whose action point is it now ? Ritz ? I mean Ritz has to add Equate to his Trust circle ?

[forever21]

he will not as long as those 2 member who in his trust list be added to his trust circle

So, whose action point is it now ? Ritz ? I mean Ritz has to add Equate to his Trust circle ?

yeah i guess so and also the other one i think it will help him to get green

[u9y42]

he will not as long as those 2 member who in his trust list be added to his trust circle

So, whose action point is it now ? Ritz ? I mean Ritz has to add Equate to his Trust circle ?

yeah i guess so and also the other one i think it will help him to get green

I'm not sure what you're proposing would have the desired effect, but one thing that would certainly have is if zackclark70 were convinced to remove his negative trust or if CanaryInTheMine removes zackclark70 from his trust list. CanaryInTheMine seems to have added a large number of members to his trust list, so he might be persuaded to be a little more selective.

[forever21]

he will not as long as those 2 member who in his trust list be added to his trust circle

So, whose action point is it now ? Ritz ? I mean Ritz has to add Equate to his Trust circle ?

yeah i guess so and also the other one i think it will help him to get green

I'm not sure what you're proposing would have the desired effect, but one thing that would certainly have is if zackclark70 were convinced to remove his negative trust or if CanaryInTheMine removes zackclark70 from his trust list. CanaryInTheMine seems to have added a large number of members to his trust list, so he might be persuaded to be a little more selective.

it will be if he do that then the teo member who are there will beat zarkclark and he will have green adding all the people who give him positive feedback into his trust list will help him to get on green

[guybrushthreepwood]

he will not as long as those 2 member who in his trust list be added to his trust circle

So, whose action point is it now ? Ritz ? I mean Ritz has to add Equate to his Trust circle ?

yeah i guess so and also the other one i think it will help him to get green

I'm not sure what you're proposing would have the desired effect, but one thing that would certainly have is if zackclark70 were convinced to remove his negative trust or if CanaryInTheMine removes zackclark70 from his trust list. CanaryInTheMine seems to have added a large number of members to his trust list, so he might be persuaded to be a little more selective.

it will be if he do that then the teo member who are there will beat zarkclark and he will have green adding all the people who give him positive feedback into his trust list will help him to get on green

Adding people to your trust list will only make their feedback show up to that person. It'll still show as negative to everyone else. The trust list here is as confusing as the activity lol.

I'm intreagued by the new competition that has arosen recently and looking forward to how Ritz & PD respond. I know they both like to have the highest paying deal and maybe so will this new guy. I don't think this new one pays automatically like Ritz does though.

[forever21]

seems like the first time ritz announce his campaign in this forum and the new campaign sounds like ritz also what i mean is maybe he copy the OP to ritz OP here

[RitzGrandCasino]

Guys, thanks for your concern about zackclark. He told us he will NEVER remove the neg trust. But that is ok because we will take legal action against him and claim damages.  Leave it to our attorneys now. It's in their hands.

Another case of damages is about to be announced hopefully this week. Just waiting on the courts response.
Moral of the story is... If you want to defame us, make sure you have a lot of $$$ and good attorneys.

[deadley]

Guys, thanks for your concern about zackclark. He told us he will NEVER remove the neg trust. But that is ok because we will take legal action against him and claim damages.  Leave it to our attorneys now. It's in their hands.

Another case of damages is about to be announced hopefully this week. Just waiting on the courts response.
Moral of the story is... If you want to defame us, make sure you have a lot of $$$ and good attorneys.

its good to see you are taking action against who are defaming Ritzcasino.

[RitzGrandCasino]

Guys, thanks for your concern about zackclark. He told us he will NEVER remove the neg trust. But that is ok because we will take legal action against him and claim damages.  Leave it to our attorneys now. It's in their hands.

Another case of damages is about to be announced hopefully this week. Just waiting on the courts response.
Moral of the story is... If you want to defame us, make sure you have a lot of $$$ and good attorneys.

its good to see you are taking action against who are defaming Ritzcasino.

Yep we have zero tolerance. And will make sure people hiding behind their computer face the courts of their country.
Obviously these people have no common sense and risk losing everything (cars, houses etc) by making up false accusations.
After we warn them and ask to remove it, and they still refuse, we let them learn the hard way.

[RitzGrandCasino]

Guys, thanks for your concern about zackclark. He told us he will NEVER remove the neg trust. But that is ok because we will take legal action against him and claim damages.  Leave it to our attorneys now. It's in their hands.

Another case of damages is about to be announced hopefully this week. Just waiting on the courts response.
Moral of the story is... If you want to defame us, make sure you have a lot of $$$ and good attorneys.

its good to see you are taking action against who are defaming Ritzcasino.

Yep we have zero tolerance. And will make sure people hiding behind their computer face the courts of their country.
Obviously these people have no common sense and risk losing everything (cars, houses etc) by making up false accusations.
After we warn them and ask to remove it, and they still refuse, we let them learn the hard way.

What about the website they are the ones that put a feedback system and let it get abused, you wont take them to court? 

Are you still gonna try to take me to court?

Zolace, we made a deal and it remains in place. So at this point in time no. However, a friend of yours is getting taken this week. I will send you a pm of who that is once the papers are served on them.

[ChuckBuck]

Guys, thanks for your concern about zackclark. He told us he will NEVER remove the neg trust. But that is ok because we will take legal action against him and claim damages.  Leave it to our attorneys now. It's in their hands.

Another case of damages is about to be announced hopefully this week. Just waiting on the courts response.
Moral of the story is... If you want to defame us, make sure you have a lot of $$$ and good attorneys.

its good to see you are taking action against who are defaming Ritzcasino.

Yep we have zero tolerance. And will make sure people hiding behind their computer face the courts of their country.
Obviously these people have no common sense and risk losing everything (cars, houses etc) by making up false accusations.
After we warn them and ask to remove it, and they still refuse, we let them learn the hard way.

What about the website they are the ones that put a feedback system and let it get abused, you wont take them to court?  

Are you still gonna try to take me to court?

Why would RGC take you to court?  Did you try to defame them also?

Pretty sure, Ritz wouldn't pursue any actions against Bitcointalk.  They gets a good chunk of players from here!  

[ChuckBuck]

Yikes!  Just read the above by Ritz.   

Remind me to never defame or put on false allegations against you or your casino.   

[RitzGrandCasino]

Guys, thanks for your concern about zackclark. He told us he will NEVER remove the neg trust. But that is ok because we will take legal action against him and claim damages.  Leave it to our attorneys now. It's in their hands.

Another case of damages is about to be announced hopefully this week. Just waiting on the courts response.
Moral of the story is... If you want to defame us, make sure you have a lot of $$$ and good attorneys.

its good to see you are taking action against who are defaming Ritzcasino.

Yep we have zero tolerance. And will make sure people hiding behind their computer face the courts of their country.
Obviously these people have no common sense and risk losing everything (cars, houses etc) by making up false accusations.
After we warn them and ask to remove it, and they still refuse, we let them learn the hard way.

What about the website they are the ones that put a feedback system and let it get abused, you wont take them to court? 

Are you still gonna try to take me to court?

Why would RGC take you to court?  Did you try to defame them also?

Pretty sure, Ritz wouldn't pursue any actions against Bitcointalk.  He gets a good chunk of players from here!  

We have no problem with bitcointalk. Just some of the defaming trolls on the board that defame.  The funny thing is that we just found out... zackclark is just up the road from us. So our attorneys will have an easy one. 

[RitzGrandCasino]

You can't sue someone for damages for trust comments in an online forum, a judge would throw out the case.

really? lol say that to the person that is getting done at the moment in a usa court.

[forever21]

You can't sue someone for damages for trust comments in an online forum, a judge would throw out the case.

have you heard about cyber bullying you can file a case of libel its a part of cyber crime case if that case is implemented in their country and also to zarkclark country then it will happen you can search about it on the net if its not cleared to you

[RitzGrandCasino]

You can't sue someone for damages for trust comments in an online forum, a judge would throw out the case.

have you heard about cyber bullying you can file a case of libel its a part of cyber crime case if that case is implemented in their country and also to zarkclark country then it will happen you can search about it on the net if its not cleared to you

Correct. We have zack clarks information, ip address and the suburb in the UK where he is. Sounds like he has no idea about the calm before the storm.
 

[forever21]

You can't sue someone for damages for trust comments in an online forum, a judge would throw out the case.

have you heard about cyber bullying you can file a case of libel its a part of cyber crime case if that case is implemented in their country and also to zarkclark country then it will happen you can search about it on the net if its not cleared to you

Correct. We have zack clarks information, ip address and the suburb in the UK where he is. Sounds like he has no idea about the calm before the storm.
 

if thats the case then i would be happy to attend and watch the court hearing lol let me know when is it 

[dreamspark]

You can't sue someone for damages for trust comments in an online forum, a judge would throw out the case.

have you heard about cyber bullying you can file a case of libel its a part of cyber crime case if that case is implemented in their country and also to zarkclark country then it will happen you can search about it on the net if its not cleared to you

Correct. We have zack clarks information, ip address and the suburb in the UK where he is. Sounds like he has no idea about the calm before the storm.
 

oooo you from the UK as well Ritz? Wouldn't have guessed.