justoiurii
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 103
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 29, 2018, 06:41:56 PM |
|
Well, Mr Andrucrypt, you've got work to do again since the release of CryptoDredge... There's approx 100% performance to be gained to be about on par with Pascal cards (at least for Vegas that is)... Come on, enough xmas turkey for you, get back to work! ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) No more plans for MTP this year ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) Probably only fee lowering to default scheme and release with x16rt support. That's perfectly fair. Out of interest, do you believe there is more potential for AMD on MTP to come anywhere close to Dredge/krnlx's nvidia variants? Something tells me that with that power draw on MTP, we're unlikely to see anything earth-shattering from AMD for this algo at all. I guess no. Using only OpenCL won't improve the speed, so next year probably I will start learning GCN ASM ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) Let's keep fingers crossed for you))) Wish you all the best!!! Maybe it can help https://www.codeproject.com/Articles/872477/Assembler-for-AMD-s-GCN-GPU
|
|
|
|
VasilyS
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 29, 2018, 06:58:16 PM |
|
What is the hashrate for MTP on a RX580 ?
I have about 700-900 h/s on RX470/570/480/580 on different rigs with overclocking similair to Ethereum mining (GPU Core is slightly increased).
|
|
|
|
melloyellow
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 30, 2018, 06:59:58 PM |
|
andrucrypt, do you think x16rt will be ready to go Jan 1? Looking forward to it.
|
|
|
|
fluxy12
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 145
Merit: 1
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 30, 2018, 07:02:51 PM |
|
What is the hashrate for MTP on a RX580 ?
I have about 700-900 h/s on RX470/570/480/580 on different rigs with overclocking similair to Ethereum mining (GPU Core is slightly increased). Thank you
|
|
|
|
mxnsch
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 31, 2018, 01:09:14 PM |
|
andrucrypt, do you think x16rt will be ready to go Jan 1? Looking forward to it.
looks good ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2F8YOTc84.png&t=665&c=xpYDmaUS9V07IA)
|
██ ███ nope ██ ███
|
|
|
andrucrypt (OP)
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 720
Merit: 49
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 31, 2018, 02:33:10 PM |
|
The last version this year with x16rt support and some improvements to mtp(still not GPU-only, but anyway). Happy New Year everyone! ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
|
|
|
|
sergoh
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 8
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 31, 2018, 03:40:39 PM |
|
ADD SOLO mining pliz.
|
|
|
|
bizlift
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 2
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 31, 2018, 06:04:13 PM |
|
The last version this year with x16rt support and some improvements to mtp(still not GPU-only, but anyway). Happy New Year everyone! ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) Thank you & Happy New Year. Any chance of linux release for x16rt?
|
|
|
|
andrucrypt (OP)
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 720
Merit: 49
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 31, 2018, 06:38:26 PM |
|
The last version this year with x16rt support and some improvements to mtp(still not GPU-only, but anyway). Happy New Year everyone! ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) Thank you & Happy New Year. Any chance of linux release for x16rt? There was some troubles because of code around mtp, but seems I got working version and uploaded it, hope it will work and Happy New Year ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
|
|
|
|
nanona
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 31, 2018, 06:52:25 PM |
|
Is it to be expected that the hashrate when mining x16rt is varying quite a lot? In my case it varies between 8 and 16 MH/s (for each GPU) over a few minutes, with all GPUs on a rig showing the same ups and downs synchronously. Is this a property of this new algo or rather a bug in this very early release?
EDIT: When the hashrate goes down, so does the temperature and fan speed on the cards. So they obviously don't work as much as they should/could.
|
|
|
|
bizlift
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 2
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 31, 2018, 06:57:44 PM |
|
The last version this year with x16rt support and some improvements to mtp(still not GPU-only, but anyway). Happy New Year everyone! ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) Thank you & Happy New Year. Any chance of linux release for x16rt? There was some troubles because of code around mtp, but seems I got working version and uploaded it, hope it will work and Happy New Year ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) My hero! You rock sir.
|
|
|
|
andrucrypt (OP)
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 720
Merit: 49
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 31, 2018, 07:01:02 PM |
|
Is it to be expected that the hashrate when mining x16rt is varying quite a lot? In my case it varies between 8 and 16 MH/s (for each GPU) over a few minutes, with all GPUs on a rig showing the same ups and downs synchronously. Is this a property of this new algo or rather a bug in this very early release?
EDIT: When the hashrate goes down, so does the temperature and fan speed on the cards. So they obviously don't work as much as they should/could.
Yes, because as for x16r - it depends on current hashorder of job(you can see that colorized string, more red chars - lower hashrate, because harder hash functions are need to be executed).
|
|
|
|
nanona
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 31, 2018, 07:13:08 PM |
|
Yes, because as for x16r - it depends on current hashorder of job(you can see that colorized string, more red chars - lower hashrate, because harder hash functions are need to be executed).
Thanks. When the harder hash functions are to be executed, shouldn't the GPU temp remain at nominal? I see the temperature dropping during that time, implying that the GPUs are working too little on those harder functions. Or is my reasoning flawed? EDIT: Haven't used x16r before. I used this miner only for x22i for two months now and I didn't see the mentioned behaviour on that algo.
|
|
|
|
andrucrypt (OP)
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 720
Merit: 49
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 31, 2018, 07:17:43 PM |
|
Yes, because as for x16r - it depends on current hashorder of job(you can see that colorized string, more red chars - lower hashrate, because harder hash functions are need to be executed).
Thanks. When the harder hash functions are to be executed, shouldn't the GPU temp remain at nominal? I see the temperature dropping during that time, implying that the GPUs are working too little on those harder functions. Or is my reasoning flawed? Won't explain everything, but some hard hashfunctions uses memory more and that's why you get lower temperature
|
|
|
|
nanona
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 31, 2018, 07:22:03 PM |
|
Won't explain everything, but some hard hashfunctions uses memory more and that's why you get lower temperature
Okay, that makes very much sense. I was suspecting something like this but it's another thing when the dev confirms it. Keep up the good work.
|
|
|
|
Coindgr
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 01, 2019, 11:09:24 AM |
|
Does the miner WildRig Multi 0.15.0.8 mtp x16rt support mining solo ?
I tried but no success
|
|
|
|
andrucrypt (OP)
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 720
Merit: 49
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 01, 2019, 01:13:49 PM |
|
Does the miner WildRig Multi 0.15.0.8 mtp x16rt support mining solo ?
I tried but no success
No, wildrig can't mine solo.
|
|
|
|
nanona
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 01, 2019, 09:52:30 PM |
|
Here is a comparison between x22i and x16rt, tested on the same rig (4 x R9 Nano, stock ROM, Win7, Crimson 16.3.2) with the same settings on the cards (900MHz/500MHz/-72mV) and the same settings in the miner (--opencl-threads 2 --opencl-launch=18x0). Total power draw for the entire rig is measured at the wall, i.e. includes CPU (70W in idle).
x22i gives a constant 5MH/s per GPU at constant 650W total power draw. x16rt gives 6MH/s to 12MH/s per GPU at 500W to 800W total power draw.
With x16rt the power draw changes dramatically every time the hash order is changing. Consider this and use lower intensity to not run into the max current breaker of the PSU if your PSU isn't oversized.
For x22i wildrig-multi-0.14.0-beta was used. For x16rt wildrig-0.15.0.8-beta was used.
|
|
|
|
shumway
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 17
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 02, 2019, 04:18:58 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
nanona
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
January 02, 2019, 06:56:58 PM |
|
I noticed that the rigs would sometimes crash while or shortly after the dev mining period. Maybe the dev mining has a bug. At least it looks a bit strange in the console. Sometimes they don't crash and just continue the normal mining as in these screenshots. The pool will however show lots of invalid shares during the dev mining period. Also the cards cool down completely in those two minutes, so I don't think they are doing any dev mining in those two minutes. You might want to check to not lose out your fees. ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FxRz4Hid.jpg&t=665&c=x6a2_2H5uHveZg) ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FnLtHH1C.jpg&t=665&c=zKjLLt1rm7hIFQ) ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FSHND3gd.jpg&t=665&c=yONFvQ0A8QMSpQ) I used the previous versions of this miner to mine x22i for two months and it didn't have this strange behaviour while mining the dev fee. No hundreds of lines of "oops, stale share" and cards wouldn't cool down at all.
|
|
|
|
|