andrucrypt (OP)
Member

Offline
Activity: 737
Merit: 50
|
 |
May 08, 2020, 09:46:20 AM |
|
0.22.0 beta Initial support for KawPow
|
|
|
|
|
andrucrypt (OP)
Member

Offline
Activity: 737
Merit: 50
|
 |
May 09, 2020, 07:58:59 AM |
|
0.23.0 beta - implemented progpow-sero - support --benchmark for progpow algorithms and added --benchmark-epoch - fixed crash when failover pool added
|
|
|
|
|
andrucrypt (OP)
Member

Offline
Activity: 737
Merit: 50
|
 |
May 09, 2020, 08:20:27 PM |
|
0.23.1 beta - improved speed on all ProgPow variants and KawPow - --donate-level now set to 1% by default
|
|
|
|
|
andrucrypt (OP)
Member

Offline
Activity: 737
Merit: 50
|
 |
May 10, 2020, 09:18:44 AM |
|
Finally released Linux build with all latest changes. Links are in first post.
|
|
|
|
|
cjwallsg
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 21
Merit: 0
|
 |
May 10, 2020, 09:39:24 AM |
|
Please. Add support for R9 290, 390 with algo KawPow, with nanominer these cards mine at 13-14 MH/s but inestable.
|
|
|
|
|
andrucrypt (OP)
Member

Offline
Activity: 737
Merit: 50
|
 |
May 10, 2020, 09:57:52 AM |
|
Please. Add support for R9 290, 390 with algo KawPow, with nanominer these cards mine at 13-14 MH/s but inestable.
they should work  But don't know if hashrate is good for those old cards. Probably later I will try to test and tune them.
|
|
|
|
|
cjwallsg
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 21
Merit: 0
|
 |
May 10, 2020, 10:01:55 AM |
|
Please. Add support for R9 290, 390 with algo KawPow, with nanominer these cards mine at 13-14 MH/s but inestable.
they should work  But don't know if hashrate is good for those old cards. Probably later I will try to test and tune them. No, It does not. I have test it and miner says that these cards are no supported by this algo.
|
|
|
|
|
andrucrypt (OP)
Member

Offline
Activity: 737
Merit: 50
|
 |
May 10, 2020, 11:05:28 AM |
|
Please. Add support for R9 290, 390 with algo KawPow, with nanominer these cards mine at 13-14 MH/s but inestable.
they should work  But don't know if hashrate is good for those old cards. Probably later I will try to test and tune them. No, It does not. I have test it and miner says that these cards are no supported by this algo. Give me the full log please. Those cards should be supported.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
andrucrypt (OP)
Member

Offline
Activity: 737
Merit: 50
|
 |
May 10, 2020, 12:55:26 PM |
|
Here is the miner, does not detect the R9 390s  Uninstall Apple Bonjour. Miner doesn't like any dll injections/hooks because of protection, but this software do this.
|
|
|
|
|
andrucrypt (OP)
Member

Offline
Activity: 737
Merit: 50
|
 |
May 11, 2020, 02:53:40 PM |
|
0.23.2 beta - faster kernel compilation for ProgPow/KawPow - fixed start on Linux in some cases - fixed sending stale shares to pool for ProgPow/KawPow
|
|
|
|
|
bitcoinminer0319
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 55
Merit: 0
|
 |
May 11, 2020, 03:44:15 PM |
|
what is the hashrate for 570/580? what is the setting for it?
|
|
|
|
|
cjwallsg
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 21
Merit: 0
|
 |
May 11, 2020, 04:57:13 PM |
|
Uninstall Apple Bonjour. Miner doesn't like any dll injections/hooks because of protection, but this software do this. It worked, thanks. But Is a little slower than nanominer, with your miner 8-9 MH/s, and with nanominer 13-14 MH/s. Could you use the binaries generated by that miner?
|
|
|
|
|
andrucrypt (OP)
Member

Offline
Activity: 737
Merit: 50
|
 |
May 11, 2020, 05:12:54 PM |
|
Here is the miner, does not detect the R9 390s  Uninstall Apple Bonjour. Miner doesn't like any dll injections/hooks because of protection, but this software do this. It worked, thanks. But Is a little slower than nanominer, with your miner 8-9 MH/s, and with nanominer 13-14 MH/s. Could you use the binaries generated by that miner? right now wildrig needs downvolting for cards, so gpu won't drop clocks.
|
|
|
|
|
andrucrypt (OP)
Member

Offline
Activity: 737
Merit: 50
|
 |
May 16, 2020, 08:49:02 AM Last edit: May 16, 2020, 09:23:46 AM by andrucrypt |
|
0.24.0 beta -added parameter --progpow-kernel(1 or 2 can give better hashrate on different drivers or gpu configuration) -speedup ProgPow/KawPow up to 10% on pre-Navi gpu's
Compare different --progpow-kernel values(1 or 2) in benchmark(on KawPow add --benchmark --benchmark-epoch 170 on ProgPowZ try --benchmark --benchmark-epoch 17)
|
|
|
|
|
tale01
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 121
Merit: 0
|
 |
May 16, 2020, 11:12:42 AM |
|
--progpow-kernel (default: 0) is the same kernel 2 ? Kernel 1 is old kernel, right ? For me. Kernel 0and 2 is good. My GPU is RX580 and R9 NANO. Good job. 
|
|
|
|
|
andrucrypt (OP)
Member

Offline
Activity: 737
Merit: 50
|
 |
May 16, 2020, 11:34:42 AM |
|
--progpow-kernel (default: 0) is the same kernel 2 ? Kernel 1 is old kernel, right ? For me. Kernel 0and 2 is good. My GPU is RX580 and R9 NANO. Good job.  yep, 1 is old one, and 0 for pre-Vega uses kernel 2 by default(this is new one).
|
|
|
|
|
cjwallsg
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 21
Merit: 0
|
 |
May 16, 2020, 11:39:23 AM |
|
0.24.0 beta -added parameter --progpow-kernel(1 or 2 can give better hashrate on different drivers or gpu configuration) -speedup ProgPow/KawPow up to 10% on pre-Navi gpu's
Compare different --progpow-kernel values(1 or 2) in benchmark(on KawPow add --benchmark --benchmark-epoch 170 on ProgPowZ try --benchmark --benchmark-epoch 17)
Excellent work! My R9 390s Boosted to 13 MH/s and stable until now. Thank you
|
|
|
|
|
cjwallsg
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 21
Merit: 0
|
 |
May 16, 2020, 03:24:47 PM |
|
0.24.0 beta -added parameter --progpow-kernel(1 or 2 can give better hashrate on different drivers or gpu configuration) -speedup ProgPow/KawPow up to 10% on pre-Navi gpu's
Compare different --progpow-kernel values(1 or 2) in benchmark(on KawPow add --benchmark --benchmark-epoch 170 on ProgPowZ try --benchmark --benchmark-epoch 17)
R9 290 (4Gb) = 12-13 MH/s
|
|
|
|
|
|
melloyellow
|
 |
May 16, 2020, 08:33:43 PM |
|
0.24.0 beta -added parameter --progpow-kernel(1 or 2 can give better hashrate on different drivers or gpu configuration) -speedup ProgPow/KawPow up to 10% on pre-Navi gpu's
Compare different --progpow-kernel values(1 or 2) in benchmark(on KawPow add --benchmark --benchmark-epoch 170 on ProgPowZ try --benchmark --benchmark-epoch 17)
Kernel 2 is great for Vega 56's with 19.2 drivers around 19mh/s but I got too many Share Above Target rejects with Send Stale Shares activated. I turned send stale shares off and it seems to work fine. Is this expected behavior? edit: As soon as I posted that, I started getting rejects for Share Above Target.
|
|
|
|
|
|