🚀[ANN] Invech Token IEO - Licensed Crypto Exchange & Blockchain Smart City🚀

[Dasha88fed]

If IEO is conducted on Binance, then the team and all project documentation will be carefully checked. Although Binance is very difficult to get to spend IEO. Recently I read statistics, only 4 of the 60 projects were selected and will be able to hold their IEO.

Interesting, and where did the other 56 projects go after that? Gone to other exchanges, or as before, began to conduct ordinary ICO? Still, without ICO projects, we are not going anywhere. But bounty hunters will not remain without work.

I agree with you, ICO still exists and will exist for a long time, but IEO is a trend today and as long as it brings profit to investors it will be popular.

IEO projects have their advantages, but there are also disadvantages. It seems to me that we will return to the ICO projects all the same, however, when they are regulated and protected from fraudsters by state bodies. This is still the simplest and most accessible form of fundraising and distribution of new tokens.

The main danger for projects with participation in an IEO may be a dump of tokens within a few days after listing.
This aspect is solved by a partial lock of investors' funds.

Freezing investor tokens is the right move, but it’s usually bounty hunters that drop tokens at low prices and dump the price of the coin, so it’s important whether the bounty hunters token freezes. This would help keep the price of the coin, so do some projects and the result is positive.

[Smitty Werben Man Jensen]

Who knows the information when will IEO should starts and anything about conditions?

Regarding this, I also don't know when the IEO will start and you better just ask the team or the manager, hopefully it's responded and if it's not better, look for information in the telegram group

[DmitFomin]

Who knows the information when will IEO should starts and anything about conditions?

Regarding this, I also don't know when the IEO will start and you better just ask the team or the manager, hopefully it's responded and if it's not better, look for information in the telegram group

According to the roadmap of the project, IEO will be in May 2019. But in the telegram group, the admin answered that the exact date has not yet been determined, they will announce it later.

Roadmap May 2019:
1.Invech Consultancy
2.Invech Initial Exchange Offering (IEO)
3.Full Official Launch with Fully Operational Exchange Platform

[A7373]

Team need to speed up IEO preparation for Initial Exchange Offering becouse some project show themselves from the bad side and the rating of IEO could fall down after time.

[Artem57]

Team need to speed up IEO preparation for Initial Exchange Offering becouse some project show themselves from the bad side and the rating of IEO could fall down after time.

Some sense to IEO now if all of the team's achievements, we can highlight only the white paper, which is similar to the white paper the other exchange. First, we need to give people the belief that you can realize your idea into a final product and then ask money from people to development.

[DoubleShow]

Team need to speed up IEO preparation for Initial Exchange Offering becouse some project show themselves from the bad side and the rating of IEO could fall down after time.

Some sense to IEO now if all of the team's achievements, we can highlight only the white paper, which is similar to the white paper the other exchange. First, we need to give people the belief that you can realize your idea into a final product and then ask money from people to development.

Well, actually IEO is scheduled for November 2019 . In the same month in the roadmap and the release of the working version of the exchange. There we'll see should we trust the developers to invest in the stock market or not. So far only words.

[Leyss]

If IEO is conducted on Binance, then the team and all project documentation will be carefully checked. Although Binance is very difficult to get to spend IEO. Recently I read statistics, only 4 of the 60 projects were selected and will be able to hold their IEO.

Interesting, and where did the other 56 projects go after that? Gone to other exchanges, or as before, began to conduct ordinary ICO? Still, without ICO projects, we are not going anywhere. But bounty hunters will not remain without work.

I agree with you, ICO still exists and will exist for a long time, but IEO is a trend today and as long as it brings profit to investors it will be popular.

IEO projects have their advantages, but there are also disadvantages. It seems to me that we will return to the ICO projects all the same, however, when they are regulated and protected from fraudsters by state bodies. This is still the simplest and most accessible form of fundraising and distribution of new tokens.

The main danger for projects with participation in an IEO may be a dump of tokens within a few days after listing.
This aspect is solved by a partial lock of investors' funds.

Freezing investor tokens is the right move, but it’s usually bounty hunters that drop tokens at low prices and dump the price of the coin, so it’s important whether the bounty hunters token freezes. This would help keep the price of the coin, so do some projects and the result is positive.

As far as I know, there are no bounty campaigns in this IEO yet. The INVECH team, however, plans to create such campaigns. If they plan to distribute their tokens in May, then it should be soon.

[A7373]

Those projects who have a lot of investors and believe in themselves, usually, don’t use bounty campaign for advertising.

[nutildah]

As a reminder to everybody considering investing in this project (don't):

This project employs a cheesy bumping service to bump its thread (as can be seen by the utterly dumb conversation in this thread by newb and jr member accounts); also their white paper is heavily plagiarized from the Binance whitepaper:







This project is most likely a scam, DO NOT send money there.

[DmitFomin]

Those projects who have a lot of investors and believe in themselves, usually, don’t use bounty campaign for advertising.

Even strong projects need advertising to reach a larger audience and spread information about the project. Even the world's largest brands do this.

[Dasha88fed]

Those projects who have a lot of investors and believe in themselves, usually, don’t use bounty campaign for advertising.

Even strong projects need advertising to reach a larger audience and spread information about the project. Even the world's largest brands do this.

The best advertising for any project is the provision of quality services, quality service and high level of work of the project team. The finished product is an indicator of the project level.

[A7373]

Those projects who have a lot of investors and believe in themselves, usually, don’t use bounty campaign for advertising.

Even strong projects need advertising to reach a larger audience and spread information about the project. Even the world's largest brands do this.

If you are a professional investor, you need to know that high priority or another words high rating projects collect hard cup without any problem.

[DmitFomin]

Those projects who have a lot of investors and believe in themselves, usually, don’t use bounty campaign for advertising.

Even strong projects need advertising to reach a larger audience and spread information about the project. Even the world's largest brands do this.

If you are a professional investor, you need to know that high priority or another words high rating projects collect hard cup without any problem.

I agree with you, for example, BitTorrent, which collected $7.2 million in 18 minutes. Or projects that collected hard cap in seconds Bread ($6 million) and Gifto ($3.4 million).

[Artem57]

Those projects who have a lot of investors and believe in themselves, usually, don’t use bounty campaign for advertising.

Even strong projects need advertising to reach a larger audience and spread information about the project. Even the world's largest brands do this.

If you are a professional investor, you need to know that high priority or another words high rating projects collect hard cup without any problem.

I agree with you, for example, BitTorrent, which collected $7.2 million in 18 minutes. Or projects that collected hard cap in seconds Bread ($6 million) and Gifto ($3.4 million).

Yes, but these projects were a great marketing and news background. Now think , who knows about Invech that sketched white paper from binance? Do you think there is a chance that Invech collect at least a million dollars on IEO?

[Faeton]

Those projects who have a lot of investors and believe in themselves, usually, don’t use bounty campaign for advertising.

Even strong projects need advertising to reach a larger audience and spread information about the project. Even the world's largest brands do this.

If you are a professional investor, you need to know that high priority or another words high rating projects collect hard cup without any problem.

I agree with you, for example, BitTorrent, which collected $7.2 million in 18 minutes. Or projects that collected hard cap in seconds Bread ($6 million) and Gifto ($3.4 million).

Yes, but these projects were a great marketing and news background. Now think , who knows about Invech that sketched white paper from binance? Do you think there is a chance that Invech collect at least a million dollars on IEO?

If you use some kind of common white paper from other projects as a sample, I see nothing wrong with that. This cannot be considered plagiarism.
As for marketing in IEO projects, investors, in any case, should learn about such projects from somewhere. The only exception may be cases when large investors appear as a result of private negotiations.

[kolnides]

What about project? Is it going in time with its roadmap? Where are any news from devs?

[Artem57]

Those projects who have a lot of investors and believe in themselves, usually, don’t use bounty campaign for advertising.

Even strong projects need advertising to reach a larger audience and spread information about the project. Even the world's largest brands do this.

If you are a professional investor, you need to know that high priority or another words high rating projects collect hard cup without any problem.

I agree with you, for example, BitTorrent, which collected $7.2 million in 18 minutes. Or projects that collected hard cap in seconds Bread ($6 million) and Gifto ($3.4 million).

Yes, but these projects were a great marketing and news background. Now think , who knows about Invech that sketched white paper from binance? Do you think there is a chance that Invech collect at least a million dollars on IEO?

If you use some kind of common white paper from other projects as a sample, I see nothing wrong with that. This cannot be considered plagiarism.
As for marketing in IEO projects, investors, in any case, should learn about such projects from somewhere. The only exception may be cases when large investors appear as a result of private negotiations.

This is plagiarism, even though something very bad I do not see. In terms of investment I think the project would be difficult to collect a large amount because I do not see any strong marketing or any major innovation in the white paper for this exchange. There are very a lot existing.

[Zhenka]

Those projects who have a lot of investors and believe in themselves, usually, don’t use bounty campaign for advertising.

Even strong projects need advertising to reach a larger audience and spread information about the project. Even the world's largest brands do this.

If you are a professional investor, you need to know that high priority or another words high rating projects collect hard cup without any problem.

I agree with you, for example, BitTorrent, which collected $7.2 million in 18 minutes. Or projects that collected hard cap in seconds Bread ($6 million) and Gifto ($3.4 million).

Yes, but these projects were a great marketing and news background. Now think , who knows about Invech that sketched white paper from binance? Do you think there is a chance that Invech collect at least a million dollars on IEO?

If you use some kind of common white paper from other projects as a sample, I see nothing wrong with that. This cannot be considered plagiarism.
As for marketing in IEO projects, investors, in any case, should learn about such projects from somewhere. The only exception may be cases when large investors appear as a result of private negotiations.

This is plagiarism, even though something very bad I do not see. In terms of investment I think the project would be difficult to collect a large amount because I do not see any strong marketing or any major innovation in the white paper for this exchange. There are very a lot existing.

Personally I don't care where they took a piece of white paper. Before conducting the IEO is still a lot of time and if the project shows us that the ability to develop , it will only lead to the fact that among the exchanges will be another player who will not give to relax the others.

[Zhenka]

Those projects who have a lot of investors and believe in themselves, usually, don’t use bounty campaign for advertising.

Even strong projects need advertising to reach a larger audience and spread information about the project. Even the world's largest brands do this.

If you are a professional investor, you need to know that high priority or another words high rating projects collect hard cup without any problem.

I agree with you, for example, BitTorrent, which collected $7.2 million in 18 minutes. Or projects that collected hard cap in seconds Bread ($6 million) and Gifto ($3.4 million).

Yes, but these projects were a great marketing and news background. Now think , who knows about Invech that sketched white paper from binance? Do you think there is a chance that Invech collect at least a million dollars on IEO?

If you use some kind of common white paper from other projects as a sample, I see nothing wrong with that. This cannot be considered plagiarism.
As for marketing in IEO projects, investors, in any case, should learn about such projects from somewhere. The only exception may be cases when large investors appear as a result of private negotiations.

This is plagiarism, even though something very bad I do not see. In terms of investment I think the project would be difficult to collect a large amount because I do not see any strong marketing or any major innovation in the white paper for this exchange. There are very a lot existing.

Personally I don't care where they took a piece of white paper. Before conducting the IEO is still a lot of time and if the project shows us that the ability to develop , it will only lead to the fact that among the exchanges will be another player who will not give to relax the others.

Friends, what's the point of your discussion? Let's wait for action from the developers. Only on their basis we can make some conclusions.

[Leyss]

Are you planning a generosity company? Will there be a distribution of your tokens? I would like to know about future plans.

We will be starting our IEO (Initial Exchange Offering) soon, you can visit our token-sale website at: https://tokensale.invech.io

Do not you think that the second phase of the distribution of tokens IV is too unprofitable for investors. And the discount is reduced by half - to ten percent, and the price increases from 0.32 dollars to 0.36 dollars, and the tokens will be blocked for 9 months, instead of 6 months. ?