Influence of Bounty Participants

[Alert31]

Lately there have been many who argue about bounty participants, some argue that the more bounty participants the better the new project will be. and there are also those who argue that bounty participants must be limited so they can avoid the number of dumper when a project is completed.

I have questions
1. How influential is this bounty participant for a new project?
2. If the bounty participant is restricted what will affect the success of a new project?

    Ofcourse bounty participants has a great effect on every project to be known and attract more investors.  If the bounty participants is restricted it will also affect the demand on every project that's why bounty participants are very important as a part of project advertisement and promotion.

[1714772373]

1714772373

[1714772373]

1714772373

[cliber]

Very much the influence of participants bounties for the success or success of a new project. If participants in bounties are limited, the positive is that the benefits gained by participating participants will be greater. The negative is the success of the project. Because in general, the function of participants in bounties is to help promote the ICO.

[Perfect35]

Lately there have been many who argue about bounty participants, some argue that the more bounty participants the better the new project will be. and there are also those who argue that bounty participants must be limited so they can avoid the number of dumper when a project is completed.

I have questions
1. How influential is this bounty participant for a new project?
2. If the bounty participant is restricted what will affect the success of a new project?

Putting limitation to the number of participants does not in any way guarantee the success of the project. I personally believe that if participants are many, then there will be more room for the information about the project to be disseminated across board.
The that bounty participants are many does not mean the token will dump. The reason is that on average, the percentage allocated to bounty is not more than 3%, so there is no way that can cause a dump.

[Huntler1993]

Bounty participant really do a lot for new projects, never underestimate them. From selling out to buying of the project all depends on them. Also most of the hunters turn out to be investors so they sometimes invest heavily in it knowing that its really a good project. Restricting them could really cost the project as the project might experience a decrease in hype affecting their general sales at large.

[Liklopor]

I think that the participants of the Bounty have a positive impact on the project and attract new investors to the project. and the number of participants should be regulated.

[drew314]

The influence of bounty participants in the fields of promoting or advertising makes more demand in the success of the new project to be honest do not put limits participating in bounty project because they are big responsibility in making project succeed.

[MAXE]

Bounty hunters create hype around the project and simulated activity.
Often, some investors look at this and can base their decision on this factor.

[Koobtcgal]

This can be said in two ways:
1. The more bounty hunters a project have available, the better the reach to the outside world to attract more investors.
2. the more the tokens are distributed to a large number of hunters, the more likely the price will dump when listed on an exchange.

Every project will choose point #1 because they want more investors and they won't think more about whether the tokens are dumped after listing or not.

[Dobby070]

Lately there have been many who argue about bounty participants, some argue that the more bounty participants the better the new project will be. and there are also those who argue that bounty participants must be limited so they can avoid the number of dumper when a project is completed.

I have questions
1. How influential is this bounty participant for a new project?
2. If the bounty participant is restricted what will affect the success of a new project?

Basically, as you can see, there is much more percentage alloted in the signature campaign followed by media content and videos and etc. That is because bounty hunters are the heart of advertisements. ICO will succeed with the help of the increasingly number of bounty hunters all over the world.

[0t3p0t]

Lately there have been many who argue about bounty participants, some argue that the more bounty participants the better the new project will be. and there are also those who argue that bounty participants must be limited so they can avoid the number of dumper when a project is completed.

I have questions
1. How influential is this bounty participant for a new project?
2. If the bounty participant is restricted what will affect the success of a new project?

Bounty participants made advertisements and promotion of projects in a much cheaper way compared to having a space of ads on billboards or televisions. Depending on the chosen participants on how they encourage or reach the attentions of investors. Based on my observation managers and team of projects prefer high quality profiles of participants like legendary or anyone that has good reputation and merits. If ever bounty participants are restricted I don't think if the project will making it's way up to the target number of investors because as we all know that cryptocurrency is restricted in social media and other platforms that has huge number of audience. It is not about dumpers actually, it is about delivering the project legitimately and professionally. Dumpers are only small percentage on this early stage so if the project is good and has potential dumpers will think twice depending on every situation.

[Vispilio]

Regardless of how many bounty participants, the vast majority of projects are outright failing, or falling short of even their softcap targets and having to extend their ICO's indefinitely at the moment,

so looks like they must find a more qualified and selective way to do marketing via bounties...

[Armstand]

Regardless of how many bounty participants, the vast majority of projects are outright failing, or falling short of even their softcap targets and having to extend their ICO's indefinitely at the moment,

so looks like they must find a more qualified and selective way to do marketing via bounties...

Bounty hunters didn't do much help nowadays since investors were smart enough to check the ICO potential, though hunters can still be a help to at least know that such project exist. It just need some never before seen tactic to outstand.

[thenameisjay]

Lately there have been many who argue about bounty participants, some argue that the more bounty participants the better the new project will be. and there are also those who argue that bounty participants must be limited so they can avoid the number of dumper when a project is completed.

I have questions
1. How influential is this bounty participant for a new project?
2. If the bounty participant is restricted what will affect the success of a new project?

Answers:
1. Bounty participants help spread the name of the project through the signature campaign whilst wearing the banner. It helps investors find viable investments to buy in to.
2. It will affect the bounty campaign because it limits the movement of information from one investor to another. They can't buy in if they don't see your banner.

[joybella]

Bounty participants does a God job at advertising such projects and this exposes the said project to their prospective investors. Bounty participants are paid advertisers although cheaper when compared to what's obtainable in the advertising industry today.

[confreslamp]

Bounty hunters have a huge influence on a new project, because the bounty is the most efficient way of promoting an ICO on the first stages. Without any bounty, an ICO won't reach its funding goals on such a market.

[milani]

Bounty hunters nowadays do not help to the project like it was in 2017, but  although today the bounty works n for the developing of the projects' idea and their popularization. For example signature and telegram chat campaigns help to the show the information to the potential investors or people who would be interested in coins. But the problem is that mowadays the situation on the crypto market in whole do not attract lots of investors. So the high interest to invest into something became less than in previous years. But soon the situation will change.

[Maricurijohn]

Bounty hunters have a huge influence on a new project, because the bounty is the most efficient way of promoting an ICO on the first stages. Without any bounty, an ICO won't reach its funding goals on such a market.

Yes, in my opinion, the bounty channel will make it easier for ICO projects to reach out to related audiences, and sometimes running ads on google would be unlikely to be successful with Bounty campaigns. So Bounty will never end.

[Babyrica0226]

Lately there have been many who argue about bounty participants, some argue that the more bounty participants the better the new project will be. and there are also those who argue that bounty participants must be limited so they can avoid the number of dumper when a project is completed.

I have questions
1. How influential is this bounty participant for a new project?
2. If the bounty participant is restricted what will affect the success of a new project?

I think the bounty hunter or participants could only be influential if their rank is higher than the member position.
The Full member, Sr. Member, Hero member and Legendary has a strong influence in the list with the investors in my opinion.
though I'm not saying below of this rank has no influence I am just point out that its an advantage if you're account was in high
rank level. I'm not try trying to offend anyone.

[Mommynigabby]

yes I think Bounty hunters play a big part ion the success of ICO. one major contribution is being visible. if many people are mentioning you or talking about you, possible investors gets curious. What they will do next is read the whitepaper and research the project. I think this is just the same how advertisement work. exposure!

[arifteguhr]

yes I think Bounty hunters play a big part ion the success of ICO. one major contribution is being visible. if many people are mentioning you or talking about you, possible investors gets curious. What they will do next is read the whitepaper and research the project. I think this is just the same how advertisement work. exposure!

Bounty also has an impact on ico because it is able to introduce their ico to the community and their possibility if they are interested in investing in it. as we know now, the bounty still survives because it is indeed beneficial for ICO and also benefits the participants