Influence of Bounty Participants

[llecrf]

Some projects do not run a bounty but they do airdrop to increase the number of communities from the project, if they want the project to run well, they can run a bounty with a pretty good budget. For many participants who participated there was no one disappointed.

[1715188395]

1715188395

[1715188395]

1715188395

[1715188395]

1715188395

[1715188395]

1715188395

[distr@yopmail.com]

Some projects do not run a bounty but they do airdrop to increase the number of communities from the project, if they want the project to run well, they can run a bounty with a pretty good budget. For many participants who participated there was no one disappointed.

Bounty Hunter still plays a very important role, I think it is related to the success of the sale ico. but there are indeed some who do not carry out bounty campaigns, but the work of the team must be very hard by doing huge advertising to get investors. and it could have been a large amount of funds spent, even greater than making a bounty campaign.

[marufnang]

Lately there have been many who argue about bounty participants, some argue that the more bounty participants the better the new project will be. and there are also those who argue that bounty participants must be limited so they can avoid the number of dumper when a project is completed.

I have questions
1. How influential is this bounty participant for a new project?
2. If the bounty participant is restricted what will affect the success of a new project?

I think it would be better if we are able to makes every bounty participant to avoid selling their coins directly the first time the coins listed in the market, that way should be able to control the price for not dropping when it listed in the market for the first time.

[sergey1301]

Member of the bounty company. could affect the project. For example, the majority of Bautista, sell tokens of the project immediately upon receipt. This affects the price of the token.

[Accts4u2]

Lately there have been many who argue about bounty participants, some argue that the more bounty participants the better the new project will be. and there are also those who argue that bounty participants must be limited so they can avoid the number of dumper when a project is completed.

I have questions
1. How influential is this bounty participant for a new project?
2. If the bounty participant is restricted what will affect the success of a new project?

A bounty campaign can be what determines whether a coin is going to do well or not, it depends on how well that the bounty campaign is executed to make sure that they get across to the kind of investors that they are looking for to invest in their project. I do think that if there is some kind of limit on a project then it can lead to better results from the bounty participants

[r_delossa]

Bounty hunters have a huge influence on new projects, because hunters are their main promoting power that allow the project to collect more funds and maybe to reach their funding goals. Without bounty hunters it would be difficult to achieve a soft cap on this market.

[powerman24]

Bounty hunters play an important role in the advertising and promoting  a new campaign.  It is not good if there are too much of hunters in a campaign  as the quality is more important then the quantity in this case. It is true that many hunters dump their coins immediately as it is listed on exchanges but it does not effect the price long term as bounty rewards are usually 1-2% of the total supply.

[bagikoin]

It seems to me that the campaign bounty should not limit the number of participants because it is not profitable for them and the PR campaign of the project will be much worse

But in this case, the participants may become too much and then they will receive a very small payment. So I think it’s necessary to limit the number of participants.

Yes, it was indeed true. too many participants that join will give the amount of the fee is small. at the very least need to be restricted to this case in order to be paid remains in the amount proportional to the jobs that exist. not to mention when it is extended and the number of participants continues to grow naturally makes the results more and more refined.

[alexsoul]

Perhaps you will be surprised, but bounty hunters bring little benefit to the promotion of the project. Their contribution to the project promotion and attraction of new investors is minimal. What is needed then the participants of the bounty? They increase traffic on social networks, promote the project hashtag in the search query, but nothing more.

[Ayobami99]

Lately there have been many who argue about bounty participants, some argue that the more bounty participants the better the new project will be. and there are also those who argue that bounty participants must be limited so they can avoid the number of dumper when a project is completed.

I have questions
1. How influential is this bounty participant for a new project?
2. If the bounty participant is restricted what will affect the success of a new project?

Some times one have to check the negative effects of something to be able to judge the actual advantage, check the times when bounty hunters negatively advertised some products... You see the product going down... I believe the bounty hunters have influences that is so great it cannot be measured

[cudora]

Influence is pretty huge, but hunters can be as helpful and as well as a disaster for a project. If an ICO restricts to pay their earnings, the bounty hunters will destroy the image of the whole project and the team.

[jamids]

Influence is pretty huge, but hunters can be as helpful and as well as a disaster for a project. If an ICO restricts to pay their earnings, the bounty hunters will destroy the image of the whole project and the team.

Well, it is up to the team as to how they would treat the bounty participants because if they would just do what they promise then the bounty participants would do their job in promoting the project and then if they would decide to not pay them then it would just reflect that they may just be a scam team and their intention is really to just get money from people and then run away thereafter. Bounty participants are influential because they are the key so that the information about the ICO can reach as many people as they can.

[Anna_88]

The fewer people the more salary, the fewer people the less the project is promoted! But some kind of limitation should be.

[johnalyn]

I think bounty hunters really have a great role of promoting their project and to get more investors that will make the campaign get their success in the estimated time. And I think it would be great if all the bounty manager get what is their exact rewards on the campaign they participated because some of the ICO's don't give what really the allocated rewards to the participants sometimes.

[MetalEngine]

Lately there have been many who argue about bounty participants, some argue that the more bounty participants the better the new project will be. and there are also those who argue that bounty participants must be limited so they can avoid the number of dumper when a project is completed.

I have questions
1. How influential is this bounty participant for a new project?
2. If the bounty participant is restricted what will affect the success of a new project?

1. The only investors that bountyhunters can find are those, who visit bitcointalk i guess. And some small part from twitter and facebook.
2. The more participant - the more info spreads.

[Uguande]

Bounty campaign - the easiest way to promote project without heavy expenditures. The main problem is that there are many bounty hunters, so rewards aren't so good, as it used to be. So, bounty managers should complicate the rules and also fix the number of participants

[jyotianand01]

Bounty hunters have huge influence as they give the huge promotion to any new ICO through their social media networks but limiting participation have no effect on dumping as bounty share always fixed to nearly 1 or 2% of total sale and if will be distributed to participants as per their stakes so no effect of limiting participation.

[a4illusionist]

I think there has to be some standards set for bounty hunters. Not all should be allowed to come and join. I think the jr rank should be made compulsory for everyone to join any bounties.

[CapGelatik]

Bounty hunters have huge influence as they give the huge promotion to any new ICO through their social media networks but limiting participation have no effect on dumping as bounty share always fixed to nearly 1 or 2% of total sale and if will be distributed to participants as per their stakes so no effect of limiting participation.

that's right, it should not be a bounty hunter who is a scapegoat in the event of a dumping of an ICO project, because it is seen from the allocation that only a few percent will not have a major impact on the price of the coin.

[drumamat]

Lately there have been many who argue about bounty participants, some argue that the more bounty participants the better the new project will be. and there are also those who argue that bounty participants must be limited so they can avoid the number of dumper when a project is completed.

I have questions
1. How influential is this bounty participant for a new project?
2. If the bounty participant is restricted what will affect the success of a new project?

Most important in a new project in crypto is the bounty hunters. Without the influence of the bounty hunters the project will not properly promoted olin this forum and all social media. About second question, very infavor because the lesser the participants the more profits will gain of a bounty hunter as the allocation is mostly not so big in bounty campaign.

1. How influential is this bounty participant for a new project?-I think this is a rhetorical question.Because without the participants of the bounty any project will be a failure.
About second question,i don't agree with you here.Yes, with a smaller number of participants in the bounty, they will be paid more. But what’s the point of reducing participants in the bounty for the project itself.It is better to pay $ 10 hundred people than to pay $ 100 only to 10 people.The fact is that for more effective advertising you need a large number of people and in the end for any startup it does not matter how much the participant will eventually get a bounty. The main thing that the startup has collected the amount that is needed for further development.