Influence of Bounty Participants

[DAVETUN]

Lately there have been many who argue about bounty participants, some argue that the more bounty participants the better the new project will be. and there are also those who argue that bounty participants must be limited so they can avoid the number of dumper when a project is completed.

I have questions
1. How influential is this bounty participant for a new project?
2. If the bounty participant is restricted what will affect the success of a new project?

It is good to have lots of people on the bounty as this is sure to have a positive impact on th ICO  as its tends to create more awareness for the project, thereby  increasing the numbers  of  investors, to avoid high numbers of dumpers you can  develop a format that  tends to give bonus to holders per time, you can also lock the token of bounty hunters in order to play save.

[hahay]

I just assume if the ICO project only requires investors to invest in their project, at least to achieve the value needed to achieve the specified target. So I don't think many or not the bounty participants are so problematic, because if indeed they really want to build the project well, then the number of bounty participants should be better, because of that high enthusiasm that makes him optimistic to keep moving upward.

[trahaubab]

bounty participants are making community, I see that good project use them like this.
also they are really influenced, when you see that projcet has many articles or reposts it gives additional trust

[Revvo1]

The place of bounty participants is such that can't be underrated and over emphasized. The extra boost they bring to the marketing of a project should in no way be taken for granted.

On the issue of them dumping, this assessment hasn't been objective enough especially lately. We all know that virtually all projects are struggling in prices due to the ongoing market tsunami. I have even seen bounty participants holding on than the investors in some cases.

[samycoin]

Lately there have been many who argue about bounty participants, some argue that the more bounty participants the better the new project will be. and there are also those who argue that bounty participants must be limited so they can avoid the number of dumper when a project is completed.

I have questions
1. How influential is this bounty participant for a new project?
2. If the bounty participant is restricted what will affect the success of a new project?

Bounty participants is big influence in one project because participants is the one can promote about their project to get a investors. And there's a many participants in this forum so if one or two person will restricted it will not affect to the project.

[zhengqi]

The success of the project is not affected by the bounty participants. The number of participants only affects the bounty reward. After all, the more participants, the less each of them will be able to get. Limiting the number of bounty hunters will also be useful for the project, i believe. After all, in this case it will be easier to manage and detect violations.

[kawetsriyanto]

Bounty participants have a big role to promote ICOs projects to the real potential investors. I think they are very crucial for a new project. If there are restriction for bounty participants, It will reduce the possibility for the successful token sales.  

[Kurokonobasuke]

Lately there have been many who argue about bounty participants, some argue that the more bounty participants the better the new project will be. and there are also those who argue that bounty participants must be limited so they can avoid the number of dumper when a project is completed.

I have questions
1. How influential is this bounty participant for a new project?
2. If the bounty participant is restricted what will affect the success of a new project?

Bounty participants or I'd say bounty campaigns are playing a huge role to promote ICO projects. The role of Bounty campaigns is to promote a project through various platforms such as social media, forums and sites where potent investors can be found. If ever participants would be restricted, it will surely be a huge loss especially on the part of advertising the project itself.

[Btcmarmipp2]

Bounty participants have a big role to promote ICOs projects to the real potential investors. I think they are very crucial for a new project. If there are restriction for bounty participants, It will reduce the possibility for the successful token sales. 

I agree with you mate, bounty hunters are just like fuel of a vehicle it can't run or can't go to a destination. Bounty hunters are the influence of all investors that the project is successful.

[lutfi-hasan]

I think the effect is very large from the Bounty participants for the success of the ICO project, because with Bounty participants automatically a project will be appointed to the public, so that it will attract Investors to participate in their ICO. So don't underestimate Bounty participants.

[heritage35]

Lately there have been many who argue about bounty participants, some argue that the more bounty participants the better the new project will be. and there are also those who argue that bounty participants must be limited so they can avoid the number of dumper when a project is completed.

I have questions
1. How influential is this bounty participant for a new project?
2. If the bounty participant is restricted what will affect the success of a new project?

Despite the number of bounty participants not being restricted for the bounties, it seems some are already restricting themselves, because of the present situation of the market. For those who are still i to bounty, they will have more rewards to themselves.
Bounty is a promotional means for every project that employs its service, not necessarily new or old projects.

[rangnatht]

Bounty participants played a important role in the new project and without bounty its very hard to spread the project everywhere. But the question of how much it's good for project. First of all almost 1 or 2 percent of total coin is reserve for bounty participants. And I don't think so it could more effect on token dump. People thinking that bounty participants dump their token but I am agree with it. First 2 percent of the total supply of the coin is not much effective for price drop. And also these 2 percent is not distributed at one single wallet. These 2 percent bounty coin distributed among thousands of wallet and not everyone selling their coin at the same time. Few bounty hunterss could do it but not everyone. And those thousand of wallet also get their token for their hard work. It's not free.. Their are other so many resources for dump the coin. It's depend on the project. If the project is strong and listed on good volumes exchange then it could be grow too.

[ottogary]

Bounty participant is just a part of the promotion of a project, And making promotion in a forum or social media, can give a good result of investors.
Without a bounty participant, the the project will have a hard time to find an investors.

[malading]

In theory, this should be understood, yes. However, it is important to know that there are many places where the number of participants in the bounty is very competitive. Usually the total amount will not be changed by the number of people.

[bolbau]

1. I think the participant's bounty is only a media campaign for the Iico project, when talking about the future of a project, the innovations offered, whitepapers and roadmaps are the basic things that matter. investors will not simply believe in participant bounties, they will still carry out a fundamental analysis of the project, so even if there are thousands of participant bounties, if the project is not attractive, investors will not come.

2. I agree more with restrictions on participant bounties, this looks more equitable for each participant. Acceptable participant bounty should have high credibility and willingness to work, not just a bounty hunter who tends to spam. with restrictions on participant bounties, income commission sharing will also be large, not necessarily shared by many people.

[SiBuboy]

Lately there have been many who argue about bounty participants, some argue that the more bounty participants the better the new project will be. and there are also those who argue that bounty participants must be limited so they can avoid the number of dumper when a project is completed.

I have questions
1. How influential is this bounty participant for a new project?
2. If the bounty participant is restricted what will affect the success of a new project?

bounty participants nowadays arent taking for granted and always get disrespected in the world of crypto, thats very much sad considering how they all work just to promote a certain project.

[Beldon]

Obviously the bounty participants have an influence on the success of a project, because indirectly the participants promote the projects they are participating in, the more participants they are certainly the better for the project

[viananda2525]

Obviously the bounty participants have an influence on the success of a project, because indirectly the participants promote the projects they are participating in, the more participants they are certainly the better for the project

bounty hunter give their best effort to make ico project successfull and raise money suitable with their target.more participants make more people know current project.

[Karlblaise1]

Bounty hunting is a publicity/Marketing drive; far cheaper than what google and other e-marketing firms can collect.

In that regard, most people will go for bounty hunters because of the affordability.

The good thing is that; even the fuss generated by the worst participants who may end up not been shortlisted,  will add to the publicity of a project.

My take:
Bounty hunting is a better channeled marketing exercise for bounty hunting; take it or leave it.
Except if your product is very sound, and you're sure of the utility value; bounty will give you that community value projects are looking for.

Finally;
Bounty is important, productive but still dispensable for good projects.
The impact will always be felt, more than most other marketing gimmicks and despite the cost.
No doubt; the activity is, and remains influential.

[Golftech]

Obviously the bounty participants have an influence on the success of a project, because indirectly the participants promote the projects they are participating in, the more participants they are certainly the better for the project

bounty hunter give their best effort to make ico project successfull and raise money suitable with their target.more participants make more people know current project.

That's the role of bounty hunters, they needed to attract people/investors attentions in order to make sure that the project will be supported, from that they can get a guarantee that the effort that they made will be paid off, we knew more participants means a lots of ways to advertise the project, it will
be for the benefits of both ends.