Influence of Bounty Participants

[iljamlnk]

Bounty program is carried out to promote the new cryptocurrency produced by the project. Which in turn attracts investors to the ICO. Therefore, participants are simply necessary for the bounty company.

[Gontxi]

Lately there have been many who argue about bounty participants, some argue that the more bounty participants the better the new project will be. and there are also those who argue that bounty participants must be limited so they can avoid the number of dumper when a project is completed.

I have questions
1. How influential is this bounty participant for a new project?
2. If the bounty participant is restricted what will affect the success of a new project?

there is no guarantee between the two you say.

however there will always be endless debates.
but I agree more if the bounty campaign participants are limited especially to signatures.

[Slash61]

I see there are some ico that does not hold a bounty program. and they can also get investors. from where they get the investor, yes I think they are doing a very big advertising. because I believe every project has different investor objectives.
the role of the bounty participant equals the advertising in several media. It is possible that a given cost for the program is cheaper than the bounty must be advertise on a medium as possible, that's what makes many of the ico that choose to do bounty campaign.

[Kunlejoe0]

Bounty participant especially that of signature campaign are strategically important to project exposure to community where it matter most. The project is actually getting free advert with a promise of a token that may not be valuable in the future!

[ub27]

Lately there have been many who argue about bounty participants, some argue that the more bounty participants the better the new project will be. and there are also those who argue that bounty participants must be limited so they can avoid the number of dumper when a project is completed.

I have questions
1. How influential is this bounty participant for a new project?
2. If the bounty participant is restricted what will affect the success of a new project?

I see we should limit bounty participants, because by doing so, the bounty hunters will receive more rewards and the quality of their work will be better.
But bounties want to have as many participants as possible, they will help ICO easier to be more popular and more successful.

[frost_wind]

Don't be deceived by a raw numbers of bounty participants in bounty campaigns that have more than 2000 participants . Sometimes we can see bounties whith 5000+ participants , but I can assure you that at least half of them are not an unique participants . Those bot accounts owned by a few persons and you should understand that when you see 40,000 people in a telegram group, or the same number of followers in social networks of the newly created project , they are fake users who do not reflect the objective interest in the project. I doubt that such fake users may be useful. It is much more important to have high-quality support of community than the fake one from the army of bots.

[cryptobae10]

For a new project, the most important thing is growth and development and they need investors too
So to gain maximum awareness bounty hunters are required to spread the word about their project across the world

Imagine 50000 people making 10 post weekly with hashtags  across all social media
That makes it alot of post and a lot of marketing ranges

[gabbie2010]

The popularity of bounty campaign in this forum has a great impact to the marketing of ICOs that is why it has a massive participants even the ICOs owners really appreciate the value of bounty participants towards the success of their protects.

[cryptogeek101]

Lately there have been many who argue about bounty participants, some argue that the more bounty participants the better the new project will be. and there are also those who argue that bounty participants must be limited so they can avoid the number of dumper when a project is completed.

I have questions
1. How influential is this bounty participant for a new project?
2. If the bounty participant is restricted what will affect the success of a new project?

Bounty participants are the live wire of any crypto project, without bounty participants the project might not come to lime light,they do most of the marketing campaigns, however for effective marketing campaign we need a limited number of bounty participants.

[mistersehmuz]

I also do not believe that social media bounties, like twitter, facebook or vk, do not affect too much ICO sell. But content, signature and translations bounties are vital for new projects.

[Russlenat]

We bounty hunters is very influential because we can spread to the word and create awareness about the projects that can lead the investor to see what we have promoted and they invest on it, the limitation of bounty participants it depend on the team of the project because I think they want a fair and good share of bounty reward to the participants.

[coaprotet]

Bounty hunters are doing a very hard job. Their work is to promote a project on social media, forums, media platforms, crypto resources and so on. I think a bounty programme is extremely important for a new ICO.

[marksayson]

It is more advantage when the ICO campaign that is hosting the bounty campaign allocate more funds in order for many bounty hunters to join in the campaign. And the possible of it will surely get you amazed. Because most of the investors find their ico through the bounty campaign.

[Cryptoguru274]

Lately there have been many who argue about bounty participants, some argue that the more bounty participants the better the new project will be. and there are also those who argue that bounty participants must be limited so they can avoid the number of dumper when a project is completed.

I have questions
1. How influential is this bounty participant for a new project?
2. If the bounty participant is restricted what will affect the success of a new project?

Bounty hunters are one of the most influential participants in the whole ICO project process,without them many ICO projects might not succeed, however if bounty hunters are restricted the success of the project might be compromised.

[maculeth]

I can say the influence of the bounty participants on the success of the bounty is 30%, and the rest is the invetsor and the team itself. simple language is that participants promote bounties to attract investors to participate in investing funds for bounty success, of course with projects that have been neatly arranged by their team.

then if the participants are limited, it doesn't have a big influence on the bounty, because one participant can do promotions on various campaigns and that can still help. indeed, when the bounty was finished, most of them carried out large dumps which could have an impact on the sustainability of the coins in the market. also good enough to limit the number of participants to reduce the big dump and that is more effective in my opinion than Kyc.

[FIREBALL24]

It's better to limit bounty hunters, and oblige KYC! Because there are so many bounty hunters who cheat. So that makes the Bounty Manager trouble.
Some only copy work from other participants. Some also use the names of other participants.

Your right bounty participants must be restricted in joining such campaigns and must submit kyc for the clearer of each participants,yes in a multiple accounts as what ive observed and heared only one person uses it,so its unfair they get many rewards in only one campaign,.and i know that it is already made in action of our beloved head.,

[Kadal Ijo]

Bounty participants play a role in ICO's success. I think bounty participants are ambassadors of coins or projects that are followed, and as long as they give good opinions it will make ICO successful and can reach hardcap.

[darktt]

I think unlimited bountyhunters is more profitable for project because more advertize, but worst for bounyhunters because less money. If we talk about influence from bounty hunters in my opinion they do a lot of avertize for project, and probably we should KYC in every ICO for hunters.

[zeze18]

Lately there have been many who argue about bounty participants, some argue that the more bounty participants the better the new project will be. and there are also those who argue that bounty participants must be limited so they can avoid the number of dumper when a project is completed.

I have questions
1. How influential is this bounty participant for a new project?
2. If the bounty participant is restricted what will affect the success of a new project?

1. quite affect the project because bounty hunter can promote the project so the project will be seen by many new investors.
2. do you mean no bounty on the project or what ? if the project already has a big name behind the project, i think bounty is no more needed

[elenka n]

If we talk about marketing, then bounty hunters can only affect the popularity of the project.