These turds look like they are group spamming the same crap

[cryptohunter]

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5063402.0  

look at their post history

shill group needs to be stopped.

Don't reply to this thread unless you have read it properly. This is not about them spamming about sharding . This is about contrived fake conversations between those 3 to promote the same icos on the main alt board on many threads.

Also don't reply if you are usually some kind of pathetic turd that usually spends time picking on genuine accounts for nitpicking shit that is wasting time trying to elevate your low self esteem. Like ALONE055 who is a sad and pathetic loser or any other gimp here.

Real proven scam hunters only need feel the need to reply. Or just  not bother and let the thread die since if I report it here and those accounts continue on spamming and colluding to promote shit to noobs then that's as far as I can take it for now.

Actually also unless you joined before 2014 don't reply because it takes experience here to see the wood for the trees.

[The Sceptical Chymist]

I don't even know what "sharding" is, much less what that discussion is all about.  

Your posts in that thread seem to be trolling, so I'm not sure why you're complaining about the other members there.  What am I missing here?

Edit:

Read their post history. This is a group of alts pushing the same shitty icos and creating fake discussions.

I did try to do just that, but they apparently do most of their posting in sections I have on ignore--most likely the spam mega thread sections.

[cryptohunter]

I don't even know what "sharding" is, much less what that discussion is all about.  

Your posts in that thread seem to be trolling, so I'm not sure why you're complaining about the other members there.  What am I missing here?

Read their post history. This is a group of alts pushing the same shitty icos and creating fake discussions.

Do I need to go back to describing people in a room eating cake to you again for you to see scams here.

Sharding is just the guise to bring up their next crap ico on the main board.

[Upgrade00]

I don't even know what "sharding" is, much less what that discussion is all about.  

It's a concept I have come across in a couple of new ICOs and they claim it can solve the problem of scalability and improve throughput.

Basically is shares the information of transaction in  and only part of that information is available (a shard of it) to those involved in the consensus unread if storing all the information on the blocks this aims at lightening the load.

It can't function of POW algorithm reason why members of the forum and ardent bitcoin enthusiast would have likely not heard about it.

[cryptohunter]

I don't even know what "sharding" is, much less what that discussion is all about.  

It's a concept I have come across in a couple of new ICOs and they claim it can solve the problem of scalability and improve throughput.

Basically is shares the information of transaction in  and only part of that information is available (a shard of it) to those involved in the consensus unread if storing all the information on the blocks this aims at lightening the load.

It can't function of POW algorithm reason why members of the forum and ardent bitcoin enthusiast would have likely not heard about it.

Ethereum had discussed it years ago. The first time I heard about it was when anonymint talked about it in 2014. I think these new icos are probably using it (in their whitepapers) to drum up some funds.

[Initscri]

OP, people would probably take you a hell of a lot more seriously if you acted with maturity. Bringing up "your mom" jokes isn't going to bring any seriousness/validity to the claims you are making:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5063402.msg47619117#msg47619117

As for sharding, I'm assuming it's relevant to sharding of databases, just put into the context of cryptocurrency/blockchains (in terms of storage of data). If it's a legitimate discussion, while it may be somewhat spammy to create new threads to discuss, the OP of that thread is in the right provided the thread has some form of value.

If they make multiple threads to discuss the same sort of thing, then that's a different story.

[cryptohunter]

OP, people would probably take you a hell of a lot more seriously if you acted with maturity. Bringing up "your mom" jokes isn't going to bring any seriousness/validity to the claims you are making:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5063402.msg47619117#msg47619117

As for sharding, I'm assuming it's relevant to sharding of databases, just put into the context of cryptocurrency/blockchains (in terms of storage of data). If it's a legitimate discussion, while it may be somewhat spammy to create new threads to discuss, the OP of that thread is in the right provided the thread has some form of value.

If they make multiple threads to discuss the same sort of thing, then that's a different story.

Please re-read then try again.

Your mum jokes are irrelevant given the fact their post history proves all 3 are  pumping the same shit icos over and over.

You are missing the point entirely.

They are not spamming sharding. They are using any discussion they can think of to join together to collude and spam the same ico's

These fake discussions are quite obvious to most people. I have even laid out clearly how to identify this and yet there are other like yourself who need that little extra help.

Is it becoming any clearer now??

[Onuohakk]

Am still a newbie here so am wondering would my opinion matter? Well if yes then I would say to MR OP two wrong don't make a right  your reply to the thread you highlighted was not befitting of your rank and totally unfair. Yes they might be guilty of your accusations and deserve to be reported. But if everyone decides to use word just as you did to every post or reply that don't go well with them then here would not be a conducive place and it would affect member and possibly future users perspective of the forum

[Marcel555]

Please re-read then try again.

Your mum jokes are irrelevant given the fact their post history proves all 3 are  pumping the same shit icos over and over.

You are missing the point entirely.

They are not spamming sharding. They are using any discussion they can think of to join together to collude and spam the same ico's

Regardless, you always have the option to report to moderator and their posts would likely be deleted or thrashed.
Or if you feel any stricter penalty is needed you can make a post on meta just as you did.
Joining the spam on the thread is not one of the ways to handle the situation.

[cryptohunter]

Am still a newbie here so am wondering would my opinion matter? Well if yes then I would say to MR OP two wrong don't make a right  your reply to the thread you highlighted was not befitting of your rank and totally unfair. Yes they might be guilty of your accusations and deserve to be reported. But if everyone decides to use word just as you did to every post or reply that don't go well with them then here would not be a conducive place and it would affect member and possibly future users perspective of the forum

I am wondering too. errrr ..... NO. Bye.

[MainIbem]

Am still a newbie here so am wondering would my opinion matter? Well if yes then I would say to MR OP two wrong don't make a right  your reply to the thread you highlighted was not befitting of your rank and totally unfair. Yes they might be guilty of your accusations and deserve to be reported. But if everyone decides to use word just as you did to every post or reply that don't go well with them then here would not be a conducive place and it would affect member and possibly future users perspective of the forum

I am wondering too.

And I see that your post seems to have ended the discussion. Yet again, you have been trolling on the 3 members in question. How come?  When and how did you start observing them?

[cryptohunter]

Am still a newbie here so am wondering would my opinion matter? Well if yes then I would say to MR OP two wrong don't make a right  your reply to the thread you highlighted was not befitting of your rank and totally unfair. Yes they might be guilty of your accusations and deserve to be reported. But if everyone decides to use word just as you did to every post or reply that don't go well with them then here would not be a conducive place and it would affect member and possibly future users perspective of the forum

I am wondering too.

And I see that your post seems to have ended the discussion. Yet again, you have been trolling on the 3 members in question. How come?  When and how did you start observing them?

Are you seriously asking me how come I am trolling them? After I have explained 3x here and 1x on the thread in detail?

Calling out scammers as scammers is not trolling. It is simply preventing scammers.

If you were in your house and people broke in trying to steal things would you ask them nicely to leave or hide behind your bbw blow up doll and call the cops or pull out a hand grenade removing the pin with your tongue  and tell them to gtfo?  

Of course you select the option 2 since as luck would have it you were there already


Now start from here...

1. reread until you understand fully.
2. if above is not possible do not touch keyboard again until help arrives.


In the words of the man himself...satoshi

"If you don't believe me or don't get it, I don't have time to try to convince you, sorry."  

[cryptohunter]

Please re-read then try again.

Your mum jokes are irrelevant given the fact their post history proves all 3 are  pumping the same shit icos over and over.

You are missing the point entirely.

They are not spamming sharding. They are using any discussion they can think of to join together to collude and spam the same ico's

Regardless, you always have the option to report to moderator and their posts would likely be deleted or thrashed.
Or if you feel any stricter penalty is needed you can make a post on meta just as you did.
Joining the spam on the thread is not one of the ways to handle the situation.

Spam is a very over used word here most of the time incorrectly so.

I am guessing you are a hide behind the blow up doll kind of guy.

Or ask nicely?

There are people getting banned on here for not giving full references on guides they post. Of course these kind of  spamming shills pushing icos to defraud people of their money need to be booted out.

[Alone055]

@OP, you just broke this rule:

32. Posting multiple posts in a row (excluding bumps and reserved posts by the thread starter) is not allowed.

No matter how serious of a matter you bring up for the betterment of the forum, but it won't be effective as long as you yourself don't care about the things that make the forum a better place.


Edit: Thread archived for reference: http://archive.fo/XmnnH

[cryptohunter]

@OP, you just broke this rule:

32. Posting multiple posts in a row (excluding bumps and reserved posts by the thread starter) is not allowed.

No matter how serious of a matter you bring up for the betterment of the forum, but it won't be effective as long as you yourself don't care about the things that make the forum a better place.

2 times ? 1 each to reply to different responses = multiple ?? ( well i guess it can mean that to a moron like you that does not have capacity to read the rules and make sense of them.)

Kind of like when you tell your internet friends/sympathisers  you have had sexual relations with multiple women in your long and pathetic life. (You mean 2 women. (that you paid for, who later self terminated due to the mental scarring ))



Get your rotten noob trash teeth into this thread then ... I'll await your swift action on this... but it won't happen.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1523788.0

3 updates  spams per day somedays and going on for months......



LOL replying to a person who's comment that I missed before. (That is not what the rule is regarding)

Compared to

scam groups trying to pump scammy ico's

You imbecile...

Let me explain why you are ALONE055



Whining about 2 posts replying to 2 different people here when it was a legitimate reply to a missed question is a demonstration of your stupidity.


Can you also show me any posts or threads where you have done anything of real note. Or made any difference by joining at all.

If you can not provide what I ask then keep your pathetic twittering to yourself.

Looking at your post history you are a joke. A self important turd trying to nitpick on noobs over a small mistakes.

[Infinixhot1996]

Am still a newbie here so am wondering would my opinion matter?

This sort of opening already discredits whatsoever you said/say/wanted to say..

No one cares about your rank, as long as you have something quality to add to the discussion,then you're free to..
Apparently you didn't

[Tszunami98]

@OP are you really trying to get people to take you serious with this attitude?

[Initscri]

OP, people would probably take you a hell of a lot more seriously if you acted with maturity. Bringing up "your mom" jokes isn't going to bring any seriousness/validity to the claims you are making:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5063402.msg47619117#msg47619117

As for sharding, I'm assuming it's relevant to sharding of databases, just put into the context of cryptocurrency/blockchains (in terms of storage of data). If it's a legitimate discussion, while it may be somewhat spammy to create new threads to discuss, the OP of that thread is in the right provided the thread has some form of value.

If they make multiple threads to discuss the same sort of thing, then that's a different story.

These fake discussions are quite obvious to most people. I have even laid out clearly how to identify this and yet there are other like yourself who need that little extra help.

Is it becoming any clearer now??

I did read the users posts, and while I do see many threads being created, I'm not certain I would call it spam. It still has inherent value. This thread, however: debatable. Listen, I'm not usually one to come to *any* spammers defence, but if a effort is made to make a thread worth value to BitcoinTalk, then I will take notice of that.

Your snarky attitude really isn't becoming of you, and it's not going to garner you any sympathy when it comes to members listening to your claims.

Also, yes, you did break a rule above posting twice in a row (not bumping). You don't have to call the other user a moron when you are clearly the user who is not reading the rules in this situation.

[cryptohunter]

OP, people would probably take you a hell of a lot more seriously if you acted with maturity. Bringing up "your mom" jokes isn't going to bring any seriousness/validity to the claims you are making:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5063402.msg47619117#msg47619117

As for sharding, I'm assuming it's relevant to sharding of databases, just put into the context of cryptocurrency/blockchains (in terms of storage of data). If it's a legitimate discussion, while it may be somewhat spammy to create new threads to discuss, the OP of that thread is in the right provided the thread has some form of value.

If they make multiple threads to discuss the same sort of thing, then that's a different story.

These fake discussions are quite obvious to most people. I have even laid out clearly how to identify this and yet there are other like yourself who need that little extra help.

Is it becoming any clearer now??

I did read the users posts, and while I do see many threads being created, I'm not certain I would call it spam. It still has inherent value. This thread, however: debatable. Listen, I'm not usually one to come to *any* spammers defence, but if a effort is made to make a thread worth value to BitcoinTalk, then I will take notice of that.

Your snarky attitude really isn't becoming of you, and it's not going to garner you any sympathy when it comes to members listening to your claims.

Also, yes, you did break a rule above posting twice in a row (not bumping). You don't have to call the other user a moron when you are clearly the user who is not reading the rules in this situation.

You are a moron. That is clear.

Those 3 accounts are colluding together to spam the same shitty icos.

Read the op again
I am not interested in your opinion on facts that are clearly observable.


Just because you are dumb enough to believe 3 accounts colluding to create fake conversations to spam icos has inherent value means nothing other than to display you need to keep your mouth shut.

Now stop replying on my thread because I stated in the OP I don't want gimps cluttering it with their dip shit comments.

@Tszunami98dumbass

As I often explain to people. When presenting observable facts there is no room for serious or not serious. There is simply the facts.

I you can not digest such information and take it seriously that means zero to me.

I lock this thread now since enough time has passed to act upon the information presented in the OP.