REEEEE: PussyGate, a Collection of Trump Investigations

[TECSHARE]

Problem is that he already made up his mind long ago, he considers trump guilty no matter what, look at the way he writes, things like ''well this investigation could take 4 more years, that's why he isn't convicted yet'' For me 2 years of investigation with virtually no results means most of the accusations against trump are bullshit, not saying that he is 100% not guilty but the more time passes the more innocent he looks, of course hellfish doesn't see it that way.

You know what is interesting regarding your last comment, is under the new sexual assault laws in Canada, if you were to accuse him of rape he would essentially have to prove he didn't rape you.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5089923.0

I suppose this is just the general trend of thinking of these types of people, everything is relative in the pursuit of their vision of social justice, even pillars of freedom and law.

[1714021572]

1714021572

[Astargath]

Problem is that he already made up his mind long ago, he considers trump guilty no matter what, look at the way he writes, things like ''well this investigation could take 4 more years, that's why he isn't convicted yet'' For me 2 years of investigation with virtually no results means most of the accusations against trump are bullshit, not saying that he is 100% not guilty but the more time passes the more innocent he looks, of course hellfish doesn't see it that way.

You know what is interesting regarding your last comment, is under the new sexual assault laws in Canada, if you were to accuse him of rape he would essentially have to prove he didn't rape you.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5089923.0

I suppose this is just the general trend of thinking of these types of people, everything is relative in the pursuit of their vision of social justice, even pillars of freedom and law.

Yeah that is pretty insane, it is like that in many places even though it's not a law but essentially anyone who is accused of rape is seen as guilty instantly, which is disgusting. It also seems extremely hard to prove you didn't rape someone, specially if you actually had sex with that person and that person decides to lie about it. I blame SJW's and feminism. Also women who got caught lying about it walked almost free, almost no punishments or really mild ones compared to what the man accused of rape would have gotten.

[TECSHARE]

Problem is that he already made up his mind long ago, he considers trump guilty no matter what, look at the way he writes, things like ''well this investigation could take 4 more years, that's why he isn't convicted yet'' For me 2 years of investigation with virtually no results means most of the accusations against trump are bullshit, not saying that he is 100% not guilty but the more time passes the more innocent he looks, of course hellfish doesn't see it that way.

You know what is interesting regarding your last comment, is under the new sexual assault laws in Canada, if you were to accuse him of rape he would essentially have to prove he didn't rape you.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5089923.0

I suppose this is just the general trend of thinking of these types of people, everything is relative in the pursuit of their vision of social justice, even pillars of freedom and law.

Yeah that is pretty insane, it is like that in many places even though it's not a law but essentially anyone who is accused of rape is seen as guilty instantly, which is disgusting. It also seems extremely hard to prove you didn't rape someone, specially if you actually had sex with that person and that person decides to lie about it. I blame SJW's and feminism. Also women who got caught lying about it walked almost free, almost no punishments or really mild ones compared to what the man accused of rape would have gotten.

It is interesting how the same people who claim to care so much about rape victims have no issues with sending an innocent man to prison to actually be raped. It is almost as if they never cared about rape victims at all and only were using them as cover for their own ideological goals...

[Spendulus]

Problem is that he already made up his mind long ago, he considers trump guilty no matter what, look at the way he writes, things like ''well this investigation could take 4 more years, that's why he isn't convicted yet'' For me 2 years of investigation with virtually no results means most of the accusations against trump are bullshit, not saying that he is 100% not guilty but the more time passes the more innocent he looks, of course hellfish doesn't see it that way.

Right, But Flying_H is not alone, rather there are millions who think exactly this way. Who knows or cares how many.

It's exactly this type of thinking that's problematic.

It's a hateful rhetoric, generated and orchestrated by Hate_Central_Command, strictly for political purposes. Think in terms of Soros operations.

[TECSHARE]

A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by the starter of a self-moderated topic. There are no rules of self-moderation, so this deletion cannot be appealed. Do not continue posting in this topic if the topic-starter has requested that you leave.

You can create a new topic if you are unsatisfied with this one. If the topic-starter is scamming, post about it in Scam Accusations.

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-02-12/stocks-surge-senate-intel-committee-confirms-no-collusion

Maybe Buzzfeed can whip up some more horse shit for you to run with...

So turns out this investigation was horse shit all along... Flying Hellfish would rather we all forget.

[mOgliE]

You know what is interesting regarding your last comment, is under the new sexual assault laws in Canada, if you were to accuse him of rape he would essentially have to prove he didn't rape you.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5089923.0

That's one big hell pile of bullshit you have here xD

Sure now in Canada you have to prove that you haven't done anything when you're accused of rape.

That's exactly what the bill says. Well I could quote the part of the bill saying something even remotely close to that but i'll just... Well I could but... Well I could.

[TECSHARE]

You know what is interesting regarding your last comment, is under the new sexual assault laws in Canada, if you were to accuse him of rape he would essentially have to prove he didn't rape you.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5089923.0

That's one big hell pile of bullshit you have here xD

Sure now in Canada you have to prove that you haven't done anything when you're accused of rape.

That's exactly what the bill says. Well I could quote the part of the bill saying something even remotely close to that but i'll just... Well I could but... Well I could.

Those are some impressive mental gymnastics you have there. I linked the law. I quoted. I gave hypothetical examples. I linked multiple reviews of the law. You... you deny reality and claim I substantiated nothing. Sorry you just don't have the intellectual capacity to understand the legal system enough to make a judgement here. Perhaps you should take your ignorant criticisms to the appropriate thread.

[mayo2u]

1. We should require internet ID for all services. If you want free speech we should at least know who you are. Barring that, at least make the ID private. Civility happens because people don't wanna be shot or beat up. If half the shit said on the web was said IRL people wouldn't like it much. It's giving power to groups to play identity politics and accumulate followers. AI driven fake news is a problem. I don't think speech should be banned and we should only see PC crap, just we should be able to ridicule the hell out of someone and be held accountable. The white identity people, the flat Earth society, conspiracy types, etc is nonsense, and we need to be able to at least vote it down to irrelevance without some special interest group with a bunch of AI doing it for us.

2. Fred Trump was in the KKK.

3. I didn't say it had to be human. I believe humans are incapable of managing themselves. The cybernetics people mid 20th century make Marx and Hayek look like school children. We never fully went head first into a cybernetic led society. The first to ever try was Chile by the socialist government and it worked so well it was destroyed when they fell. It was using 60s archaic mainframes! Lol.

https://youtu.be/wx26zpPg884

Absolutely NOT.  Anonymity and free speech goes hand in hand.  The real benefit of free speech (and anonymity) is when criticizing the government and powerful institutions. Do you want a forum such as this to ban people and stop people from expressing themselves when they say hateful things?

That can be done. First clearly define what is hateful. Then will come all sorts of problems in distinguishing valid criticism from hate.

The easiest way for a forum such as this is to have posts flagged for being off topic, or hateful or, argumentative, or of low quality, etc...

Then moderators review these flags.

Then the post can be hidden from view UNLESS the user chooses to see posts moderated as hateful, etc...

Stack exchange does something similar.

We can make it so that anyone (say Junior Member) can flag.

Any Member + can moderate (say you need 5 votes to agree with the flag)

Then the post gets "hidden" from view for those who don't want to view such posts. (Similar to what Slashdot does)

You're concerned about accountability right? Well people will want to have their accounts get high status. OK then. The above will lead to that.

[TECSHARE]

A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by the starter of a self-moderated topic. There are no rules of self-moderation, so this deletion cannot be appealed. Do not continue posting in this topic if the topic-starter has requested that you leave.

You can create a new topic if you are unsatisfied with this one. If the topic-starter is scamming, post about it in Scam Accusations.

...
Plus I don't even understand the hatred for Trump. It has been more than 2 years now, I personally do not live there but people that live there, does anyone feel any difference? I'm sure 95% of people are still living in the same way as before, perhaps a good amount of them in better conditions, I see the statistics and I don't see much wrong, obviously not perfect, Trump does say a lot of shit but overall everything seems totally fine.

Yes, the hatred is a sort of fake, artificial whipped up hatred.

People here are better off under Trump. And he has not started any wars....

At this point it is far more than that. It is a form of trauma based mind control that relies on cognitive dissonance and media based fear and hysteria. The people who have been duped by this lie subconsciously know they can not handle the pain and stress of having to not only admit they were fooled, but then having to reorganize their entire belief system to make room for this reality.

Instead, feeling they have "gone to far to turn back", they continue on this path of ever increasing collective hysteria, and at a certain point society itself will not accept them back even if they manage to cope with their own internal conflict. They subconsciously know this and get ever more extreme and erratic as their ability to lie to themselves is continually eroded, this in a last ditch panic effort to regain control. Like a cornered rabid animal they will lash out, because they perceive the message itself as being the cause of this discord.

Way to prove you aren't suffering from cognitive dissonance Flying Hellfish.

[mOgliE]

Way to prove you aren't suffering from cognitive dissonance Flying Hellfish.

Have you EVER considered that if numerous people say your an asshole who can't debate with anyone as your double standards allow you to use personnal attacks, baseless statements and off topic and unrelated arguments, it might be because it's true and not because the whole world is united against you in a giant Marxist conspiracy?

[TECSHARE]

Way to prove you aren't suffering from cognitive dissonance Flying Hellfish.

Have you EVER considered that if numerous people say your an asshole who can't debate with anyone as your double standards allow you to use personnal attacks, baseless statements and off topic and unrelated arguments, it might be because it's true and not because the whole world is united against you in a giant Marxist conspiracy?

I agree I am an asshole, often quite purposely in fact. I never said no one else should use personal attacks against me. It is however important to note my personal attacks almost always include logic based criticism along with them, unlike you fat man. Keep running.

[mOgliE]

I agree I am an asshole, often quite purposely in fact. I never said no one else should use personal attacks against me. It is however important to note my personal attacks almost always include logic based criticism along with them, unlike you fat man. Keep running.

Ahahahahah xD

Yeah of course, if you call bland statements based on absolutely nothing such as

"the 10 planks are enforced everywhere"
"Communisme can't exist without Capitalism"
"Marxists are mentally challenged"

"logic based criticism"

It's just funny how you have a definition of what logic is for you, and another one for what logic is for others.

[TECSHARE]

I agree I am an asshole, often quite purposely in fact. I never said no one else should use personal attacks against me. It is however important to note my personal attacks almost always include logic based criticism along with them, unlike you fat man. Keep running.

Ahahahahah xD

Yeah of course, if you call bland statements based on absolutely nothing such as

"the 10 planks are enforced everywhere"
"Communisme can't exist without Capitalism"
"Marxists are mentally challenged"

"logic based criticism"

It's just funny how you have a definition of what logic is for you, and another one for what logic is for others.

"the 10 planks are enforced everywhere"
Never said that.

"Communisme can't exist without Capitalism"
See reply in the other thread

"Marxists are mentally challenged"
Marxism necessarily requires victim status to operate, its primary form being mental illness by many other names. The thread which you are referring to included many sources.

[mOgliE]

"Marxists are mentally challenged"
Marxism necessarily requires victim status to operate, its primary form being mental illness by many other names. The thread which you are referring to included many sources.

Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaah

I'm very sorry, it seems you confuse sources and a dictionnary. That's sad.

Your sources are just defining the mental illness. You're the one claiming that marxists suffer them. You understand the difference?

But again here you claim that Marxism requires "victim status to operate" and that without anything else that your opinion.

I don't think I've seen you state anything factual here. You bring your opinion, then you yell loudly at anyone criticizing it. That's your way of doing things.

"the 10 planks are enforced everywhere"
Never said that.

Memory problem my dear?

I think you will have to admit the world has largely adopted these policies, even if they have a different name for it.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5125094.0

That's the reason why people no longer want you in discussions. Not because you have a truth that they don't want to here. But because you're a lying asshole just vomitting his opinion.

[TECSHARE]

"Marxists are mentally challenged"
Marxism necessarily requires victim status to operate, its primary form being mental illness by many other names. The thread which you are referring to included many sources.

Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaah

I'm very sorry, it seems you confuse sources and a dictionnary. That's sad.

Your sources are just defining the mental illness. You're the one claiming that marxists suffer them. You understand the difference?

But again here you claim that Marxism requires "victim status to operate" and that without anything else that your opinion.

I don't think I've seen you state anything factual here. You bring your opinion, then you yell loudly at anyone criticizing it. That's your way of doing things.

"the 10 planks are enforced everywhere"
Never said that.

Memory problem my dear?

I think you will have to admit the world has largely adopted these policies, even if they have a different name for it.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5125094.0

That's the reason why people no longer want you in discussions. Not because you have a truth that they don't want to here. But because you're a lying asshole just vomitting his opinion.

One of the defining characteristics of insane people is that they usually do not know they are mentally ill, and usually will even resist efforts by others to expose them to these concepts of self understanding. While it may not be obvious to you, these behaviors are obvious to anyone who doesn't dream about fondling Marx's boil covered balls every night.

Marxism is based upon victim status. The proletariat and the oppressed masses which need to create a revolution to overthrow the bourgeoisie yadda yadda. It is a collectivized form of malignant narcissism. It is a simple formula. Either find or create victims, point at a target group and condition them to believe that target group is responsible for their victim status, justify victimizing them in the name of equality, create more victims as a result, rinse and repeat.

I am looking at my quote there, I don't see "the 10 planks are enforced everywhere" anywhere within it. I did however say the world has already largely adopted most of the policies outlined in the 10 planks of Communism, which is true. I would be happy to debate any of those planks and their current application, specifically in the USA with you, but you felt the need to isolate your reply to the criticism of your precious failure of an ideology to another thread and refuse to address them here.

People like you don't want me in their discussions because I don't let you get away with your easy mindless platitudes and challenge you to provide actual empirical data or logic to support your assertions, which of course you are nearly incapable of. I can see how this would be frustrating for you, but frankly I don't give a fuck if you like it. The fact is I regularly get private messages from people telling me they enjoy my contributions here, so I am afraid it is mostly just you and your comtard buddies that are upset by my words. Even if no one liked it I could care less. These are things you and others need to hear for the common good of humanity, and I enjoy the task.

[mOgliE]

You know, since I've came to realization that you're just dumb I'm really having fun discussing with you  

People like you don't want me in their discussions because I don't let you get away with your easy mindless platitudes and challenge you to provide actual empirical data or logic to support your assertions, which of course you are nearly incapable of.

Marxism is based upon victim status. The proletariat and the oppressed masses which need to create a revolution to overthrow the bourgeoisie yadda yadda.

I don't even have to really talk to you, just putting your own words close together make it funny ^^

[TECSHARE]

You know, since I've came to realization that you're just dumb I'm really having fun discussing with you  

People like you don't want me in their discussions because I don't let you get away with your easy mindless platitudes and challenge you to provide actual empirical data or logic to support your assertions, which of course you are nearly incapable of.

Marxism is based upon victim status. The proletariat and the oppressed masses which need to create a revolution to overthrow the bourgeoisie yadda yadda.

I don't even have to really talk to you, just putting your own words close together make it funny ^^

Dumb people often think they are smarter than they are, but your logical arguments are so water tight, clearly that is me right? P.S. you aren't having a discussion, you are talking at me not with me.

[Spendulus]

You know, since I've came to realization that you're just dumb I'm really having fun discussing with you  

People like you don't want me in their discussions because I don't let you get away with your easy mindless platitudes and challenge you to provide actual empirical data or logic to support your assertions, which of course you are nearly incapable of.

Marxism is based upon victim status. The proletariat and the oppressed masses which need to create a revolution to overthrow the bourgeoisie yadda yadda.

I don't even have to really talk to you, just putting your own words close together make it funny ^^

Dumb people often think they are smarter than they are, but your logical arguments are so water tight, clearly that is me right? P.S. you aren't having a discussion, you are talking at me not with me.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pibqo6Z4Cgo

[Beerwizzard]

Marxism is based upon victim status. The proletariat and the oppressed masses which need to create a revolution to overthrow the bourgeoisie yadda yadda. It is a collectivized form of malignant narcissism. It is a simple formula. Either find or create victims, point at a target group and condition them to believe that target group is responsible for their victim status, justify victimizing them in the name of equality, create more victims as a result, rinse and repeat.

One thing to add.
It is true that Marxism always operates to victim status of some class. But as we see it is not necessarily supposed to be the proletariat. Working class was in the middle of marxist ideology somewhere at the 20 century. Now when proletariat understood that Marx was wrong and working class does not really suffer from anything Marxists switched their ideology to different minorities: mostly sexual or religious ones.

I don't even have to really talk to you, just putting your own words close together make it funny ^^

In some other words: "I know that I'm right but I don't know how to prove it and I don't have to because you are wrong."

[Spendulus]

Marxism is based upon victim status. The proletariat and the oppressed masses which need to create a revolution to overthrow the bourgeoisie yadda yadda. It is a collectivized form of malignant narcissism. It is a simple formula. Either find or create victims, point at a target group and condition them to believe that target group is responsible for their victim status, justify victimizing them in the name of equality, create more victims as a result, rinse and repeat.

One thing to add.
It is true that Marxism always operates to victim status of some class. But as we see it is not necessarily supposed to be the proletariat. Working class was in the middle of marxist ideology somewhere at the 20 century. Now when proletariat understood that Marx was wrong and working class does not really suffer from anything Marxists switched their ideology to different minorities: mostly sexual or religious ones.

I don't even have to really talk to you, just putting your own words close together make it funny ^^

In some other words: "I know that I'm right but I don't know how to prove it and I don't have to because you are wrong."

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4a6YdNmK77k