REEEEE: PussyGate, a Collection of Trump Investigations

[dupeddonk]

buzzfeed FOIA request just got another page of the report unredacted.

Before and After.



Nothing that surprising, but it confirms that either:

A Trump has been lying all along about what he knew and when regarding the emails Russia hacked and ultimately leaked through Assange.
B Gates and Manafort lied to Mueller about knowing more than they did.
C They're all telling the truth and Trump was not in the loop regarding the email dump.


imo:
A - 96.8%
B - 0.2%
C -  4%

Makes sense why they fought so hard to keep it redacted.  same with jon boltons new book judge just ruled so he can publish it.

[TECSHARE]

Yeah, more lies from the lying liars who perpetuated all this bullshit to begin with sure proves a lot.

[Spendulus]

....
Makes sense why they fought so hard to keep it redacted.  same with jon boltons new book judge just ruled so he can publish it.

Down to obscure footnotes in obscure works of only a few co-conspirators now?

[TECSHARE]

....
Makes sense why they fought so hard to keep it redacted.  same with jon boltons new book judge just ruled so he can publish it.

Down to obscure footnotes in obscure works of only a few co-conspirators now?

A guy who once knew the sister of a woman who's cousin saw her serving Trump a hotdog thought about Russian Collusion in a dream once. PROOF THE ELECTION WAS STOLEN!

[TwitchySeal]

buzzfeed FOIA request just got another page of the report unredacted.

Before and After.



Nothing that surprising, but it confirms that either:

A Trump has been lying all along about what he knew and when regarding the emails Russia hacked and ultimately leaked through Assange.
B Gates and Manafort lied to Mueller about knowing more than they did.
C They're all telling the truth and Trump was not in the loop regarding the email dump.


imo:
A - 96.8%
B - 0.2%
C -  4%

Makes sense why they fought so hard to keep it redacted.  same with jon boltons new book judge just ruled so he can publish it.

The initial redactions were all marked as "Harm to Ongoing Matter"



So it was either ongoing and now it's not, or it was redacted for the wrong reason.  Or, I suppose it shouldn't have been underacted is also a possibility.

[dupeddonk]

buzzfeed FOIA request just got another page of the report unredacted.

Before and After.



Nothing that surprising, but it confirms that either:

A Trump has been lying all along about what he knew and when regarding the emails Russia hacked and ultimately leaked through Assange.
B Gates and Manafort lied to Mueller about knowing more than they did.
C They're all telling the truth and Trump was not in the loop regarding the email dump.


imo:
A - 96.8%
B - 0.2%
C -  4%

Makes sense why they fought so hard to keep it redacted.  same with jon boltons new book judge just ruled so he can publish it.

The initial redactions were all marked as "Harm to Ongoing Matter"



So it was either ongoing and now it's not, or it was redacted for the wrong reason.  Or, I suppose it shouldn't have been underacted is also a possibility.

wait that a different page. where are you looking?

[TwitchySeal]

buzzfeed FOIA request just got another page of the report unredacted.

Before and After.



Nothing that surprising, but it confirms that either:

A Trump has been lying all along about what he knew and when regarding the emails Russia hacked and ultimately leaked through Assange.
B Gates and Manafort lied to Mueller about knowing more than they did.
C They're all telling the truth and Trump was not in the loop regarding the email dump.


imo:
A - 96.8%
B - 0.2%
C -  4%

Makes sense why they fought so hard to keep it redacted.  same with jon boltons new book judge just ruled so he can publish it.

The initial redactions were all marked as "Harm to Ongoing Matter"



So it was either ongoing and now it's not, or it was redacted for the wrong reason.  Or, I suppose it shouldn't have been underacted is also a possibility.

wait that a different page. where are you looking?

My bad, I took screen shot one page off.  Same result though, originally redacted as Harm to Ongoing matter.


I'm going by official doj document: https://www.justice.gov/storage/report.pdf

[Spendulus]

....
Makes sense why they fought so hard to keep it redacted.  same with jon boltons new book judge just ruled so he can publish it.

Down to obscure footnotes in obscure works of only a few co-conspirators now?

A guy who once knew the sister of a woman who's cousin saw her serving Trump a hotdog thought about Russian Collusion in a dream once. PROOF THE ELECTION WAS STOLEN!

The amount of hate displayed here by Anti-Trumpers is certainly interesting. Sad, though. Trump won. We voted him in. We voted against your Hitlery-lap-dog. We told you idiots Sanders was a puppet show, and would be ran out and put back in his barrel. Now you've got Senile Joe.

[TwitchySeal]

https://data.ddosecrets.com/file/The%20Room%20Where%20It%20Happened%20-%20John%20Bolton.pdf

[TECSHARE]

https://data.ddosecrets.com/file/The%20Room%20Where%20It%20Happened%20-%20John%20Bolton.pdf

Too bad he wasn't even in that room. The leak makes it clear this was all about interfering with the election, not his free speech, not profits from a book, not the truth. Just one more Russiagate, Stormy Daniels, Jessie Smollet, Kavanaugh, COVID hysteria, riot, etc engineered hoax. There is so much more but who can keep track of all of these desperate lies that have been an endless attempt to overturn the election since 2016.

[Spendulus]

https://www.axios.com/michael-flynn-appeals-court-judge-7fc2c840-35c9-4842-b2b7-d241d96a3fbf.html

A three-judge panel from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. has basically ordered Judge Sullivan to dismiss the case against General Flynn. High time. Alas, the decision was 2-1. Powerline’s Scott Johnson has posted the majority opinion. Choice quote from Scott: “The Flynn case constitutes a sidebar to the biggest political scandal in American history by far. One can only hope that this is, as it should be, the end of the road for this utterly disgraceful case.”

What will this do to Pussygate? A thread started by slobbering libtards, victorious in the absence of facts, gleefully for the destruction of the Trump yet to come.  Crusaders, mighty in their pushing the lies, seeking only the fall of The Trump.

But then, they deleted posts that were contrary to the theme of ORANGEMANBAD. The Pussygate thread, it would seem, reigned supreme in the oceans of baboons.

Then came the dreaded, evil REEEEE.

REEEEE: Pussygate, a repository for all things that banned by the saintly, erudite Keepers of the Truth of the Pussygate.

Today, only REEEEE remains.

What will happen to the Pussygate?

[TwitchySeal]

https://www.axios.com/michael-flynn-appeals-court-judge-7fc2c840-35c9-4842-b2b7-d241d96a3fbf.html

A three-judge panel from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. has basically ordered Judge Sullivan to dismiss the case against General Flynn. High time. Alas, the decision was 2-1. Powerline’s Scott Johnson has posted the majority opinion. Choice quote from Scott: “The Flynn case constitutes a sidebar to the biggest political scandal in American history by far. One can only hope that this is, as it should be, the end of the road for this utterly disgraceful case.”

Looks like Sullivan is considering bringing the case to the full appeals court.  Probably won't know for a couple weeks unless he dismisses the case soon.

Another unrelated appeals court just voted 2-1 against Trump this time on his method of funding the border wall.  Basically it puts the injunction back into place that keeps him from spending money on the wall that congress doesn't approve.  It will probably get voted down again in the full appeals court and then get over ruled in the supreme court.

"Trump broke the law by using military money for border wall, appeals court rules"

https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2020-06-26/9th-circuit-court-rules-against-trump-border-wall


Whatever happened to mexico paying for the wall?

[Viper1]

Whatever happened to mexico paying for the wall?

Did you miss the talking points? The trade deal with Mexico is paying for it. That's what Trump really meant all along. Yep.

[TwitchySeal]

Whatever happened to mexico paying for the wall?

Did you miss the talking points? The trade deal with Mexico is paying for it. That's what Trump really meant all along. Yep.

[Spendulus]

Whatever happened to mexico paying for the wall?

Did you miss the talking points? The trade deal with Mexico is paying for it. That's what Trump really meant all along. Yep.

Darn I though those sick fucks dominating the 9th circuit had been replaced. But on looking, the LIBTARDS have now a three seat majority compared to eleven when Trump took office.

[sirazimuth]

I always get a chuckle out of that juvenile sounding term LIBTARD.
It's like a silly name some 7 year old came up with to  bully poor little Libby on the playground.
LIBTARD! LIBTARD!...neh neh neh neh nehhh............

[TwitchySeal]

I always get a chuckle out of that juvenile sounding term LIBTARD.
It's like a silly name some 7 year old came up with to  bully poor little Libby on the playground.
LIBTARD! LIBTARD!...neh neh neh neh nehhh............

The Republican version goes over everyones head.  (badum tss)


"Russia Secretly Offered Afghan Militants Bounties to Kill U.S. Troops, Intelligence Says"

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/06/26/us/politics/russia-afghanistan-bounties.html


Probably not the best time to be inviting Putin back into the G8...

[Gyfts]

"Russia Secretly Offered Afghan Militants Bounties to Kill U.S. Troops, Intelligence Says"

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/06/26/us/politics/russia-afghanistan-bounties.html


Probably not the best time to be inviting Putin back into the G8...

Polling data over the recent shows Republicans tend to have a more positive view on Putin prior to Trump's election and this story is exactly why Russia will always remain an adversary. I'm sure the military officials in Trump's administration is probably dealing with the matter, but publicly Trump can't let this story go unanswered.

You can't let anyone threaten U.S. troops and remain passive. I think Trump's base wouldn't be too fond of him letting this go either.

[TwitchySeal]

I think Trump's base wouldn't be too fond of him letting this go either.

Not so sure.  All he has to do is say "that's the failing NYTimes, I told you it's fake news" and that's all it would take.  Especially with anything related to him and Russia. 

Similar thing happened shortly after he got elected.  He blabbed to the Russian ambassador some highly classified information that an ally in the middle east had shared with very few people..  The Times ran a story and he accused them of 100% fabricating it because their sources were anonymous.  6 months or so later it turns out it was Israels intel on Syria, but everyone had already forgotten about it for whatever  'wtf' thing was happening at the time.

[Gyfts]

I think Trump's base wouldn't be too fond of him letting this go either.

Not so sure.  All he has to do is say "that's the failing NYTimes, I told you it's fake news" and that's all it would take.  Especially with anything related to him and Russia.  

Similar thing happened shortly after he got elected.  He blabbed to the Russian ambassador some highly classified information that an ally in the middle east had shared with very few people..  The Times ran a story and he accused them of 100% fabricating it because their sources were anonymous.  6 months or so later it turns out it was Israels intel on Syria, but everyone had already forgotten about it for whatever  'wtf' thing was happening at the time.

He had a legitimate reason to call out the media in regards to anything related to Russia because they spent two years trying to convince the American people that Trump was an illegitimate Russian spy only for Mueller to turn up nothing. Russia's always been aggressive in the middle east so there's probably truth to the NYT article meaning Trump needs to respond.

He could go down the route of calling the report fake, it might work. If Soleimani was any indication, Trump doesn't take a passive stance against threats to Americans.