Good ICOs should be protected from dump

[vgk88]

I think it is not always easy to determine which project is good. If investors do not take care of the project and do not maintain liquidity, it will be difficult to save the token from the dump. Much depends on token liquidity  .

[shinratensei_]

I think it is not always easy to determine which project is good. If investors do not take care of the project and do not maintain liquidity, it will be difficult to save the token from the dump. Much depends on token liquidity  .

That depends on the how much demand that will generate volume on exchange site. you need a lot of order buy to prevent the dump that created from the sell order. volume is the only correct answer to prevent this dump. that's why most of the good platforms applied major exchange for its first listing.

[elenka n]

It is very important that the project be interesting and promising, because in other cases, many will refuse to provide their documents!

[magnat7691]

Now it is difficult to judge what kind of ICO will be able to enter the market. Is that very large, which has already raised funds in private.

[wewe123]

If there are really good ICOs coming in the launching, it is good if it will be develop more ,so that it will come with a good success , so help it by not dumping the tokens immediately so that the price value of tokens will rise up high and will have a good effect and exchanges in the market in the future.

[heritage35]

I have come to the understanding that, no matter what is done, there are coins and in fact almost every coin will first dump at their initial listing.
Nonetheless, some certain coins will still rise, but it depend on so many factors. If those factors are not fulfilled, such as an active developmental process or a product that is already in use, which will bring value to the coin, the coin might continue to dump.

[JCviggen]

If there are really good ICOs coming in the launching, it is good if it will be develop more ,so that it will come with a good success , so help it by not dumping the tokens immediately so that the price value of tokens will rise up high and will have a good effect and exchanges in the market in the future.

Often people invest and they hope to make money quickly but not because they believe in the project, so it’s hard to argue them not to sell tokens

[Dimm_bounty13]

I think it is not always easy to determine which project is good. If investors do not take care of the project and do not maintain liquidity, it will be difficult to save the token from the dump. Much depends on token liquidity  .

In fact, it's easy to distinguish 1k bad projects from some good ones - we have a set of assessment criteria. It's more difficult to guess which of good projects will grow and which will disappear.

[invincible49]

Often people invest and they hope to make money quickly but not because they believe in the project, so it’s hard to argue them not to sell tokens

I've seen so many ICO projects after completing their ICOs start to talk about the whole moon talk, lambo talk but in terms of product they show us no substance. Any project's team that only wants to release news during an uptrend is clearly a pump & dump token. And sadly most of the ICO investors want to get involved with those projects because it is in those moments their dream of making quick bucks come true. But most of times their dreams get shattered.

[Aniwura]

The roadmap of project is very essential. If not followed duly, it can affect the trust that investors have in such project.
Sometimes,if there are changes in the roadmap, it is better  the community is informed in order to foster more support for the project and its team.

[SistaFista]

For now, you may rarely see any good ICO because of the bear market.
In 2017, there were many ICO's doing buyback to protect the value of their token so their token won't dump while crypto in a bull market.
I guess the market condition can affecting the ICO performance in the future too.

[TIDOVEE]

I also wish many ICOs be protected from dump.
I did a certain project, name withheld, the ICO did not even give a dump value and I so much appreciated it because the token was just so useful for me when things were so dry. Since then I have imagined why others cannot help out that way. Even some refuses to release our token.

[dobolspeed3]

It is indeed very important, the good and potential ICO in the future must certainly be very protected from the name dump. Because it can't be appreciated if a good ICO has to be dumped. Actually this dump cannot be predicted or controlled by anyone. Because everything is pure trade. So we must maintain that a good ICO can be protected.

[3core]

That is very s important step to take to keep the project alive, I see some project place significant buy orders from raised funds to keep the tokens value alive in some cases. Dumping can affect the project badly and make it lose potential investors.

[maman567]

Nice ideas where good and best ICO could protect for price dump and have planned by owner to buy back if their ICO price dump, many ICO after listing at exchange market make price dump because all of their team coin allocation sell and make price is dump.

[pungopete468]

The effect of a large bonus when ico and large bounty allocation is the reason why the price of coins can experience a very large decline at this time. in my opinion this is a natural thing that happens

[libert19]

Why not just have proper use case and bring token to the good exchange with liquidity instead of exact opposite then saying our token is down?

[overnight03]

I think that they need to figure out how they will support their development at the initial stage and this is the main question

I think they should focus on developing their project, if their project is really good, its price will never be dumped! It is also a long-term way for their projects to grow

[asriloni]

I think that they need to figure out how they will support their development at the initial stage and this is the main question

I think they should focus on developing their project, if their project is really good, its price will never be dumped! It is also a long-term way for their projects to grow

They need an exchange site with a huge volume, this will protect the price of token from getting a big dump. Remember about so many tokens are only applied to be listed on the small exchange and it doesn't enough to prevent the sellers.

[ityandsyn]

After careful research, when you see a good ICO, you would know and there will be no doubt about it.
I have noticed that good ICOs also dump after listing, competing with crap ones that have no definite direction, but to cart away funds.
There are ways in which they can be protected and prevent unreasonable dump in price. Some of which are:

1. They should be managed by credible and trusted managers, managers that already have good reputation on the forum, else the trust might not be there.

2. KYC should be made mandatory for all bounty and airdrop participants in order to avoid multiple accounts. The kyc should be announced

3. Participants should be made to complete the remaining process of their registrations on the project's website, where IP can be detected. Multiple accounts can also be prevented this way.

4. Listing should be done on reliable and reputable exchange sites.

5. There should be regular and prompt communication with the community.

6. Projects should maintain and comply to their roadmaps and if there is amendment, the community should be made to know, with concrete reasons.

Additional suggestion:
7. An approach that will create the demand for tokens, which can as well prevent dump, is the lockup of certain percentage of the tokens.
Some percentage of the tokens belonging to; the team, advisors, investors, promoters and bounty participants.
The main tokens for the investors should be released, at least to compensate them for the money invested, but their bonuses should be locked for certain period of time. Which is followed by their gradual release.

These are just few among so many other solutions, but if this few are integrated into the system, i believe dump can be minimized if not totally eliminated.

       Yes I believe this will  be minimized because as  I thought investors are the one doing the dump before the bounty hunters and if they are organized and they'll communicate each other for the progress of the projects , I think this is really the answer of the longtime problem of the ICO .