Good ICOs should be protected from dump

[bartolomeo]

you have a good point about minimizing or let me say avoiding the coin being dump. Not everyone want KYC even good and legit participants will not do the KYC just to participate, but this is a good thing to implement to avoid multiple accounts and members will still continue to support the project in the future

[1714635487]

1714635487

[1714635487]

1714635487

[1714635487]

1714635487

[Eat.Sleep.Bounty]

I see your good point on how it would be protected from the dump. But when the investors or the bounty hunters and even the holders decided to sell their coins or dump it on its lowest price, we have no control about it. The market decides the projects future.

[Callanta787]

Your points are very useful expect the KYC ,I have no problem dropping my identity card and house address to claim tokens or coins but my question is how safe is my identity? This is why many don't like KYC implementation

[nonbody]

The suggestions you mentioned are very good. Now many project parties lack confidence in their own projects and start selling after the listing. I think it is very necessary to constrain the project side.

[ginobitcoiner]

who should protect it? are we hunter bounties? or investors?
I think the best way to protect an ICO from dump is to buy back the team and dev from the project to do

[jimskiy]

Not all of ICO team and owner will be responsibility with their ICO if have lower price after listing at exchange market, we need new ICO at the next time could have regulated how their price could be higher than ICO price.

[dnovsckym]

Even this will not give the desired result, because sometimes the projects themselves merge their coins instead of burning them!

[trauchot]

I totally agree that companies that really deserve to be constantly at the highest level should take care of the price of their token, but at the moment with such a market it is very difficult, therefore it’s difficult to do something about it.

[pungopete468]

The main thing is the projeck is not a fraud. because we know that there are so many fraudulent projects right now. we as bounty hunters must really do research on the product or the project they offer

[spike420211]

It is very difficult to determine how good the project is until it is fully launched. Even if it is possible to protect the token from the dump, this will require huge investments, everything will still have a bearish trend factor, which somehow will crush the cost of the token.

[vanya.pronin.1983]

I think you can reduce your list and leave KYC and Bounties. I agree that ICO participants must undergo a KYC process, every single one. Moreover bounty hunters as well, and they should be paid in stable coins or in BTC to avoid dumping.

[odukoyaewatomi27]

I think there is no point protecting a good project from dump because if the project is good enough, even if it dumps upon exchange listing it will surely find its way back up when the team and developers start to realize its potentials by meeting major milestones on their roadmap or when a bullish market comes. However the list you made is the features of a good coin or token.

[MiniMountain]

Much better if the project deliver its working product to increase the demand for coin because the exchange itself wont be enough for value of coin to grow, they also need more marketing strategy and keep doing some noise for the project after the ICO to invite more buyers or investors to acquire their coins.

[Akpuv]

Dumping can mainly be controlled by the ICO team. They usually have the largest quantities of any particular coin and can dictate the pace of the price. 99% of dumps are caused by the team not investors or bounty hunters.

[trader34]

I see your point, but in the end, it's the market that controls the price, and therefore the demand and supply of that particular coin. If people decide to dump it, there's nothing we can do about it.

[salad daging]

I have come to the understanding that, no matter what is done, there are coins and in fact almost every coin will first dump at their initial listing.
Nonetheless, some certain coins will still rise, but it depend on so many factors. If those factors are not fulfilled, such as an active developmental process or a product that is already in use, which will bring value to the coin, the coin might continue to dump.

that's true because almost all coins experience such a thing, there are no coins that really have a smooth road, almost all of them experience a dump at the beginning of entering the market but because the developer and community are strong then they can pass it and can recover to a decent price

[Akoldi_ibk]

As far as people in this space still aim for the gain, and profiting being the sole purpose of supporting a project, price dump cannot be totally eliminated but like you said can still be minimise. 

[marjil]

We only have one problem. How does the ICO project show that it is authentic and reliable? I believe that ICO projects that can solve this problem can get the best attention and development.

If a project is solid and reliable, has a good team and a well done whitepaper, then people will believe in it and invest their hard earned money. Good projects are very less likely to be dumped, but there will always be dump because of get rich qiuick people who just want quick profits and don't care about the project.

[starplaks]

I think that the organizers of good ICOs will figure out how to make sure that the project participants do not collapse the project!

[SwiggHeart]

Lol, yes. But, even if there is a good ICOs which has so many dollars have been raised, the only thing the bounty hunters think they are gonna sell it once they listing on an exchange.