Safe Bounty hunters

[tterrorpipa]

I agree, since bitcointalk forum is the number one source of the news of a upcoming projects, they should initiate a crucial review first before approving its post and that can be seen on public. Because the hunters right now are just wasting time for a scam bounty campaign.

[1715116989]

1715116989

[1715116989]

1715116989

[1715116989]

1715116989

[1715116989]

1715116989

[1715116989]

1715116989

[coin-investor]

You should not impose this on the admins of this forum, they have nothing to do with how you make money with these ICO, it's your obligation to pick the right project to join and about KYC you cannot request that because this is a decentralized community it's against the principles.

[aioc]

I agree, since bitcointalk forum is the number one source of the news of a upcoming projects, they should initiate a crucial review first before approving its post and that can be seen on public. Because the hunters right now are just wasting time for a scam bounty campaign.

Well if that is the case then how much will give you give as part of your bounty campaign to the forum administrator, it is so hard to analyze a good project and even a good project fail, so if Bitcointalk recommend one ICO and it becomes a scam who would you blame, do not pass obligation to the forum, invest at your own risk.

[ansarose1]

Sounds good for all bounty hunters here. If we have that kind of mod that elliminates or bans fraud projects maybe there will be no fraud projects left to be joined by bounty hunters. And i think bounties and altcoins discussion would be cleared out of fraud and scam projects, i hope for this new development in bitcointalk.

[temilade200]

Some projects can be very deceptive and you might find it hard to easily detect they are scam projects. Sometimes, the project developer or team in general might reveal their identity, but because there is no regulation and they think nobody will be able to get hold of them, they then do whatever they like or feel is okay to them. This is why research should be done from the beginning of a project, till the end of it.

[chriseasan]

I think you should start to care about yourself and not to wait until some forum moderators will spend their time for us. Just investigate the project by your own and you would be able to avoid scam ICOs on the market.

[2tang]

it is important but we cannot demand because it is very difficult to filter out scam projects, believe that bitcointalk must have thought about this even I am sure they have moved because they must be very concerned about all their members including us who act as bounty hunters
so let's wait

[panjay]

I hope Bitcointalk will start caring about its people ,there should be new moderators that can fish out bad projects on here to avoid wasting time of bounty hunters ,and about KYC ive come to think of it as many bounty hunters don't like KYC I'm sure if Bitcointalk is the one asking for KYC so as to limit frauds and multiple accounts bounty hunters won't complain, we will follow the rules ,but first 'SAFE US FROM BAD SCAMMY PROJECTS' ,no matter how wise we investigate a project they end up been scam ,scammers are getting wiser as well.looook at desico for example Can anyone tell me if he/she knew Desico is a scam from day one? I guess not

i think forum itself only have limited ability to protect us from a scam. The member itself will do the due diligence on any project themselves, usually if something feels scammy happen someone will open an accusation scam on the subforum. After proven scam or not trustworthy enough, the moderator can give them a red trust or delete/lock thread.

Again we are not "official company" or something like that, so we can't do a KYC here, furthermore, if we do KYC, isn't contradict what the spirit of decentralization of bitcoin? the one started this forum itself, bitcointalk.

[powerman24]

I do not think forum should do anything with checking the projects if they are legit or not, it is the responsibility of the BM and you as a hunter. This is why we need  global regulations and that will help to sort our scam projects and teams like Desico.

[Christinebeauty]

I don't think choosing a legit bounty is the work of any moderator. You have to learn to take responsibility of your own actions. That is why it would be better if you choose bounties from bounty managers with good track record.

[lotfipro]

I think it's stupid to find such people. Every bountyhunter must know how to analyse ICO and choose what he wants. It's a part of our job-finding projects. I think you agree with me.

[heritage35]

This is the sole responsibility of those directly involved in the project, the bounty hunters, the managers and others. The forum has only given us the opportunity to earn here, so we should not again put the burden on them, because they have got a lot to do.

[sergoia65]

The forum team should really think about how to reduce the number of Scam projects. Maybe create some organization to check them or skip only verified projects

[KryptoKai]

KYC from big projects like tezos or stellar is acceptable as you know the process will be done properly. However, when it is requested by a small unknown ICO it is impossible to know what they will do with it, most likely sell it in the dark markets

[RoninGaijin]

The problem is that scammers are getting more and more elaborate and Byzantine. It would be a full-time job for someone here to do full due diligence on all of them.

[aryaadikariyansyahsuwarto]

absolutely right, the more days I get lazy to follow the project here, there is no regulation that makes the scammers die. they always do the same thing, which is cheating and spending our time in vain ... if this continues, it is not impossible that this forum will be empty of honest people ...

[Ridwan.P]

has nothing to do with the bitcointalk moderator. if it is related to bounty, the one who should analyze bounty is the bounty manager and bounty hunter. Bounty managers are also not happy if they get a bounty scam. especially the bounty hunter.

So, for bounty hunters and bounty managers, you have to be more careful. it's all your business.

[maaldaz]

I hope Bitcointalk will start caring about its people ,there should be new moderators that can fish out bad projects on here to avoid wasting time of bounty hunters ,and about KYC ive come to think of it as many bounty hunters don't like KYC I'm sure if Bitcointalk is the one asking for KYC so as to limit frauds and multiple accounts bounty hunters won't complain, we will follow the rules ,but first 'SAFE US FROM BAD SCAMMY PROJECTS' ,no matter how wise we investigate a project they end up been scam ,scammers are getting wiser as well.looook at desico for example Can anyone tell me if he/she knew Desico is a scam from day one? I guess not

What you thinking is good, but i think that is not the job of a moderator to select a good project for us.
We have to be extra careful our self when selecting a project so we could avoid to get scammed.

[qomariah95]

Now there are indeed many scam projects and it is true that this is a waste of time for everyone, of course. Because from the beginning we did not know the project was a scam or not. And I realized that indeed the bounty hunter did not like KYC with the reason that it was very complicated for the buck. Plus the tokens obtained are of no value. That's what makes people lazy for KYC.

[Natalim]

The market is always risky and with lack of regulation, the more it's getting risky.
As a bounty hunter who aim for money, it is your job to make a deep research on every project that you will support, I believe that promoting
good projects only will minimize the scams and this will help the market to slowly recover.

Let's do our job help promote crypto by educating the people it's purpose, they should understand that crypto does not give quick return of investment.