Safe Bounty hunters

[kiwoh123]

I hope Bitcointalk will start caring about its people ,there should be new moderators that can fish out bad projects on here to avoid wasting time of bounty hunters ,and about KYC ive come to think of it as many bounty hunters don't like KYC I'm sure if Bitcointalk is the one asking for KYC so as to limit frauds and multiple accounts bounty hunters won't complain, we will follow the rules ,but first 'SAFE US FROM BAD SCAMMY PROJECTS' ,no matter how wise we investigate a project they end up been scam ,scammers are getting wiser as well.looook at desico for example Can anyone tell me if he/she knew Desico is a scam from day one? I guess not

there's no point in doing KYC, many people can buy fake identities on the black market.
and the moderator is not likely to check every project, I don't think they will have time.

[chatedha]

I think this forum must add additional rules for bounty manager.
1. Bounty manager must do KYC before posted bounty program, at least this can reduce the number of scam bounties.
2. An account with red trust can't post bounty thread, so bounty managers will be more selective in choosing the bounty they will hold.

[zarintasnim]

As a bounty hunter we spend our valuable time behind bounty and last we get nothing from scam project. A good manager can play very good role to promote good project.  we should choose good manager for good bounty.

[GREENch]

Bounty hunters do not like to undergo the KYC procedure for various reasons. Some are afraid to give their personal data in unscrupulous hands, because they are not sure of the honesty of the developers project. Others are against because they use multi accounts.

indeed some people are afraid to do KYC for the reasons you mentioned. but i personally do not mind KYC and i will continue to follow the procedure provided that the project is truly real and has a responsible team.

indeed it is very difficult to find a good and responsible project we have to work hard for it. don't let us miss a golden opportunity to benefit from our work as a hunter bounty just because we complain about this and that and ultimately regret it. find out first, if you believe the project is good then follow the procedure. if not, leave it and don't regret it.

I didn't exactly speak for myself. For me it is not a problem to go through the KYC procedure if it is necessary in accordance with the terms of the project.

[thesmallgod]

Before I proceed to answer some of your question, I will like to tell you that it might be very difficult to spot a scam project at the beginning of a project. Like I use to tell some of my friends here, you will only know the true colour of project dev after the end of the campaign. At the beginning, they will always want to answer your questions and provide quick support but as soon as the sales end, they see you as nuisance and will see you as enemy of the project. Regarding KYC, you are the one that will have to decide whether to do bounty that require KYC or not. To me , no matter how much energy I have put on a bounty, ones I discover that team are not being regular on telegram, no regular update on social media then I work out of such bounty

[fallensky7]

Conducting research, we can only assume that the project will be successful! We just can not know for sure, because there is not all the necessary information, we only superficially study the project. We only see what we were shown!
I don’t think that the forum is capable of checking projects for cheating! There are a lot of them and this will require a lot of time and resources.

[JPSelzer]

The moderators of the forum a lot of other work. So load them that they controlled the fraudulent projects would be superfluous. Why do you want other people to do everything for you? Choose projects guided by your head.

[Eadefemi]

Bitcointalk forum is not responsible for what you ask for. There are different sections in here and how do you want them to also monitor and fish out bad projects for you. That's your duty because I know you won't also share your profits with the forum when you hit a big fish.

[dawai asmara]

The moderators of the forum a lot of other work. So load them that they controlled the fraudulent projects would be superfluous. Why do you want other people to do everything for you? Choose projects guided by your head.

yes, we really need to be able to analyze the project independently in choosing projects because fraudsters will always be there so we cannot trust anyone and we cannot depend on anyone including the moderator because they also cannot do much.

[pishite]

The moderators of the forum a lot of other work. So load them that they controlled the fraudulent projects would be superfluous. Why do you want other people to do everything for you? Choose projects guided by your head.

yes, we really need to be able to analyze the project independently in choosing projects because fraudsters will always be there so we cannot trust anyone and we cannot depend on anyone including the moderator because they also cannot do much.

It is necessary to somehow make such topics on the forum, add a scammer to the titles. When choosing a topic, everything is erased and is written not reliably. Identify such a vote of users in the topic.

[Mrcharles]

It's quite unfortunate that after entrusting your time and effort to a campaign you get disappointed because of the project inability to keep up with the term of contract. Some projects are still existent, but refuse to pay bounty hunters after carrying out their work. Project like huobi Russia have decided not to pay bounty hunters. Its an exchange and still existing, but failed to pay up.

[stigmacryptonight]

Most people really don't like KYC. Especially I personally don't like the same thing. If we do the Kyc on the project and in the end the project has no development and even dies. In my opinion, it is very disadvantageous if we have done Kyc, but what we can do is not comparable to our data. So for now, maybe what should be done is, if there is a bounty, I must, of course I will not participate there.

[IVEXO]

No where have I seen a safe bounty hunter
We are subject to various criticisms unfair treatment and even amongst bounty hunters enviness

There is need to zero out mindset and expect any reactions on this space

[Andrey13101991]

Most people really don't like KYC. Especially I personally don't like the same thing. If we do the Kyc on the project and in the end the project has no development and even dies. In my opinion, it is very disadvantageous if we have done Kyc, but what we can do is not comparable to our data. So for now, maybe what should be done is, if there is a bounty, I must, of course I will not participate there.

I agree with you that our data is the most valuable thing that can be and every time we go through KYC we pay a high price

[bangdol]

I agree with you that our data is the most valuable thing that can be and every time we go through KYC we pay a high price

not all KYC you do will have high value. sometimes there are projects that request KYC at the beginning, and that does not guarantee that the project will develop successfully, there is a possibility that all of them will be empty.

[arnoldrimmer]

I agree with most people here, I think Bitcointalk should enforce that Bounty Managers should go through KYC and if found out that anyone post fake project there should be disciplined f9r that and with it they will be careful on the project to post but nonetheless we as individuals need to also make research on our way before joining any project

[manismanja]

I agree with most people here, I think Bitcointalk should enforce that Bounty Managers should go through KYC and if found out that anyone post fake project there should be disciplined f9r that and with it they will be careful on the project to post but nonetheless we as individuals need to also make research on our way before joining any project

be careful and always supervise the project before joining, because we can get stuck if we are negligent or we are careless in making decisions.
a lot of frauds and fake projects make many people disappointed so they don't want to participate anymore, but actually not all projects are bad and there are still very good projects if we can find them, but it's hard to get good.

[cryp24x]

I smell a blame game here. What we do on this forum are our responsibility and our own decision-making. It is not the moderator's job to evaluate what is the good bounty for you. Even bounty managers are not obliged to do it for you though they should also make their own personal research to prevent spreading and helping scammers o so what they want.

[shooleh]

An audit team must inspect the ICO project and conduct screening for new ICO projects. Many projects fail and many bounty hunters complain. We need a real solution to avoid fraud. I am personally a KYC, no problem the most important thing is that the project can be successful.

[Tosyn2]

forum moderators do not have to select the right projects or not. but bounty managers should do this. so you need to choose the right managers.
I was participating in Desico. and i was thinking that this is a good project. I hope they will go to the prison

Well, I agree with you that bounty managers should protect their reputation by accepting real and genuine projects. However, the major responsibility lies with bounty hunters who in most cases at the receiving end. Bounty manager can agree with the team that his reward should be in btc or eth but bounty hunters does not have this choice.