[305 weeks] [Updated Nov 16 LoyceV's Trust list viewer - Create your own!

[bones261]

I'll update the data tomorrow.

I reckon the data has to be updated manually?  I ended up adding bones261 and amishmanish to my distrust list, and subsequently removed them several days ago, but they still show up in my distrust list when checking the data on your webpage.

To be honest, I don't know why I added them to my distrust list in the first place.  Both seem like reasonably good guys and have left feedback with which I cannot disagree.

I wondered what I was doing wrong.   It's all good though.   At least you didn't leave a rave review on my rimming talents or that I spread doomsday virus.  

However, I have been put on a list of accounts to exclude from people's trust list in reputation. So I suspect the new list Loyce comes out with is going to have many people giving me the ~ bird.

H8bussesNbicycles

[LoyceV]

I'll update the data tomorrow.

I reckon the data has to be updated manually?

I don't have a posting bot yet, so it requires some manual work. I'm still fighting with some usernames, such as user "*" (included by 3 users) break things on my end.

[o_e_l_e_o]

However, I have been put on a list of accounts to exclude from people's trust list in reputation. So I suspect the new list Loyce comes out with is going to have many people giving me the ~ bird.

I am also on the list, and have been newly "~" by 21 users since last week, all of whom seem to be using this list. A very quick count shows that between the 21 of them they have somewhere in the region of 25 "10 merit votes", and nowhere near a single "250 merit vote". If their current rates of earning merit were to continue, it would take them approximately 6 years to get a single person on that list voted on to DT1. Given their inclusion list includes 154 people, I'm not sure they've really thought out their plan.

Also, a bunch of said users are clearly alts. For example:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1586404
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1586551
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1586585
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1586656

[bones261]

However, I have been put on a list of accounts to exclude from people's trust list in reputation. So I suspect the new list Loyce comes out with is going to have many people giving me the ~ bird.

I am also on the list, and have been newly "~" by 21 users since last week, all of whom seem to be using this list. A very quick count shows that between the 21 of them they have somewhere in the region of 25 "10 merit votes", and nowhere near a single "250 merit vote". If their current rates of earning merit were to continue, it would take them approximately 6 years to get a single person on that list voted on to DT1. Given their inclusion list includes 154 people, I'm not sure they've really thought out their plan.

Also, a bunch of said users are clearly alts. For example:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1586404
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1586551
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1586585
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1586656

I'm not particularly concerned.  I gave them an obligatory taunt post in their reputation thread. I'm sure it will be deleted, shortly.

[Foxpup]

I am also on the list, and have been newly "~" by 21 users since last week, all of whom seem to be using this list.

Only 20, actually. Cryptohunter seems to have his own agenda, despite (probably) being an alt of some of the others. Not fair to count him. I've tagged the rest.

[vit05]

Is there any statistics on how many users have received at least two negative feedback from users who are on DT1 and DT2?
Maybe a list with these users?

[LoyceV]

@vit05 You can use Open scraped data of all the users - SQL Lite DB - 2.481.270 users, but it's last updated in December.

[DireWolfM14]

I wondered what I was doing wrong.   It's all good though.

I seem to recall copying some one else's list (a momentary laps of judgement) that could be how you and amishmanish ended up there.  Rimming wasn't a factor.   

[LoyceV]

Update up to this morning's trust data dump:
http://loyce.club/trust/2019-02-02_Sat_23.13h/
http://loyce.club/trust/2019-02-03_Sun_00.08h/ Updated!

As far as I can see, I've fixed all links to accounts with weird characters now.

Browsing around, I noticed some low-Merit accounts with very big trust lists. If you start for example with cryptorgasm, you'll find many more like that.

NEW: Backscratchers^TM and Backstabbers
Red: one user trust the other, but the other distrusts the first user (=backstabbing).

This feature is currently broken.
I'm uploading a new version now, with a new link.

[o_e_l_e_o]

Browsing around, I noticed some low-Merit accounts with very big trust lists. If you start for example with cryptorgasm, you'll find many more like that.

These accounts are using the trust list being shared in the REMOVE LAUDA FROM DT thread. There are 20 accounts at the moment using this trust list, most of them alts or sockpuppets. Essentially anyone who trusts is Lauda is distrusted, and anyone who distrusts Lauda is trusted. You can see the full list of users using this super-smart list by looking at who is trusting any of the lesser-known accounts, such as this one: http://loyce.club/trust/2019-02-02_Sat_23.13h/1059412.html

[LoyceV]

These accounts are using the trust list being shared in the REMOVE LAUDA FROM DT thread. There are 20 accounts at the moment using this trust list

There are 250+ users on the list, that makes 5k trust entries just for this? "Trust list spam" is defniitely a new thing!

Lol, they're using my own list to spam my list:

THIS LIST IS THE OPPOSITE OF WHO TRUSTS AND DISTRUSTS LAUDA
https://loyce.club/trust/2019-01-29_Tue_08.13h/101872.html

You can see the full list of users using this super-smart list by looking at who is trusting any of the lesser-known accounts, such as this one: http://loyce.club/trust/2019-02-02_Sat_23.13h/1059412.html

Thanks! They don't really seem to understand the importance of Merit though.
Did you see I've added BBCode? You can easily show it here:
Trust list for: Doncarlos74 (0 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (BPIP)
Back to index (created 2019-02-02 Sat 23.13h)

Doncarlos74 Trusts:
-

Doncarlos74 Distrusts:
~Lauda (781 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
~cryptodevil (95 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)


Doncarlos74 is Trusted by:
Thule (20 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
endlasuresh (3 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
DutchFinity (2 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
Danica22 (0 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
ac2eugenio (1 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
Bazinga442 (21 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
Deena (37 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
mr.creampie (10 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
chickinini (11 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
cryptorgasm (4 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
TinaMoran (10 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
Pablojob (10 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
PiningGarcia (10 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
PingGermoco (10 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
NilaMutac (10 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
cryptopov (4 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
poypototoy (10 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
Zin-Zang (10 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
H8bussesNbicycles (5 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)
gwsukabokepjepang (0 Merit earned) (Trust feedback) (Trust list) (BPIP)

~Doncarlos74 is Distrusted by:
-

Source: LoyceV's Trust list viewer.
Get your own Trust list in BBCode at loyce.club/trust

[DireWolfM14]

Essentially anyone who trusts is Lauda is distrusted, and anyone who distrusts Lauda is trusted.

I noticed that post too.  Obviously a suckpuppet of one of the butthurt boys.  I was starting to worry that I was being neglected by them, but I see some of them are taking H8bussesNbicycles' advice.

Code:

~DireWolfM14 is Distrusted by:
cryptohunter 
Thule 
endlasuresh 
DutchFinity 
Danica22 
ac2eugenio 
Bazinga442 
Deena 
mr.creampie 
chickinini 
cryptorgasm 
TinaMoran 
Pablojob 
PiningGarcia 
PingGermoco 
NilaMutac 
cryptopov 
poypototoy 
Zin-Zang 
H8bussesNbicycles 
gwsukabokepjepang 

[o_e_l_e_o]

They don't really seem to understand the importance of Merit though.

Any time this has been pointed out to them in their thread, the user in question has had their post deleted and then been added to their distrust list if they weren't already on it.

Did you see I've added BBCode?

I had not. Nice feature.

-snip-

Yup, I have the exact same distrust list.


On an unrelated noted, how easy would it be for you to find out/predict who is going to be added to DT1 whenever theymos does his first monthly reconfiguration?

[owlcatz]

Somehow I just found this.

Excellent work man!!! You just need some html tables to spruce it up a bit!

[LoyceV]

On an unrelated noted, how easy would it be for you to find out/predict who is going to be added to DT1 whenever theymos does his first monthly reconfiguration?

An exact match will be very difficult: theymos uses an algorithm that's quite difficult to reproduce, especially when someone's vote can be used for different users.

I've been working on this: http://loyce.club/other/DT1RankupPipeline.html
It's not complete yet: I still have to exclude votes from users with less than 10 inclusions on their trust list, and users lower than Member rank. When it's ready, I'll list all valid votes for each user. For now, it gives a good idea of what to expect.
Note that the sorting has some arbitrary choices depending on the ratio of 250+ Merit and 10+ Merit votes.
I've ignored DT1-exclusions, that's handled after the DT1-reconfiguration. And I don't check when the user was last online, or when his last post was made.

You just need some html tables to spruce it up a bit!

if you give specific instructions (like this), I can do it

[owlcatz]

Sadly, I can't do it with CSS alone, you would need to change the looping code that builds these to tables and cells - then you can use CSS to define how they show up etc....

It wouldn't be that hard. If I had the loop code that currently creates the lines like this:

Code:

3: <A HREF="https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3">satoshi</A> (<B><FONT COLOR=darkgreen>1688 Merit</FONT></B> earned) (<A HREF="https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=3">Trust feedback</A>) (<A HREF=3.html>Trust list</A>) (<A HREF="https://bpip.org/profile.aspx?p=satoshi">BPIP</A>)<BR>

And then modify that to build tables/tr/td etc etc... Is your source on github or anything, I'd like to mess with it if you don't mind? Great work again...

[o_e_l_e_o]

-snip-

Yeah, I appreciate a perfect list will be impossible without knowing how theymos distributes the votes, but that list is pretty much exactly what I was looking for, thanks. Great work as always.

I'm sure you know this already but all the username links on that page are broken.

[LoyceMobile]

I'm sure you know this already but all the username links on that page are broken.

It's a sneak preview of my next thread

[r1s2g3]

I noticed that post too.  Obviously a suckpuppet of one of the butthurt boys.  I was starting to worry that I was being neglected by them, but I see some of them are taking H8bussesNbicycles' advice.

No need to worry about them. I just think if any one of them used their energy constructively instead of throwing stones here and there, they might got the chance.
They remind me of spambies bounty hunter that used to create post "Why I did not received any merit"

[LoyceV]

Sadly, I can't do it with CSS alone, you would need to change the looping code that builds these to tables and cells - then you can use CSS to define how they show up etc....

Wouldn't that make it slower to load? It's a big and growing list.

Is your source on github or anything, I'd like to mess with it if you don't mind?

It's not really meant for publication.